Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Claire Falconer - Knowledge

Source 📝

55:, when it had only two sources, and one of those was IMDB, which is generally considered to be an unreliable source, but it has been built on during the AfD discussion, and more sources added. However, two of the deletes came after the sources were added, and commented that the sources were not adequate - for example that the BBC source was an interview, and that coverage of her art career (her assumed notability) was sparse. Having looked at the BBC interview, I agree. The interview is about the town - she is used as a commentator on the town as a resident there. And other mentions, such as in the 52:. This AfD has been relisted three times. It has had few contributors to the discussion. Of those !voting, three - including the nominator - are in favour of delete due to lack of significant reliable sources, with only one keep (from Piecesofuk, because they added sources). With three to one in favour of delete, numerically that would favour a delete. Also, lack of interest in a delete discussion in itself favours a delete on the principle of "no objection". On the other hand, the article was nominated for deletion when it was in this state: 80:
in the article is local coverage from her birthplace, so it counts for very little in terms of notability". That point has not been challenged, and has been implicitly supported by those commenting. It's also worth noting that two of those !voting to delete have been active in editing the article to provide sources, yet concluded after doing their research that there was not enough notability evidence for Knowledge's inclusion criteria.
79:
as pointed out by the nominator and user Possibly, when !voting delete, but they do provide some detailed coverage of her, as Possibly says, a "public personality". The downside of those sources is that they are local, which brings us back to the point made in the nomination that "The single source
479:. On the one hand, she has been covered by BBC and a few other good sources... but several of these are interviews. Might meet GNG as a sort of former public personality. On the other hand, coverage of her art career is very sparse. Definitely fails every point of 226: 304: 269:, or to indicate that she meets any of the points in the SNGs. The single source in the article is local coverage from her birthplace, so it counts for very little in terms of notability. ♠ 361: 220: 187: 323: 285: 342: 383:. Found and added two more references. The talk page lists three other references which are all now deadlinks, but this may indicate more coverage exists. 134: 119: 71:, a reliable source, does provide two detailed articles on her. And here's the rub. Certainly, they do not provide the information required of either 558:. I was on the fence about this one, added a couple of references and appreciate those added by others, but I don't think there is enough coverage. 536:
Boldly relisting a third time, no consensus above currently but with a more detailed review of sourcing one may be established with another 7 days.
160: 155: 164: 147: 63:, are "sparse" in that they mention her only in passing, in a trivial rather than the detailed or significant manner required of 114: 107: 17: 241: 445: 208: 369: 350: 331: 312: 293: 274: 403: 128: 124: 525: 501: 424: 584: 202: 40: 567: 548: 516: 492: 471: 452: 415: 392: 372: 365: 353: 346: 334: 327: 315: 308: 296: 289: 277: 270: 198: 89: 151: 68: 580: 36: 248: 467: 411: 143: 95: 234: 488: 85: 563: 480: 388: 262: 103: 76: 56: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
579:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
214: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
544: 258: 72: 463: 407: 402:
Added that she was interviewed in the BBC series Town, also added a reference from the
60: 484: 439: 266: 81: 64: 559: 384: 181: 540: 512: 462:
I've added an interview from Queen's University Belfast youTube channel
575:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
528:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
504:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
427:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
406:
which probably could be used to add some more information
305:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
265:. I was not able to find enough coverage of her to meet 177: 173: 169: 53: 233: 438:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~
362:
list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions
539:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 510:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 587:). No further edits should be made to this page. 360:Note: This discussion has been included in the 341:Note: This discussion has been included in the 322:Note: This discussion has been included in the 303:Note: This discussion has been included in the 284:Note: This discussion has been included in the 247: 8: 324:list of Artists-related deletion discussions 135:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 286:list of People-related deletion discussions 359: 343:list of Women-related deletion discussions 340: 321: 302: 283: 435:Need some !votes apart from comments. 7: 24: 404:Culture Northern Ireland website 120:Introduction to deletion process 257:Does not appear to meet wither 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 517:16:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC) 493:00:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC) 472:17:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC) 453:07:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC) 416:19:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC) 393:21:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC) 373:20:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC) 354:20:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC) 335:20:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC) 316:20:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC) 297:20:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC) 278:20:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC) 110:(AfD)? Read these primers! 604: 90:10:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC) 568:20:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC) 549:23:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC) 577:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 69:The Impartial Reporter 108:Articles for deletion 534:Relisting comment: 433:Relisting comment: 551: 519: 455: 375: 356: 337: 318: 299: 125:Guide to deletion 115:How to contribute 57:Irish Independent 595: 538: 531: 529: 509: 507: 505: 442: 437: 430: 428: 252: 251: 237: 185: 167: 105: 34: 603: 602: 598: 597: 596: 594: 593: 592: 591: 585:deletion review 552: 524: 522: 520: 500: 498: 456: 451: 440: 423: 421: 194: 158: 144:Claire Falconer 142: 139: 102: 99: 96:Claire Falconer 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 601: 599: 590: 589: 571: 570: 537: 532: 521: 508: 497: 496: 495: 474: 444: 436: 431: 420: 419: 418: 396: 395: 377: 376: 357: 338: 319: 300: 255: 254: 191: 138: 137: 132: 122: 117: 100: 98: 93: 61:Evening Herald 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 600: 588: 586: 582: 578: 573: 572: 569: 565: 561: 557: 554: 553: 550: 546: 542: 535: 530: 527: 518: 515: 514: 506: 503: 494: 490: 486: 482: 478: 475: 473: 469: 465: 461: 458: 457: 454: 450: 448: 443: 434: 429: 426: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 398: 397: 394: 390: 386: 382: 379: 378: 374: 371: 367: 363: 358: 355: 352: 348: 344: 339: 336: 333: 329: 325: 320: 317: 314: 310: 306: 301: 298: 295: 291: 287: 282: 281: 280: 279: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 250: 246: 243: 240: 236: 232: 228: 225: 222: 219: 216: 213: 210: 207: 204: 200: 197: 196:Find sources: 192: 189: 183: 179: 175: 171: 166: 162: 157: 153: 149: 145: 141: 140: 136: 133: 130: 126: 123: 121: 118: 116: 113: 112: 111: 109: 104: 97: 94: 92: 91: 87: 83: 78: 74: 70: 67:. However, 66: 62: 58: 54: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 576: 574: 555: 533: 523: 511: 499: 476: 459: 449:harge-parity 446: 432: 422: 399: 380: 256: 244: 238: 230: 223: 217: 211: 205: 195: 101: 49: 47: 31: 28: 221:free images 481:WP:NARTIST 464:Piecesofuk 408:Piecesofuk 263:WP:NARTIST 77:WP:NARTIST 581:talk page 259:WP:NACTOR 73:WP:NACTOR 37:talk page 583:or in a 526:Relisted 502:Relisted 485:Possibly 441:Ase1este 425:Relisted 188:View log 129:glossary 82:SilkTork 39:or in a 560:Tacyarg 400:Comment 385:Tacyarg 381:Comment 227:WP refs 215:scholar 161:protect 156:history 106:New to 556:Delete 541:Daniel 513:Bungle 477:Delete 370:(talk) 351:(talk) 332:(talk) 313:(talk) 294:(talk) 275:(talk) 267:WP:GNG 199:Google 165:delete 65:WP:GNG 50:delete 242:JSTOR 203:books 182:views 174:watch 170:links 16:< 564:talk 545:talk 489:talk 468:talk 460:Keep 412:talk 389:talk 235:FENS 209:news 178:logs 152:talk 148:edit 86:talk 59:and 483:. 366:PMC 364:. ♠ 347:PMC 345:. ♠ 328:PMC 326:. ♠ 309:PMC 307:. ♠ 290:PMC 288:. ♠ 271:PMC 261:or 249:TWL 186:– ( 75:or 566:) 547:) 491:) 470:) 414:) 391:) 368:♠ 349:♠ 330:♠ 311:♠ 292:♠ 273:♠ 229:) 180:| 176:| 172:| 168:| 163:| 159:| 154:| 150:| 88:) 562:( 543:( 487:( 466:( 447:c 410:( 387:( 253:) 245:· 239:· 231:· 224:· 218:· 212:· 206:· 201:( 193:( 190:) 184:) 146:( 131:) 127:( 84:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review

Irish Independent
Evening Herald
WP:GNG
The Impartial Reporter
WP:NACTOR
WP:NARTIST
SilkTork
talk
10:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Claire Falconer

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Claire Falconer
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.