468:- The sources provided by NinjaRobotPirate make a good case against straight deletion. Merge should be used if anything. I also agree with Sergecross73 that there is likely to be offline info available on this game (either contemporary or in a Retro Gamer kind of magazine). I'll see if I can find anything tonight before I finalize my !vote. -
449:- While NonjaRobotPirate's sourcing is a bit light, his sources provide the type of insight to lead me to believe that, if these sources aren't enough, there are enough off-line to warrant keeping. Considering this came out pre-mid-1990's, where virtually all sources are locked away in hard copy magazines, I find this scenario likely.
332:
and Google Books, but I couldn't find any archived reviews, which was very disappointing. However, given that these sources have described it in terms of id's history, I think there's still a pretty decent argument to be made that it still satisfies the GNG. I suppose we could maybe merge it to an
361:
would be a satisfactory target as the early history of that release. Seeing as the sources do not go into great enough depth on the original to warrant a full article (there's much more on 3-D) and that we do not have any reviews for the original on file, would 3-D not be a better fit for the
265:
keep. There are reliable secondary sources online, for instance the open source'ing of them (finding the magazine sources from that time is harder, but they should exist). Also, id software and
Carmack are highly influential parts of the gaming history and their early works are part of it.
375:
I think this could survive as an independent article, but if we did merge this somewhere, I guess it's not all that important where it goes. My thinking was that the design and legacy of this game is probably off-topic for the article on
173:
312:
167:
248:
126:
285:. I never heard of this game before, but I would expect even the more obscure games made by Carmack to satisfy the GNG. It's a bit sparse, but there's still coverage:
133:
99:
94:
103:
86:
204:
Largely unsourced and all potential sources are about
Carmack's own history rather than this game as its own entity. (Article topic lacks
188:
155:
17:
149:
496:
40:
145:
477:
460:
431:
413:
389:
370:
342:
275:
259:
240:
68:
427:
385:
338:
90:
195:
455:
394:
Based on the sourcing, we could alternatively wrap into an article on the series. Do you have anything on
492:
423:
401:
381:
353:
334:
296:
82:
74:
36:
161:
304:
181:
311:
shows that the game has a lasting legacy in terms of sustained interest in its source code; and
450:
271:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
491:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
54:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
473:
205:
317:
286:
219:
213:
209:
407:
364:
253:
234:
61:
358:
267:
229:
225:
120:
469:
329:
308:
291:
333:
article on the game series, but I don't think it should be deleted.
232:
is another option, but I haven't looked into its sourcing/longevity.
485:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
328:
s design and historical significance. I tried checking through
300:
303:
describes how it fit into their legacy and later games;
116:
112:
108:
180:
194:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
499:). No further edits should be made to this page.
422:, but it's difficult to find in-depth coverage.
321:is a good supplement to the other sources about
249:list of Video games-related deletion discussions
8:
247:Note: This debate has been included in the
246:
295:describes some of the design and leadup;
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
418:Some of the above sources describe
24:
357:, I mentioned in the nom that
1:
224:) I'd support a redirect to
516:
478:17:08, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
461:16:58, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
432:03:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
414:20:06, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
390:19:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
371:13:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
69:04:33, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
488:Please do not modify it.
343:20:36, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
276:09:45, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
260:09:24, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
241:09:22, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
83:Catacomb (video game)
75:Catacomb (video game)
206:significant coverage
228:, as was reverted.
214:independent sources
55:(non-admin closure)
305:this announcement
262:
223:
57:
507:
490:
458:
453:
424:NinjaRobotPirate
412:
410:
404:
402:NinjaRobotPirate
382:NinjaRobotPirate
369:
367:
356:
354:NinjaRobotPirate
335:NinjaRobotPirate
327:
258:
256:
239:
237:
217:
199:
198:
184:
136:
124:
106:
67:
66:
64:
53:
34:
515:
514:
510:
509:
508:
506:
505:
504:
503:
497:deletion review
486:
456:
451:
408:
406:
399:
365:
363:
351:
325:
318:Masters of Doom
254:
252:
235:
233:
141:
132:
97:
81:
78:
62:
60:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
513:
511:
502:
501:
481:
480:
463:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
346:
345:
287:this interview
279:
278:
263:
202:
201:
138:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
512:
500:
498:
494:
489:
483:
482:
479:
475:
471:
467:
464:
462:
459:
454:
448:
445:
444:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
416:
415:
411:
403:
397:
393:
392:
391:
387:
383:
379:
374:
373:
372:
368:
360:
355:
350:
349:
348:
347:
344:
340:
336:
331:
324:
320:
319:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
293:
288:
284:
281:
280:
277:
273:
269:
264:
261:
257:
250:
245:
244:
243:
242:
238:
231:
227:
221:
215:
211:
207:
197:
193:
190:
187:
183:
179:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
147:
144:
143:Find sources:
139:
135:
131:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
65:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
487:
484:
465:
452:Sergecross73
446:
419:
395:
378:Catacomb 3-D
377:
359:Catacomb 3-D
322:
316:
313:this chapter
290:
282:
230:Catacomb 3-D
226:John Carmack
203:
191:
185:
177:
170:
164:
158:
152:
142:
129:
49:
47:
31:
28:
420:Catacomb II
396:Catacomb II
330:archive.org
168:free images
297:this story
493:talk page
362:content?
63:Music1201
37:talk page
495:or in a
323:Catacomb
309:bit-tech
292:NowGamer
210:reliable
127:View log
39:or in a
466:Comment
268:Shaddim
174:WP refs
162:scholar
100:protect
95:history
470:Thibbs
457:msg me
146:Google
104:delete
208:from
189:JSTOR
150:books
134:Stats
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
474:talk
447:Keep
428:talk
409:czar
386:talk
366:czar
339:talk
283:Keep
272:talk
255:czar
236:czar
182:FENS
156:news
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
50:keep
315:in
307:at
301:IGN
299:at
289:at
196:TWL
125:– (
52:.
476:)
430:)
405:?
398:,
388:)
380:.
341:)
274:)
251:.
216:.
212:,
176:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
59:—
472:(
426:(
400:@
384:(
352:@
337:(
326:'
270:(
222:)
220:?
218:(
200:)
192:·
186:·
178:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
148:(
140:(
137:)
130:·
123:)
85:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.