257:
517:
of the supposedly conflicting redirect targets are invalid, and the disambiguation cleanup people would object to them. "Chinki" is not "Chinky", the slur is not neutral and uncommon, and the restaurants are not neutral and uncommon and not really an established alternative name outwith slang usage
310:
it was because random editors had put it back to being about slang rather than about a type of restaurant. The small amount of stuff that I had written about the restaurants's cuisine, which I had little doubt could be expanded upon, had been blanked by vandals, so
387:. And I predict that it would be back to a rubbish unsourced article about slang within a couple of years. But the biggest argument against it is that, contrary to my research in 2007, it seems that Chinese restaurants in the U.K. aren't even
550:
over the years (many reverted as vandalism). It has been nominated for deletion twice, and merger twice. This isn't a "main article". This is a best-of-a-bad-situation article from 2007 when we had no alternatives and nothing about
357:. If I were writing any of the content (such as about the cuisine of Chinese restaurants in the U.K., not that we need my start-off edits any more on that subject) that I wrote then, today, I'd put it in those articles with
225:
632:
use the term for
Chinese takeaways in the UK, but in my experience it's now generally older people who always have done and have a hard time seeing something they've always used as offensive. --
89:
472:
468:
460:
182:
589:. That is a stronger evidence of significance then most slang that gets pushed for inclusion. However, I would like to see other opinions and perhaps I will change my mind.
464:
281:
302:
on the type of restaurant and put the stuff about the name, which I was even the one who provided actually sourced content on, as a parenthetical aside, so that
219:
114:
129:
456:
84:
538:
in the sources (including the OfCom document and the contemporaneous reporting of the OfCom document), outright tells us that even the redirect
319:
for — bizarrely — being irrelevant to the class of resurant whose cuisine it was (sic!), a year later. And we were back to nothing but my
338:
109:
102:
17:
586:
491:. Link to the slur and the Chinese restaurant articles and most likely some people who have as a nickname or different spelling (
406:
409:
289:
273:
123:
119:
581:
If it is part of culture it should have some mention on
Knowledge (XXG). It is in the Oxford Dictionary of Slang as both a
664:
260:
It turns out that
Chinese restaurants in the U.K., like this random example from a Wikimedia Commons search, are called
707:
690:
669:
641:
598:
568:
508:
481:
448:
69:
40:
496:
186:
240:
594:
504:
207:
155:
150:
63:
582:
365:
article. We have properly systematized this in the intervening 16 years, and have non-slang-titled articles now.
159:
329:
It would be foolish to do so. It's a slang title, and experience shows (very notably from the edit history of
546:
is unsupported as a common name. There have been numerous objections to this as an alternative name actually
660:
556:
523:
354:
142:
416:
372:
312:
307:
303:
703:
590:
500:
299:
201:
58:
36:
384:
637:
686:
417:
one extra sentence about slang from one of the foolish editors who tried to make it all about slang
261:
256:
233:
197:
617:
392:
334:
564:
444:
247:
98:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
702:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
559:, which we've long since superseded with other proper articles, and it's time for it to go.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
552:
396:
361:, and put the discussion of whether "chink" and "chinky" are pejoratives in the U.K. in the
342:
371:
This article is a massive attractive nuisance, and people cannot stop writing about slang,
678:
633:
682:
654:
476:
213:
560:
492:
440:
176:
341:, which was all that we had on Chinese restaurants until 2011. We didn't have a
333:) that slang names are not proper article titles. Back in 2007 we didn't have a
146:
433:
Shouldn't you tell the article writer that you nominated it for deletion?
346:
272:
I rescued this in 2007 when it was nominated for deletion. At the time
657:, but in this case it's a synonym for a term that itself is offensive.
650:
539:
531:
138:
75:
430:
rubbish that got this article nominated for deletion twice already.
625:
613:
543:
527:
519:
380:
362:
255:
56:. The history remains for a merge, which can be done editorially.
53:
698:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
323:
of the slang name again, rather than the type of restaurant.
422:
in its history and a second small addition about slang.
337:
article. We only had the disambiguation that is now at
172:
168:
164:
232:
276:
and was about some slang. I rewrote it to be about
246:
530:alongside the ever-churning unsourced rubbish in
298:People keep trying to bring back the rubbish. I
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
710:). No further edits should be made to this page.
649:per Necrothesp. It would be non-neutral to have
522:as far back as 2007). Amusingly, the fact that
455:Note: This discussion has been included in the
345:article and it redirected to the U.S. generic
681:. Let's be done with such sorry bagatelles. -
90:Articles for deletion/Chinky (2nd nomination)
8:
280:, on the basis that this appeared to be the
130:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
534:as it stood at the time, some of which was
524:you copied my and another's writing in 2022
454:
315:. Discussion of the cuisine got removed
385:Project:Redirect#Neutrality of redirects
321:originally parenthetical side discussion
399:. The picture at right is one of many.
391:known as "chinky"s. They are known as
82:
518:(as challenged in the edit history of
377:know where the article on the slang is
383:, but that is going to fall afoul of
308:when it was re-nominated for deletion
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
513:The problem with that idea is that
339:Chinese restaurant (disambiguation)
349:at the time. And it wasn't until
24:
326:Surely you can rescue this again?
292:. There was no mention of slang.
459:lists for the following topics:
264:, and that is their common name.
115:Introduction to deletion process
1:
691:13:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
670:17:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
642:11:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
599:08:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
569:02:48, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
509:20:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
482:14:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
449:12:51, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
402:But, but, but … it's sourced!
70:14:08, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
85:Articles for deletion/Chinky
497:intrapersonal communication
436:I consider myself notified.
300:tried to keep this focussed
105:(AfD)? Read these primers!
727:
628:. People certainly still
405:Some of it is. I know.
368:So what about a redirect?
295:But it's about slang now‽
700:Please do not modify it.
413:all of the sourced parts
379:. It could redirect to
304:it then looked like this
290:it then looked like this
32:Please do not modify it.
557:British Chinese cuisine
548:edited into the article
355:British Chinese cuisine
81:AfDs for this article:
265:
187:edits since nomination
259:
103:Articles for deletion
626:Chink#United Kingdom
426:is the same sort of
278:a type of restaurant
54:Chink#United Kingdom
489:disambiguation page
393:Chinese restaurants
274:it looked like this
269:But you wrote this‽
262:Chinese restaurants
661:Maddy from Celeste
647:Merge and redirect
618:Chinese restaurant
499:style nomination.
335:Chinese restaurant
286:type of restaurant
266:
653:be a redirect to
553:Chinese takeaways
484:
397:Chinese takeaways
120:Guide to deletion
110:How to contribute
718:
620:as appropriate.
591:Richard-of-Earth
501:Richard-of-Earth
479:
457:deletion sorting
415:apart from just
359:non-slang titles
343:Chinese takeaway
313:I put it back in
306:. A year later
288:in the U.K. and
251:
250:
236:
180:
162:
100:
68:
66:
61:
34:
726:
725:
721:
720:
719:
717:
716:
715:
714:
708:deletion review
477:
424:Everything else
373:even when they
353:that we gained
193:
153:
137:
134:
97:
94:
79:
64:
59:
57:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
724:
722:
713:
712:
694:
693:
672:
655:Chinese people
644:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
574:
573:
572:
571:
485:
473:United Kingdom
469:Discrimination
461:Food and drink
438:
437:
434:
431:
403:
400:
369:
366:
351:13 years later
327:
324:
296:
293:
270:
254:
253:
190:
133:
132:
127:
117:
112:
95:
93:
92:
87:
80:
78:
73:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
723:
711:
709:
705:
701:
696:
695:
692:
688:
684:
680:
676:
673:
671:
668:
666:
662:
656:
652:
648:
645:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
615:
611:
608:
607:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
549:
545:
541:
537:
536:about "chink"
533:
529:
525:
521:
516:
512:
511:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
487:Convert to a
486:
483:
480:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
453:
452:
451:
450:
446:
442:
435:
432:
429:
425:
421:
418:
414:
411:
408:
404:
401:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
376:
370:
367:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
325:
322:
318:
314:
309:
305:
301:
297:
294:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
268:
267:
263:
258:
249:
245:
242:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
199:
196:
195:Find sources:
191:
188:
184:
178:
174:
170:
166:
161:
157:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
135:
131:
128:
125:
121:
118:
116:
113:
111:
108:
107:
106:
104:
99:
91:
88:
86:
83:
77:
74:
72:
71:
67:
62:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
699:
697:
674:
658:
646:
629:
621:
609:
547:
535:
514:
495:). Love the
493:Chinki Yadav
488:
439:
427:
423:
419:
412:
388:
374:
358:
350:
331:this article
330:
320:
316:
285:
277:
243:
237:
229:
222:
216:
210:
204:
194:
96:
49:
47:
31:
28:
410:pretty much
282:common name
220:free images
65:Mississippi
679:Necrothesp
634:Necrothesp
587:restaurant
704:talk page
683:The Gnome
478:Spiderone
428:unsourced
420:yet again
284:for that
37:talk page
706:or in a
675:Redirect
665:WAVEDASH
622:Redirect
465:Language
389:commonly
347:take-out
183:View log
124:glossary
50:redirect
39:or in a
561:Uncle G
471:, and
441:Uncle G
407:I wrote
375:clearly
226:WP refs
214:scholar
156:protect
151:history
101:New to
651:Chinky
585:and a
540:chinky
532:chinky
198:Google
160:delete
139:Chinky
76:Chinky
614:Chink
610:Merge
544:chink
528:chink
526:into
520:chink
381:chink
363:chink
317:again
241:JSTOR
202:books
177:views
169:watch
165:links
52: to
16:<
687:talk
677:per
638:talk
616:and
595:talk
583:slur
565:talk
555:nor
505:talk
445:talk
395:and
234:FENS
208:news
173:logs
147:talk
143:edit
60:Star
659:--
624:to
612:to
515:all
248:TWL
181:– (
689:)
640:)
630:do
597:)
567:)
542:→
507:)
475:.
467:,
463:,
447:)
228:)
185:|
175:|
171:|
167:|
163:|
158:|
154:|
149:|
145:|
685:(
667:)
663:(
636:(
593:(
563:(
503:(
443:(
252:)
244:·
238:·
230:·
223:·
217:·
211:·
205:·
200:(
192:(
189:)
179:)
141:(
126:)
122:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.