454:
record labels of way lesser note which have had their articles remain intact, with the goal of improving upon said articles. This record label clearly passes the smell test for both notability and credibility in today's music industry, as both the article's references and a quick web search reaffirm. You do make some interesting points
453:
There seems to be some longstanding disagreement going back a few years between the two primary contributors to this article. While I respect everybody's opinions and previous contributions, I simply see no justification for the deletion of this article at this time, especially with regards to other
424:
is not close to being met. My standards on notability for record labels are looser than most, but this is not notable by record label standards in that it has no length of history, no roster of notable artists, and can not claim to have made any perceptible impact on the direction of any particular
727:
I agree with the re-direct, and that was it's state before the article was re-created, yet again. The re-direct is useful. Repeated re-creation of this unrelated, non-notable label is not. The re-direct needs to be protected so that only extended-confirmed can edit, and I would do so except I am
765:
and the label is clearly notable in today's music industry as evidenced by its reputable sources, so at worst this article should be kept as a record label stub and added to as time goes by. I would stub it myself, but obviously I too am "very involved", so I will wait for another editor to do so.
511:
I simply do not see anything new at all which has changed in the interim to sway my opinion from the previous AfD discussion above. I do agree with the editor who "stubbed" this article (again) recently though, as this article is the perfect Record Label Stub type article in my opinion while more
362:
Article has clear credible media sources and any label under
Capitol Music and Universal getting mainstream news coverage is notable. The issue in the previous AfD appears to have been adequately addressed by the new article's author, so I respectfully disagree with you on this point Rosguill.
380:
I have no conflict of interest and have based my updated article on current newsworthy mainstream entertainment media sources. The article has been updated using such appropriately , and I even made a new edit to satisfy the question of any unclear connection to the
425:
genre. Having a joint venture (distribution deal) with a major label does not inherit notability for a record label. Now.... if Rhames goes on to have a #1 record, or even begins to sniff the charts, then we can re-evaluate, but at the very best this is
223:
82:
319:
385:. If anybody wants to disagree with my article updates that is one thing, but let's stay away from any inaccurate conflict of interest accusations based on one editor's strong opinion. Thank you. --
403:
176:
458:, and I respect your passion about this article's subject matter, but nevertheless I must again disagree with you about your proposed deletion of this article, be it due to
687:. Not creating a redirect that would be useful for the sole reason of "might be recreated" is not a good reason not to have the redirect; that's what protection is for.--
217:
281:
77:
420:
Not commenting on the reliability of the sources, the first source gives a drive-by mention, and the second source does not mention the label at all. Therefore
183:
300:
123:
108:
52:. Consensus is clear. A redirect can be created separately; no one seems to be arguing to keep the content and replace it with a redirect.
462:
or otherwise. I think Music2015's update was justified and the article should remain, albeit with further improvements as time goes by. --
814:
513:
463:
364:
149:
144:
407:
153:
842:
822:
799:
779:
747:
718:
693:
675:
650:
625:
595:
578:
541:
521:
499:
471:
448:
411:
394:
372:
352:
330:
311:
292:
273:
61:
136:
103:
96:
17:
238:
205:
742:
443:
268:
117:
113:
604:
558:
484:
861:
199:
40:
837:
818:
794:
645:
536:
517:
467:
368:
195:
254:
Non-notable record label re-created again by editor with what I strongly believe to be an undeclared COI.
140:
857:
714:
671:
495:
36:
245:
132:
67:
775:
390:
231:
832:
789:
640:
531:
689:
572:
459:
426:
323:
304:
285:
92:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
856:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
211:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
710:
667:
659:
57:
813:
Article’s references are both current and reputable enough to establish clear notability.
767:
738:
706:
684:
663:
591:
439:
382:
264:
666:
as a business. No redirect, as it will just get recreated, unless protection is applied.
771:
616:
386:
762:
702:
636:
554:
421:
345:
567:
170:
53:
729:
705:
and the only thing that can be done with the article is to give a redirect to
639:
fail. Last AfD was a redirect, no issue if that's the ultimate decision here.
587:
430:
255:
565:: IPs have not edited outside this AfD and 68.202.197.64 has !voted twice.
402:
This article should be a Stub for now with AfD consideration withdrawn. --
512:
notable information and reliable sources get added to it over time. --
788:
You've already voted keep above, so I have struck your second vote.
530:
You've already voted keep above, so I have struck your second vote.
831:
You've already voted keep above, so I have struck your third vote.
341:
none of the issues raised in the previous AfD have been addressed.
852:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
607:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
487:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
320:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
561:
and pointing at nonexistent "clear credible media sources".
166:
162:
158:
230:
83:
Articles for deletion/Cheiron
Records (2nd nomination)
613:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
493:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
864:). No further edits should be made to this page.
318:Note: This discussion has been included in the
299:Note: This discussion has been included in the
280:Note: This discussion has been included in the
282:list of Business-related deletion discussions
244:
8:
124:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
317:
301:list of Music-related deletion discussions
298:
279:
75:
557:. Keep voters' arguments are a mix of
404:2603:9001:305:6F00:F5E9:1FD2:9F28:3A54
78:Articles for deletion/Cheiron Records
7:
74:
24:
770:is definitely not appropriate. --
555:the general notability guideline
109:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
766:Re-directing this article to
843:20:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
823:20:05, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
800:20:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
780:19:56, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
748:13:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
719:12:41, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
694:14:12, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
676:14:10, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
651:13:18, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
626:10:20, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
596:18:29, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
579:01:06, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
542:20:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
522:18:20, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
500:01:10, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
412:01:36, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
62:21:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
472:02:24, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
449:23:48, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
395:23:34, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
373:20:48, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
353:19:29, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
331:18:35, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
312:18:35, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
293:18:35, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
274:18:19, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
99:(AfD)? Read these primers!
881:
728:obviously very INVOLVED.
854:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
658:Zero coverage, failing
761:Article does not fail
73:AfDs for this article:
97:Articles for deletion
559:"other stuff exists"
383:old Cheiron Studios
628:
624:
502:
333:
314:
295:
114:Guide to deletion
104:How to contribute
872:
840:
797:
734:
692:
648:
623:
621:
614:
612:
610:
608:
575:
570:
539:
498:
492:
490:
488:
435:
328:
309:
290:
260:
249:
248:
234:
186:
174:
156:
94:
34:
880:
879:
875:
874:
873:
871:
870:
869:
868:
862:deletion review
836:
793:
768:Cheiron Studios
746:
730:
707:Cheiron Studios
701:.Clearly fails
688:
685:Cheiron Studios
644:
629:
617:
615:
603:
601:
573:
568:
535:
503:
494:
483:
481:
447:
431:
344:
324:
305:
286:
272:
256:
191:
182:
147:
133:Cheiron Records
131:
128:
91:
88:
71:
68:Cheiron Records
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
878:
876:
867:
866:
848:
847:
846:
845:
826:
825:
805:
804:
803:
802:
783:
782:
753:
752:
751:
750:
736:
722:
721:
696:
678:
653:
611:
600:
599:
598:
581:
563:Note to closer
547:
546:
545:
544:
525:
524:
491:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
437:
415:
414:
397:
375:
356:
355:
342:
335:
334:
315:
296:
262:
252:
251:
188:
127:
126:
121:
111:
106:
89:
87:
86:
85:
80:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
877:
865:
863:
859:
855:
850:
849:
844:
841:
839:
834:
833:SportingFlyer
830:
829:
828:
827:
824:
820:
816:
815:68.202.197.64
812:
811:
807:
806:
801:
798:
796:
791:
790:SportingFlyer
787:
786:
785:
784:
781:
777:
773:
769:
764:
760:
759:
755:
754:
749:
744:
740:
735:
733:
726:
725:
724:
723:
720:
716:
712:
708:
704:
700:
697:
695:
691:
686:
682:
679:
677:
673:
669:
665:
661:
657:
656:Strong Delete
654:
652:
649:
647:
642:
641:SportingFlyer
638:
634:
631:
630:
627:
622:
620:
609:
606:
597:
593:
589:
585:
582:
580:
577:
576:
571:
564:
560:
556:
552:
549:
548:
543:
540:
538:
533:
532:SportingFlyer
529:
528:
527:
526:
523:
519:
515:
514:68.202.197.64
510:
509:
505:
504:
501:
497:
496:North America
489:
486:
473:
469:
465:
464:68.202.197.64
461:
457:
452:
451:
450:
445:
441:
436:
434:
428:
423:
419:
418:
417:
416:
413:
409:
405:
401:
398:
396:
392:
388:
384:
379:
376:
374:
370:
366:
365:68.202.197.64
361:
358:
357:
354:
351:
350:
349:
340:
337:
336:
332:
329:
327:
321:
316:
313:
310:
308:
302:
297:
294:
291:
289:
283:
278:
277:
276:
275:
270:
266:
261:
259:
247:
243:
240:
237:
233:
229:
225:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
197:
194:
193:Find sources:
189:
185:
181:
178:
172:
168:
164:
160:
155:
151:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
129:
125:
122:
119:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
101:
100:
98:
93:
84:
81:
79:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
853:
851:
835:
809:
808:
792:
757:
756:
731:
698:
690:SkyGazer 512
680:
655:
643:
632:
618:
602:
583:
566:
562:
550:
534:
507:
506:
482:
455:
432:
399:
377:
359:
347:
346:
338:
326:CAPTAIN RAJU
325:
307:CAPTAIN RAJU
306:
288:CAPTAIN RAJU
287:
257:
253:
241:
235:
227:
220:
214:
208:
202:
192:
179:
90:
49:
47:
31:
28:
810:Strong Keep
743:revolutions
711:Vinodbasker
668:scope_creep
444:revolutions
269:revolutions
218:free images
619:Sandstein
460:WP:TOOSOON
427:WP:TOOSOON
858:talk page
772:Music2015
660:WP:SIGCOV
387:Music2015
37:talk page
860:or in a
681:Redirect
664:WP:NCORP
605:Relisted
485:Relisted
348:Rosguill
343:signed,
177:View log
118:glossary
39:or in a
739:spin me
584:Delete.
440:spin me
265:spin me
224:WP refs
212:scholar
150:protect
145:history
95:New to
763:WP:GNG
703:WP:GNG
699:Delete
637:WP:GNG
635:clear
633:Delete
553:fails
551:Delete
422:WP:GNG
339:Delete
196:Google
154:delete
54:Drmies
50:delete
732:78.26
588:Szzuk
456:78.26
433:78.26
258:78.26
239:JSTOR
200:books
184:Stats
171:views
163:watch
159:links
16:<
838:talk
819:talk
795:talk
776:talk
758:Keep
715:talk
672:talk
662:and
646:talk
592:talk
586:NN.
569:Tera
537:talk
518:talk
508:Keep
468:talk
408:talk
400:Keep
391:talk
378:Keep
369:talk
360:Keep
232:FENS
206:news
167:logs
141:talk
137:edit
58:talk
683:to
574:TIX
429:.
246:TWL
175:– (
821:)
778:)
741:/
717:)
674:)
594:)
520:)
470:)
442:/
410:)
393:)
371:)
363:--
322:.
303:.
284:.
267:/
226:)
169:|
165:|
161:|
157:|
152:|
148:|
143:|
139:|
60:)
817:(
774:(
745:)
737:(
713:(
709:.
670:(
590:(
516:(
466:(
446:)
438:(
406:(
389:(
367:(
271:)
263:(
250:)
242:·
236:·
228:·
221:·
215:·
209:·
203:·
198:(
190:(
187:)
180:·
173:)
135:(
120:)
116:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.