145:天寶十二載（753年）進士，曾任檢校祠部員外郎、洪州鹽鐵判官。大歷末（779年），伉儷歿於洪州。有《張祠部詩集》。在唐代詩人中，張繼不算大家，也不是名家，宋人葉夢得《石林詩話》記載其詩在南宋時僅存三十多首。《全唐詩》中，只存四十餘首。《楓橋夜泊》是他最著名的詩，作於天寶十五載流寓蘇州時，这首诗首先被选入高仲武編選的《中兴间气集》，後又選入《唐诗三百首》。高仲武評張繼詩：「員外累代詞伯，積習弓裘。其於為文，不自雕飾。及爾登第，秀發當時。詩體清迥，有道者風。」「比興深矣。」其事蹟見於辛文房《唐才子傳》。 According to this, he became a scholar in 753. In terms of Tang poet, He is not a huge poet; Record show that he only have 30 poems left by Song dynasty, while The "Complete Poem Collection of Tang" he only contributed 40. However, he did contributed<<楓橋夜泊: -->
291:. I added a reference for the Mahler connection, which IMO is enough to make him notable from a Western POV. There is ample room for further improvement. I am not an expert in Chinese literature, but "The 300 T'ang Poems" is arguably the most famous and most "classic" anthology of Chinese poetry. I would keep him based on that alone.
273:
I, too am also unsure of his importance. I'm adding the "expert" template to see if we can get some help on this one. In the meantime, I'm relisting the discussion to see what other users think. If you have any questions, please contact me at
121:
Effectively an unsourced article since the source relied on provides insufficient information as to this person's identity (and given that, the person, if he existed, cannot really be referred to as a "famous" poet).
114:
234:
324:. Although I lack the expertise to determine if the article can ever be much more than the stub it is now, the assertions of notability that is
198:
My opinion is that not all poets who had a poem in there qualifies. The problem with this article, again, though, is that it doesn't establish
216:
Well, the people at the relevent national WikiProject are probably more likely to be able to figure this out than a bunch of random AfD voters
17:
87:
82:
91:
74:
363:
36:
362:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
174:
In the view of those who understand its significance, is any poet with a poem in the 300 Tang Poems notable?
240:
217:
190:
148:
330:
348:
336:
312:
295:
282:
266:
243:
220:
211:
193:
180:
166:
151:
135:
78:
56:
258:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, If you have any questions, please contact me at
309:
292:
275:
259:
344:
per
Stammer and Satori Son. The Mahler is one of the best known Western uses of Chinese poetry.
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
53:
305:
161:
147:, which is collected in the "300 Tang Poems", and most famous chinese poem anthology.
279:
263:
207:
131:
345:
108:
253:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
49:
304:
OK, it appears that we have stumbled upon a scholarly hornet's nest. See this
70:
62:
203:
176:
127:
186:
356:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
104:
100:
96:
126:
unless more information as to identify is provided. --
202:
Chinese poet the name "Chang Tsi" corresponds to. --
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
366:). No further edits should be made to this page.
328:contain are sufficient and properly sourced. --
8:
308:, which I have also added to the article.
233:: This debate has been included in the
189:'s poem is there... can someone check?
7:
141:Uncertain: From Chinesw wikipedia:
24:
235:list of China-related deletions
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
160:- No assertion of notablity.--
1:
383:
349:17:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
57:22:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
337:17:42, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
313:17:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
296:15:55, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
283:06:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
267:06:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
244:09:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
221:09:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
212:05:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
194:04:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
181:04:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
167:02:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
152:00:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
136:22:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
359:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
172:Expert opinion needed
269:
246:
238:
374:
361:
335:
257:
254:
239:
229:
164:
112:
94:
34:
382:
381:
377:
376:
375:
373:
372:
371:
370:
364:deletion review
357:
329:
252:
162:
85:
69:
66:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
380:
378:
369:
368:
352:
351:
339:
318:
317:
316:
315:
299:
298:
271:
270:
256:
248:
247:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
196:
169:
143:
142:
119:
118:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
379:
367:
365:
360:
354:
353:
350:
347:
343:
340:
338:
334:
333:
327:
323:
320:
319:
314:
311:
307:
303:
302:
301:
300:
297:
294:
290:
287:
286:
285:
284:
281:
277:
268:
265:
261:
255:
250:
249:
245:
242:
236:
232:
228:
222:
219:
215:
214:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
195:
192:
191:142.58.101.27
188:
185:Well, I know
184:
183:
182:
179:
178:
173:
170:
168:
165:
159:
156:
155:
154:
153:
150:
149:142.58.101.27
140:
139:
138:
137:
133:
129:
125:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
358:
355:
341:
331:
325:
321:
288:
276:my talk page
272:
260:my talk page
251:
230:
199:
175:
171:
157:
144:
123:
120:
45:
43:
31:
28:
332:Satori Son
306:reference
280:Ian Manka
264:Ian Manka
71:Chang Tsi
63:Chang Tsi
115:View log
346:Johnbod
310:Stammer
293:Stammer
88:protect
83:history
187:Li Bai
163:Bryson
158:Delete
124:Delete
92:delete
50:Splash
200:which
146:: -->
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
342:Keep
326:does
322:Keep
289:Keep
231:Note
208:talk
132:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
46:KEEP
241:cab
237:.
218:cab
204:Nlu
177:DGG
128:Nlu
113:– (
48:. -
278:.
262:.
210:)
134:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
54:tk
52:-
206:(
130:(
117:)
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.