401:, does not have in-depth discussion, but what it does have is some statistics on the proportion of research administrators that have the CRA. They do not include any other certifications, implying that this is the most widely recognised (possibly only) scheme in the field.
209:
203:
275:
162:
135:
130:
139:
122:
295:
358:. Seems to have some notability to me. The organisation behind the certification scheme may not be able to pass NORG, but the certification itself gets past GNG.
169:
109:
94:
224:
378:
191:
126:
464:
447:
428:
348:
324:
307:
287:
266:
249:
64:
185:
118:
70:
369:
361:
89:
82:
17:
181:
438:- per the sources above it seems reasonable to say that the profession has enough coverage and consideration to pass GNG.
231:
103:
99:
333:
481:
40:
197:
257:
As an interested party, would adding third party/external references allow for this entry to remain? Thanks.
423:
411:, confirms that there are no other "education and certification program" for the profession besides the CRA.
404:
477:
443:
344:
36:
460:
320:
245:
217:
418:
303:
283:
262:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
476:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
439:
457:
316:
241:
54:
299:
279:
258:
59:
156:
386:
374:
has the topic as a section heading and clearly has substantial coverage.
366:
has the topic as a section heading and clearly has substantial coverage.
455:, a couple of cite books added, there are more out there. Meets GNG.
388:
Perceptions Of
Research Administrators On The Value Of Certification
394:
472:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
336:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
391:(a doctoral thesis) is pretty much entirely about the CRA.
152:
148:
144:
216:
363:
Guide to national professional certification programs
315:
What is required coverage from independent sources.
342:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
371:Certification and Accreditation Programs Directory
276:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
484:). No further edits should be made to this page.
294:Note: This discussion has been included in the
274:Note: This discussion has been included in the
405:"The research administrator as a professional"
296:list of Education-related deletion discussions
230:
8:
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
395:"2010 Profile of a Research Administrator"
293:
273:
409:Research Administration and Management
380:Research Administration and Management
7:
24:
119:Certified Research Administrator
95:Introduction to deletion process
71:Certified Research Administrator
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
465:13:06, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
448:22:42, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
429:19:33, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
349:06:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
65:15:30, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
325:19:20, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
308:18:40, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
288:18:40, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
267:00:02, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
250:18:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
383:gives it a short paragraph.
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
501:
399:Research Management Review
407:, a different paper from
474:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
83:Articles for deletion
240:Does not pass GNG.
55:(non-admin closure)
351:
310:
290:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
57:
492:
347:
341:
339:
337:
235:
234:
220:
172:
160:
142:
80:
53:
34:
500:
499:
495:
494:
493:
491:
490:
489:
488:
482:deletion review
352:
343:
332:
330:
177:
168:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
498:
496:
487:
486:
468:
467:
450:
432:
431:
415:
414:
413:
412:
402:
392:
384:
377:Chapter 24 in
375:
367:
340:
329:
328:
327:
312:
311:
291:
271:
270:
269:
238:
237:
174:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
497:
485:
483:
479:
475:
470:
469:
466:
463:
462:
459:
454:
451:
449:
445:
441:
437:
434:
433:
430:
427:
426:
422:
421:
417:
416:
410:
406:
403:
400:
396:
393:
390:
389:
385:
382:
381:
376:
373:
372:
368:
365:
364:
360:
359:
357:
354:
353:
350:
346:
345:North America
338:
335:
326:
322:
318:
314:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
292:
289:
285:
281:
277:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
247:
243:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:Find sources:
175:
171:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
63:
62:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
473:
471:
456:
452:
435:
424:
419:
408:
398:
387:
379:
370:
362:
355:
331:
239:
227:
221:
213:
206:
200:
194:
188:
178:
165:
76:
60:
49:
47:
31:
28:
440:Nosebagbear
204:free images
317:Rathfelder
478:talk page
242:Natureium
37:talk page
480:or in a
420:Spinning
334:Relisted
300:Bakazaka
280:Bakazaka
259:Amgray19
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
210:WP refs
198:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
61:MRD2014
461:Sailor
182:Google
140:delete
425:Spark
225:JSTOR
186:books
170:Stats
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
453:Keep
444:talk
436:Keep
356:Keep
321:talk
304:talk
284:talk
263:talk
246:talk
218:FENS
192:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
50:keep
458:Sam
232:TWL
161:– (
446:)
397:,
323:)
306:)
298:.
286:)
278:.
265:)
248:)
212:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
58:—
52:.
442:(
319:(
302:(
282:(
261:(
244:(
236:)
228:·
222:·
214:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
184:(
176:(
173:)
166:·
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.