414:
to it (once the threat of deletion has been removed and I, or someone else gets the time to look up the refs again to get more info). If the article then becomes too big, we can divide it up like the US articles covering different aspect. But it all comes down in the UK articles to the time
395:. Most of this article is unsourced and too dubious without proper referencing. The few bits of definite factual information are already included in this article. But by all means rescue/recreate if this information is properly sourced.
347:"Comment:" The lack of other articles that would be suitable for wikipedia isn't something that affects a deletion discussion. Maybe there just haven't been interested editors to create those articles like Cannabis in France, etc.
168:
203:
that has been tagged as unreferenced since
November 2009. The content looks like it is a personal essay from multiple editors. The article's name is worth of an article, but the contents of this article need nuking from orbit.
409:
article, it would be easier to expand if we included all aspects of cannabis use in this article, including industrial hemp, medical uses, as well as the legal position. I can then transfer some of the information I placed on
162:
411:
365:
96:
91:
100:
234:. It is a notable topic with sufficient verifiable references. Note that an AfD should not be used for an article on a notable topic that simply needs some editing. --
222:. If the article should exist, but its current content isn't up to standard, let's work to fix it. I posted four reliable sources on the talk page as a starting point.
289:.. the problem with this article is that it needs to be balanced with "Cannabis in France", "Cannabis in USA" etc. to be balanced... should it not be a sub-section of
123:
83:
511:. Definitely agree with the idea that if the article should exist, but its current content isn't up to standard, we should work to fix it, not just delete it.
128:
272:: I imagine, percentage-wise there are very few editors in the UK who are knowledgeable enough to expand this, so we need to give them time. --
309:
183:
521:
150:
87:
529:
503:
484:
462:
444:
424:
380:
351:
341:
313:
281:
264:
243:
226:
213:
144:
65:
17:
79:
71:
48:. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator and one editor arguing for userfication. The consensus here is that any
140:
458:
327:
190:
53:
545:
305:
36:
405:
Redirecting to a more restricted topic (i.e., just the legal aspects) is the last thing it needs now. Like the
544:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
525:
454:
330:. Also, there seems to be too many cultural and legal differences, to neatly put these things in one article.
260:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
480:
440:
239:
209:
156:
406:
61:
499:
512:
517:
494:
if it's such a problem. then the creator can reinstate it into wikipedia's database when it's ready.
392:
301:
297:
256:
176:
476:
436:
252:
235:
205:
376:
348:
223:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
57:
420:
337:
277:
471:
453:, although the usage section still needs serious attention to deal with the OR issues.
495:
372:
200:
49:
117:
435:. There has now been substantial change since the article was put up for AfD. --
416:
333:
273:
290:
538:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
52:
issues can be fixed through the normal editing process. (
113:
109:
105:
175:
412:
List of
British politicians who admit to cannabis use
366:
list of United
Kingdom-related deletion discussions
415:available from a more limited number of editors.--
449:Okay, I can now see enough in this article for a
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
548:). No further edits should be made to this page.
475:and simply delete any contentious material. --
189:
8:
360:
364:: This debate has been included in the
326:We already have "Cannabis in USA" see:
7:
393:Legality of cannabis#United Kingdom
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
80:Cannabis in the United Kingdom
72:Cannabis in the United Kingdom
1:
328:Category:Cannabis by country
566:
251:AFD is not cleanup. See
541:Please do not modify it.
530:20:53, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
504:14:23, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
485:21:15, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
463:20:34, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
445:20:23, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
425:05:56, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
381:17:45, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
352:21:49, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
342:17:20, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
314:13:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
282:10:18, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
265:06:24, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
244:05:38, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
227:00:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
214:23:20, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
66:02:14, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
407:Cannabis in Australia
199:An article rife with
455:Chris Neville-Smith
44:The result was
552:
520:comment added by
427:
383:
369:
354:
331:
317:
300:comment added by
201:original research
54:non-admin closure
557:
543:
532:
401:
370:
357:
346:
322:
316:
294:
194:
193:
179:
131:
121:
103:
34:
565:
564:
560:
559:
558:
556:
555:
554:
553:
546:deletion review
539:
515:
302:Stephencdickson
295:
136:
127:
94:
78:
75:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
563:
561:
551:
550:
534:
533:
522:131.111.184.88
506:
488:
487:
466:
465:
447:
429:
428:
398:
397:
387:As it stands,
384:
356:
355:
344:
319:
318:
284:
267:
257:Colonel Warden
246:
229:
197:
196:
133:
129:AfD statistics
74:
69:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
562:
549:
547:
542:
536:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
514:
513:• triswithers
510:
507:
505:
501:
497:
493:
490:
489:
486:
482:
478:
477:Alan Liefting
474:
473:
468:
467:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
446:
442:
438:
437:Alan Liefting
434:
431:
430:
426:
422:
418:
413:
408:
404:
400:
399:
396:
394:
390:
385:
382:
378:
374:
367:
363:
359:
358:
353:
350:
345:
343:
339:
335:
329:
325:
321:
320:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
292:
288:
285:
283:
279:
275:
271:
268:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
247:
245:
241:
237:
236:Alan Liefting
233:
230:
228:
225:
221:
218:
217:
216:
215:
211:
207:
206:The Pink Oboe
202:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
540:
537:
508:
491:
470:
450:
432:
402:
388:
386:
361:
323:
286:
269:
248:
231:
219:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
45:
43:
31:
28:
516:—Preceding
296:—Preceding
253:WP:NOEFFORT
249:Speedy Keep
163:free images
58:Ron Ritzman
469:We could
373:• Gene93k
518:unsigned
496:qö₮$ @37
403:Comment:
389:Redirect
324:Comment:
310:contribs
298:unsigned
291:Cannabis
124:View log
492:userify
472:be bold
433:Comment
169:WP refs
157:scholar
97:protect
92:history
349:Sancho
224:Sancho
141:Google
101:delete
417:Aspro
334:Aspro
287:Dodgy
274:Aspro
184:JSTOR
145:books
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
526:talk
509:Keep
500:talk
483:) -
481:talk
459:talk
451:keep
443:) -
441:talk
421:talk
377:talk
362:Note
338:talk
306:talk
278:talk
270:Keep
261:talk
242:) -
240:talk
232:Keep
220:Keep
210:talk
177:FENS
151:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
62:talk
46:keep
391:to
371:--
293:?
191:TWL
126:•
122:– (
528:)
502:)
461:)
423:)
379:)
368:.
340:)
332:--
312:)
308:•
280:)
263:)
255:.
212:)
171:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
56:)
50:OR
524:(
498:(
479:(
457:(
439:(
419:(
375:(
336:(
304:(
276:(
259:(
238:(
208:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
120:)
82:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.