354:
populated place. I disagree with the argument that the mere presence of a post office proves the presence of an associated community of some notability. The other references to "Clem" also likely refer just to an informal, local name for part of
Braxton County and do not provide sufficient evidence of a populated place / community of any significance. Furthermore, historic USGS topographic maps and Goggle Earth imagery all lack any indication of any past or present clustering of structures and roads that is indicative of a recognizable populated place / real and substantial community of any significance or notability. There simply is a lack of any credible evidence of notabillity for this entity. Clem, West Virginia fails
340:
seemed to have information from snippets, though it isn't available online. And that's in addition to the source in the article about the name origin and the community's continued inclusion in modern highway maps, including the one cited in the article. I'd argue that having a designated ZIP Code
353:
The above arguments for a recognizable populated place that is known as "Clem" is overstated and likely misinterpreted. For example, the reference to zip code, schools, and even the County Road map cited in the
Knowledge article all reference a post office and lack any definitive mention of a
319:
Since the community shares its name with a somewhat common name, it's a little hard to research, but Clem certainly appears to be more than a locale. Its post office survived into the ZIP Code era and was given a ZIP Code of 26614 before it closed (go
245:
standard. Topographic maps show a max of two buildings here. Newspapers.com brings up nothing useful searching either with or without the county name; the guy it's apparently named after's name brings up no hits within the state of West
Virginia.
341:
counts as government recognition - by the 1960s, you didn't have the problem of rural post offices with no associated community anymore - but in any case, there's an abundance of evidence that this is a real and substantial community.
254:
lists Clem among pre-RFD route post offices, but doesn't mention it among the city or unincorporated villages of the county. As a locale, it fails GEOLAND, and the significant, in-depth coverage in reliable sources needed to pass
199:
333:
234:
296:
193:
160:
276:
233:
calls it a post office, and as that source makes a distinction with calling many other entries villages (the v. designation), it looks to only be a post office.
251:
247:
107:
92:
325:
133:
128:
137:
337:
120:
214:
181:
60:
87:
80:
17:
175:
101:
97:
231:
422:
398:
462:
443:
413:
389:
370:
345:
308:
288:
268:
171:
62:
479:
40:
124:
221:
378:
as the post office confers legal recognition and the obituaries confirm residents, thus it is a community. ~
475:
409:
36:
381:
58:
207:
187:
116:
68:
329:
342:
304:
284:
264:
238:
366:
355:
242:
76:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
474:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
53:
434:
458:
359:
300:
280:
260:
256:
362:
154:
454:
250:
published six years after the "founding" of Clem does not mention it.
332:
documents multiple residents, including the deceased. I found another
321:
470:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
425:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
401:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
453:
Clem, West
Virginia has people living there. Thank You-
150:
146:
142:
206:
230:
Looks non-notable. A 1945 history of West
Virginia
431:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
407:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
297:list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
482:). No further edits should be made to this page.
295:Note: This discussion has been included in the
275:Note: This discussion has been included in the
277:list of Geography-related deletion discussions
220:
8:
324:and search the 266 range for proof). It had
108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
328:as of 1927, according to state reports. An
294:
274:
7:
24:
93:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
463:18:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
444:13:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
414:08:34, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
390:18:40, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
371:02:19, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
346:21:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
336:of a soldier from Clem, and
309:05:07, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
289:05:07, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
269:05:07, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
63:22:14, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
83:(AfD)? Read these primers!
499:
472:Please do not modify it.
241:, which falls below the
32:Please do not modify it.
252:old government report
235:1981 USGS publication
81:Articles for deletion
117:Clem, West Virginia
69:Clem, West Virginia
330:obituary from 1969
239:locale (geography)
446:
442:
416:
311:
291:
98:Guide to deletion
88:How to contribute
490:
441:
439:
432:
430:
428:
426:
412:
406:
404:
402:
384:
259:is not present.
225:
224:
210:
158:
140:
78:
34:
498:
497:
493:
492:
491:
489:
488:
487:
486:
480:deletion review
447:
435:
433:
421:
419:
417:
408:
397:
395:
382:
307:
287:
267:
167:
131:
115:
112:
75:
72:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
496:
494:
485:
484:
466:
465:
429:
418:
405:
394:
393:
392:
373:
348:
313:
312:
303:
292:
283:
263:
248:County history
228:
227:
164:
111:
110:
105:
95:
90:
73:
71:
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
495:
483:
481:
477:
473:
468:
467:
464:
460:
456:
452:
449:
448:
445:
440:
438:
427:
424:
415:
411:
410:North America
403:
400:
391:
387:
386:
385:
377:
374:
372:
368:
364:
361:
357:
352:
349:
347:
344:
343:TheCatalyst31
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
318:
315:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
293:
290:
286:
282:
278:
273:
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
258:
253:
249:
244:
240:
236:
232:
223:
219:
216:
213:
209:
205:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
173:
170:
169:Find sources:
165:
162:
156:
152:
148:
144:
139:
135:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
113:
109:
106:
103:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
85:
84:
82:
77:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
59:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
471:
469:
450:
436:
420:
396:
380:
379:
375:
350:
316:
229:
217:
211:
203:
196:
190:
184:
178:
168:
74:
54:
49:
47:
31:
28:
338:this source
326:two schools
237:calls it a
194:free images
437:Sandstein
356:WP:GEOLAND
243:WP:GEOLAND
55:Ritchie333
476:talk page
37:talk page
478:or in a
423:Relisted
399:Relisted
301:Hog Farm
281:Hog Farm
261:Hog Farm
161:View log
102:glossary
39:or in a
363:Paul H.
200:WP refs
188:scholar
134:protect
129:history
79:New to
360:WP:GNG
351:Delete
334:record
257:WP:GNG
172:Google
138:delete
305:Bacon
285:Bacon
265:Bacon
215:JSTOR
176:books
155:views
147:watch
143:links
16:<
459:talk
451:Keep
383:EDDY
376:Keep
367:talk
358:and
322:here
317:Keep
208:FENS
182:news
151:logs
125:talk
121:edit
50:keep
455:RFD
222:TWL
159:– (
461:)
388:~
369:)
299:.
279:.
202:)
153:|
149:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
127:|
123:|
52:.
457:(
365:(
226:)
218:·
212:·
204:·
197:·
191:·
185:·
179:·
174:(
166:(
163:)
157:)
119:(
104:)
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.