409:
The location of the source is immaterial. Here is the standard by which to judge this article: "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject."
203:
566:
which is a major regional newspaper. There is adequate sourcing here. I am guessing if you did a deep dive on
Chicago sources back to when she received her highest government appointment you would find
457:
is questioned on grounds of lack of independence on LDS matters rather than for its locality. WP reported status is that it is reliable but we have no consensus on independence.
156:
410:
Are the sources significant? Yes. Is there more than one? Yes. Are they secondary, reliable, intellectually independent of each other and independent of the subject? Yes. --
197:
500:
is more applicable. The coverage for the most part is interviews, there no secondary sources of any real value. I can't see Salt Lake
Tribune as its not GDPR compliant
298:
260:
317:
279:
103:
88:
163:
129:
124:
133:
435:
116:
218:
83:
76:
17:
185:
97:
93:
380:
That is what I thought, a non-answer. As far as I'm concerned it is minimal, local coverage only, that fails to pass
179:
593:
572:
40:
576:
550:
531:
510:
468:
446:
414:
402:
375:
366:
347:
328:
309:
290:
271:
252:
58:
175:
432:
589:
458:
225:
120:
36:
388:. It has been previously deleted at Afd and as supplied, the references are not sufficient to satisfy
568:
527:
211:
428:
464:
442:
321:
302:
283:
264:
191:
72:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
588:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
339:
I see four independent sources giving in-depth coverage of this person. This means it passes
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
543:
503:
395:
389:
381:
359:
245:
239:
112:
64:
523:
431:. The former applies to organisations and adding it in for people was (it seems) rejected
519:
497:
424:
385:
340:
235:
491:
460:
453:
438:
150:
420:
411:
372:
344:
54:
584:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
518:
I see two non-trivial sources and see that the subject passes
356:
Are they not very local, defeating the whole point of SIGCOV?
437:
The latter applies for events (in a rather weak form).
146:
142:
138:
210:
434:
but its removal from organisations was also rejected.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
596:). No further edits should be made to this page.
316:Note: This discussion has been included in the
297:Note: This discussion has been included in the
278:Note: This discussion has been included in the
259:Note: This discussion has been included in the
299:list of Illinois-related deletion discussions
224:
8:
104:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
261:list of Africa-related deletion discussions
318:list of Women-related deletion discussions
315:
296:
277:
258:
280:list of Utah-related deletion discussions
488:Seems to be good-RS. Thanks for that
371:You may want to re-read the policy.--
7:
419:Yes indeed. Locality is not part of
24:
89:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
577:03:18, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
59:16:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
551:16:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
532:16:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
511:11:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
469:19:22, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
447:19:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
415:17:16, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
403:16:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
376:16:40, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
367:16:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
348:15:50, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
329:14:11, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
310:14:10, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
291:14:10, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
272:14:10, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
253:13:58, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
423:. Scope may be thinking of
79:(AfD)? Read these primers!
613:
540:And what they be exactly?
586:Please do not modify it.
562:We have sourcing to the
242:. Some minor coverage.
32:Please do not modify it.
77:Articles for deletion
569:John Pack Lambert
564:Salt Lake Tribune
331:
312:
293:
274:
94:Guide to deletion
84:How to contribute
604:
548:
546:
508:
506:
495:
400:
398:
364:
362:
326:
307:
288:
269:
250:
248:
229:
228:
214:
166:
154:
136:
113:Catherine Stokes
74:
65:Catherine Stokes
34:
612:
611:
607:
606:
605:
603:
602:
601:
600:
594:deletion review
544:
542:
504:
502:
489:
396:
394:
360:
358:
322:
303:
284:
265:
246:
244:
171:
162:
127:
111:
108:
71:
68:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
610:
608:
599:
598:
580:
579:
556:
555:
554:
553:
535:
534:
513:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
449:
417:
351:
350:
333:
332:
313:
294:
275:
232:
231:
168:
107:
106:
101:
91:
86:
69:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
609:
597:
595:
591:
587:
582:
581:
578:
574:
570:
565:
561:
558:
557:
552:
549:
547:
539:
538:
537:
536:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
514:
512:
509:
507:
499:
493:
487:
484:
483:
470:
466:
462:
459:
456:
455:
450:
448:
444:
440:
436:
433:
430:
426:
422:
418:
416:
413:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
401:
399:
391:
387:
383:
379:
378:
377:
374:
370:
369:
368:
365:
363:
355:
354:
353:
352:
349:
346:
342:
338:
335:
334:
330:
327:
325:
319:
314:
311:
308:
306:
300:
295:
292:
289:
287:
281:
276:
273:
270:
268:
262:
257:
256:
255:
254:
251:
249:
241:
237:
227:
223:
220:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
177:
174:
173:Find sources:
169:
165:
161:
158:
152:
148:
144:
140:
135:
131:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
105:
102:
99:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
80:
78:
73:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
585:
583:
563:
559:
541:
515:
501:
496:. I'm think
485:
454:Deseret News
452:
451:Quite often
393:
357:
336:
324:CAPTAIN RAJU
323:
305:CAPTAIN RAJU
304:
286:CAPTAIN RAJU
285:
267:CAPTAIN RAJU
266:
243:
233:
221:
215:
207:
200:
194:
188:
182:
172:
159:
70:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
545:scope_creep
505:scope_creep
429:WP:GEOSCOPE
397:scope_creep
361:scope_creep
247:scope_creep
198:free images
524:Lightburst
590:talk page
390:WP:ANYBIO
382:WP:SIGCOV
240:WP:SIGCOV
37:talk page
592:or in a
157:View log
98:glossary
39:or in a
492:Thincat
486:Comment
461:Thincat
439:Thincat
204:WP refs
192:scholar
130:protect
125:history
75:New to
520:WP:GNG
498:WP:AUD
425:WP:AUD
386:WP:BIO
384:, nor
341:WP:GNG
236:WP:BIO
234:Fails
176:Google
134:delete
567:more.
219:JSTOR
180:books
164:Stats
151:views
143:watch
139:links
16:<
573:talk
560:Keep
528:talk
516:Keep
465:talk
443:talk
421:WP:N
337:Keep
238:and
212:FENS
186:news
147:logs
121:talk
117:edit
55:Tone
50:keep
427:or
343:.--
226:TWL
155:– (
575:)
530:)
522:.
467:)
445:)
412:TM
373:TM
345:TM
320:.
301:.
282:.
263:.
206:)
149:|
145:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
52:.
571:(
526:(
494::
490:@
463:(
441:(
392:.
230:)
222:·
216:·
208:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
178:(
170:(
167:)
160:·
153:)
115:(
100:)
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.