Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Chinese threat theory - Knowledge

Source 📝

522:
part of one "thing". The subject seems to have vanishingly little substance outside of detailing China's foreign politics, which is contained in other articles. The article should either be deleted, or its scope defined much more narrowly about a specific 'theory', either self-professed or at least as the label China has begun applying in its rhetoric.
521:
The article itself seems synthetic, relying on headline phraseology to create a topic where one does not readily exist: it admits it is not covering one specific 'theory', but rather collating every assorted way another polity has characterized China as a threat, without justifying why they are all
460:
and is ready for mainspace (I'd rate it as C-class, not B-class, but shrug). If the nom thinks there are some essay like part, I recommend they either fix them or list them on talk so that the student can do so (the assignment will be graded in mid to late
204: 198: 161: 481:, the only problem I could envision is if there already was an article on the topic. If that was the case, then the newer article should be merged into the older article. 456:
for the ping. I am indeed the instructor supervising this. And yes, this is a translation from zh. While the article needs copyediting and whatsnot, I believe it meets
283: 360: 279: 275: 287: 108: 93: 134: 129: 138: 271: 121: 348: 352: 322:: Article could use some work, but the first few sources cited suggest this is a subject that has broad recognition and thus passes 308: 219: 344: 186: 88: 81: 17: 180: 165: 102: 98: 535: 513: 496: 473: 444: 423: 394: 372: 335: 313: 264: 248: 63: 125: 176: 552: 389: 40: 226: 331: 411: 509: 548: 303: 117: 69: 36: 381: 261: 491: 212: 192: 530: 432: 419: 327: 236: 505: 467: 77: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
547:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
292: 244: 367: 356: 258: 483: 523: 457: 453: 436: 415: 323: 343:. Extensive independent, significant coverage from leading media outlets, including 463: 405: 155: 240: 380:
It appears notable, doesn't look bad enough that deletion is the best option.
364: 54: 410:. Also seems to be at least partially a translated article from 543:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
363:, as well as a plethora of primary academic work on the topic. 402:
This seems to be a WikiEd article so pinging the prof:
151: 147: 143: 211: 257:no sufficient policy-based argument has been made. 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 555:). No further edits should be made to this page. 270:Note: This discussion has been included in the 225: 8: 109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 269: 504:per all forementioned reasons above. 464:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 7: 24: 431:The article is not exclusively a 388:Ping me or leave a message on my 274:lists for the following topics: 94:Introduction to deletion process 435:violation to warrent an AfD 𐩘 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 514:11:56, 30 November 2023 (UTC) 497:20:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 474:10:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 445:08:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 424:05:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 395:00:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 373:20:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC) 336:15:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) 314:05:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) 265:06:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC) 249:03:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC) 235:This could be a violation of 536:18:12, 1 December 2023 (UTC) 64:06:27, 4 December 2023 (UTC) 239:and is worth a discussion. 84:(AfD)? Read these primers! 572: 531: 545:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 166:edits since nomination 118:Chinese threat theory 82:Articles for deletion 70:Chinese threat theory 361:The Times of India 422: 316: 99:Guide to deletion 89:How to contribute 563: 533: 528: 495: 488: 470: 418: 409: 311: 306: 299: 295: 272:deletion sorting 230: 229: 215: 159: 141: 79: 62: 34: 571: 570: 566: 565: 564: 562: 561: 560: 559: 553:deletion review 524: 484: 482: 472: 468: 403: 383:Alextejthompson 370: 309: 304: 297: 293: 172: 132: 116: 113: 76: 73: 53: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 569: 567: 558: 557: 539: 538: 516: 499: 476: 462: 447: 426: 397: 375: 368: 349:New York Times 338: 317: 267: 233: 232: 169: 112: 111: 106: 96: 91: 74: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 568: 556: 554: 550: 546: 541: 540: 537: 534: 529: 527: 520: 517: 515: 511: 507: 503: 500: 498: 493: 489: 487: 480: 477: 475: 471: 465: 459: 455: 451: 448: 446: 443: 442: 441: 434: 430: 427: 425: 421: 417: 413: 407: 401: 398: 396: 392: 391: 385: 384: 379: 376: 374: 371: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 339: 337: 333: 329: 328:WeirdNAnnoyed 325: 321: 318: 315: 312: 307: 302: 301: 300: 289: 285: 281: 277: 273: 268: 266: 263: 260: 256: 253: 252: 251: 250: 246: 242: 238: 228: 224: 221: 218: 214: 210: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 178: 175: 174:Find sources: 170: 167: 163: 157: 153: 149: 145: 140: 136: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 114: 110: 107: 104: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 86: 85: 83: 78: 71: 68: 66: 65: 61: 59: 58: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 544: 542: 525: 519:Lean delete. 518: 506:Tumbuka Arch 501: 485: 478: 461:December).-- 449: 439: 437: 428: 399: 387: 382: 377: 340: 319: 296: 291: 254: 234: 222: 216: 208: 201: 195: 189: 183: 173: 75: 56: 55: 49: 47: 31: 28: 433:WP:NOTESSAY 237:WP:NOTESSAY 199:free images 469:reply here 353:Al Jazeera 259:Buckshot06 549:talk page 492:reasoning 486:Abductive 452:. Thanks 390:talk page 357:The Times 298:Quidditch 284:Economics 37:talk page 551:or in a 526:Remsense 454:Jumpytoo 416:Jumpytoo 280:Politics 276:Military 162:View log 103:glossary 39:or in a 406:Piotrus 400:Comment 345:Reuters 286:, and 205:WP refs 193:scholar 135:protect 130:history 80:New to 458:WP:GNG 324:WP:GNG 262:(talk) 241:Amigao 177:Google 139:delete 502:Keep: 365:Owen× 288:China 220:JSTOR 181:books 156:views 148:watch 144:links 16:< 510:talk 479:Keep 450:Keep 440:pass 438:Data 429:Keep 420:Talk 378:Keep 341:Keep 332:talk 320:Keep 255:Keep 245:talk 213:FENS 187:news 152:logs 126:talk 122:edit 50:keep 359:, 227:TWL 160:– ( 52:‎. 512:) 414:. 412:zh 393:) 355:, 351:, 347:, 334:) 294:WC 290:. 282:, 278:, 247:) 207:) 164:| 154:| 150:| 146:| 142:| 137:| 133:| 128:| 124:| 60:iz 532:留 508:( 494:) 490:( 466:| 408:: 404:@ 386:( 369:☎ 330:( 326:. 310:✎ 305:☎ 243:( 231:) 223:· 217:· 209:· 202:· 196:· 190:· 184:· 179:( 171:( 168:) 158:) 120:( 105:) 101:( 57:L

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Liz
06:27, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Chinese threat theory

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Chinese threat theory
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
edits since nomination
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.