Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Carlie Wong - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

323:: they can be notable simply by having multiple reliable sources, and neither being the losing contestant nor being a high school football coach disqualifies them from notability. Wong seems to have about five different reliable sources on this article, and (as the unsigned comment says) for different events, too, so I can't see how this person fails the notability test. 171:
Wong should be able to have one, too. Carlie Wong has shown a collection at L'Oreal Fashion Week and is preparing to show again in October. The four designers I have named above have never shown at a prestigious fashion week. So if they have this "notability" then why doesn't Carlie Wong? Perhaps propose to delete their articles?
174:
I do understand you are trying to keep wikipedia orderly and the best it can be, so I appreciate you carefully checking my article (now with refrences/citations and celebrity clientele to come in the next few hours/days). So I really hope that this article doesn't have to be deleted, because I really
170:
I, myself, am not Carlie Wong, but the only wikipedia I planned on creating was for Carlie Wong (thus the username). And if Kelli Martin, Kit Pistol, Kevin Johnn, and Diana Eng can have articles for Project Runway when none of them are notable (and their articles are otherwise stubs), then Carlie
278:
Wong is noted for Project Runway Canada and for L'Oreal Fashion Week. That's two events going on three. But if you really do feel strongly about deleting it, please do so. You are the experts, not me. So I'll completely understand if you do. No
341:
per nom. I don't know why someone would make a username based off a real person if they are not said person. Even if they aren't, it's just going to lead people to believe that they are.--
258: 127: 361: 146:, and in my opinion, does not have the sources that would make her notability clear. I searched google briefly and didn't find the kinds of sources that I thought met 390: 298:
Query: Could someone knowledgeable advise, if you strip out the Project Runway thing, at what point would showing a collection at a Fashion week cross the
422: 17: 160: 231: 94: 89: 98: 307: 81: 445: 36: 243: 213: 444:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
346: 303: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
426: 418: 403: 374: 156: 430: 408: 379: 350: 332: 311: 292: 270: 248: 218: 190: 165: 63: 319:
Losing contestants on reality shows aren't notable, but neither are high school football coaches like
85: 288: 284: 266: 236: 206: 186: 182: 227: 342: 77: 69: 178:
If there's any way you see the article can be improved as a matter of rhetoric, do let me know.
328: 230:... that she did not even win. The article is certainly sourced to heaven... but where is the 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
397: 368: 151: 56: 201: 200:
speaking about other articles as a defense of this one is not an appropriate argument. See
135: 262: 147: 139: 143: 324: 320: 115: 134:
If I understand precedent correctly, reality show participants aren't considered
51: 299: 415:
If Carlie Wong is so notable then Biddell should have a page, since he won.
150:. Prod removed by creator, who appears to be Carlie Wong herself. 438:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
142:. This particular person finished eighth on a season of 122: 111: 107: 103: 138:unless their importance has also been discussed in 259:list of Living people-related deletion discussions 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 448:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 362:list of Fashion-related deletion discussions 391:list of Canada-related deletion discussions 389:: This debate has been included in the 360:: This debate has been included in the 257:: This debate has been included in the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 283:thank you for your consideration. 1: 140:reliable, third-party sources 431:02:38, 6 December 2008 (UTC) 409:17:55, 12 October 2008 (UTC) 380:17:55, 12 October 2008 (UTC) 351:23:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 333:17:56, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 312:09:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 293:00:57, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 271:00:02, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 226:as this person is known for 64:05:33, 14 October 2008 (UTC) 249:23:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 219:23:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 191:22:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 166:21:42, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 465: 175:do believe it is notable. 441:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 304:SockpuppetSamuelson 44:The result was 421:comment added by 411: 394: 382: 365: 273: 181:Thank you, Brett 456: 443: 433: 406: 400: 395: 385: 377: 371: 366: 356: 253: 239: 209: 164: 125: 119: 101: 61: 59: 54: 34: 464: 463: 459: 458: 457: 455: 454: 453: 452: 446:deletion review 439: 416: 404: 398: 375: 369: 302:threshold ? -- 237: 207: 154: 121: 92: 76: 73: 57: 52: 50: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 462: 460: 451: 450: 413: 412: 383: 343:CyberGhostface 336: 335: 314: 281: 280: 275: 274: 251: 221: 144:Project Runway 132: 131: 72: 67: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 461: 449: 447: 442: 436: 435: 434: 432: 428: 424: 423:207.47.247.26 420: 410: 407: 401: 392: 388: 384: 381: 378: 372: 363: 359: 355: 354: 353: 352: 348: 344: 340: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 315: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 296: 295: 294: 290: 286: 277: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 250: 247: 246: 245: 241: 240: 233: 229: 225: 222: 220: 217: 216: 215: 211: 210: 203: 199: 195: 194: 193: 192: 188: 184: 179: 176: 172: 168: 167: 162: 158: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 129: 124: 117: 113: 109: 105: 100: 96: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 74: 71: 68: 66: 65: 62: 60: 55: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 440: 437: 414: 386: 357: 338: 337: 321:Mark Mangino 316: 282: 254: 244: 242: 235: 223: 214: 212: 205: 197: 180: 177: 173: 169: 133: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 417:—Preceding 399:Fabrictramp 370:Fabrictramp 279:worries. :) 152:FisherQueen 78:Carlie Wong 70:Carlie Wong 405:talk to me 376:talk to me 300:notability 285:CarlieWong 263:Erwin85Bot 232:notability 183:CarlieWong 228:one event 419:unsigned 238:Schmidt, 208:Schmidt, 161:contribs 128:View log 325:Nyttend 198:Comment 136:notable 95:protect 90:history 339:Delete 224:Delete 202:WP:WAX 123:delete 99:delete 46:delete 148:WP:RS 126:) – ( 116:views 108:watch 104:links 16:< 427:talk 387:Note 358:Note 347:talk 329:talk 317:Keep 308:talk 289:talk 267:talk 261:. -- 255:Note 187:talk 157:talk 112:logs 86:talk 82:edit 396:-- 393:. 367:-- 364:. 58:ykh 53:kur 429:) 402:| 373:| 349:) 331:) 310:) 291:) 269:) 234:? 204:. 189:) 159:· 114:| 110:| 106:| 102:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 48:. 425:( 345:( 327:( 306:( 287:( 265:( 196:" 185:( 163:) 155:( 130:) 120:( 118:) 80:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
kur
ykh
05:33, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Carlie Wong
Carlie Wong
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
notable
reliable, third-party sources
Project Runway
WP:RS
FisherQueen
talk
contribs
21:42, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
CarlieWong
talk
22:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
WP:WAX

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑