606:, as we have high standard there. For this non-accredited recording engineer, I would expect that they would need to have some large accomplishments to meet GNG. There would have to be good coverage, or significant awards, and there seems to be very little of those here. the fact that they worked on adjusting levels for a famous musician's recording just does not cut it, unless good pubs have written about that work. In short, this is just a guy doing his job, who has attracted a small amount of low-quality coverage. There is nothing particularly notable about his accomplishments, and this is attested to by the lack of coverage in reliable sources. ---
590:
602:
the tracks. They might also add effects like reverb to tracks. they are essentially equipment operators who adjust the amplitude and frequency characteristics of the parts of a recording. It's a run of the mill job. Audio "engineering" not the kind of "engineering" we might look at for a engineering professor who is on the tenure-track at a university. Even those accredited engineers, of which there are hundreds of thousands, are not typically notable under
601:
What is an audio engineer? It's not a person with an engineering degree. It's someone who is hired to work in a studio "engineering" a recording. I have done some minor recording engineering, so I know what it is: sitting behind a mixing board and computer adjusting levels, equalization and mixing of
618:
I don't know why you have brought up NPROF, nobody in this discussion has suggested that audio engineers are a discipline of chartered engineers. I have worked in the industry too, so I know perfectly well that they are not. It is, however, recognised that the engineer can contribute significantly
490:
I've been starting AfDs of audio engineers in my spare time because I found that many of them appeared promotional. Those that have been deleted thus far were poorly sourced, and appeared promotional for structural reasons. Because of the lack of reliable coverage about their lives, the articles
376:
applies to music engineers (because it does not explicitly mention them). This fellow appears to have a solid background and industry appreciation as an engineer. References are better than a lot of other articles I have seen for music engineers. Meets
470:. It may be time for an RfC on what notability requirements apply for music engineers and producers, rather than going through a bunch of AfD nominations of music engineers where nobody can agree what the consensus is.
668:
that includes songs originally created by the artists listed in the lede of the article. That seems to be where this list comes from. None of the other credits can be verified, as this guy isn't even listed in the
216:
84:
439:
509:. The current consensus is that NMUSIC doesn't cover audio engineers, though if somebody starts an RfC to change that, I'll stop nominating audio engineers for deletion during the time it runs.
312:
177:
332:
210:
79:
272:
292:
109:
432:
491:
focused on their production credits. Such articles are essentially advertisements: "This guy worked with a bunch of notable artists, you should hire him".
124:
436:
589:
150:
145:
104:
97:
17:
154:
682:
638:
613:
583:
545:
518:
500:
485:
462:
417:
390:
363:
344:
324:
304:
284:
264:
64:
137:
480:
231:
118:
114:
354:
I did not alert the author of this discussion because I suspect they are connected to all the previous AfD's !keep voters.
198:
623:
and why PRODUCER is the relevant guideline here. For the avoidance of doubt, I am not making an argument either way for
554:
399:
434:
413:
699:
441:
40:
247:
Renominating because in the last (non-admin closed) AfD, the only keep argument was that Cartee met criterion #10 of
192:
657:
620:
443:
633:
578:
409:
188:
141:
695:
36:
649:
566:
529:
506:
373:
248:
238:
619:
to the creative content of a recording and can become very notable for it. That's how come we have
133:
70:
386:
224:
533:
678:
628:
610:
573:
514:
496:
476:
359:
340:
320:
300:
280:
260:
603:
378:
541:
455:
93:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
694:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
204:
428:
382:
55:
569:) has been identified, I'm relisting to see if anyone wants to make a case under that.
674:
607:
510:
492:
472:
355:
336:
316:
296:
276:
256:
255:. This doesn't hold up because the article doesn't say Cartee performs music at all.
537:
447:
171:
427:. Sound engineers do not pass MUSICBIO by definition. This biography fails
670:
652:. The list of artists that the article claims this person worked with is
665:
648:: There is no argument that can be made to !keep this article based of
588:
690:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
557:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
402:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
431:. The six references are not good at all. The first three (
251:. This policy affirms that a musician may be notable if he
253:
has performed music for a work of media that is notable
167:
163:
159:
223:
85:
Articles for deletion/Cameron Cartee (2nd nomination)
572:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
408:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
237:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
702:). No further edits should be made to this page.
528:per Eostrix's convincing source analysis. Fails
331:Note: This discussion has been included in the
313:list of Engineering-related deletion discussions
311:Note: This discussion has been included in the
291:Note: This discussion has been included in the
271:Note: This discussion has been included in the
333:list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions
8:
125:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
273:list of People-related deletion discussions
330:
310:
293:list of Music-related deletion discussions
290:
270:
445:barely mention Cartee (he's in a list).--
77:
438:) are promotional PR. The last three (
252:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
80:Articles for deletion/Cameron Cartee
660:that he appears in the credits of
24:
565:Now that the correct guideline (
110:Introduction to deletion process
519:03:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
501:03:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
486:11:18, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
463:06:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
418:05:44, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
391:20:19, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
364:05:45, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
345:05:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
325:05:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
305:05:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
285:05:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
265:05:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
1:
593:Example of an audio engineer.
683:05:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
372:It's a bit hard to say that
65:06:43, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
639:13:33, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
614:22:12, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
584:19:49, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
546:22:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
100:(AfD)? Read these primers!
719:
505:Producers are covered by
692:Please do not modify it.
621:category:audio engineers
32:Please do not modify it.
76:AfDs for this article:
594:
592:
98:Articles for deletion
595:
563:Relisting comment:
410:Extraordinary Writ
586:
420:
347:
327:
307:
287:
115:Guide to deletion
105:How to contribute
63:
710:
664:of a mixtape by
571:
560:
558:
484:
461:
450:
407:
405:
403:
242:
241:
227:
175:
157:
95:
62:
60:
53:
34:
718:
717:
713:
712:
711:
709:
708:
707:
706:
700:deletion review
625:this particular
587:
553:
551:
471:
458:
453:
448:
421:
398:
396:
184:
148:
132:
129:
92:
89:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
716:
714:
705:
704:
686:
685:
654:total bullshit
643:
642:
641:
570:
561:
550:
549:
548:
523:
522:
521:
503:
465:
456:
406:
395:
394:
393:
349:
348:
328:
308:
288:
245:
244:
181:
134:Cameron Cartee
128:
127:
122:
112:
107:
90:
88:
87:
82:
75:
73:
71:Cameron Cartee
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
715:
703:
701:
697:
693:
688:
687:
684:
680:
676:
672:
667:
663:
662:a single song
659:
656:. We can see
655:
651:
647:
644:
640:
637:
636:
632:
631:
626:
622:
617:
616:
615:
612:
609:
605:
600:
597:
596:
591:
585:
582:
581:
577:
576:
568:
564:
559:
556:
547:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
502:
498:
494:
489:
488:
487:
482:
478:
474:
469:
466:
464:
459:
452:
451:
444:
442:
440:
437:
435:
433:
430:
426:
423:
422:
419:
415:
411:
404:
401:
392:
388:
384:
380:
375:
371:
368:
367:
366:
365:
361:
357:
353:
346:
342:
338:
334:
329:
326:
322:
318:
314:
309:
306:
302:
298:
294:
289:
286:
282:
278:
274:
269:
268:
267:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
240:
236:
233:
230:
226:
222:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
190:
187:
186:Find sources:
182:
179:
173:
169:
165:
161:
156:
152:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
130:
126:
123:
120:
116:
113:
111:
108:
106:
103:
102:
101:
99:
94:
86:
83:
81:
78:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
691:
689:
661:
653:
645:
634:
629:
624:
598:
579:
574:
562:
552:
525:
467:
446:
424:
397:
369:
351:
350:
246:
234:
228:
220:
213:
207:
201:
195:
185:
91:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
650:WP:PRODUCER
567:WP:PRODUCER
530:WP:MUSICBIO
507:WP:PRODUCER
374:WP:MUSICBIO
249:WP:MUSICBIO
211:free images
673:database.
627:engineer.
58:Sandstein
696:talk page
534:WP:SIGCOV
383:Whiteguru
37:talk page
698:or in a
675:Mottezen
671:AllMusic
630:Spinning
608:Possibly
604:WP:NPROF
575:Spinning
555:Relisted
511:Mottezen
493:Mottezen
481:contribs
473:Eastmain
449:Eostrix
400:Relisted
379:WP:BASIC
356:Mottezen
337:Mottezen
317:Mottezen
297:Mottezen
277:Mottezen
257:Mottezen
178:View log
119:glossary
39:or in a
666:DJ Esco
646:Comment
538:4meter4
468:Comment
217:WP refs
205:scholar
151:protect
146:history
96:New to
599:Delete
526:Delete
457:hoot🦉
429:WP:GNG
425:Delete
189:Google
155:delete
50:delete
635:Spark
580:Spark
370:Keep:
352:Note:
232:JSTOR
193:books
172:views
164:watch
160:links
16:<
679:talk
658:here
542:talk
532:and
515:talk
497:talk
477:talk
414:talk
387:talk
360:talk
341:talk
321:talk
301:talk
281:talk
261:talk
225:FENS
199:news
168:logs
142:talk
138:edit
239:TWL
176:– (
681:)
544:)
517:)
499:)
479:•
416:)
389:)
381:--
362:)
343:)
335:.
323:)
315:.
303:)
295:.
283:)
275:.
263:)
219:)
170:|
166:|
162:|
158:|
153:|
149:|
144:|
140:|
52:.
677:(
611:☎
540:(
536:.
513:(
495:(
483:)
475:(
460:)
454:(
412:(
385:(
358:(
339:(
319:(
299:(
279:(
259:(
243:)
235:·
229:·
221:·
214:·
208:·
202:·
196:·
191:(
183:(
180:)
174:)
136:(
121:)
117:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.