Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Concentra Financial - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

497:
to a list, template, or other namespace to be particularly helpful. As well, it sometimes creates double redirects in that when an article page becomes a redirect, that article page is still listed in the footer box of similar companies so when the user clicks on that name of related companies, they
417:. As the essay itself explains, there are plenty of permanent stub articles that are perfectly viable as articles and should not be deleted. The stub articles that should be deleted are to be deleted for reasons other than being simply stubs. 434:, I am fine with you amending the original rationale to place a period following "notable" and deleting from "or" to "permastub" if you like. That's probably the weakest of the arguments for deletion. I think it's sufficient to delete on 570:
take on such links in templates - unlik or remove entirely? Perhaps remove, and make a note on talk that such template should only list notable banks, with the template perhaps using the word major, like 'major Canadaian banks' etc..
209: 493:, Thanks for your further reply to the trend in Canadian credit union and bank stubs and their non-notability. As to your suggestion about merging with a list, that's problematic in that I don't find redirecting 162: 203: 313: 333: 353: 380:
has never been created, as that is the current name of this bank, I'm wondering if it is possible to cross-list/cross-post the red notice of the article's deletion?
94: 109: 169: 543: 135: 130: 139: 122: 89: 82: 17: 224: 191: 542:
are still listed in that template as redlinked banks. If we have a redirect, instead of deleting the page, which redirects to
103: 99: 604: 546:, the user clicks through from the template to the list. I just don't think that's helpful. Does that make more sense? 40: 185: 583: 555: 526: 507: 485: 451: 426: 389: 365: 345: 325: 305: 64: 181: 126: 535: 265: 245: 231: 470: 494: 439: 414: 410: 273: 269: 249: 118: 70: 600: 442:
alone. Just make sure you put an edit summary that the proponent authorized your editing the rationale.
36: 285: 539: 462: 281: 217: 435: 406: 398: 293: 197: 538:, that template is added to the footer of every page. Many banks and credit unions that aren't 577: 520: 479: 78: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
599:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
466: 402: 277: 241: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
551: 503: 447: 385: 361: 341: 321: 301: 567: 563: 422: 377: 257: 55: 573: 531: 516: 490: 475: 253: 156: 547: 514:
Double redirects are easy to fix, just remove the links to them from the list.--
499: 443: 381: 357: 337: 317: 297: 562:
It does. Red links are for topics that are deemed notable but not created yet (
431: 418: 276:. The edit history comments even remark on the myriad problems with 595:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
566:). Deleted entries should be unlinked. I am unsure what is the 397:- Agree that there doesn't seem to be enough in terms of 152: 148: 144: 216: 498:end up back on the same page, if that makes sense? 230: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 607:). No further edits should be made to this page. 534:, Sorry, I don't think I was clear. You see, in 352:Note: This discussion has been included in the 332:Note: This discussion has been included in the 312:Note: This discussion has been included in the 405:, or at least I was not able to find any in my 314:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 8: 413:(an essay-level guide, not policy) is not a 334:list of Finance-related deletion discussions 110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 354:list of Canada-related deletion discussions 401:in reliable sources for this page to pass 351: 331: 311: 544:List of banks and credit unions in Canada 574:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 517:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 476:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 465:and press-releases and as such fails 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 294:not a directory or the yellow pages 24: 409:. One thing I would say is - no, 284:. This is a textbook example of 95:Introduction to deletion process 469:. I'd suggest a merge to some 1: 268:or, if it is, it is either a 584:04:50, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 556:04:00, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 527:03:47, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 508:03:30, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 486:03:14, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 390:16:46, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 252:, and following the lead of 65:17:55, 17 October 2019 (UTC) 452:18:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 427:15:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 366:06:06, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 346:06:06, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 326:06:06, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 306:06:02, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 288:and I would also point out 85:(AfD)? Read these primers! 624: 461:. Coverage is limited to 597:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 536:Template:Canadian banks 240:As written, this fails 471:list of Canadian banks 83:Articles for deletion 473:or such, however. -- 495:Concentra Financial 260:, this article may 119:Concentra Financial 71:Concentra Financial 374:Note to AfD Closer 274:emerging permastub 368: 348: 328: 100:Guide to deletion 90:How to contribute 63: 615: 580: 523: 482: 235: 234: 220: 172: 160: 142: 80: 62: 60: 53: 34: 623: 622: 618: 617: 616: 614: 613: 612: 611: 605:deletion review 582: 578: 525: 521: 484: 480: 290:Knowledge (XXG) 177: 168: 133: 117: 114: 77: 74: 56: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 621: 619: 610: 609: 591: 590: 589: 588: 587: 586: 572: 559: 558: 515: 511: 510: 474: 456: 455: 454: 392: 378:Concentra Bank 370: 369: 349: 329: 258:User:Mrschimpf 238: 237: 174: 113: 112: 107: 97: 92: 75: 73: 68: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 620: 608: 606: 602: 598: 593: 592: 585: 581: 575: 569: 565: 561: 560: 557: 553: 549: 545: 541: 537: 533: 530: 529: 528: 524: 518: 513: 512: 509: 505: 501: 496: 492: 489: 488: 487: 483: 477: 472: 468: 464: 460: 457: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 433: 430: 429: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 393: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 372: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 350: 347: 343: 339: 335: 330: 327: 323: 319: 315: 310: 309: 308: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 246:WP:Notability 243: 233: 229: 226: 223: 219: 215: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 183: 180: 179:Find sources: 175: 171: 167: 164: 158: 154: 150: 146: 141: 137: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 115: 111: 108: 105: 101: 98: 96: 93: 91: 88: 87: 86: 84: 79: 72: 69: 67: 66: 61: 59: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 596: 594: 458: 440:WP:CORPDEPTH 415:WP:DELREASON 411:WP:PERMASTUB 394: 373: 289: 261: 254:User:Piotrus 250:WP:Permastub 239: 227: 221: 213: 206: 200: 194: 188: 178: 165: 76: 57: 49: 47: 31: 28: 286:WP:CORPSPAM 282:wikipuffery 204:free images 579:reply here 548:Doug Mehus 540:WP:Notable 522:reply here 500:Doug Mehus 481:reply here 463:WP:PRIMARY 444:Doug Mehus 382:Doug Mehus 358:Doug Mehus 338:Doug Mehus 318:Doug Mehus 298:Doug Mehus 58:Sandstein 601:talk page 436:WP:SIGCOV 407:WP:BEFORE 399:WP:SIGCOV 376:Although 270:permastub 37:talk page 603:or in a 163:View log 104:glossary 39:or in a 532:Piotrus 491:Piotrus 467:WP:NORG 403:WP:CORP 278:WP:NPOV 266:notable 242:WP:NORG 210:WP refs 198:scholar 136:protect 131:history 81:New to 568:WP:MOS 564:WP:RED 459:Delete 395:Delete 272:or an 248:, and 182:Google 140:delete 50:delete 432:FOARP 419:FOARP 225:JSTOR 186:books 170:Stats 157:views 149:watch 145:links 16:< 552:talk 504:talk 448:talk 438:and 423:talk 386:talk 362:talk 342:talk 322:talk 302:talk 280:and 256:and 218:FENS 192:news 153:logs 127:talk 123:edit 292:is 264:be 262:not 232:TWL 161:– ( 571:-- 554:) 506:) 450:) 425:) 388:) 364:) 356:. 344:) 336:. 324:) 316:. 304:) 296:. 244:, 212:) 155:| 151:| 147:| 143:| 138:| 134:| 129:| 125:| 52:. 576:| 550:( 519:| 502:( 478:| 446:( 421:( 384:( 360:( 340:( 320:( 300:( 236:) 228:· 222:· 214:· 207:· 201:· 195:· 189:· 184:( 176:( 173:) 166:· 159:) 121:( 106:) 102:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Sandstein
17:55, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Concentra Financial

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Concentra Financial
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.