376:, notability, and often sourcing, can be found on the linked items' pages. If there is something that needs to be sourced on this list page, that is not a reason for deletion of the entire article. Tabulating related, notable software in a structured list format, and including documented features of that software, is not original research or
417:, which states the article most conform to GNG. Standalone is not a get out of jail free card for notability. It specifically states that there must be multiple reliable independent sources that provide significant coverage discussing the items as a group. Said reliable sources are unlikely to exist, because the topic is far to pedantic.
319:
The categorization and grouping of software lacks any nuance between image capture, video recording, editing, and screencasting. What's the appropriate way to create ways to sort out the functionality of these in useful way. Right now the area seems very muddied.
201:
195:
135:
130:
139:
162:
122:
261:
109:
94:
216:
183:
340:
364:. The stand-alone list ("List of..." and "Comparison of..." articles) is a well-established article category on Knowledge. The categories
452:
426:
401:
352:
329:
311:
294:
270:
253:
64:
177:
302:
due to not meeting the standards of the various guidelines that have already been cited. I'm not really sure what else to add. --
381:
89:
82:
17:
173:
126:
385:
369:
223:
118:
70:
325:
103:
99:
471:
40:
189:
436:
422:
321:
467:
36:
448:
414:
397:
373:
365:
348:
233:
209:
418:
307:
440:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
466:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
444:
393:
377:
344:
286:
249:
241:
289:
265:
55:
435:
What do you mean by 'pedantic'? The group has certainly received coverage, including
410:
303:
282:
237:
156:
388:
are essays and as such are not guidelines and do not dictate or guide content. A
392:
of past afd's shows that this type of article has routinely been kept at afd.
245:
389:
462:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
372:
show that this is a legitimate article form on
Knowledge. As a
232:
I fail to see how this passes any type of guideline let alone
152:
148:
144:
208:
343:. This content could be merged to related articles.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
474:). No further edits should be made to this page.
260:Note: This discussion has been included in the
339:We have related comparison articles including
262:list of Software-related deletion discussions
222:
8:
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
259:
7:
341:Comparison of screencasting software
24:
119:Comparison of screenshot software
71:Comparison of screenshot software
95:Introduction to deletion process
382:Knowledge:Notability (software)
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
386:Knowledge:Software notability
453:23:51, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
427:21:25, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
402:14:39, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
353:09:11, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
330:16:39, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
312:15:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
295:11:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
271:11:24, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
254:09:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
65:18:45, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
491:
464:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
236:, this seems to breach
83:Articles for deletion
370:software comparison
322:Brad Thomas Hanks
273:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
63:
482:
374:stand-alone list
292:
281:- clear case of
268:
227:
226:
212:
160:
142:
80:
62:
60:
53:
34:
490:
489:
485:
484:
483:
481:
480:
479:
478:
472:deletion review
290:
266:
244:in my opinion.
169:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
488:
486:
477:
476:
458:
457:
456:
455:
430:
429:
404:
358:
357:
356:
355:
334:
333:
314:
297:
275:
274:
230:
229:
166:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
487:
475:
473:
469:
465:
460:
459:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
433:
432:
431:
428:
424:
420:
419:Footlessmouse
416:
415:WP:STANDALONE
412:
408:
405:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
360:
359:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
337:
336:
335:
331:
327:
323:
318:
315:
313:
309:
305:
301:
298:
296:
293:
288:
284:
280:
277:
276:
272:
269:
263:
258:
257:
256:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
225:
221:
218:
215:
211:
207:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
175:
172:
171:Find sources:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
463:
461:
406:
361:
316:
299:
278:
234:WP:NSOFTWARE
231:
219:
213:
205:
198:
192:
186:
180:
170:
76:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
437:tom's guide
366:comparisons
196:free images
445:Dialectric
441:lifehacker
394:Dialectric
345:Dialectric
58:Sandstein
468:talk page
291:Spiderone
267:Spiderone
37:talk page
470:or in a
378:wp:synth
304:Adamant1
287:WP:SYNTH
242:WP:SYNTH
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
317:Comment
202:WP refs
190:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
411:WP:GNG
407:Delete
390:search
300:Delete
279:Delete
174:Google
140:delete
50:delete
283:WP:OR
246:Govvy
238:WP:OR
217:JSTOR
178:books
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
449:talk
439:and
423:talk
413:and
409:per
398:talk
384:and
368:and
362:Keep
349:talk
326:talk
308:talk
285:and
250:talk
240:and
210:FENS
184:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
224:TWL
161:– (
451:)
425:)
400:)
380:.
351:)
328:)
310:)
264:.
252:)
204:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
52:.
447:(
443:.
421:(
396:(
347:(
332:)
324:(
306:(
248:(
228:)
220:·
214:·
206:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
176:(
168:(
165:)
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.