1424:
literature, so to delete it would possibly be worse than keeping it, because students will encounter it in source documents or fictional literature of the past and not know what it is. Having the redirect is helpful for educating people, and being non-xenophobic would lead to ignorance. Also, as I stated in my previous comment, the term "Chinese virus" has been received consistent usage in
English literature since 1984. It occurred to me that since the great firewall blocks wikipedia, the only Chinese we risk offending are expats, those on VPNs, and those in Taiwan and maybe Hong Kong/Macau. Unfortunately, the expats are the ones most vulnerable to xenophobia, especially now.--
382:: The term "Chinese virus" is being used widely in the media to refer to COVID-19 (because Trump is using the term). It is likely that some readers will hear the term and not know (or care) about whether it's an appropriate way to describe COVID-19 — and search for information about the current pandemic using "Chinese virus". Those readers should be directed to the COVID-19 information that they're looking for. It's not often that an AfD discussion about a disambiguation page could actually affect whether someone can find life-saving information, but these are interesting times. We should direct those readers to the information that they need. —
1638:, and others. This month it is also part of China wanting reasonably to distance the association and of other nations to use in framing border closures. It is also this week or so become associated to claims of racism, and MULTIPLE article links mentioned here. None of these are so dominant as to justify it being a redirect and shutting off the other links, and it would be helpful to lead readers to the associated links. Cheers
52:. The articles on the current disease and the virus do not use the phrase "Chinese virus" at all, so would make poor redirect targets. The article's on Donald Trump's use of the phrase do include the term, but as pointed out are not likely to be the topic sought either. If content about the nomenclature is added to COVID-19, no prejudice in this close for redirecting there then. --
2493:. The links on that page are 1) A ban on all citizens from some countries on entering the US, regardless of religion 2) A ban on a legal system, which is also banned by some Muslims 3 & 4) Bans on face covering regardless of religion, including those worn by a minority of Muslim women. The deletion discussion on the redirect of "Muslim ban" to the Trump order
2072:: The only current references to "Chinese virus" or "China virus" that I've seen are quotes from Trump and other right-wing politicians in the United States. This is not the common name for SARS-CoV-2. The only appropriate subject for an article titled "China virus" or "Chinese virus" would be the use of that term by American politicians, not the virus itself. -
2496:
said that it should be kept for being a valid search term based on social media trends, rather than for it being factual, neutral or accurate: "This RfD is pedantic and only impedes readers using a very popular name that has been widely bandied about in the news and social media", "this redirect is a
1580:
Not necessarily. Just like people searching for the
Spanish flu are looking for information about the Spanish flu and not about anti-Spanish sentiment, people searching for this term are most likely looking for information about the pandemic/virus, not about anti-China sentiment. It's more helpful to
1199:
I'm quite confidence that people searching for "Chinese virus" when they're trying to learn about Covid-19, just like people searching for "n*..." aren't actually looking for articles about black people. I don't believe that anyone is actually that stupid. But guess what - I'm basing my response here
1020:
as I said below, "a Google News search for "Chinese virus" gives me 8.4 million hits, while "Chinese virus" -Trump gives me fewer than 78k hits". This is overwhelmingly a
Trumpian slur. No one looking for it is looking for the top, though a few of them might be looking for Knowledge to validate their
907:
This is a name applied to the present COVID-19. Normally we do not require sources for disambiguation, but in this case, I would want to see sources about these other conditions because I am unclear if anyone ever called them "Chinese virus". I have no objection to anyone creating a page for "viruses
1284:
Is the term "Chinese virus" even used to any significant extent outside the United States? In the context in which it is used, by right-wing
American politicians, it is a xenophobic term. But even more to the point, "Chinese virus" is simply not a widely used name for SARS-CoV-2. It is widely called
1835:
Yes, they can lose validity. The references you're citing are all from the very early days of reporting on the virus, before it even had a name, and when the virus was largely confined to China. The virus now has a name, and it's not confined to China. In fact, China is now one of the less-affected
1780:
can use the phrase "China virus" and if some people use it is bad and if other people use it is good. By the way, I, for one, do not like French food. What kind of mental gymnastics would it take to say I have anything against France, a country I love, have lived in, and will return to literally a
518:
page is currently under discussion about moving it to a non-xenophobic name. Maybe we should wait and see what they do and do the same for consistency? It seems undesirable to say
Chinese virus is xenophobic but Spanish flu is okay, or Spanish flu is xenophobic and Chinese virus is okay. I can live
355:. But that already excludes the use of the U.S. President, whom is using "Chinese virus" to refer to the COVID-19 virus. Thus, if you ignore Trump's personal terminology, there is still actual use of this as an actual virus name (that is not COVID-19 related, and not human-virus-related either). --
1067:
Do not direct to anything about Donald Trump. The term was used before the United States president, is currently used by tens of millions now who are not Trump (including United States members of
Congress, Secretary of States, news anchors), and when people search the term they are not looking for
1887:
said that "Chinese coronavirus infections, death toll soar." They're discussing the number of coronavirus infections in China, not the number of infections with "Chinese coronavirus." Remember that back at this early date, the virus had no name and almost all known cases were in China. Both facts
1043:
It is not a slur. The
President of the United States receiving wide coverage for using it, has nothing to do with what people are using the word for. No one searching for the term on Knowledge is looking for information on the United States President. It's a phrase that refers to a virus. They're
1240:. Knowledge may contain content that some readers consider objectionable or offensive—even exceedingly so. Attempting to ensure that articles and images will be acceptable to all readers, or will adhere to general social or religious norms, is incompatible with the purposes of an encyclopedia.
1802:
The latest source in your list is from 27 January, barely a month after the discovery of the virus. Back then, the virus was not yet known to have spread widely outside China. I don't see any sources nowadays referring to the "Chinese virus" or "China virus," except when quoting Trump or other
1423:
and it is a redirect to syphilis. If that isn't xenophobic, I don't know what is, especially since historically it originated in the
Americas and from what I understand it came to Europe with explorers from a different country, not France. Yet the term "French disease" is common in historical
1269:
I also want to point out that "chinese" is not a race it is a nationality, and "xenophobic" as a term is also largely useless in a global context (English
Knowledge is used in nearly every country on earth), so determining whether something "validates" xenophobia or not is also an exercise in
1753:
when he says "China virus" or "Chinese virus". Both terms have been widely criticized as being racist, and there has been a strong uptick in racist attacks on
Chinese and other Asian people in the United States. His words have very unfortunate consequences, much to the joy of his xenophobic
1147:
Do you have any sources to support this? As far as I can tell, this is just another Trumpian slur. While I know that the Google test is less that ideal, a Google News search for "Chinese virus" gives me 8.4 million hits, while "Chinese virus" -Trump gives me fewer than 78k hits.
1122:
target this should go to, but by no means should this be used as a vehicle to promote a political point of view. And I say that as someone who shares that point of view: full disclosure, I think Trump is a venal idiot. But that should not be reflected in the outcome of this
1218:
All else aside, if you're trying to make a moral argument, there are two sides at play. Even if you're right, even if some people come here looking for Covid-19, the slur you're saying we should normalise is rooted in the kind of hateful bigotry that leaves us with this:
1177:
I understand that most people who hear and use the phrase "Chinese virus" are likely Trump fans, and can appreciate the the schadenfreude in sending them to an article on Trump instead of what they're looking for. But is that really what you want to use Knowledge for?
1351:
to one of the articles related to the virus or pandemic. The term has in fact been widely used (not just by Trump) or discussed, so regardless of whether some see it as offensive towards China, there is no reason not to keep this as a disambiguation page or redirect
1558:
1220:
1173:
I don't know what you mean by "sources" in determining where a redirect goes. The idea is to get readers to the material they're looking for. The issue is not how often the term occurs ion media relating to Trump; it's what the readers using the term are looking
490:
es. As search terms, the neutral search would lead to the list of viruses for both "China" and "Chinese" as good and valid search term redirects, while the recentism search would lead to a COVID-19 topic (the pandemic, the disease or the virus articles) --
511:
2014:
in using the names "CoVID-19" and "SARS-CoV-2," unless you think that the world is about to adopt the phrases that Trump and his political allies have been insisting on using, "Chinese virus," "China virus," etc. "Chinese virus" is simply not the
1820:
lose no validity as time goes by. The 9/11 Knowledge entry, for example, includes many citations from September 2001. Are you seriously proposing those reliable sources be deleted because they were written in the immediate aftermath of 9/11?
661:
Donald Trump said that “It’s not racist at all”. China's government reject US and said that it is “stigmatization". WHO official warns against calling it 'Chinese virus' and says 'there is no blame in this'. Hence, “Chinese virus” has a wide
981:
because the criticisms relate to his racial motives and xenophobic base. Trump just uses the slur to appeal to his xenophobic base. It doesn't deserve an article. Someone is bound to use it as a search term, so make a redirect out of it. --
2112:
I said "current references." January 23rd is not current, especially in the context of SARS-CoV-2. You know that I'm aware of this reference, because I responded to you above, so I'd appreciate a bit less sarcasm and a bit more good faith.
657:
have used the name “Chinese virus” before. And some similar names, such as “Wuhan virus”, “Chinese Coronavirus”, has been used by Mike Pompeo and Fox News host respectively. Hence, “Chinese virus” and these similar names have been used
1621:
As disambiguation page. Do not redirect, instead have separate links to the associated usages. Look, ‘China virus’ or ‘Chinese virus’ is at least ALSO an informal phrasing, including for SARS in 2003. It has recently been used in
2518:, a type of Ebola named by Americans after a place in Virginia. There is even a particular breed of this virus named after Pennsylvania. As Ebola has a worse reputation than SARS, maybe you can take some solace in in knowing this.--
1836:
areas of the world at the moment. I haven't seen any publication refer to "China virus" or "Chinese virus" in months now, except to quote Trump or other right-wing American politicians. "China virus" is not a name for SARS-CoV-2. -
1270:
futility. For example, and I do not mean to be flippant, China is perhaps one of the most xenophobic places on earth both as a matter of culture and national policy. Does Knowledge having on article on China validate xenophobia?
1385:
or another article related to the virus. WP:ATP does not apply here; the tone of the dab page is as neutral as any other, and wikipedia is not censored. This term has received widespread coverage by reliable sources.
935:. It os not an accurate name for the virus, not used by any expert or WHO, nor is it in common use. It's use by a demagogue is more relevant for the article of said demagogue than for any virus. And yes, obviously
206:
1854:
cease to have validity by your own personal deadlines, and get on deleting all the September 2001 sources in the 9/11 article. Once the policy is in place, then we can have this conversation again. Cheerio,
347:; there are several more viruses that are named after places in China, so "Chinese virus" would be an appropriate search term for all these viruses. If this is deleted, then it should redirect to either
772:
417:
Knowledge is not censored. This does not seem to meet any criteria for deletion, and the term is used by many across the world, including the United States president. Removing would be unencyclopedic.
1876:. Early reports didn't have any name to call the virus, because no name existed back then - it was only discovered in late December 2019, and only began to be covered by Western press in January 2020.
591:
given that the pandemic is a major news item at the moment, so it makes more sense to have it as a disambiguation page instead of a direct redirect to SARS-CoV-2 that adds a hatnote pointing users to
1115:
of you who are posting such suggestions really believe that a reader is searching on "Chinese virus" so they can read about Trump? Really? No. They're obviously trying to be educated about a virus.
1888:
have now changed - the virus has a name and the vast majority of cases are outside China. Nowadays, "China virus" or "Chinese virus" is a political slogan, not a widely used name for SARS-CoV-2. -
1390:
makes a good point; Knowledge has always contained content that some people have found offensive, and, as much as I fully understand it if you hate Trump, a redirect or dab page isn't xenophobic.
1463:. This should be used as a redirect due to the term's appearance in reliable sources. This is not an attack page because of that fact. It could be considered offensive (I don't think it is), but
418:
1604:
1223:. I don't believe that's your aim, but the logical consequence of having Knowledge validate this slur is more racist and xenophobic attacks. Normalising this slur puts people's lives at risk.
579:
because "Chinese virus" could refer to past flus associated with China, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, the 2019-20 coronavirus pandemic, or the virus that causes mosaic disease in plants. While
575:
because it is not an attack page; it does not disparage the viruses and the tone of the page is about as neutral as one could make it. Having a disambiguation page is consistent with
278:
1749:, all of your sources are talking about the course of the disease in China. You may have misunderstood the discussion. There is no question that the virus originated in China, but
775:(to clarify, the hierarchy of headings has this as a subsection of "Misinformation by governments"). Either way, the rd needs to be explained by showing the source of this name.
2396:
2005:"Especially in scientific and academic fields, older sources may be inaccurate because new information has been brought to light, new theories proposed, or vocabulary changed."
1884:
1656:
322:
1631:
1356:). More than 500 people searched for this term on the English Knowledge the day before the disambiguation page was nominated for deletion. We don't delete the article on the
159:
200:
2007:
Every source you've cited comes from the very early days of reporting on the virus, before it even had a name. It has a name now, and that name is not "Chinese virus."
2180:--I've attempted to address some of the pro-delete voters' concerns on the disambig page, feel free to check it out or join the discussion on the talk page there.--
1655:
Unfortunately, the term is being widely used for the current virus, but it is also used for other viruses so it should be kept. A discussion is going on on over at
1514:
1489:
1460:
1327:
1073:
1069:
878:
764:
580:
318:
258:
1044:
looking for information on that virus. He did not invent it, and many people used it before him. Redirecting it to anything related to Trump would be ridiculous.
1873:. It specifically mentions changing vocabulary. All the sources you listed above are from 27 January or earlier. The disease was only named on 11 February 2020:
881:. I think the media has overblown this one because, although I'm against racism, it's not incorrect to call a virus that originated in China, a "Chinese virus".
1883:
headline was "China virus death toll rises to 42 " This is shorthand for "Death toll in China rises to 42," not "Death toll from the China virus rises to 42."
298:
1467:. Also, consider the above comments about Spanish flu and French disease, neither of which are proper names for the infection but we still have the pages.
453:
106:
2372:
91:
2497:
highly plausible search term for its current target" "This executive order is often referred to as the Muslim Ban in the media and on social platforms"
1659:
about whether the term should be used in the main article, but it has relatively few contributors so I hope other will join so we can reach consensus.
2296:
2140:. This is a simple phrase that can be far better covered in the article on Donald Trump's racial views than this racism-legitimising disambiguation.
1166:
believe readers searching on "Chinese virus" are looking for information on Trump, and not for information on the current pandemic? Really? Really?
464:
virus"es, and they're partial matches to boot. SARS wasn't called the "Chinese virus", other than as a simple adjective-noun pairing. Would you list
665:
In conclusion, “Chinese virus” and these similar name have been used widely. And “Chinese virus' has a wide dispute. Hence, we should be based on
2475:
2442:
1285:
either by the name of the disease, "CoVID-19," or by the name of the virus, "SARS-CoV-2," or by the family the virus belongs to, "Coronavirus." -
771:
already leads (the third paragraph of the lead discusses nomenclature, and could almost form a new section, especially with this addition?), or
1627:
706:
Furthermore, in this case, the view of the World Health Organization should be regarded as an opinion, and should not be regarded as a fact. --
592:
1597:
Keep this article as it is, with the proper name, Chinese Virus, after the corrupt, communist government that allowed it to infect the world
2453:
1880:
635:
166:
2198:
Excellent additions and certainly should remove any concerns. It is so rare to see so much animus towards deleting a mere disambig page.
2019:
that the virus is known by. Who, outside of Trump and a few other right-wing political figures in the US, do you see using this phrase? -
1445:
to COVID-19, regardless of whether it's offensive or not, the term is used to refer to this current pandemic originating from China. --
492:
422:
356:
1608:
1492:
per Epiphyllumlover's logic. Trump uses it as a slur, but that doesn't keep it from being useful in directing readers appropriately.
132:
127:
1946:
clearly says: "Sources of any age may be prone to recentism, and this needs to be balanced out by careful editing." Please avoid
136:
2322:
1522:
1237:
86:
79:
17:
721:
688:
119:
221:
514:
the term dates back to 1959. Most use is found starting in 1984. It does not appear to be a fad term. I might add that the
188:
853:
2502:
2137:
1874:
1200:
on policy, not on my faith in humanity. As for the rest of it? Schadenfreude? You've been here long enough to know that
1000:
978:
893:
746:. None of the virus species mentioned on the list of virus species are ever referred to as simply “Chinese virus”. --
524:
2494:
2240:
1404:
100:
96:
1518:
1275:
1081:
1049:
855:), so this is actually an accurate name. The nominator is misguided as this has zero elements of an attack page.--
2544:
2523:
2185:
2145:
1543:
1538:
about whether it is appropriate to indicate the potential pejorative sense on the existing disambiguation page.--
1429:
1335:
532:
40:
2158:
1485:
974:
845:
824:
556:
379:
182:
2476:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/23/coronavirus-panic-spreads-in-china-with-three-cities-in-lockdown
2443:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/23/coronavirus-panic-spreads-in-china-with-three-cities-in-lockdown
1072:
as historically together it refers to more than just one virus, however perhaps we can emphasize it by having
1068:
information about him. They are looking for information about a virus. I also do not recommend redirecting to
2498:
1581:
our readers to explain the term and its use in an article about the pandemic, and redirect the term there. --
2347:
2118:
2077:
2024:
1893:
1841:
1808:
1290:
520:
1950:. This is why the 9/11 articles have so many sources from the earliest days. Same principles apply here.
631:
2527:
2506:
2454:
https://www.france24.com/en/20200125-china-virus-death-toll-rises-to-41-more-than-1-300-infected-worldwide
2207:
2189:
2170:
2149:
2122:
2107:
2081:
2042:
2028:
1959:
1897:
1864:
1845:
1830:
1812:
1790:
1763:
1741:
1668:
1664:
1647:
1612:
1590:
1571:
1547:
1526:
1501:
1497:
1476:
1472:
1451:
1433:
1411:
1369:
1339:
1294:
1279:
1232:
1213:
1187:
1157:
1135:
1085:
1053:
1030:
1012:
991:
987:
962:
948:
921:
916:
899:
864:
836:
815:
794:
763:
to some page to which has been added a sourced statement that this is Donald Trump's terminology: either
755:
728:
695:
639:
613:
584:
563:
536:
500:
496:
481:
477:
469:
442:
426:
406:
391:
364:
360:
333:
329:
310:
290:
270:
250:
178:
61:
2540:
1643:
1387:
1353:
1271:
1104:
1098:; I don't have a strong opinion about which should be the primary name and which should be the redirect.
1077:
1045:
596:
457:
348:
344:
36:
1094:
As I say above, I think this is best merged with and redirected to the overlapping disambiguation page
2489:- the inaccuracy and partisan nature of "China virus" is no different to another disambiguation page,
1639:
852:. The virus originated in China (despite propaganda from the Chinese government that states otherwise
627:
2519:
2203:
2181:
2141:
2103:
2016:
1955:
1935:
1860:
1826:
1786:
1737:
1600:
1539:
1425:
1331:
849:
528:
228:
2400:
1567:
1228:
1209:
1153:
1026:
1008:
832:
751:
606:
588:
549:
402:
387:
214:
2265:
2416:
2114:
2073:
2020:
1889:
1837:
1804:
1535:
1286:
1111:. I am no fan of Trump, but such a targeting would be a huge disservice to Knowledge readers. Do
714:
681:
599:
would make it implausible to hatnote and instead, the list is linked in the disambiguation page.
352:
123:
57:
317:
Note: A similar discussion is taking place over whether the term should be included in the main
2227:
472:? That just leaves COVID-19, and that minor Trump idiocy isn't even mentioned in that article.
2273:
2038:
2011:
1947:
1939:
1759:
1660:
1586:
1493:
1468:
1365:
983:
909:
743:
473:
433:
Obvious IP-sock. No real first-time user goes to an AfD to argue about criteria for deletion.
325:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
2539:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
2166:
2000:
1943:
1870:
1464:
958:
944:
888:
860:
438:
2098:: ten cities locked down and Beijing festivities scrapped and similar sources cited above.
544:
The WHO said it is racist, and all regions should not to use this term. It also applies to
194:
2429:
2199:
2099:
1951:
1856:
1822:
1797:
1782:
1746:
1733:
1446:
1398:
576:
306:
286:
266:
246:
2373:"WHO official warns against calling it 'Chinese virus,' says 'there is no blame in this'"
1318:
the name is not offensive or racist. However I do think the page is pretty useless, also
2464:
1563:
1420:
1224:
1205:
1183:
1149:
1131:
1022:
1004:
873:
is an attack page. Primary topic seems to be the current coronavirus, so I recommend a
828:
827:. It is not a separate concept. It refers to the coronavirus that originated in China.
811:
785:
747:
666:
600:
548:: "the redirect is offensive or abusive". So I think this redirect should be deleted.--
398:
383:
323:
Talk:Severe_acute_respiratory_syndrome_coronavirus_2#Repeated_addition_of_"China_Virus"
1559:
List of incidents of xenophobia and racism related to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic
1221:
List of incidents of xenophobia and racism related to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic
1635:
1201:
936:
707:
674:
670:
572:
238:
115:
67:
53:
2397:"Chinese coronavirus infections, death toll soar as fifth case is confirmed in U.S."
2515:
2034:
1851:
1817:
1755:
1729:
1582:
1361:
932:
654:
465:
2266:"Politicians' Use of 'Wuhan Virus' Starts a Debate Health Experts Wanted to Avoid"
153:
2162:
1357:
1319:
1095:
954:
940:
883:
870:
856:
768:
545:
515:
434:
1623:
486:
The list of viruses also contains viruses named after places in China, so also
2490:
2323:"Trump defends calling coronavirus 'Chinese virus' — 'it's not racist at all'"
1657:
Talk:Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2#Careless talk costs lives
1392:
302:
282:
262:
242:
2276:
1879:
I'd also like to point out that you're misreading some of your sources. The
1194:
1179:
1142:
1127:
807:
803:
776:
773:
Misinformation_related_to_the_2019–20_coronavirus_pandemic#United_States_2
397:
I changed my vote to Redirect, which more clearly expresses my opinion. —
1850:
If you really believe that, you need a new Knowledge policy stating that
1382:
953:
And you calling President Trump a demagogue obviously is not an attack.--
2297:"Fox News host Tucker Carlson begins referring to 'Chinese coronavirus'"
1109:
Under no circumstance should this redirect to anything related to Trump
595:. Additionally, the fact that 13 viruses include the name "China" in
454:
Anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States#Donald Trump presidency
1204:
is policy. You're crossing a line with your insults. Please stop.
2535:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1686:
infections, death toll soar as fifth case is confirmed in U.S.
2241:"Province at China virus's center lets some companies reopen"
1517:. This is a very likely search term, and WP is not censored.
1465:
we don't remove material just because it may be objectionable
2228:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-chinese-virus-notes/
1562:. It is obviously intended and used as a xenophobic slur. --
1712:
death toll rises to 42, more than 1,400 infected worldwide
1699:: ten cities locked down and Beijing festivities scrapped
343:
there are several viruses named "China virus", listed at
908:
originating in China", if one does not otherwise exist.
1776:
The sources refer to a "China virus." I don't see how
149:
145:
141:
669:
to treat “Chinese virus” and these similar names, and
213:
2465:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-51245680
2348:"China rejects US' virus stigma - Chinadaily.com.cn"
1803:
right-wing political figures in the United States. -
1751:
Trump has substituted the word "corona" with "China"
279:
list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions
2033:Very well put. I agree 100% with Thucydides411. --
621:– Donald Trump use this term to mean coronavirus.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
2547:). No further edits should be made to this page.
673:should not be the deletion reason. Thank you. --
297:Note: This discussion has been included in the
277:Note: This discussion has been included in the
257:Note: This discussion has been included in the
2514:- If you are Chinese, I want to tell you about
1515:Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
1490:Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
1461:Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
1328:Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
879:Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
765:Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
519:with both options, as long as you don't change
319:Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
1781:handful of days after it reopens its borders?
259:list of Medicine-related deletion discussions
227:
8:
653:Donald Trump and British Columbia newspaper
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
1598:
299:list of China-related deletion discussions
296:
276:
256:
1869:The policy already exists, and is called
1728:Last I heard, we in Knowledge go by the
1330:or perhaps the disese or pandemic page.
1103:But I'm posting again to reiterate what
2220:
2425:
2414:
2004:
1076:toward the top in the disambiguation.
593:Clerodendrum golden mosaic China virus
583:would likely be the primary topic per
419:2600:1010:B15D:5299:ED8B:CD7:4EBA:38D1
1725:: Death toll rises as disease spreads
1605:2601:645:200:3A50:C9BF:6358:C9E8:CB34
7:
1170:what they're seeking information on?
1118:Reasonable minds can vary on what
24:
1126:Come on. We're better than this.
525:Separated brethren antigen system
92:Introduction to deletion process
2371:Gstalter, Morgan (2020-03-19).
1509:, as a disambiguation page, or
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
2264:Rogers, Katie (2020-03-10).
2138:Racial views of Donald Trump
1534:-- there is a discussion on
1001:Racial views of Donald Trump
979:Racial views of Donald Trump
869:Not an attack page, unless
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
2564:
2528:02:31, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
2507:21:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
2321:Mangan, Dan (2020-03-18).
2208:08:42, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
2190:17:48, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
2171:14:18, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
2150:01:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
2123:12:31, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
2108:11:29, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
2082:11:18, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
2043:15:56, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
2029:12:17, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
1960:08:33, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
1934:The relevant policies are
1898:15:50, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
1865:12:49, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
1846:12:34, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
1831:11:29, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
1813:11:15, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
1791:04:54, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
1764:04:04, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
1742:14:53, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
1669:13:20, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
1648:00:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
1613:07:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
1591:05:25, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
1572:17:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
1548:01:29, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
1527:22:20, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1502:19:17, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1477:17:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1452:17:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1434:16:14, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1412:14:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1370:13:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1340:10:35, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1295:15:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
1280:07:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1233:04:51, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1214:04:14, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1188:03:54, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1158:02:51, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1136:02:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1086:01:42, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1054:07:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1031:04:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1013:00:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
992:23:47, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
963:23:09, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
949:22:58, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
922:20:41, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
900:17:19, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
865:16:05, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
837:15:40, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
816:15:57, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
795:14:54, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
756:13:33, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
729:13:19, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
696:13:05, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
640:12:45, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
614:09:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
564:07:52, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
537:07:16, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
501:04:01, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
482:03:07, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
443:23:01, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
427:02:45, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
407:16:19, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
392:02:39, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
365:02:09, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
334:14:08, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
311:02:04, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
291:02:04, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
271:02:04, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
251:02:04, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
62:13:55, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
1238:Knowledge is not censored
559:Defeat the virus together
2537:Please do not modify it.
2159:Coronavirus disease 2019
1486:Coronavirus disease 2019
975:Coronavirus disease 2019
846:Coronavirus disease 2019
825:Coronavirus disease 2019
380:Coronavirus disease 2019
32:Please do not modify it.
521:Lutheran antigen system
452:somewhere, possibly to
2090:yay, must have missed
587:, it is wise to avoid
2352:www.chinadaily.com.cn
1519:JungerMan Chips Ahoy!
597:list of virus species
458:List of virus species
349:List of virus species
345:List of virus species
80:Articles for deletion
571:It does not violate
470:Argentine footballer
2401:The Washington Post
1885:The Washington Post
1684:Chinese coronavirus
1678:The Washington Post
456:. The entries from
2499:Wallachia Wallonia
2270:The New York Times
2239:McDONALD, By JOE.
1536:Talk:Chinese_virus
800:Redirect and merge
353:List of virus taxa
2010:I see no risk of
1723:China coronavirus
1615:
1603:comment added by
409:
336:
313:
293:
273:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
2555:
2478:
2473:
2467:
2462:
2456:
2451:
2445:
2440:
2434:
2433:
2427:
2422:
2420:
2412:
2410:
2408:
2393:
2387:
2386:
2384:
2383:
2368:
2362:
2361:
2359:
2358:
2343:
2337:
2336:
2334:
2333:
2318:
2312:
2311:
2309:
2308:
2293:
2287:
2286:
2284:
2283:
2261:
2255:
2254:
2252:
2251:
2236:
2230:
2225:
1801:
1726:
1713:
1700:
1687:
1449:
1410:
1388:Symphony Regalia
1272:Symphony Regalia
1198:
1146:
1105:Symphony Regalia
1078:Symphony Regalia
1046:Symphony Regalia
919:
914:
898:
792:
783:
726:
719:
712:
693:
686:
679:
610:
603:
561:
554:
396:
321:article over at
316:
232:
231:
217:
169:
157:
139:
77:
34:
2563:
2562:
2558:
2557:
2556:
2554:
2553:
2552:
2551:
2545:deletion review
2520:Epiphyllumlover
2483:
2482:
2481:
2474:
2470:
2463:
2459:
2452:
2448:
2441:
2437:
2423:
2413:
2406:
2404:
2395:
2394:
2390:
2381:
2379:
2370:
2369:
2365:
2356:
2354:
2345:
2344:
2340:
2331:
2329:
2320:
2319:
2315:
2306:
2304:
2301:The Independent
2295:
2294:
2290:
2281:
2279:
2263:
2262:
2258:
2249:
2247:
2238:
2237:
2233:
2226:
2222:
2182:Epiphyllumlover
2142:Devonian Wombat
1795:
1754:supporters. --
1721:
1708:
1695:
1682:
1540:Epiphyllumlover
1447:
1426:Epiphyllumlover
1419:I just checked
1391:
1332:Graeme Bartlett
1192:
1140:
917:
910:
882:
786:
777:
722:
715:
708:
689:
682:
675:
607:
601:
585:WP:PRIMARYUSAGE
557:
550:
529:Epiphyllumlover
174:
165:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2561:
2559:
2550:
2549:
2531:
2530:
2509:
2480:
2479:
2468:
2457:
2446:
2435:
2388:
2363:
2338:
2313:
2288:
2256:
2231:
2219:
2218:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2193:
2192:
2174:
2173:
2152:
2130:
2129:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2085:
2084:
2066:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2053:
2052:
2051:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2046:
2045:
2008:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1877:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1727:
1720:
1714:
1707:
1701:
1694:
1688:
1681:
1671:
1650:
1616:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1575:
1574:
1550:
1529:
1504:
1479:
1454:
1436:
1421:French disease
1414:
1372:
1354:WP:NOTCENSORED
1342:
1322:should likely
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1175:
1171:
1124:
1116:
1100:
1099:
1089:
1088:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
994:
967:
966:
965:
925:
924:
912:Blue Rasberry
902:
867:
839:
818:
797:
758:
736:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
699:
698:
663:
659:
650:
649:
643:
642:
623:
622:
616:
566:
552:Shwangtianyuan
539:
505:
504:
503:
446:
445:
430:
429:
412:
411:
410:
338:
337:
314:
294:
274:
235:
234:
171:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2560:
2548:
2546:
2542:
2538:
2533:
2532:
2529:
2525:
2521:
2517:
2513:
2510:
2508:
2504:
2500:
2495:
2492:
2488:
2485:
2484:
2477:
2472:
2469:
2466:
2461:
2458:
2455:
2450:
2447:
2444:
2439:
2436:
2431:
2418:
2403:
2402:
2398:
2392:
2389:
2378:
2374:
2367:
2364:
2353:
2349:
2342:
2339:
2328:
2324:
2317:
2314:
2302:
2298:
2292:
2289:
2278:
2275:
2271:
2267:
2260:
2257:
2246:
2242:
2235:
2232:
2229:
2224:
2221:
2217:
2209:
2205:
2201:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2191:
2187:
2183:
2179:
2176:
2175:
2172:
2168:
2164:
2160:
2156:
2153:
2151:
2147:
2143:
2139:
2135:
2132:
2131:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2115:Thucydides411
2111:
2110:
2109:
2105:
2101:
2097:
2093:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2086:
2083:
2079:
2075:
2074:Thucydides411
2071:
2068:
2067:
2044:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2031:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2021:Thucydides411
2018:
2013:
2009:
2006:
2002:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1961:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1937:
1936:WP:COMMONNAME
1933:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1890:Thucydides411
1886:
1882:
1878:
1875:
1872:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1853:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1838:Thucydides411
1834:
1833:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1819:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1810:
1806:
1805:Thucydides411
1799:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1779:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1752:
1748:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1731:
1724:
1718:
1711:
1705:
1698:
1692:
1685:
1679:
1675:
1672:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1651:
1649:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1620:
1617:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1560:
1554:
1551:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1530:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1505:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1480:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1455:
1453:
1450:
1444:
1440:
1437:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1422:
1418:
1415:
1413:
1408:
1407:
1402:
1401:
1396:
1395:
1389:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1373:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1350:
1346:
1343:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1314:
1313:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1287:Thucydides411
1283:
1282:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1239:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1196:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1176:
1172:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1144:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1120:virus-related
1117:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1066:
1063:
1062:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1019:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
995:
993:
989:
985:
980:
977:
976:
971:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
951:
950:
946:
942:
938:
934:
930:
927:
926:
923:
920:
915:
913:
906:
903:
901:
897:
896:
892:
891:
887:
886:
880:
876:
872:
868:
866:
862:
858:
854:
851:
850:WP:OTHERNAMES
847:
843:
840:
838:
834:
830:
826:
822:
819:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
798:
796:
793:
791:
790:
784:
782:
781:
774:
770:
766:
762:
759:
757:
753:
749:
745:
741:
738:
737:
730:
727:
725:
720:
718:
713:
711:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
697:
694:
692:
687:
685:
680:
678:
672:
668:
664:
660:
656:
652:
651:
648:
645:
644:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
624:
620:
617:
615:
611:
604:
598:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
567:
565:
562:
560:
555:
553:
547:
543:
540:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
517:
513:
509:
506:
502:
498:
494:
489:
488:Chinese virus
485:
484:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
448:
447:
444:
440:
436:
432:
431:
428:
424:
420:
416:
413:
408:
404:
400:
395:
394:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
374:
373:
369:
368:
367:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
335:
331:
327:
324:
320:
315:
312:
308:
304:
300:
295:
292:
288:
284:
280:
275:
272:
268:
264:
260:
255:
254:
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
177:
176:Find sources:
172:
168:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:Chinese virus
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
68:Chinese virus
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
2536:
2534:
2516:Reston virus
2511:
2486:
2471:
2460:
2449:
2438:
2426:|archiveurl=
2405:. Retrieved
2399:
2391:
2380:. Retrieved
2376:
2366:
2355:. Retrieved
2351:
2341:
2330:. Retrieved
2326:
2316:
2305:. Retrieved
2303:. 2020-03-10
2300:
2291:
2280:. Retrieved
2269:
2259:
2248:. Retrieved
2244:
2234:
2223:
2215:
2177:
2154:
2133:
2095:
2092:The Guardian
2091:
2069:
1778:The Guardian
1777:
1750:
1722:
1716:
1715:and per the
1709:
1703:
1702:and per the
1696:
1691:The Guardian
1690:
1683:
1677:
1673:
1661:Hemiauchenia
1652:
1618:
1599:— Preceding
1557:redirect to
1556:
1552:
1531:
1510:
1506:
1494:VernoWhitney
1481:
1469:funplussmart
1456:
1442:
1438:
1416:
1405:
1399:
1393:
1378:
1374:
1348:
1344:
1323:
1315:
1167:
1163:
1119:
1112:
1108:
1107:says above.
1064:
1017:
996:
984:BullRangifer
973:
969:
933:Donald Trump
928:
911:
904:
894:
889:
884:
874:
841:
820:
799:
788:
787:
779:
778:
760:
744:Clarityfiend
739:
723:
716:
709:
690:
683:
676:
655:The_Province
646:
618:
568:
558:
551:
541:
512:ngram viewer
507:
493:67.70.32.186
487:
474:Clarityfiend
466:Lionel Messi
461:
449:
414:
375:
371:
370:
357:67.70.32.186
340:
339:
326:Hemiauchenia
236:
224:
218:
210:
203:
197:
191:
185:
175:
162:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
2096:China virus
2017:common name
2003:also says,
1710:China virus
1697:China virus
1640:Markbassett
1358:Spanish flu
1320:China virus
1123:discussion.
1096:Chinese flu
871:Spanish flu
769:Wuhan Virus
767:, to which
628:Soumyabrata
516:Spanish flu
201:free images
2491:Muslim ban
2382:2020-03-20
2357:2020-03-20
2332:2020-03-20
2307:2020-03-20
2282:2020-03-20
2250:2020-03-20
2216:References
2200:XavierItzm
2100:XavierItzm
2012:WP:RECENCY
1952:XavierItzm
1948:WP:RECENCY
1940:WP:POVNAME
1857:XavierItzm
1823:XavierItzm
1798:XavierItzm
1783:XavierItzm
1747:XavierItzm
1734:XavierItzm
1484:to either
1448:Local hero
1360:either. --
1074:SARS-CoV-2
1070:SARS-CoV-2
609:talk to me
581:SARS-CoV-2
2541:talk page
2417:cite news
2277:0362-4331
2001:WP:RS AGE
1944:WP:RS AGE
1938:, and/or
1871:WP:RS AGE
1704:France 24
1628:Bloomberg
1626:and , in
1564:MaeseLeon
1225:Guettarda
1206:Guettarda
1150:Guettarda
1023:Guettarda
1021:bigotry.
1005:Guettarda
939:applies.
829:Natureium
804:China flu
748:awkwafaba
608:<: -->
602:Zach Vega
589:recentism
399:Toughpigs
384:Toughpigs
37:talk page
2543:or in a
2407:23 March
2155:Redirect
2134:Redirect
1881:France24
1689:and per
1601:unsigned
1511:Redirect
1482:Redirect
1457:Redirect
1443:redirect
1383:COVID-19
1379:redirect
1349:redirect
1324:redirect
997:Redirect
970:Redirect
929:Redirect
905:Redirect
875:redirect
842:Redirect
821:Redirect
761:Redirect
740:Redirect
662:dispute.
636:subpages
577:WP:DPAGE
450:Redirect
376:Redirect
160:View log
101:glossary
54:JHunterJ
39:or in a
2512:Comment
2428:value (
2377:TheHill
2178:Comment
2035:Valjean
1756:Valjean
1632:Reuters
1583:Tataral
1532:Comment
1417:Comment
1362:Tataral
1162:So you
848:as per
742:as per
667:WP:NPOV
658:widely.
647:Comment
508:Comment
341:Comment
207:WP refs
195:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
2424:Check
2163:desmay
2070:Delete
1636:Nature
1553:Delete
1202:WP:NPA
1168:That's
1164:really
955:Rusf10
941:Jeppiz
937:WP:ATP
918:(talk)
857:Rusf10
671:WP:ATP
573:WP:ATP
542:Delete
435:Jeppiz
239:WP:ATP
179:Google
137:delete
1852:WP:RS
1818:WP:RS
1730:WP:RS
1634:, in
1630:, in
1394:L293D
1375:Keep'
802:with
510:--on
462:China
460:are "
303:Njzjz
283:Njzjz
263:Njzjz
243:Njzjz
222:JSTOR
183:books
167:Stats
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
2524:talk
2503:talk
2487:Keep
2430:help
2409:2020
2346:陈蓓.
2327:CNBC
2274:ISSN
2245:WJAX
2204:talk
2186:talk
2167:talk
2146:talk
2119:talk
2104:talk
2078:talk
2039:talk
2025:talk
1956:talk
1894:talk
1861:talk
1842:talk
1827:talk
1809:talk
1787:talk
1760:talk
1738:talk
1676:per
1674:Keep
1665:talk
1653:Keep
1644:talk
1619:Keep
1609:talk
1587:talk
1568:talk
1544:talk
1523:talk
1507:Keep
1498:talk
1473:talk
1439:Keep
1430:talk
1366:talk
1345:Keep
1336:talk
1316:Note
1291:talk
1276:talk
1229:talk
1210:talk
1195:TJRC
1184:talk
1180:TJRC
1174:for.
1154:talk
1143:TJRC
1132:talk
1128:TJRC
1082:talk
1065:Keep
1050:talk
1027:talk
1018:Note
1009:talk
988:talk
959:talk
945:talk
890:uidh
877:to
861:talk
833:talk
812:talk
808:TJRC
632:talk
619:Keep
569:Keep
546:WP:R
533:talk
497:talk
478:talk
439:talk
423:talk
415:Keep
403:talk
388:talk
372:Keep
361:talk
330:talk
307:talk
287:talk
267:talk
247:talk
237:Per
215:FENS
189:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
50:keep
2157:to
2136:to
1942:.
1717:BBC
1624:BBC
1555:or
1513:to
1488:or
1459:to
1441:or
1381:to
1377:or
1347:or
1326:to
1113:any
999:to
972:to
931:to
844:to
823:to
780:Pam
717:-20
710:SCP
684:-20
677:SCP
527:.--
523:to
468:in
378:to
351:or
229:TWL
158:– (
2526:)
2505:)
2421::
2419:}}
2415:{{
2375:.
2350:.
2325:.
2299:.
2272:.
2268:.
2243:.
2206:)
2188:)
2169:)
2161:.
2148:)
2121:)
2106:)
2094::
2080:)
2041:)
2027:)
1958:)
1896:)
1863:)
1844:)
1829:)
1811:)
1789:)
1762:)
1740:)
1732:.
1667:)
1646:)
1611:)
1589:)
1570:)
1546:)
1525:)
1500:)
1475:)
1432:)
1403:•
1368:)
1338:)
1293:)
1278:)
1231:)
1212:)
1186:)
1156:)
1134:)
1084:)
1052:)
1029:)
1011:)
1003:.
990:)
961:)
947:)
863:)
835:)
814:)
806:.
754:)
752:📥
724:00
691:00
638:)
634:•
626:--
612:)
535:)
499:)
480:)
441:)
425:)
405:)
390:)
363:)
332:)
309:)
301:.
289:)
281:.
269:)
261:.
249:)
241:.
209:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
2522:(
2501:(
2432:)
2411:.
2385:.
2360:.
2335:.
2310:.
2285:.
2253:.
2202:(
2184:(
2165:(
2144:(
2117:(
2113:-
2102:(
2076:(
2037:(
2023:(
1954:(
1892:(
1859:(
1840:(
1825:(
1807:(
1800::
1796:@
1785:(
1758:(
1736:(
1719::
1706::
1693::
1680::
1663:(
1642:(
1607:(
1585:(
1566:(
1542:(
1521:(
1496:(
1471:(
1428:(
1409:)
1406:✎
1400:☎
1397:(
1364:(
1352:(
1334:(
1289:(
1274:(
1227:(
1208:(
1197::
1193:@
1182:(
1152:(
1145::
1141:@
1130:(
1080:(
1048:(
1025:(
1007:(
986:(
957:(
943:(
895:e
885:b
859:(
831:(
810:(
789:D
750:(
630:(
605:(
531:(
495:(
476:(
437:(
421:(
401:(
386:(
359:(
328:(
305:(
285:(
265:(
245:(
233:)
225:·
219:·
211:·
204:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
181:(
173:(
170:)
163:·
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.