332:- I wrote this page. On the page which you have linked too it says "Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage" are notable. I set out to write a page for every leader and opposition leader in Camden but I quickly realised that not all of them have received sufficient press coverage. eg the current opposition leader Tom Simon or Giovanni Spinella who was briefly opposition leader between Leyland and Cooper. However Leyland and especially Cooper have received major media coverage including in the national press that goes far beyond the average leader of the opposition on a council this size (almost 300,000 people).
245:: "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." I'm not convinced that Leyland meets the criteria. (Similar to her fellow Camden Conservative
366:, the deletion nomination already counts as an opinion in favour of deletion. I know that deletion discussions are supposedly not votes, but your following it up with a bolded "delete" could lead to double counting, so I would recommend striking that word at the beginning of that statement.
441:
and supposed coverage is missing. I found the
Evening Standard which is on the election campaign and fails NPOL. Didn't find the Sunday Times, but is likely to be the same election cycle news and again failing npol. There is no secondary coverage on it, at all, failing
489:. What little coverage we do have is all routine local news coverage. Per precedence at AFD, we need to see a greater diversity of sources to establish notability for a politician at the municipal level beyond local news coverage.
202:
349:- I don’t think the GNG are met. Do we want or need articles for every opposition leader on councils with a large population, even in London? If it was a Camden Knowledge (XXG) then the articles would be fine.—
294:
464:- She seems to picked up above average news coverage for a local party leader and parliamentary candidate, not much more but enough so that's it worth keeping the page on balance.—
266:
196:
159:
290:
91:
106:
132:
127:
286:
136:
119:
86:
79:
17:
217:
184:
242:
100:
96:
246:
238:
526:
410:
563:
178:
40:
163:
544:
515:
498:
473:
456:
425:
397:
375:
358:
341:
324:
306:
278:
258:
61:
437:
I can't understand why this article merits two keep entries, when the coverage is tenuous at best. Doesn't meet in
123:
174:
224:
234:
388:
Okay, I thought I had to make it clear which option I was “voting” for, so I’ve modified my comment above.—
371:
559:
540:
421:
393:
354:
274:
254:
115:
67:
36:
57:
486:
337:
302:
210:
190:
443:
511:
469:
494:
367:
320:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
558:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
482:
438:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
536:
449:
389:
363:
350:
270:
250:
53:
333:
298:
507:
465:
490:
316:
153:
315:- the Sunday Times and Evening Standard articles give significant coverage
554:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
446:. As far as I can see it is a complete sop and non-notable.
529:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
413:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
149:
145:
141:
209:
535:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
419:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
249:, whose article I've also nominated for deletion.)
223:
506:as per Mujinga - enough coverage to make SIGCOV.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
566:). No further edits should be made to this page.
285:Note: This discussion has been included in the
267:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
265:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
284:
264:
233:Local councillor in London who led the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
289:lists for the following topics:
92:Introduction to deletion process
1:
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
583:
545:15:33, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
516:07:25, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
499:07:22, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
474:08:56, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
457:08:08, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
426:14:29, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
398:18:02, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
376:17:43, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
359:15:28, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
342:14:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
325:10:38, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
307:13:36, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
279:13:21, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
259:13:21, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
556:Please do not modify it.
62:02:27, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
243:WP:Notability (people)
164:edits since nomination
116:Claire-Louise Leyland
80:Articles for deletion
68:Claire-Louise Leyland
547:
428:
309:
281:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
574:
534:
532:
530:
454:
452:
424:
418:
416:
414:
364:User:TrottieTrue
287:deletion sorting
228:
227:
213:
157:
139:
77:
34:
582:
581:
577:
576:
575:
573:
572:
571:
570:
564:deletion review
525:
523:
450:
448:
420:
409:
407:
170:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
580:
578:
569:
568:
550:
549:
533:
519:
518:
501:
476:
459:
431:
430:
417:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
381:
380:
379:
378:
344:
327:
310:
295:United Kingdom
282:
239:Camden Council
231:
230:
167:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
579:
567:
565:
561:
557:
552:
551:
548:
546:
542:
538:
531:
528:
521:
520:
517:
513:
509:
505:
502:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
477:
475:
471:
467:
463:
460:
458:
455:
453:
445:
440:
436:
433:
432:
429:
427:
423:
422:North America
415:
412:
405:
399:
395:
391:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
377:
373:
369:
365:
362:
361:
360:
356:
352:
348:
345:
343:
339:
335:
331:
328:
326:
322:
318:
314:
311:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
283:
280:
276:
272:
268:
263:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
248:
247:Oliver Cooper
244:
240:
236:
235:Conservatives
226:
222:
219:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
176:
173:
172:Find sources:
168:
165:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
555:
553:
524:
522:
503:
478:
461:
447:
434:
408:
406:
368:Phil Bridger
346:
329:
312:
232:
220:
214:
206:
199:
193:
187:
181:
171:
73:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
537:Less Unless
451:scope_creep
390:TrottieTrue
351:TrottieTrue
271:TrottieTrue
251:TrottieTrue
197:free images
487:WP:NOTNEWS
54:TigerShark
560:talk page
462:Weak Keep
444:WP:SIGCOV
334:Fosse1884
299:Shellwood
37:talk page
562:or in a
527:Relisted
508:Ingratis
481:. Fails
466:Sam11333
411:Relisted
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
491:4meter4
483:WP:NPOL
439:WP:NPOL
317:Mujinga
241:. From
203:WPÂ refs
191:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
479:Delete
435:Delete
347:Delete
175:Google
137:delete
291:Women
218:JSTOR
179:books
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
541:talk
512:talk
504:Keep
495:talk
485:and
470:talk
394:talk
372:talk
355:talk
338:talk
330:Keep
321:talk
313:Keep
303:talk
293:and
275:talk
255:talk
211:FENS
185:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
269:.--
237:on
225:TWL
158:– (
543:)
514:)
497:)
472:)
396:)
374:)
357:)
340:)
323:)
305:)
297:.
277:)
257:)
205:)
162:|
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
539:(
510:(
493:(
468:(
392:(
370:(
353:(
336:(
319:(
301:(
273:(
253:(
229:)
221:·
215:·
207:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
182:·
177:(
169:(
166:)
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.