Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Ciberbit - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

417:: Literally no coverage other than their website found. Working with Microsoft in this case means publishing games on their platform, which isn't notable. They make software, but don't describe what it is or why it's notable, further hindering our efforts to prove notability. I can't find anything about this commercial enterprise. 204: 260: 264: 161: 272: 268: 198: 93: 108: 434:: No sign of notability anywhere. I'm not even sure if it still exists. Looks like a relic from the past when notability standards were much less strict. 256: 366:
original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject
88: 81: 17: 102: 98: 385: 134: 129: 472: 219: 40: 165: 138: 186: 325:
Known for influence in the country, with no coverage about it? Can you provide any articles about this influence?
121: 293:
The company is known for its cooperation with Microsoft and its influence on the IT industry in the country. --
180: 361: 36: 298: 176: 455: 426: 422: 405: 374: 334: 330: 320: 302: 284: 248: 212: 125: 63: 357: 349: 345: 311:, which is a requirement for a standalone page, a vague claim it is influential is not enough. 308: 236: 226: 316: 280: 244: 117: 77: 69: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
467:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
353: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
368:. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. 468: 364:. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include 294: 418: 326: 192: 450: 369: 312: 276: 240: 155: 436: 396: 54: 463:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
239:
with a lack of any significant coverage in reliable sources.
388:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
151: 147: 143: 211: 394:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 225: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 475:). No further edits should be made to this page. 255:Note: This discussion has been included in the 8: 109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 254: 235:Written like an advertisement and fails 362:in-depth information *on the company* 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 307:There's still no evidence it passes 24: 344:This is a company therefore GNG/ 259:lists for the following topics: 94:Introduction to deletion process 348:requires at least two deep or 1: 84:(AfD)? Read these primers! 492: 456:01:56, 1 August 2024 (UTC) 64:05:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC) 427:23:02, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 406:22:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 375:11:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 335:23:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC) 321:14:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 303:11:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 285:17:30, 24 July 2024 (UTC) 249:17:30, 24 July 2024 (UTC) 465:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 166:edits since nomination 358:"Independent Content" 82:Articles for deletion 408: 287: 99:Guide to deletion 89:How to contribute 483: 454: 453: 447: 446: 443: 440: 404: 393: 391: 389: 257:deletion sorting 230: 229: 215: 159: 141: 79: 62: 34: 491: 490: 486: 485: 484: 482: 481: 480: 479: 473:deletion review 449: 444: 441: 438: 437: 435: 395: 384: 382: 172: 132: 116: 113: 76: 73: 53: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 489: 487: 478: 477: 459: 458: 429: 411: 410: 392: 378: 377: 339: 338: 337: 323: 288: 233: 232: 169: 112: 111: 106: 96: 91: 74: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 488: 476: 474: 470: 466: 461: 460: 457: 452: 448: 433: 430: 428: 424: 420: 416: 413: 412: 409: 407: 403: 401: 400: 390: 387: 380: 379: 376: 373: 372: 367: 363: 359: 355: 352:sources with 351: 347: 343: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 322: 318: 314: 310: 306: 305: 304: 300: 296: 292: 289: 286: 282: 278: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 253: 252: 251: 250: 246: 242: 238: 228: 224: 221: 218: 214: 210: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 178: 175: 174:Find sources: 170: 167: 163: 157: 153: 149: 145: 140: 136: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 114: 110: 107: 104: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 86: 85: 83: 78: 71: 68: 66: 65: 61: 59: 58: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 464: 462: 431: 414: 398: 397: 383: 381: 370: 365: 341: 290: 234: 222: 216: 208: 201: 195: 189: 183: 173: 75: 56: 55: 49: 47: 31: 28: 356:containing 354:each source 350:significant 261:Video games 199:free images 295:Loewstisch 469:talk page 419:Oaktree b 327:Oaktree b 265:Companies 37:talk page 471:or in a 386:Relisted 371:HighKing 360:showing 346:WP:NCORP 309:WP:NCORP 273:Portugal 269:Software 237:WP:NCORP 162:View log 118:Ciberbit 103:glossary 70:Ciberbit 39:or in a 313:ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ 277:ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ 271:, and 241:ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ 205:WP refs 193:scholar 135:protect 130:history 80:New to 432:Delete 415:Delete 342:Delete 177:Google 139:delete 50:delete 220:JSTOR 181:books 156:views 148:watch 144:links 16:< 423:talk 331:talk 299:talk 291:Keep 213:FENS 187:news 152:logs 126:talk 122:edit 275:. 227:TWL 160:– ( 52:‎. 451:💬 425:) 402:iz 333:) 319:) 301:) 283:) 267:, 263:, 247:) 207:) 164:| 154:| 150:| 146:| 142:| 137:| 133:| 128:| 124:| 60:iz 445:A 442:F 439:C 421:( 399:L 329:( 317:ᴛ 315:( 297:( 281:ᴛ 279:( 245:ᴛ 243:( 231:) 223:· 217:· 209:· 202:· 196:· 190:· 184:· 179:( 171:( 168:) 158:) 120:( 105:) 101:( 57:L

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Liz
05:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Ciberbit

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Ciberbit
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
edits since nomination
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.