341:. The building is in all likelihood incomplete, as there would probably be tons of press coverage available in Chinese and English sources had a skyscraper of this scale be constructed, and the Chinese media would probably not be humble about their accomplishments had this really been constructed. All I could find is information about its geographical location, and blatantly promotional blurbs from unreliable sources like this:
361:
are two different buildings: the former is a completed building at 176m, the latter is the subject of this article which is a skyscraper under construction. It seems the baidu article you cited is referring to the former building. Their names are also different in
Chinese. (The former is
315:, the de facto Knowledge equivalent in China. Unfortunately, it doesn't have good references (and is a promotional mess), so there's not much to go off of (I'm certainly not suggesting we defer to Baidu Baike for determining notability).
208:
202:
169:
281:
142:
137:
146:
129:
262:
116:
387:
for now - if a better article can be sourced apart from a one-line stub, go ahead and recreate it, as the topic should be notable at some point if true.
101:
303:
At very first glance, I'm not able to easily find any coverage, but that's very possibly just due to my lack of proficiency in
Chinese. One database
311:
it's just a proposed project, which is what the page says. There's no page in
Chinese (at least that's been linked through Wikidata), but there is
223:
190:
401:
312:
439:
and should be deleted but with no prejudice against it being recreated if and when it does get coverage of a sufficient standard
96:
89:
17:
445:
427:
406:
379:
333:
292:
273:
254:
184:
71:
180:
133:
110:
106:
66:
230:
354:
304:
125:
77:
462:
40:
393:
196:
458:
36:
216:
388:
423:
415:
285:
266:
85:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
457:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
375:
358:
308:
62:
440:
307:
it's been completed, which would probably make it notable given its scale, but another
436:
346:
244:
240:
419:
163:
371:
53:
350:
321:
342:
453:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
418:. It appears to be proposed but not yet finished or built.
159:
155:
151:
215:
282:list of Architecture-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
465:). No further edits should be made to this page.
280:Note: This discussion has been included in the
261:Note: This discussion has been included in the
229:
8:
117:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
279:
263:list of China-related deletion discussions
260:
7:
239:No indication of notability, fails
24:
102:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
407:09:52, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
380:05:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
334:19:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
293:18:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
274:18:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
255:18:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
446:11:27, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
428:22:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
359:Changchun World Trade Center
126:Changchun World Trade Center
78:Changchun World Trade Center
72:15:33, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
92:(AfD)? Read these primers!
482:
455:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
366:贸易中心, the latter is 长春
355:World Trade Center GTC
313:an item on Baidu Baike
90:Articles for deletion
331:
319:
295:
276:
107:Guide to deletion
97:How to contribute
473:
443:
404:
396:
332:
329:
328:
326:
317:
290:
271:
251:
248:
234:
233:
219:
167:
149:
87:
58:
34:
481:
480:
476:
475:
474:
472:
471:
470:
469:
463:deletion review
441:
400:
392:
322:
320:
316:
286:
267:
249:
246:
176:
140:
124:
121:
84:
81:
70:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
479:
477:
468:
467:
449:
448:
430:
409:
382:
336:
297:
296:
277:
237:
236:
173:
120:
119:
114:
104:
99:
82:
80:
75:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
478:
466:
464:
460:
456:
451:
450:
447:
444:
438:
435:- this fails
434:
431:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
410:
408:
405:
403:
397:
395:
390:
389:SportingFlyer
386:
383:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
337:
335:
327:
325:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
298:
294:
291:
289:
283:
278:
275:
272:
270:
264:
259:
258:
257:
256:
253:
252:
242:
232:
228:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
182:
179:
178:Find sources:
174:
171:
165:
161:
157:
153:
148:
144:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
122:
118:
115:
112:
108:
105:
103:
100:
98:
95:
94:
93:
91:
86:
79:
76:
74:
73:
68:
64:
59:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
454:
452:
432:
411:
399:
391:
384:
367:
363:
338:
323:
300:
288:CAPTAIN RAJU
287:
269:CAPTAIN RAJU
268:
245:
238:
226:
220:
212:
205:
199:
193:
187:
177:
83:
55:
49:
47:
31:
28:
353:, it seems
203:free images
67:revolutions
416:WP:TOOSOON
370:贸易中心). --
345:, failing
459:talk page
442:Spiderone
37:talk page
461:or in a
170:View log
111:glossary
39:or in a
420:Bearian
301:Comment
209:WP refs
197:scholar
143:protect
138:history
88:New to
63:spin me
437:WP:GNG
433:Delete
412:Delete
385:Delete
349:. And
347:WP:GNG
339:Delete
241:WP:GNG
181:Google
147:delete
50:delete
372:Dps04
224:JSTOR
185:books
164:views
156:watch
152:links
56:78.26
16:<
424:talk
414:per
376:talk
357:and
351:Sdkb
324:Sdkb
318:{{u|
309:says
305:says
250:5969
247:Onel
217:FENS
191:news
160:logs
134:talk
130:edit
231:TWL
168:– (
426:)
378:)
368:世界
364:环球
362:长春
330:}}
284:.
265:.
243:.
211:)
162:|
158:|
154:|
150:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
65:/
52:.
422:(
402:C
398:·
394:T
374:(
343:1
235:)
227:·
221:·
213:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
183:(
175:(
172:)
166:)
128:(
113:)
109:(
69:)
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.