Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Coronation Street sets - Knowledge

Source 📝

326:) with multiple page numbers, indicating that the sets are discussed in detail and not simply mentioned. News articles from the Guardian and BBC News indicate public interest from reliable sources. The four examples given on 231: 291: 225: 184: 330:-- plot summary, song lyrics, list of statistics and log of software updates -- bear no similarity to this fairly in-depth article with connection to real-world events. 131: 157: 152: 116: 161: 191: 144: 314:: From the references, it looks like the history and evolution of the sets are of particular interest. There are three books referenced ( 79: 246: 213: 111: 104: 17: 410: 207: 414: 391: 369: 339: 303: 283: 148: 125: 121: 86: 348: 203: 431: 40: 327: 263: 253: 271: 73: 140: 92: 427: 36: 384: 219: 335: 299: 239: 279: 58: 380: 100: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
426:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
406: 360: 331: 295: 54: 388: 275: 178: 401: 383:
for a TV show spanning decades, the sourcing is fine, it's got no problems with
387:. This is what I'd want to see in en.wiki's fiction coverage. – 422:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
351:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
292:
list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
174: 170: 166: 238: 357:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 434:). No further edits should be made to this page. 290:Note: This discussion has been included in the 270:can and should be included on the main article. 316:Coronation Street; A fully illustrated record 252: 8: 132:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 289: 399:per above, which were convincing enough. 7: 320:Coronation Street: The Inside Story 379:It can be considered a legitimate 24: 117:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 340:19:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC) 324:40 Years of Coronation Street 304:19:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC) 284:19:27, 26 December 2019 (UTC) 266:. Information on the set of 415:16:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC) 392:09:55, 6 January 2020 (UTC) 370:21:40, 2 January 2020 (UTC) 107:(AfD)? Read these primers! 87:21:44, 9 January 2020 (UTC) 451: 274:needs a separate article. 424:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 141:Coronation Street sets 93:Coronation Street sets 105:Articles for deletion 55:(non-admin closure) 372: 368: 328:WP:INDISCRIMINATE 306: 268:Coronation Street 264:WP:INDISCRIMINATE 122:Guide to deletion 112:How to contribute 57: 442: 367: 365: 358: 356: 354: 352: 272:WP:NOTEVERYTHING 257: 256: 242: 194: 182: 164: 102: 82: 76: 68: 65: 62: 53: 34: 450: 449: 445: 444: 443: 441: 440: 439: 438: 432:deletion review 373: 361: 359: 347: 345: 199: 190: 155: 139: 136: 99: 96: 80: 74: 66: 63: 60: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 448: 446: 437: 436: 418: 417: 394: 355: 344: 343: 342: 308: 307: 260: 259: 196: 135: 134: 129: 119: 114: 97: 95: 90: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 447: 435: 433: 429: 425: 420: 419: 416: 412: 408: 404: 403: 398: 395: 393: 390: 386: 385:WP:INUNIVERSE 382: 378: 375: 374: 371: 366: 364: 353: 350: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 310: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 288: 287: 286: 285: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 255: 251: 248: 245: 241: 237: 233: 230: 227: 224: 221: 218: 215: 212: 209: 205: 202: 201:Find sources: 197: 193: 189: 186: 180: 176: 172: 168: 163: 159: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 137: 133: 130: 127: 123: 120: 118: 115: 113: 110: 109: 108: 106: 101: 94: 91: 89: 88: 85: 83: 77: 70: 69: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 423: 421: 400: 396: 376: 362: 346: 323: 319: 315: 311: 267: 262:Aligns with 261: 249: 243: 235: 228: 222: 216: 210: 200: 187: 98: 71: 59: 49: 47: 31: 28: 226:free images 381:WP:SPINOUT 363:Sandstein 428:talk page 332:Toughpigs 296:Shellwood 37:talk page 430:or in a 411:contribs 389:sgeureka 349:Relisted 276:DarkGlow 185:View log 126:glossary 81:Contribs 39:or in a 232:WP refs 220:scholar 158:protect 153:history 103:New to 402:Quahog 204:Google 162:delete 247:JSTOR 208:books 192:Stats 179:views 171:watch 167:links 61:NNADI 16:< 407:talk 397:Keep 377:Keep 336:talk 322:and 312:Keep 300:talk 280:talk 240:FENS 214:news 175:logs 149:talk 145:edit 75:Talk 67:LUCK 64:GOOD 50:keep 254:TWL 183:– ( 413:) 409:• 338:) 318:, 302:) 294:. 282:) 234:) 177:| 173:| 169:| 165:| 160:| 156:| 151:| 147:| 52:. 405:( 334:( 298:( 278:( 258:) 250:· 244:· 236:· 229:· 223:· 217:· 211:· 206:( 198:( 195:) 188:· 181:) 143:( 128:) 124:( 84:) 78:| 72:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
(non-admin closure)
NNADIGOODLUCK
Talk
Contribs
21:44, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Coronation Street sets

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Coronation Street sets
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.