1866:
made that prediction about his election future based on what i am seeing in terms of how
Swalwell's colleagues in Congress and the common man is reacting and just going on that it looks like at a minimum this will be a godsend for his opponents because they are going to use this issue like a millstone around his neck. And i would appreciate it if you could please quit it already with the SPA accusation like just because i am new and i voted doesn't mean it counts as any less of a vote than people who have been here for a long time. yeah i know my vote makes it look like i'm an spa and it's not the greatest look but you gotta understand i wasn't the one who started this vote it was Travelmite who did. i would have prefered to have gotten more familiar with things on wikipedia before i voted, but as i have already voted and you've drawn attention to it, it is what it is i guess
808:- i would say that the article should be keept. The event has been discussed in much depth by multitude of references (Knowledge:Notability (events)/Depth of coverage) and the intense backlash against not just fang, but all the politicians she got associated with shows that the event has had lasting effect. (Knowledge:Notability (events)/Lasting effects) the votes which say that the article should be delleted only because fang is notable for only one event (Knowledge:Biographies of living persons/Subjects notable only for one event) appear very much to be mistaken. There are three conditions which have to met and one of them is "If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented." i think it is safe to say from the many references and lasting consequences of her event that this ha not been met.
1349:
other types of spying as demonstrated, for example, by the significant
Congressional reactions to Fang's relationship to Swalwell. The fact that the events she was involved in wasn't reported on previously doesn't diminish the significance of those events in much the same way that you wouldn't say just because you didn't find out a person had committed murder, then that would have diminished the significance of the murder. Your explanation is also irrelevant because even if you were right about what the event was, your argument would still fail to satisfy
1547:
the Axios report in comparison with other types of spying as demonstrated, for example, by the significant
Congressional reactions to Fang's relationship to Swalwell. The fact that the events she was involved in wasn't reported on previously doesn't diminish the significance of those events in much the same way that you wouldn't say just because you didn't find out a person had committed murder, then that would have diminished the significance of the murder."
468:
While this assertion may be true, that is not the same as an authoritative law agency making a sentencing or the like (the Axios report event has said the FBI has no comment on their investigative report). There may be factors of the Axios report to include elsewhere but there's no reason to have a separate article on the assertions that have yet to be proven out by law enforcement or in course for the person they are accusing. --
1779:
makes any sense because spying isn't an event. As for privacy, she is not "entitled" to that when her name is already out there. Literally it is plastered on the news all over the world in all languages, everybody knows her now and all the people especially the men that got caught up in her honey potting are getting raked over the coals.
1553:
M.O. (campaign financing and networking) - there's no contradiction between being a (suspected) spy and having a high profile such as a bundler (see the "How Fang rose to prominence among Bay Area politicos" section of the Axios article) And incomplete because you didn't address subsections 2bii-v of that section of my argument.
2013:
As I read the article, this individual didn't commit any crime, was tracked by the government (who reportedly are tracking 2,000 other
Chinese visa holders), was never convicted or even accused of a crime. I'm sure that the government has thousands of cases of people they deem "suspicious" who do not
1865:
okay well there is a lot that is not accurate in your comment. I did not say
Swalwell will lose his job i said he will probably lose his job and it is not really an unreasonble thing to say. just because his seat was rated as safe Democratic in the past does not mean it will be safe in the future. I
1348:
This is incorrect and irrelevant. Incorrect because she is notable for both the disclosure of her purported spying AND the events she performed (actual and purported) on which the disclosure supervened - this explains the qualitative difference of the responses to the Axios report in comparison with
3097:
were charged or indicted which isn't the case here. From what I've read, there are hundreds (or more) foreign visa holders to the U.S. who are monitored by security agencies. Considered that this woman was not charged with a crime, I don't see why she should be profiled on
Knowledge...we don't have
2709:
since it is unconfirmed suspicion based on a single source (the refs point to the original Axios source). No significant notability, with no coverage outside of recent suspicions; this is regardless of the existing major BLP violations, which are legitimate issues but may also be cleanup-related as
1172:
All of your queries have already been addressed by my analysis. All of the phenomena you cited are events (what else do you call catching a plane to China?), she is notable for her involvement in all them (and more) and that is why §1 of BLP1E is invalidated: because she's notable for more than one
2282:
article and I am skeptical that we can do the integration without gutting the most important parts of the primary article. The allegations involved here are quite serious and has also been covered quite extensively in the mainstream press. I think it does the wider community a disservice to try to
1778:
it's not true to say she is only known for one event and that she's entitled to privacy. She is known for doing something (suspected illegal spying) which got her involved in doing an unlimited number of events and if people are saying the one event she is known for was the spying then that hardly
1613:
Let me clarify 3). The report itself is significant. However, the only thing that event/report confirms is that the intelligence community is suspicious of her and her activities. That she is a spy or her purported activities in furtherance of that role are not confirmed nor well documented beyond
1558:
3) Wrt to your analysis of section 2c of my argument - this is illogical. Even if you were right about what the event was (disclosure of the purported spying) your argument would still fail to satisfy WP:BLP1E because the event has been significant (as demonstrated by the article's satisfaction of
1552:
2) Wrt to your analysis of section 2bi of my argument - this is incorrect and incomplete. Incorrect because she's drawing attention to both herself AND the candidate - it's not an either or proposition. She had to make a name for herself because that was a key part of at least two of her suspected
1546:
1) Wrt to your analysis of section 2a of my argument - this is incorrect. As I said: "she is notable for both the disclosure of her purported spying AND the events she performed (actual and purported) on which the disclosure supervened - this explains the qualitative difference of the responses to
999:
c) §3 is invalidated by the article's satisfaction of the aformentioned basic and inclusion criteria: the events have been significant (they've been significant enough for the FBI to put her under surveillance) AND the individual's role in relation to the events have been BOTH substantial AND well
467:
per BLP1E, BLPCRIME and lacking a prior public figure stance. The article only exists because Axios published this report which makes the assertion that Fang is a
Chinese spy, which triggered several other media reports to see if they could see anything corroborating (this makes it a BLP1E issue).
619:
The Axios investigation isn't creating a legal case against Fang, that was already done by the FBI. (surveillance, meet with
Congress, etc) It's merely reporting on the accusations that have been levelled against her. I got no idea where you got this idea that Axios was trying to play the role of
511:
But here is the thing though just because the FBI didn't make a comment on the Axios investigation doesn't mean they didn't accuse her of anything which it turns out they did. They got together reps and senators not run of the mill ones I'm talking big-wigs like Pelosi and apparently
Swalwell too
3122:
There can be exemptions from BLP1E particularly depending on an individual's role in the event. This can be quite hard to evaluate now (and in today's media circus in general) due to recentism etc. afaics it's not quite met currently. The larger, and less debatable, issue here is BLPCRIME, which
2565:
makes her a public figure. Raising money by targeting specific communities like the Bay Area's asian voters on behalf of a political candidate does not mean that she's trying to draw attention to herself but to the candidate, and she is doing a shitty job with her suspected spying activities if
1050:
which says that an article that documents phenomena that is deemed to be both notable and likely criminal/a crime should remain even if it has been subsequently established that no crime actually occurred as that finding would not diminish the notability of the phenomena. Specifically:
1920:
Your contributions to
Knowledge are welcome. I'm sure you'd agree it would be a catastrophe if Knowledge became a political battlefield. The policies we are discussing protect Knowledge, maintain it's academic integrity and prevent it from being accused of defamation.
3009:. Looks quite notable. FBI gave Swalwell a "defensive briefing" in 2015, informing him that Fang was a suspected Chinese agent. Swalwell was one of many politicians who associated with Fang. She fled the United States in mid-2015 as she was being investigated. BTW,
2777:
which should address those concerns as the subject matter of the proposed article is no longer about the person but about the person's activities (or the event as others have put it). Further votes for this AFD should take the rename request into consideration.
2451:
that we include them. A discussion, like this one, may find that inclusion is against other policies. That is exactly what BLP1E and BLPCRIME further explain. Yes, the subject may have received widespread coverage for a single event, but that does not mean the
1061:
b) U.S. law enforcement agencies deemed it likely that Fang's disappearance was caused by her criminal conduct (From Axios: "U.S. officials said China’s intelligence operation broke up in mid-2015 when Fang left the U.S. amid the FBI-led probe.") -
1559:
the aformentioned basic and inclusion criteria) and Fang's role in relation to it has been BOTH substantial AND well documented - the entire Axios investigations is about (you guessed it) Fang's role in the suspected spying operation.
763:- I believe this is currently a BLP1E situation where there shouldn't be a standalone article. The 1E being the Axios report itself. All pertinent information can be put into the Swalwell article without necessarily naming her due to
1510:
does not make her a high profile person. She's drawing attention to the candidate not herself. If she's trying to draw attention to herself, she's not being a good alleged spy. This should also invalidate your defense against
2687:
and thus protected by BLPCRIME, and it appears she has not been convicted of any crime. So the very existence of this article is a BLP violation, and I see no way to remedy that at this period in time other than by deletion.
2705:: BLP1E as all of the coverage pertains to the single event of her being suspected of wrongdoing originating in the December 2020 Axios article.Concerning the specific concerns with BLP1E#3, the suspected wrongdoing is not
1136:
The "nature of Fang's activities" are being president of a student group (not a position of power), helping political campaigns, having sex and catching a plane to China. These are not what is meant by events. The rest are
3068:
Visas can be cancelled by authorities upon on any suspicion. If cancelled, that ends all future travel plans to anywhere. If asked, any consulate/embassy also would advise go home. I agree there are BLP issues with page
2992:, I see nothing there which wouldn't be better covered on other pages, if the subject turns out to have a lasting significant of their own obviously we can and should revisit the subject but for today its a no from me.
209:
600:
Axios - and the media overall - have zero legal authority to create a legal case against a person like this under our BLP /CRIME aspects. This is the type of stuff we're supposed to avoid with a 10 foot pole.
1353:
because it fails to meet the stipulations in §3 as the event (disclosure of the purported spying according to you) was significant and Fang's role in relation to it was BOTH substantial and well documented.
2498:
Please see sections 2b, 3 and 6 of my argument. Privacy conerns do not apply because she is a public figure and the concern about her presumption of innocence (a high bar, to be sure) does not invalidate
318:
512:
back in 2015 to tell them about the intel ops that Fang was running and after that Swalwell cut off ties wth her. If that's not a red flag that says Fang committed a crime then I don't know what is.
2456:
is what's notable. Out of a concern for privacy and the presumption of innocence, we should and do have a high bar for situations like these. I don't think that's been met, and so we should delete.
2675:
BLP1E. Also concur with Liz, and Morbidthoughts on renaming the article -- if the crime itself is worthy of its own article (which, at this point is still dubious) beyond trimmed down inclusion in
2769:: Due to the repeated comments above that the current material in the article violates BLP1E, BLPCRIME and other BLP-grounded concerns, I have formally requested that the article be renamed from
2038:
Plus, when I did a copyright analysis, it appears that some of the article was taken from the Axios article and statements simply have quotation marks put around them to make it not a violation.
2503:
which would clearly advise that the documentation of Fang's activities (i.e. the main article) should remain if they have been deemed to be both notable and likely criminal/a crime (they have)
1072:
d) Fang's criminal acts and the motivation for and execution of them have been sufficiently notable as evidenced by the article's satisfaction of the aformentioned basic and inclusion criteria
2944:
Remember that most sock-masters are in general affirmation seeking master-baiters, its best not to take the master’s bait even post-mortem in order to avoid pleasuring them yourself.
1145:: What is her real name? When and where was she born? What's she doing in the last 5 years? As the page main author you have included hearsay criminal accusations of espionage by the
3001:
1506:
I disagree with your BLP1E analysis: §1 - the 1E is indeed the Axios report as the following coverage by other RS relies on that original report. §2 - being a campaign fundraiser or
170:
2018:
and is more salacious than informative. The article's use of "relationship" implies a sexual or romantic connection without actually proving anything of that nature exists.
2953:
2913:
203:
2574:
discusses the notability of the alleged criminal. If your argument rests on NCRIME, then the article should be renamed to describe the case rather than the person.
1709:- The above analysis spells out very clearly why this article is suitable for inclusion and deletion is unnecessary. It may need a clean-and-watch in some ways but
2279:
2055:
268:
2802:
2613:
2531:
2307:
2244:
2134:
1890:
1803:
1583:
1470:
1378:
1290:
1205:
1102:
832:
644:
538:
428:
304:
1326:
The only event here is the investigative report from Axios and how additional sources added to it. Yes, there may have been multiple events in the past, but
982:(i) she had participated in an attention-seeking manner (most notably as a bundler for a sitting US Congressman) in publicity for multiple election campaigns
346:
332:
1054:
a) her acts were deemed illegal by U.S. law enforcement authorities (the FBI put Fang under surveillance and also notified Congress about her activities) -
117:
2879:
I was considering tagging those with SPA a few days ago but the slightly diverse editing interest made me think "eh, AGF". Guess the gut is always right.
1661:
GNG can't apply as the coverage only exists for 5 days (from Axios' Dec 10 article). GNG also looks for enduring coverage and we can't judge that yet. --
102:
3167:; do not redirect. This is a blatantly non-neutral article on Chinese intelligence activities hanging on a stub biography of a non-notable individual.
1023:
b) does not categorically rule out the inclusion of criminal accusations against a person - it only advises that editor's not include such material
2798:
2609:
2527:
2130:
1974:
The espionage is suspected. This reasoning presumes these suspicions are factual. Let the politicians or FBI prove these suspicions, if they can.
1579:
1466:
1374:
1286:
1201:
1098:
640:
424:
1069:
c) some of the victims of her criminal acts/crime are or have been important politicians, which the activities section of the article documents
583:
2939:
2177:
Axios report is interesting detail about China but not about Fang personally. Swallwell bit to date is just right-wing conspiracy theories.
2303:
143:
138:
2443:
I agree with Maxim and Liz that BLP1E applies here, but I also want to challenge a lot fo the keep rationales. The GNG says that we
828:
147:
586:, but didn't mention Fang. Private discussions between FBI and politicians are not RS, nor do they turn BLP suspicions into facts.
245:
2679:, it should be titled after the crime. I see no good argument here on why Fang should have a BLP here. Not to mention the glaring
991:(iv) the allegations she's been involved in has been noteworthy, relevant, and well documented (as has already been mentioned) and
3177:
3128:
2884:
2837:
2814:
2693:
2625:
2543:
2319:
2256:
2146:
1902:
1815:
1595:
1515:§3 - the suspected role or activities are not actually confirmed or significant, only the event (the Axios report itself) is.
1482:
1390:
1302:
1217:
1114:
844:
656:
550:
440:
130:
97:
90:
17:
1066:
makes it clear that this condition applies regardless of whether the perpetrator (in this case Fang) is identified or charged.
513:
2240:
1886:
1799:
1058:
defines criminal acts to include those that have been suspected by law enforcement agencies as likely to have been committed.
534:
224:
2658:
It appears she has an article for something suspected to have happened but not confirmed. For that, I don’t see notability.
2357:, because "the allegations involved here are quite serious" and to delete it would be to "cover this up" - demonstration of
994:(v) these allegations have been documented by a multitude of reliable published sources (as has also already been mentioned)
191:
2507:(emphasis are mine) it has been subsequently established that Fang did not actually commit the crimes she was accused of.
52:. Minus the various socks, rough consensus is that this spy story should not be covered as a separate article, because of
968:
a) §1 is invalidated because the nature of Fang's activities eo ipso means that she is notable for more than one event.
2997:
2949:
2909:
2794:
2783:
2605:
2594:
2523:
2512:
2126:
2115:
1575:
1564:
1462:
1451:
1370:
1359:
1282:
1271:
1197:
1186:
1094:
1083:
636:
625:
420:
409:
111:
107:
3124:
2880:
2833:
2689:
1840:
is a whole slew of supposition, particularly the "Swalwell will lose his job" (seat in Congress), when his seat is
3216:
1017:
893:
40:
185:
2579:
1850:
1738:
1718:
1691:
1619:
1520:
1248:
772:
727:
691:
988:(iii) she was engaged in high-profile activity as a lifelong endeavor, but is now attempting to be low-profile
1442:
They are relevant to both Fang and Swalwell's page - it's not an either or proposition. Your arguments about
2729:. BLP1E, at BEST, User:Forevertruthsayer's unconvincing attempt at spinning it otherwise notwithstanding. --
1330:; it is only this discovery of the purported spying by Axios that is the event to be considered by BLP1E. --
955:
876:
3199:
3182:
3151:
3132:
3109:
3082:
3063:
3045:
3026:
2984:
2888:
2874:
2841:
2826:
2737:
2721:
2697:
2667:
2637:
2583:
2555:
2467:
2433:
2414:
2397:
2370:
2348:
2331:
2268:
2188:
2158:
2069:
2049:
2029:
2005:
1983:
1965:
1950:- BIO1E does not apply in this instance, since there was more than one politician involved. Easily passes
1930:
1914:
1855:
1827:
1744:
1724:
1697:
1673:
1656:
1623:
1607:
1524:
1494:
1436:
1402:
1342:
1314:
1260:
1229:
1166:
1126:
897:
880:
856:
776:
755:
732:
668:
613:
595:
562:
480:
452:
372:
352:
338:
324:
310:
296:
181:
72:
2993:
2945:
2905:
2901:
2790:
2779:
2601:
2590:
2519:
2508:
2393:
2299:
2288:
2122:
2111:
1571:
1560:
1458:
1447:
1366:
1355:
1278:
1267:
1240:
1193:
1182:
1174:
1142:
1090:
1079:
1013:
976:
632:
621:
416:
405:
2904:. As the saying goes two pathetics do not a civility make, or something like that. Be the bigger person.
3212:
3094:
3014:
2562:
1507:
1178:
1154:
1029:
872:
824:
813:
272:
36:
3190:
And frankly a coordinated effort by probably a state-backed actor, this was not a recreational troll.
231:
3195:
3168:
3078:
2663:
2366:
2278:
at 23,637 kb, it appears that the Fang article size is just too large to properly integrate into the
1979:
1926:
1710:
1432:
1256:
1162:
972:
889:
591:
292:
280:
1173:
event. Just because I don't know the minutiae of her biography does not then mean that she is not a
3147:
3040:
2810:
2621:
2575:
2539:
2462:
2428:
2343:
2315:
2252:
2183:
2142:
1898:
1811:
1734:
1714:
1687:
1615:
1591:
1516:
1478:
1386:
1298:
1213:
1110:
840:
768:
652:
546:
436:
217:
134:
3164:
3034:?? Please don't make allegations or insinuations that are not contained in mainstream RS reports.
2680:
2236:
2225:
1882:
1871:
1795:
1784:
530:
519:
2974:
1954:
as shown in Forevertruthsayer's analysis. Especially since the scandal just continues to grow.
1181:
does not apply because she's not a victim but the accused perpetrator (as I had already said).
3090:
3070:
3059:
3022:
3010:
2935:
2870:
2389:
2295:
2284:
1512:
1006:
947:
764:
752:
718:
368:
86:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
3211:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
2734:
2567:
2500:
1652:
1063:
1055:
1047:
820:
809:
197:
1039:
does not apply because all of the sources which have been used in the article are reliable.
3191:
3172:
3160:
3074:
2979:
2970:
2659:
2571:
2362:
2107:
1975:
1922:
1669:
1647:- I am persuaded by above mentioned reasons for inclusion in this project. WP:GNG applies.
1443:
1428:
1413:
1350:
1338:
1252:
1244:
1236:
1158:
1043:
962:
951:
609:
587:
476:
288:
260:
252:
251:
forum for espionage allegations. No case or allegations by authorities, so does not meet
3143:
3035:
2860:
2822:
2806:
2746:
2633:
2617:
2551:
2535:
2476:
2459:
2423:
2410:
2338:
2327:
2311:
2264:
2248:
2197:
2178:
2154:
2138:
2082:
1910:
1894:
1823:
1807:
1755:
1603:
1587:
1490:
1474:
1417:
1398:
1382:
1310:
1294:
1225:
1209:
1122:
1106:
943:
906:
852:
836:
785:
664:
648:
558:
542:
489:
448:
432:
381:
126:
78:
63:
1729:
Aside - while the argument I cite was made by a socking sock who socked, the analysis
2684:
2676:
2420:
2358:
2232:
2221:
2054:
If this article is deleted, we should consider removing her from other articles like
2015:
2000:
1955:
1951:
1878:
1867:
1791:
1780:
1409:
714:
526:
515:
284:
264:
248:
57:
3055:
3018:
2931:
2895:
2866:
2712:
747:
579:
364:
53:
2973:. Redirect pertinent content to the pages of politicians she was affiliated with.
164:
2730:
2566:
otherwise. Section 6 does not require a standalone article outside of Swalwell.
1679:
1648:
1036:
939:
276:
256:
1662:
1416:. Congress and the media are not courts. Today's politics doesn't change what
1331:
602:
469:
2106:
Please see section 6 of my argument which should address your concerns about
2818:
2629:
2547:
2406:
2323:
2260:
2150:
1906:
1819:
1599:
1486:
1394:
1306:
1266:
In her biographical context, yes (as I noted in section 2a of my argument).
1221:
1118:
848:
660:
554:
444:
2353:
Since the FBI didn't charge Fang, the extensive article puts Fang on trial
3123:
cannot be remedied with this article's existence at this moment in time.
3100:
2060:
2040:
2020:
3171:. This should have been speedy deleted at the start of this discussion.
1844:
and he has never fell below 2/3 of the vote in a non-primary contest.
1427:
you inserted that Fang actually acted as an "intelligence operative".
1032:
does not apply because she's not a victim but the accused perpetrator
929:: none of cited policies in the OP justifies deletion of the article.
979:: the background and activities sections of her page indicates that
713:
per BLP1E; all the other outlets are citing Axios, whose author has
1995:- Based on sources in the article and strongly agree with the user
1150:
1146:
241:
3054:
the United States in mid-2015 as she was being investigated. --
1157:
of defamation, being investigated and leaks of sexual activity.
3207:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
3098:
bios on the hundreds of other people under U.S. surveillance.
2570:
describes the notability of the suspected criminal act, while
2405:
unless all the suspicious issues are clarified and dismissed
2056:
List of Chinese spy cases in the United States#Christine Fang
319:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
2832:
Something along those lines address BLP1E, not BLPCRIME.
1153:
criminal suspicions are facts. FBI made no case. We must
2419:
That is the opposite of how Knowledge works. Please read
1841:
1837:
1425:
1423:
1421:
160:
156:
152:
216:
1235:
Catching a plane is an event? This logic invalidates
956:
all five parts of the inclusion criteria for an event
1412:'s page, but not Fang's guilt or innocence as per
954:for a person (as was noted by another editor) and
2589:See the above where I responded to your comment.
2561:I strongly disagree that being a fundraiser or a
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
3219:). No further edits should be made to this page.
345:Note: This discussion has been included in the
331:Note: This discussion has been included in the
317:Note: This discussion has been included in the
303:Note: This discussion has been included in the
275:. No real name or biographical details so fails
2280:List of Chinese spy cases in the United States
269:List of Chinese spy cases in the United States
1999:analysis. I have nothing to add all covered.
715:stoked further high-profile racist Sinophobia
230:
8:
3142:Tabloidish notability for a fleeting event.
271:. Consensual sexual activity disclosed must
118:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
971:b) §2 is invalidated because Fang is not a
305:list of People-related deletion discussions
2865:& his many sockpuppets. How pathetic.
2753:The following discussion has been closed.
2742:
2483:The following discussion has been closed.
2472:
2447:a subject should be included but does not
2204:The following discussion has been closed.
2193:
2089:The following discussion has been closed.
2078:
1762:The following discussion has been closed.
1751:
1446:has been met in section 6 of my argument.
950:) is satisfied: the article satisfies the
913:The following discussion has been closed.
902:
792:The following discussion has been closed.
781:
698:The following discussion has been closed.
686:
496:The following discussion has been closed.
485:
388:The following discussion has been closed.
377:
347:list of Women-related deletion discussions
344:
333:list of China-related deletion discussions
330:
316:
302:
2014:have bios here and I think this violates
265:Eric_Swalwell#Ties_to_alleged_Chinese_spy
3017:are also notable only for one event. --
2683:violation, given that Fang is obviously
888:per well reasoned argument of nominator.
2706:
584:Chinese espionage in the United States
363:- Yup, this bio article has gotta go.
3050:Or, to be more precise, she abruptly
1328:none of those were reported on before
7:
1149:website. This response presumes all
871:Just bring in RS from Eric Swallell
2220:per reasoning by Forevertruthsayer
1682:only says brief bursts of coverage
2900:thats basically the definition of
2337:Charges? What do you call charges?
255:, therefore not factually notable
24:
2775:Christine Fang spying accusations
1733:is still, I believe, on point. -
985:(ii) she held a position of power
103:Introduction to deletion process
2786:) 19:55, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
2710:some participants point out. —
2707:substantial and well-documented
2597:) 19:55, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
2515:) 21:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
2291:) 01:10, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
2228:) 19:09, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
2118:) 19:58, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
1874:) 19:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
1787:) 00:03, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
1567:) 19:55, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
1454:) 09:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
1362:) 04:19, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
1274:) 09:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
1189:) 04:19, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
1086:) 09:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
816:) 18:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
721:) without any sign of apology.
628:) 19:58, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
522:) 00:03, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
412:) 12:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
746:As said above violates BLP1E.
1:
3200:22:13, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
3183:15:41, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
3152:13:12, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
3133:03:26, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
3110:20:26, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
3083:03:58, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
3064:22:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
3046:21:53, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
3027:21:45, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
3002:21:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
2985:02:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
2954:21:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
2940:21:16, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
2914:21:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
2889:00:51, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
2875:00:47, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
2842:23:33, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
2827:00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
2738:14:30, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
2722:05:57, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
2698:03:30, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
2668:23:42, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
2638:00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
2584:00:49, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
2556:00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
2468:20:36, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
2434:16:30, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
2415:15:59, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
2398:01:57, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
2371:14:36, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
2349:01:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
2332:00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
2269:00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
2189:16:32, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
2159:00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
2070:21:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
2050:03:09, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
2030:03:06, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
2006:05:46, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
1984:00:59, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
1966:00:28, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
1931:00:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
1915:00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
1856:00:10, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
1828:00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
1745:01:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
1725:21:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
1698:01:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
1674:03:27, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
1657:21:34, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
1624:22:04, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
1608:00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
1525:01:14, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
1495:00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
1437:09:19, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
1408:The politics are relevant to
1403:00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
1343:03:24, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
1315:00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
1261:09:19, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
1230:00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
1167:02:45, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
1127:00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
898:21:03, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
881:18:50, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
857:00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
777:17:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
756:17:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
733:15:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
669:00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
620:judge, jury and executioner.
614:03:22, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
596:01:43, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
563:00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
481:14:27, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
453:00:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
373:12:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
353:09:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
339:09:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
325:09:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
311:09:53, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
297:10:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
73:17:53, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
952:basic criteria of notability
2388:per most of the other keeps
1686:not indicate notability. -
93:(AfD)? Read these primers!
3236:
3169:Knowledge is not a tabloid
2283:cover this up in any way.
1678:That's not how GNG works.
1420:actually did. Three times
1046:does not apply because of
283:. Likely defamatory under
240:Non-factual suspicions in
3209:Please do not modify it.
2756:Please do not modify it.
2486:Please do not modify it.
2207:Please do not modify it.
2092:Please do not modify it.
1765:Please do not modify it.
1249:presumption of innocence
965:does not apply because:
916:Please do not modify it.
795:Please do not modify it.
701:Please do not modify it.
582:may have contributed to
499:Please do not modify it.
391:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
1018:not a non-public figure
1009:does not apply because
973:low-profile individual
3125:ProcrastinatingReader
3095:Natalia Veselnitskaya
3015:Natalia Veselnitskaya
2881:ProcrastinatingReader
2834:ProcrastinatingReader
2690:ProcrastinatingReader
2563:Bundler (campaigning)
1508:bundler (campaigning)
91:Articles for deletion
267:. Inconsistent with
259:. Single news event
1139:unproven suspicions
942:(more specifically
2930:for sock-masters.
3091:Elena Khusyaynova
3071:Elena Khusyaynova
3011:Elena Khusyaynova
2969:Clear example of
2851:
2850:
2829:
2801:) is a confirmed
2791:Forevertruthsayer
2780:Forevertruthsayer
2717:
2652:
2651:
2640:
2612:) is a confirmed
2602:Forevertruthsayer
2591:Forevertruthsayer
2558:
2530:) is a confirmed
2520:Forevertruthsayer
2509:Forevertruthsayer
2382:
2381:
2334:
2306:) is a confirmed
2271:
2243:) is a confirmed
2171:
2170:
2161:
2133:) is a confirmed
2123:Forevertruthsayer
2112:Forevertruthsayer
1997:Forevertruthsayer
1944:
1943:
1917:
1889:) is a confirmed
1853:
1830:
1802:) is a confirmed
1641:
1640:
1614:that one report.
1610:
1582:) is a confirmed
1572:Forevertruthsayer
1561:Forevertruthsayer
1497:
1469:) is a confirmed
1459:Forevertruthsayer
1448:Forevertruthsayer
1405:
1377:) is a confirmed
1367:Forevertruthsayer
1356:Forevertruthsayer
1317:
1289:) is a confirmed
1279:Forevertruthsayer
1268:Forevertruthsayer
1232:
1204:) is a confirmed
1194:Forevertruthsayer
1183:Forevertruthsayer
1129:
1101:) is a confirmed
1091:Forevertruthsayer
1080:Forevertruthsayer
890:John Pack Lambert
865:
864:
859:
831:) is a confirmed
740:
739:
730:
685:
684:
671:
643:) is a confirmed
633:Forevertruthsayer
622:Forevertruthsayer
565:
537:) is a confirmed
461:
460:
455:
427:) is a confirmed
417:The Ace in Spades
406:The Ace in Spades
355:
341:
327:
313:
108:Guide to deletion
98:How to contribute
71:
3227:
3108:
2994:Horse Eye's Back
2982:
2977:
2946:Horse Eye's Back
2906:Horse Eye's Back
2899:
2864:
2788:
2758:
2743:
2720:
2715:
2599:
2517:
2488:
2473:
2466:
2293:
2230:
2209:
2194:
2120:
2094:
2079:
2068:
2048:
2028:
1962:
1959:
1876:
1849:
1847:
1789:
1767:
1752:
1741:
1721:
1694:
1666:
1569:
1456:
1364:
1335:
1276:
1191:
1141:. Fang is not a
1088:
918:
903:
818:
797:
782:
750:
726:
724:
703:
687:
630:
606:
524:
501:
486:
473:
414:
393:
378:
263:mentioned under
235:
234:
220:
168:
150:
88:
70:
68:
61:
34:
3235:
3234:
3230:
3229:
3228:
3226:
3225:
3224:
3223:
3217:deletion review
3180:
3099:
2980:
2975:
2902:WP:GRAVEDANCING
2893:
2858:
2754:
2718:
2711:
2484:
2457:
2205:
2090:
2059:
2039:
2019:
1960:
1957:
1845:
1763:
1743:
1739:
1723:
1719:
1696:
1692:
1664:
1333:
1241:WP:PUBLICFIGURE
1175:WP:PUBLICFIGURE
1143:WP:PUBLICFIGURE
1016:(and therefore
914:
793:
748:
722:
719:another example
699:
604:
497:
471:
389:
177:
141:
125:
122:
85:
82:
64:
62:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3233:
3231:
3222:
3221:
3203:
3202:
3185:
3176:
3154:
3137:
3136:
3135:
3120:
3119:
3118:
3117:
3116:
3115:
3114:
3113:
3112:
3073:-- go for it!
3004:
2987:
2963:
2962:
2961:
2960:
2959:
2958:
2957:
2956:
2919:
2918:
2917:
2916:
2891:
2849:
2848:
2847:
2846:
2845:
2844:
2771:Christine Fang
2760:
2759:
2750:
2749:
2741:
2740:
2724:
2714:
2700:
2670:
2650:
2649:
2648:
2647:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2643:
2642:
2641:
2576:Morbidthoughts
2490:
2489:
2480:
2479:
2471:
2470:
2438:
2437:
2436:
2400:
2380:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2376:
2375:
2374:
2373:
2272:
2211:
2210:
2201:
2200:
2192:
2191:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2096:
2095:
2086:
2085:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2033:
2032:
2008:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1986:
1969:
1968:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1859:
1858:
1851:leave language
1832:
1831:
1769:
1768:
1759:
1758:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1737:
1735:The Bushranger
1717:
1715:The Bushranger
1704:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1690:
1688:The Bushranger
1639:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1616:Morbidthoughts
1554:
1549:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1517:Morbidthoughts
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1418:Christine Fang
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1179:WP:AVOIDVICTIM
1155:WP:AVOIDVICTIM
1075:
1074:
1073:
1070:
1067:
1059:
1040:
1033:
1030:WP:AVOIDVICTIM
1026:
1025:
1024:
1021:
1003:
1002:
1001:
997:
996:
995:
992:
989:
986:
983:
969:
959:
932:
931:
920:
919:
910:
909:
901:
900:
883:
863:
862:
861:
860:
799:
798:
789:
788:
780:
779:
769:Morbidthoughts
758:
738:
737:
736:
735:
728:leave language
705:
704:
695:
694:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
598:
569:
568:
567:
566:
503:
502:
493:
492:
484:
483:
459:
458:
457:
456:
404:: meets BASIC
395:
394:
385:
384:
376:
375:
357:
356:
342:
328:
314:
273:WP:AVOIDVICTIM
238:
237:
174:
127:Christine Fang
121:
120:
115:
105:
100:
83:
81:
79:Christine Fang
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3232:
3220:
3218:
3214:
3210:
3205:
3204:
3201:
3197:
3193:
3189:
3186:
3184:
3179:
3174:
3170:
3166:
3162:
3158:
3155:
3153:
3149:
3145:
3141:
3138:
3134:
3130:
3126:
3121:
3111:
3107:
3105:
3104:
3096:
3092:
3088:
3087:
3086:
3085:
3084:
3080:
3076:
3072:
3067:
3066:
3065:
3061:
3057:
3053:
3049:
3048:
3047:
3044:
3043:
3039:
3038:
3033:
3030:
3029:
3028:
3024:
3020:
3016:
3012:
3008:
3005:
3003:
2999:
2995:
2991:
2988:
2986:
2983:
2978:
2972:
2968:
2965:
2964:
2955:
2951:
2947:
2943:
2942:
2941:
2937:
2933:
2929:
2925:
2924:
2923:
2922:
2921:
2920:
2915:
2911:
2907:
2903:
2897:
2892:
2890:
2886:
2882:
2878:
2877:
2876:
2872:
2868:
2862:
2856:
2853:
2852:
2843:
2839:
2835:
2831:
2830:
2828:
2824:
2820:
2816:
2812:
2808:
2804:
2800:
2796:
2792:
2787:
2785:
2781:
2776:
2772:
2768:
2764:
2763:
2762:
2761:
2757:
2752:
2751:
2748:
2745:
2744:
2739:
2736:
2732:
2728:
2725:
2723:
2719:
2708:
2704:
2701:
2699:
2695:
2691:
2686:
2682:
2678:
2677:Eric_Swalwell
2674:
2671:
2669:
2665:
2661:
2657:
2654:
2653:
2639:
2635:
2631:
2627:
2623:
2619:
2615:
2611:
2607:
2603:
2598:
2596:
2592:
2587:
2586:
2585:
2581:
2577:
2573:
2569:
2564:
2560:
2559:
2557:
2553:
2549:
2545:
2541:
2537:
2533:
2529:
2525:
2521:
2516:
2514:
2510:
2506:
2502:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2493:
2492:
2491:
2487:
2482:
2481:
2478:
2475:
2474:
2469:
2464:
2461:
2455:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2439:
2435:
2432:
2431:
2427:
2426:
2422:
2418:
2417:
2416:
2412:
2408:
2404:
2401:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2387:
2384:
2383:
2372:
2368:
2364:
2360:
2356:
2352:
2351:
2350:
2347:
2346:
2342:
2341:
2336:
2335:
2333:
2329:
2325:
2321:
2317:
2313:
2309:
2305:
2301:
2297:
2292:
2290:
2286:
2281:
2277:
2273:
2270:
2266:
2262:
2258:
2254:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2238:
2234:
2229:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2215:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2208:
2203:
2202:
2199:
2196:
2195:
2190:
2187:
2186:
2182:
2181:
2176:
2173:
2172:
2160:
2156:
2152:
2148:
2144:
2140:
2136:
2132:
2128:
2124:
2119:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2104:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2100:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2093:
2088:
2087:
2084:
2081:
2080:
2071:
2067:
2065:
2064:
2057:
2053:
2052:
2051:
2047:
2045:
2044:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2031:
2027:
2025:
2024:
2017:
2012:
2009:
2007:
2004:
2003:
1998:
1994:
1991:
1990:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1967:
1964:
1963:
1953:
1949:
1946:
1945:
1932:
1928:
1924:
1919:
1918:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1875:
1873:
1869:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1857:
1852:
1843:
1839:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1793:
1788:
1786:
1782:
1777:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1766:
1761:
1760:
1757:
1754:
1753:
1746:
1742:
1740:One ping only
1736:
1732:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1722:
1720:One ping only
1716:
1712:
1711:WP:NOTCLEANUP
1708:
1705:
1699:
1695:
1693:One ping only
1689:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1643:
1642:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1612:
1611:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1568:
1566:
1562:
1556:
1555:
1551:
1548:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1509:
1505:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1455:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1424:
1422:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1410:Eric Swalwell
1407:
1406:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1363:
1361:
1357:
1352:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1329:
1325:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1275:
1273:
1269:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1233:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1190:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1087:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1076:
1071:
1068:
1065:
1060:
1057:
1053:
1052:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1038:
1034:
1031:
1027:
1022:
1019:
1015:
1014:public figure
1012:a) Fang is a
1011:
1010:
1008:
1004:
998:
993:
990:
987:
984:
981:
980:
978:
977:public figure
975:but rather a
974:
970:
967:
966:
964:
960:
957:
953:
949:
945:
941:
937:
935:
934:
930:
928:
924:
923:
922:
921:
917:
912:
911:
908:
905:
904:
899:
895:
891:
887:
884:
882:
878:
874:
873:Charles Juvon
870:
867:
866:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
822:
817:
815:
811:
807:
803:
802:
801:
800:
796:
791:
790:
787:
784:
783:
778:
774:
770:
766:
762:
759:
757:
754:
751:
745:
742:
741:
734:
729:
720:
716:
712:
709:
708:
707:
706:
702:
697:
696:
693:
689:
688:
670:
666:
662:
658:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
629:
627:
623:
617:
616:
615:
611:
607:
599:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
578:In your link
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
564:
560:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
523:
521:
517:
514:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
500:
495:
494:
491:
488:
487:
482:
478:
474:
466:
463:
462:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
413:
411:
407:
403:
399:
398:
397:
396:
392:
387:
386:
383:
380:
379:
374:
370:
366:
362:
359:
358:
354:
351:
348:
343:
340:
337:
334:
329:
326:
323:
320:
315:
312:
309:
306:
301:
300:
299:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
281:WP:LOWPROFILE
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
243:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:Find sources:
175:
172:
166:
162:
158:
154:
149:
145:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
123:
119:
116:
113:
109:
106:
104:
101:
99:
96:
95:
94:
92:
87:
80:
77:
75:
74:
69:
67:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
3208:
3206:
3187:
3156:
3139:
3102:
3101:
3051:
3041:
3036:
3031:
3006:
2989:
2966:
2927:
2854:
2774:
2770:
2766:
2765:
2755:
2726:
2702:
2672:
2655:
2588:
2504:
2497:
2485:
2453:
2448:
2444:
2440:
2429:
2424:
2402:
2390:Seven Pandas
2385:
2354:
2344:
2339:
2296:BCEVERYWHERE
2285:BCEVERYWHERE
2275:
2274:
2217:
2216:
2206:
2184:
2179:
2174:
2105:
2091:
2062:
2061:
2042:
2041:
2022:
2021:
2010:
2001:
1996:
1992:
1956:
1947:
1864:
1775:
1774:
1764:
1730:
1706:
1683:
1644:
1557:
1550:
1545:
1441:
1347:
1327:
1265:
1171:
1138:
1078:
936:
933:
926:
925:
915:
885:
868:
805:
804:
794:
760:
743:
710:
700:
618:
580:Nancy Pelosi
510:
498:
464:
401:
400:
390:
360:
350:
336:
322:
308:
239:
227:
221:
213:
206:
200:
194:
188:
178:
84:
65:
49:
47:
31:
28:
3165:WP:COATRACK
2928:no sympathy
2803:sock puppet
2685:low profile
2681:WP:BLPCRIME
2614:sock puppet
2532:sock puppet
2355:in absentia
2308:sock puppet
2245:sock puppet
2135:sock puppet
1891:sock puppet
1838:This remark
1804:sock puppet
1584:sock puppet
1471:sock puppet
1379:sock puppet
1291:sock puppet
1206:sock puppet
1103:sock puppet
1000:documented.
927:Strong keep
833:sock puppet
821:Festerhauer
810:Festerhauer
645:sock puppet
539:sock puppet
429:sock puppet
204:free images
3192:Albertaont
3173:Ivanvector
3075:Travelmite
2660:Trillfendi
2363:Travelmite
1976:Travelmite
1923:Travelmite
1513:WP:SUSPECT
1429:Travelmite
1253:Travelmite
1159:Travelmite
1007:WP:SUSPECT
948:WP:NEVENTS
765:WP:SUSPECT
588:Travelmite
289:Travelmite
279:. Fang is
66:Sandstein
60:concerns.
3213:talk page
3144:ValarianB
3037:SPECIFICO
2861:Waskerton
2807:Waskerton
2618:Waskerton
2568:WP:NCRIME
2536:Waskerton
2501:WP:NCRIME
2425:SPECIFICO
2340:SPECIFICO
2312:Waskerton
2249:Waskerton
2180:SPECIFICO
2139:Waskerton
1895:Waskerton
1846:Caradhras
1808:Waskerton
1588:Waskerton
1475:Waskerton
1383:Waskerton
1295:Waskerton
1210:Waskerton
1107:Waskerton
1064:WP:NCRIME
1056:WP:NCRIME
1048:WP:NCRIME
837:Waskerton
723:Caradhras
649:Waskerton
543:Waskerton
433:Waskerton
37:talk page
3215:or in a
3161:WP:BLP1E
2971:WP:BLP1E
2815:contribs
2799:contribs
2626:contribs
2610:contribs
2572:WP:CRIME
2544:contribs
2528:contribs
2463:a·po·des
2320:contribs
2304:contribs
2257:contribs
2241:contribs
2233:GMPX1234
2222:GMPX1234
2147:contribs
2131:contribs
2108:WP:CRIME
2002:Gharouni
1903:contribs
1887:contribs
1879:Afalfafa
1868:Afalfafa
1816:contribs
1800:contribs
1792:Afalfafa
1781:Afalfafa
1596:contribs
1580:contribs
1483:contribs
1467:contribs
1444:WP:CRIME
1414:WP:CRIME
1391:contribs
1375:contribs
1351:WP:BLP1E
1303:contribs
1287:contribs
1247:and the
1245:WP:BLP1E
1237:WP:CRIME
1218:contribs
1202:contribs
1115:contribs
1099:contribs
1044:WP:CRIME
963:WP:BLP1E
845:contribs
829:contribs
657:contribs
641:contribs
551:contribs
535:contribs
527:Afalfafa
516:Afalfafa
441:contribs
425:contribs
261:WP:BIO1E
253:WP:CRIME
244:article
171:View log
112:glossary
39:or in a
3056:Tobby72
3019:Tobby72
2932:GoodDay
2896:GoodDay
2867:GoodDay
2855:Comment
2747:WP:SOCK
2505:even if
2477:WP:SOCK
2449:require
2445:presume
2198:WP:SOCK
2083:WP:SOCK
1848:Aiguo (
1756:WP:SOCK
944:WP:NBIO
907:WP:SOCK
786:WP:SOCK
749:BJackJS
725:Aiguo (
490:WP:SOCK
382:WP:SOCK
365:GoodDay
210:WP refs
198:scholar
144:protect
139:history
89:New to
3188:Delete
3157:Delete
3140:Delete
2990:Delete
2967:Delete
2767:UPDATE
2731:Calton
2727:Delete
2703:Delete
2673:Delete
2656:Delete
2454:person
2441:Delete
2421:WP:BLP
2359:WP:NOT
2175:Delete
2011:Delete
1952:WP:GNG
1731:itself
1649:BabbaQ
886:Delete
761:Delete
744:Delete
711:Delete
465:Delete
361:Delete
285:WP:BLP
249:WP:NOT
182:Google
148:delete
58:WP:BLP
50:delete
3178:Edits
3089:Both
2976:KidAd
2926:I've
2713:MarkH
1151:Axios
1147:Axios
690:SOCK
242:Axios
225:JSTOR
186:books
165:views
157:watch
153:links
54:WP:1E
16:<
3196:talk
3163:and
3159:per
3148:talk
3129:talk
3093:and
3079:talk
3060:talk
3052:left
3042:talk
3032:Fled
3023:talk
3007:Keep
2998:talk
2981:talk
2950:talk
2936:talk
2910:talk
2885:talk
2871:talk
2838:talk
2823:talk
2819:ST47
2811:talk
2795:talk
2784:talk
2735:Talk
2694:talk
2664:talk
2634:talk
2630:ST47
2622:talk
2606:talk
2595:talk
2580:talk
2552:talk
2548:ST47
2540:talk
2524:talk
2513:talk
2460:Wug·
2430:talk
2411:talk
2407:KPX8
2403:Keep
2394:talk
2386:Keep
2367:talk
2345:talk
2328:talk
2324:ST47
2316:talk
2300:talk
2289:talk
2276:Keep
2265:talk
2261:ST47
2253:talk
2237:talk
2226:talk
2218:Keep
2185:talk
2155:talk
2151:ST47
2143:talk
2127:talk
2116:talk
1993:Keep
1980:talk
1961:5969
1958:Onel
1948:Keep
1927:talk
1911:talk
1907:ST47
1899:talk
1883:talk
1872:talk
1842:D+20
1824:talk
1820:ST47
1812:talk
1796:talk
1785:talk
1776:Keep
1713:. -
1707:Keep
1680:WP:N
1665:asem
1653:talk
1645:Keep
1620:talk
1604:talk
1600:ST47
1592:talk
1576:talk
1565:talk
1521:talk
1491:talk
1487:ST47
1479:talk
1463:talk
1452:talk
1433:talk
1399:talk
1395:ST47
1387:talk
1371:talk
1360:talk
1334:asem
1311:talk
1307:ST47
1299:talk
1283:talk
1272:talk
1257:talk
1226:talk
1222:ST47
1214:talk
1198:talk
1187:talk
1177:and
1163:talk
1123:talk
1119:ST47
1111:talk
1095:talk
1084:talk
1037:WP:V
946:and
940:WP:N
894:talk
877:talk
869:Keep
853:talk
849:ST47
841:talk
825:talk
814:talk
806:Keep
773:talk
753:talk
692:here
665:talk
661:ST47
653:talk
637:talk
626:talk
605:asem
592:talk
559:talk
555:ST47
547:talk
531:talk
520:talk
472:asem
449:talk
445:ST47
437:talk
421:talk
410:talk
402:KEEP
369:talk
293:talk
277:WP:V
257:WP:N
218:FENS
192:news
161:logs
135:talk
131:edit
56:and
3013:or
2817:).
2805:of
2773:to
2628:).
2616:of
2546:).
2534:of
2322:).
2310:of
2259:).
2247:of
2149:).
2137:of
2016:BLP
1905:).
1893:of
1818:).
1806:of
1684:may
1598:).
1586:of
1485:).
1473:of
1393:).
1381:of
1305:).
1293:of
1220:).
1208:of
1117:).
1105:of
1042:6)
1035:5)
1028:4)
1005:3)
961:2)
938:1)
847:).
835:of
659:).
647:of
553:).
541:of
443:).
431:of
232:TWL
169:– (
3198:)
3181:)
3175:(/
3150:)
3131:)
3106:iz
3081:)
3062:)
3025:)
3000:)
2952:)
2938:)
2912:)
2887:)
2873:)
2857:-
2840:)
2825:)
2813:•
2797:•
2789:—
2733:|
2716:21
2696:)
2666:)
2636:)
2624:•
2608:•
2600:—
2582:)
2554:)
2542:•
2526:•
2518:—
2458:—
2413:)
2396:)
2369:)
2361:.
2330:)
2318:•
2302:•
2294:—
2267:)
2255:•
2239:•
2231:—
2157:)
2145:•
2129:•
2121:—
2110:.
2066:iz
2058:.
2046:iz
2026:iz
1982:)
1929:)
1913:)
1901:•
1885:•
1877:—
1854:)
1826:)
1814:•
1798:•
1790:—
1672:)
1655:)
1622:)
1606:)
1594:•
1578:•
1570:—
1523:)
1493:)
1481:•
1465:•
1457:—
1435:)
1401:)
1389:•
1373:•
1365:—
1341:)
1313:)
1301:•
1285:•
1277:—
1259:)
1243:,
1239:,
1228:)
1216:•
1200:•
1192:—
1165:)
1125:)
1113:•
1097:•
1089:—
896:)
879:)
855:)
843:•
827:•
819:—
775:)
767:.
731:)
667:)
655:•
639:•
631:—
612:)
601:--
594:)
561:)
549:•
533:•
525:—
479:)
451:)
439:•
423:•
415:—
371:)
349:.
335:.
321:.
307:.
295:)
287:.
247:.
212:)
163:|
159:|
155:|
151:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
3194:(
3146:(
3127:(
3103:L
3077:(
3058:(
3021:(
2996:(
2948:(
2934:(
2908:(
2898::
2894:@
2883:(
2869:(
2863::
2859:@
2836:(
2821:(
2809:(
2793:(
2782:(
2692:(
2662:(
2632:(
2620:(
2604:(
2593:(
2578:(
2550:(
2538:(
2522:(
2511:(
2465:
2409:(
2392:(
2365:(
2326:(
2314:(
2298:(
2287:(
2263:(
2251:(
2235:(
2224:(
2153:(
2141:(
2125:(
2114:(
2063:L
2043:L
2023:L
1978:(
1925:(
1909:(
1897:(
1881:(
1870:(
1822:(
1810:(
1794:(
1783:(
1670:t
1668:(
1663:M
1651:(
1618:(
1602:(
1590:(
1574:(
1563:(
1519:(
1489:(
1477:(
1461:(
1450:(
1431:(
1397:(
1385:(
1369:(
1358:(
1339:t
1337:(
1332:M
1309:(
1297:(
1281:(
1270:(
1255:(
1251:.
1224:(
1212:(
1196:(
1185:(
1161:(
1121:(
1109:(
1093:(
1082:(
1020:)
958:.
892:(
875:(
851:(
839:(
823:(
812:(
771:(
717:(
663:(
651:(
635:(
624:(
610:t
608:(
603:M
590:(
557:(
545:(
529:(
518:(
477:t
475:(
470:M
447:(
435:(
419:(
408:(
367:(
291:(
236:)
228:·
222:·
214:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
184:(
176:(
173:)
167:)
129:(
114:)
110:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.