385:
anyone can edit (and don't get me started on "not notable" when this site has individual articles for EVERY EPISODE of most current US TV shows!). Even highly-sourced articles contain great heaping piles of original research if you care to read between the lines, so I think that new articles such as this one (which, frankly, I'm not going out of my way to defend on its own merits) get unfairly targeted. I mean really, honestly; if every unverified sentence on
Knowledge (XXG) that's suspected of being OR was cut then how much content do you think we'd loose? 30%? 50%? 75%? Think about it. -
361:
nearly the definition of original research. I'm certain one could find individual comic books that have a situation where these two characters behaved toward each other in a certain way...but unless one could find an interview with the writer and artist of that comic book, any interpretation of the
288:
You're labelling the entire article with a couple of words, generalising for the sake of convenience. Nothing is as black and white as that. As far as I'm concerned, there are too many people on this site who think the truth exists in absolutes. My faith in this site is shaken. This will be my last
384:
Well, call me a heretic, but I think
Knowledge (XXG)'s whole pretence of not containing original research is increasingly laughable, especially in cases like this where existing scholarship is minimal or non-existant. While a worthy goal, it's entirely undercut by its very status as a text that
240:
While I agree that not just any characters should have articles like this, I see the comparison between these two characters as exceptionally relevant because of their prominent cultural status, the close relevance they have to each other, and their juxtaposition within Frank Miller's books,
153:
Not sure if this article is okay, but given the existence of the "Superman and Batman" comic series (which often emphasizes the differences and similarities, from what I can see), an article on the two in relation to each other may be justified.
362:
MEANING of that encounter only exists in the mind of the individual, not in any objective and verifiable state. An article about a psychology textbook that uses
Superman and Batman as examples might be excyclopaedic (something like
90:
85:
94:
77:
117:
311:
We certainly won't miss your melodrama. If you have no real evidence for your opinions, then we can't be expected to believe your assertions. That's the way things are.
363:
292:
244:
455:
434:
411:
374:
353:
319:
277:
232:
216:
204:
173:
158:
145:
132:
59:
406:
348:
17:
366:) but a straight up article that attempts to determine meaning, psychology and interpretation to these characters is exactly what
81:
73:
65:
224:
this could get out of hand if allowed. There are a lot of superheros you couold write this type of article on. Batman and
470:
419:
36:
304:
256:
469:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
402:
344:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
451:
213:
392:
334:
155:
53:
386:
273:
200:
296:
248:
170:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
266:
That still doesn't change the fact that it is a essay based on your own original research. --
229:
186:
182:
447:
427:
312:
300:
252:
367:
125:
50:
190:
268:
195:
124:
Another overzealous Batman article. Unencyclopedic, an essay consisting entirely of
371:
111:
225:
391:
Awesome. Let's throw open the doors to every crank with a proposed theory. -
142:
129:
463:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
107:
103:
99:
228:
is a good example. Its to much of a slippery slope.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
473:). No further edits should be made to this page.
364:The Simpsons and Philosophy: The D'oh! of Homer
8:
212:as a textbook example of original research.
189:. Whether the continence of the essay is
169:sources can be given. Otherwise, delete.
241:Superman/Batman and the Justice League.
74:Comparisons between Superman and Batman
66:Comparisons between Superman and Batman
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
333:. This is pure original research. -
24:
1:
456:18:44, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
435:17:44, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
412:06:57, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
375:21:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
354:19:28, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
320:17:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
278:23:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
233:21:41, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
217:20:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
205:19:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
174:18:21, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
159:17:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
146:17:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
133:17:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
60:19:28, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
418:Congratulations, you made a
490:
466:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
370:is intended to avoid. -
295:comment was added by
247:comment was added by
128:and fan speculation.
183:original researched
420:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS
454:
432:
422:argument, Prime.
410:
352:
317:
308:
260:
193:is irrelevant. --
126:original research
481:
468:
445:
428:
400:
398:
342:
340:
313:
290:
242:
187:WP:NOT#PUBLISHER
115:
97:
56:
34:
489:
488:
484:
483:
482:
480:
479:
478:
477:
471:deletion review
464:
394:
336:
291:—The preceding
243:—The preceding
88:
72:
69:
54:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
487:
485:
476:
475:
459:
458:
439:
438:
437:
415:
414:
378:
377:
356:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
283:
282:
281:
280:
235:
219:
207:
176:
161:
148:
141:as nominator.
122:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
486:
474:
472:
467:
461:
460:
457:
453:
449:
443:
440:
436:
433:
431:
425:
421:
417:
416:
413:
408:
404:
399:
397:
390:
389:
388:
387:PacifistPrime
383:
380:
379:
376:
373:
369:
365:
360:
357:
355:
350:
346:
341:
339:
332:
329:
328:
321:
318:
316:
310:
309:
306:
302:
298:
294:
287:
286:
285:
284:
279:
275:
271:
270:
265:
262:
261:
258:
254:
250:
246:
239:
236:
234:
231:
227:
223:
220:
218:
215:
211:
208:
206:
202:
198:
197:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:
175:
172:
168:
165:
162:
160:
157:
152:
149:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:
135:
134:
131:
127:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
57:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
465:
462:
441:
429:
423:
395:
381:
358:
337:
330:
314:
267:
263:
237:
221:
209:
194:
178:
166:
163:
150:
138:
123:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
230:Stephen Day
226:Moon Knight
185:essay, per
448:MrDolomite
214:YechielMan
191:verifiable
444:as above.
393:A Man In
335:A Man In
407:past ops
403:conspire
349:past ops
345:conspire
305:contribs
293:unsigned
257:contribs
245:unsigned
156:Sid 3050
118:View log
372:Markeer
264:Comment
151:Comment
91:protect
86:history
442:Delete
424:Delete
359:Delete
331:Delete
289:edit.
222:Delete
210:Delete
181:as an
179:Delete
139:Delete
95:delete
46:delete
396:Bl♟ck
368:WP:OR
338:Bl♟ck
297:A gx7
269:Farix
249:A gx7
196:Farix
171:Dlong
112:views
104:watch
100:links
55:desat
16:<
452:Talk
382:Keep
301:talk
274:Talk
253:talk
238:Keep
201:Talk
164:Keep
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
51:Core
48:. --
143:~CS
130:~CS
116:– (
450:•
446:—
426:.
405:|
347:|
307:).
303:•
276:)
259:).
255:•
203:)
167:if
154:--
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
430:'
409:)
401:(
351:)
343:(
315:'
299:(
272:(
251:(
199:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.