261:"My search for information turned up no sources on this person". Did you follow Knowledge (XXG) procedure and complete a BEFORE search? When I did simply by clicking the links, I found the sources I added to the article. I'm sure I'd get more if I added information like the names of his coworkers (Curtiz, Borzage), wife, employer to a search. So it looks like you didn't complete the BEFORE or you didn't look at the sources that came up--more than I added, but the way, as some were redundant. Either way, this is a dysfunctional approach to AfD. --
471:
on people who try and do reasonable actions to improve articles on
Knowledge (XXG). We have held that IMDb is unreliable and cannot be used as a source. I did a reasonable search for information and came up with nothing that indicated there was some. The fact of the matter is that this article lacked any reliable source at all when I found it and had existed on Knowledge (XXG) for 10 years. That is far longer than we should tolerate articles lacking reliable sources.
487:
John, your argument to delete is being countered and your statement you didn't find anything in a search when I found things just by clicking the "find sources" links are what we have addressed. No one has attacked you. In good faith I recommend you strike that particular word and consider replacing
470:
The fact of the matter is that this article existed for over 10 years sourced to nothing except IMDb. I did a search for sources. The fact that I am being attacked for not finding any, when no other editor bothered to place any on the article for over 10 years seems to be putting the weight too much
388:
meets notability guidelines and we don't nominate because things are sourced to IMDb... And when IMDb is clearly quoting something in the bio... Demonstrating sources exist... ::Screams:: Bad nomination etiquette and I'll leave a message on nominator's talk page. I have a life and have essentially
245:
This article lacks any reliable sources, and as far as I can tell has never had any. My search for information turned up no sources on this person. Knowledge (XXG) should not be built on sources like IMDb which we have ruled to be unreliable.
214:
507:
people were able to find additional sources that now show notability. This was not easily evident when found and the article had existed for an excessive amount of time with no reliable sources at all.
336:
78:
208:
368:
364:
360:
312:
171:
426:
488:
it with another in case someone (not me) makes a beef about it later. You started an AfD and you know how AfDs go. Your work will be critiqued. This is the way of things.
144:
139:
148:
131:
103:
411:
that goes into his work on a particular film, but that I can't view or check out through
Internet Archive/Open Library to meaningfully quote in the article.
118:
356:
389:
given up WP because of this bologna, but I'll spare a few minutes for a troubled soul who has given me so much joy. Big fat eyeroll, though!
408:
229:
196:
98:
91:
17:
135:
532:
516:
497:
480:
462:
438:
420:
398:
379:
348:
328:
290:
270:
255:
63:
281:
I did multiple searches in google, google books. google news archive, which are the searches that before actually recomends.
190:
112:
108:
127:
69:
549:
186:
40:
236:
528:
512:
493:
476:
434:
416:
394:
286:
266:
251:
304:
524:
489:
430:
412:
390:
262:
545:
202:
36:
308:
508:
472:
320:
282:
247:
344:
222:
451:
58:
372:
87:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
544:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
175:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
450:
per the excellent expansion work by
DiamondRemley39 and another case of Lambert not doing a
316:
340:
53:
456:
165:
540:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
337:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
313:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Log/2022 March 14
161:
157:
153:
221:
235:
523:Thank you for withdrawing, John. I appreciate it.
79:Articles for deletion/Carl Erickson (screenwriter)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
552:). No further edits should be made to this page.
355:Note: This discussion has been included in the
335:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
119:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
354:
334:
76:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
429:from a book on Curtiz and ditto.
359:lists for the following topics:
104:Introduction to deletion process
1:
311:). I have transcluded it to
128:Carl Erickson (screenwriter)
70:Carl Erickson (screenwriter)
303:This AfD was not correctly
94:(AfD)? Read these primers!
569:
533:14:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
517:13:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
498:14:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
481:12:59, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
463:17:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
439:02:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
421:02:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
399:01:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
380:16:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
349:13:22, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
329:13:10, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
291:12:51, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
271:02:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
256:12:55, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
64:13:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
542:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
75:AfDs for this article:
176:edits since nomination
92:Articles for deletion
301:Automated comment:
509:John Pack Lambert
473:John Pack Lambert
382:
351:
331:
327:
283:John Pack Lambert
248:John Pack Lambert
109:Guide to deletion
99:How to contribute
560:
459:
377:
357:deletion sorting
323:
322:Talk to my owner
318:
299:
240:
239:
225:
169:
151:
89:
61:
56:
34:
568:
567:
563:
562:
561:
559:
558:
557:
556:
550:deletion review
525:DiamondRemley39
490:DiamondRemley39
457:
431:DiamondRemley39
413:DiamondRemley39
391:DiamondRemley39
373:
326:
321:
263:DiamondRemley39
182:
142:
126:
123:
86:
83:
73:
59:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
566:
564:
555:
554:
536:
535:
520:
519:
501:
500:
484:
483:
465:
444:
443:
442:
441:
423:
402:
401:
383:
352:
332:
319:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
274:
273:
243:
242:
179:
122:
121:
116:
106:
101:
84:
82:
81:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
565:
553:
551:
547:
543:
538:
537:
534:
530:
526:
522:
521:
518:
514:
510:
506:
503:
502:
499:
495:
491:
486:
485:
482:
478:
474:
469:
466:
464:
461:
460:
453:
449:
446:
445:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
405:
404:
403:
400:
396:
392:
387:
384:
381:
378:
376:
370:
366:
362:
358:
353:
350:
346:
342:
338:
333:
330:
324:
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
292:
288:
284:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
272:
268:
264:
260:
259:
258:
257:
253:
249:
238:
234:
231:
228:
224:
220:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
188:
185:
184:Find sources:
180:
177:
173:
167:
163:
159:
155:
150:
146:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
124:
120:
117:
114:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
96:
95:
93:
88:
80:
77:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
541:
539:
504:
467:
455:
447:
385:
375:CAPTAIN RAJU
374:
307:to the log (
300:
244:
232:
226:
218:
211:
205:
199:
193:
183:
85:
49:
47:
31:
28:
386:speedy keep
369:Connecticut
305:transcluded
209:free images
365:California
361:Television
546:talk page
452:WP:BEFORE
341:Shellwood
37:talk page
548:or in a
505:Withdraw
172:View log
113:glossary
39:or in a
468:Comment
458:Lugnuts
425:Source
407:Source
367:, and
325::Online
215:WP refs
203:scholar
145:protect
140:history
90:New to
309:step 3
187:Google
149:delete
60:plicit
230:JSTOR
191:books
166:views
158:watch
154:links
16:<
529:talk
513:talk
494:talk
477:talk
448:Keep
435:talk
417:talk
395:talk
345:talk
315:. —
287:talk
267:talk
252:talk
223:FENS
197:news
162:logs
136:talk
132:edit
50:keep
237:TWL
170:– (
531:)
515:)
496:)
479:)
454:.
437:)
419:)
397:)
371:.
363:,
347:)
339:.
289:)
269:)
254:)
217:)
174:|
164:|
160:|
156:|
152:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
52:.
527:(
511:(
492:(
475:(
433:(
427:2
415:(
409:1
393:(
343:(
285:(
265:(
250:(
241:)
233:·
227:·
219:·
212:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
189:(
181:(
178:)
168:)
130:(
115:)
111:(
55:✗
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.