162:
313:. I'd keep it if there was evidence that there is an unofficial term in common use in Leeds, but the closest thing I could find was a letter to the Yorkshire Evening Post saying that there should be a Chinatown.
156:
117:
289:
122:
90:
85:
94:
77:
177:
144:
17:
318:
138:
385:
36:
384:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
314:
134:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
370:
344:
322:
304:
279:
248:
231:
213:
59:
328:
81:
184:
244:
209:
194:
73:
65:
203:
170:
270:
150:
340:
300:
227:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
240:
363:
55:
355:
265:
257:
359:
336:
296:
261:
223:
198:
111:
50:
378:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
193:
There is no
Chinatown in Leeds, yet we have an article here on
107:
103:
99:
335:
saying that
Chinatown plans were likely scuppered? ☺
169:
197:. There are no sources, and this reads like pure
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
388:). No further edits should be made to this page.
183:
8:
290:list of England-related deletion discussions
284:
288:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
222:- Unwikified original essay.
60:00:08, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
371:17:34, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
345:10:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
323:08:22, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
305:00:50, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
280:00:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
249:22:58, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
232:16:17, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
214:16:10, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
405:
381:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
315:Chris Neville-Smith
44:The result was
307:
293:
239:WP:OR violation.
212:
396:
383:
368:
294:
277:
268:
208:
202:
195:Chinatown, Leeds
188:
187:
173:
125:
115:
97:
74:Chinatown, Leeds
66:Chinatown, Leeds
34:
404:
403:
399:
398:
397:
395:
394:
393:
392:
386:deletion review
379:
364:
271:
266:
206:
130:
121:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
402:
400:
391:
390:
374:
373:
349:
348:
347:
308:
282:
251:
234:
191:
190:
127:
123:AfD statistics
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
401:
389:
387:
382:
376:
375:
372:
369:
367:
361:
357:
353:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
332:
326:
325:
324:
320:
316:
312:
309:
306:
302:
298:
291:
287:
283:
281:
278:
276:
275:
269:
263:
259:
255:
252:
250:
246:
242:
238:
235:
233:
229:
225:
221:
218:
217:
216:
215:
211:
205:
200:
196:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
124:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
380:
377:
365:
351:
330:
329:the earlier
310:
285:
273:
272:
253:
236:
219:
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
327:You missed
241:scope_creep
157:free images
366:Joaquin008
297:• Gene93k
274:--Talk--
267:Guoguo12
204:Timneu22
118:View log
337:Uncle G
333:article
256:as per
224:Carrite
163:WP refs
151:scholar
91:protect
86:history
356:WP:GNG
354:- Per
352:Delete
311:Delete
258:WP:GNG
254:Delete
237:Delete
220:Delete
135:Google
95:delete
46:delete
360:WP:OR
262:WP:OR
199:WP:OR
178:JSTOR
139:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
48:. --
16:<
358:and
341:talk
319:talk
301:talk
286:Note
260:and
245:talk
228:talk
210:talk
201:. —
171:FENS
145:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
331:YEP
295:--
185:TWL
120:•
116:– (
362:.
343:)
321:)
303:)
292:.
264:.
247:)
230:)
165:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
339:(
317:(
299:(
243:(
226:(
207:·
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.