333:. Hi there, this my first article and I hope you'll forgive me if my response is incorrectly formatted. I added some more detail and more sources to this article. I'm not sure if they will satisfy the stated reasons for deletion, but I felt I needed to at least give it a try. I would say that some of the sources are definitely more than mentions of the subject mostly because they appear to based on the author's message and the terminology used in the book, even if they don't give full credit. I think this person is known for introducing a new technique in employee training, and has influenced multiple companies over the past two decades to use it. There has been coverage on this technique and this author for around 20 years. This person's method is now practiced in many hospitals and school systems because of their influence on two other authors to promote the same learning techniques. Thanks for your consideration. --
246:. Furthermore, Google Scholar searches returned no evidence that the subject's work is widely cited, and I tried searching both for several different forms of the subject's name, and specifically for their listed publications and those that supposedly were influenced by them–the fact that the article only cites one other author of dubious notability as the subject's legacy leads me to believe that this subject does not pass
358:, but most of the article is behind a paywall and the amount that is visible for free is not sufficiently in-depth. If it covers the subject in more depth, it would count toward the subject's notability. As for your claims that the subject's innovations have been put into practice, in the absence of sources that clearly reference or otherwise cite the subject they appear to be
462:
I did my own search as well as checking the references in the article and I don't see significant independent coverage of him. A number of the article's references don't even mention his name and many are not independent. I didn't check those behind paywalls, but the others were not enough to meet
211:
273:
362:, which is against Knowledge's policies. Saying that they "appear to be based" on Fred's publications simply because they are similar is insufficient–we need verifiable proof.
164:
351:
Looking through the additional citations you've provided, the only one that appears to potentially have the sort of in-depth coverage of the subject necessary to demonstrate
205:
311:
292:
111:
96:
171:
137:
132:
64:
141:
91:
84:
17:
226:
124:
193:
105:
101:
408:
384:
493:
40:
187:
356:
338:
183:
489:
476:
454:
423:
419:
399:
395:
373:
342:
322:
303:
284:
265:
66:
36:
334:
128:
53:
62:
233:
446:
247:
242:
None of the independent provided sources are more than mere mentions of the subject, does not pass
219:
120:
72:
56:
If you would like the article put in your userspace so can retrieve the text, please let me know.
472:
438:
315:
296:
277:
251:
80:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
488:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
199:
57:
468:
464:
434:
366:
258:
243:
445:
method was notable and well researched, then maybe the originator would be notable.
359:
158:
352:
484:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
411:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
387:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
274:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
154:
150:
146:
218:
417:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
393:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
496:). No further edits should be made to this page.
310:Note: This discussion has been included in the
291:Note: This discussion has been included in the
272:Note: This discussion has been included in the
232:
8:
312:list of Montana-related deletion discussions
293:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
112:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
309:
290:
271:
7:
24:
97:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
477:22:07, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
455:02:12, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
424:09:30, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
67:15:31, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
400:10:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
374:00:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
343:00:06, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
323:22:01, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
304:22:01, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
285:22:01, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
266:17:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
87:(AfD)? Read these primers!
513:
486:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
85:Articles for deletion
443:speed to proficiency
426:
402:
360:original research
325:
306:
287:
102:Guide to deletion
92:How to contribute
504:
433:. Does not pass
422:
416:
414:
412:
398:
392:
390:
388:
320:
301:
282:
237:
236:
222:
174:
162:
144:
82:
34:
512:
511:
507:
506:
505:
503:
502:
501:
500:
494:deletion review
427:
418:
407:
405:
403:
394:
383:
381:
365:
316:
297:
278:
257:
179:
170:
135:
119:
116:
79:
76:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
510:
508:
499:
498:
480:
479:
457:
415:
404:
391:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
363:
346:
345:
327:
326:
307:
288:
255:
240:
239:
176:
115:
114:
109:
99:
94:
77:
75:
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
509:
497:
495:
491:
487:
482:
481:
478:
474:
470:
466:
461:
458:
456:
453:
452:
449:
444:
440:
436:
432:
429:
428:
425:
421:
420:North America
413:
410:
401:
397:
396:North America
389:
386:
375:
372:
371:
370:
361:
357:
354:
350:
349:
348:
347:
344:
340:
336:
332:
329:
328:
324:
321:
319:
313:
308:
305:
302:
300:
294:
289:
286:
283:
281:
275:
270:
269:
268:
267:
264:
263:
262:
253:
249:
245:
235:
231:
228:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
185:
182:
181:Find sources:
177:
173:
169:
166:
160:
156:
152:
148:
143:
139:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:
113:
110:
107:
103:
100:
98:
95:
93:
90:
89:
88:
86:
81:
74:
71:
69:
68:
65:
63:
61:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
485:
483:
459:
450:
447:
442:
430:
406:
382:
368:
367:
335:Wordgardener
330:
318:CAPTAIN RAJU
317:
299:CAPTAIN RAJU
298:
280:CAPTAIN RAJU
279:
260:
259:
248:WP:NACADEMIC
241:
229:
223:
215:
208:
202:
196:
190:
180:
167:
121:Charles Fred
78:
73:Charles Fred
58:
54:Wordgardener
49:
47:
31:
28:
206:free images
439:WP:NAUTHOR
353:notability
252:WP:NAUTHOR
59:Ritchie333
490:talk page
441:. If the
37:talk page
492:or in a
469:Papaursa
409:Relisted
385:Relisted
369:Rosguill
364:signed,
261:Rosguill
256:signed,
165:View log
106:glossary
39:or in a
451:Outcast
448:Popular
212:WP refs
200:scholar
138:protect
133:history
83:New to
465:WP:GNG
460:Delete
435:WP:GNG
431:Delete
244:WP:GNG
184:Google
142:delete
50:delete
227:JSTOR
188:books
172:Stats
159:views
151:watch
147:links
16:<
473:talk
339:talk
331:Keep
250:and
220:FENS
194:news
155:logs
129:talk
125:edit
437:or
355:is
234:TWL
163:– (
475:)
467:.
341:)
314:.
295:.
276:.
254:.
214:)
157:|
153:|
149:|
145:|
140:|
136:|
131:|
127:|
52:.
471:(
337:(
238:)
230:·
224:·
216:·
209:·
203:·
197:·
191:·
186:(
178:(
175:)
168:·
161:)
123:(
108:)
104:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.