616:. Boy, I had a heck of a time finding this little gem, googling for garbage. Dead prostitutes are a common joke in "popular culture." I'm sure even Family Guy had a dead hooker or two. So, why the resounding delete on an article on what is essentially a pop culture joke and list of examples, just like Cleveland steamer? Maybe an admin could undelete and compare the two. "Dead prostitutes" apparently had a sole author and no serial AfD's, and those are the only differences I can detect at this point. Oh, and the fact that it's pretty easy to figure out what a dead hooker is without reading a sentence-long definition.
490:. This appears to have been a very, very bad article, a real troublemaker, a point of contention, and a source of snicker material for vandals for a very long time. I must question badlydrawnjeff's neutrality (but not his zeal) as he has consistently voted to strongly keep this without a single rational reason that I can find in six AfD's. I don't understand "valid pop culture term" as a reason to keep. This is a contentious issue, and I hope you don't mind having a newbie like me chime in, as perhaps I may offer a new perspective after researching this for a day.
1168:. I've looked over all the AfDs and, while I agree with most of the nominators that this is disgusting (I seriously wish I could scrub the info out of my brain), that's not a reason to delete it. I believe this is more than a simple definition. This article should focus on the origins of the phrase and how it has seeped into popular culture. So this article just needs an overhaul. Transwiki if you want to, but don't delete. -
486:
ground
Wikipedians think they are. Also, I first heard of this in 1992 when it was college slang, not fodder for TV jokesters, and there was no mention of the "steamroller motion of the buttocks." I have a conventional ass, and mine won't move 360 deg. It sounds like an embellishment. I believe the common-sense etymology involving how feces steam in cool temperatures. Origin in 1992, to me, means neologism banned according to
646:. This nomination was made less than a week after the last AfD closed. There is very little chance of the outcome changing in such a short time, so this was probably premature and a bit of a time-waster. Despite the fact that I'd be happy to see it deleted (see my reasons in the last several discussions), I don't think enough time has passed for this AfD to be relevant. Note also that this is the
878:
FWIW, from a non-contributors point of view, it was just partially referred to on a US television program known as "prison break" and I came here looking for the meaning.. I know there are 'frank' listings of sex things at wikipedia, and I decry deleting it as well, even at 36 I need a place where I
1086:
The above reply contains numerous wildly unverified claims. Ironic, given the editor's position on why the article should be deleted. Additionally, drawing comparisons between felching/etc. and cleveland steamer is inappropriate, as the former is (as has been mentioned) notable due to its incidence
1011:
I've scoured the pages, and I haven't found anything but "keep, I've heard of it," "keep, important to popular culture (i.e., TV)," "keep because of previous AfD's. Does anyone know
Anderson Cooper or Keith Olberman? This would make good copy for them and extract the urine from WP in the process.
674:
encyclopedic if only someone would include some decent sources, and it has never happened after the AfD closed. Given that repeated failure, I don't think it ever will until the Real World does some academic or semi-academic treatment of the subject and creates some decent sources for us. In other
704:
of value to the
Knowledge. Then on the other hand you have the chance of this being picked up and used to give a bad impression of Knowledge, invitation to vandalism, attracting the undesirable sort of editor, really inappropriate for children (and yes I know we are not censored for minors, but I
193:
The term has widespread pop culture references - mentioned in major
Hollywood motion pictures and popular cartoons. Referenced in a Family Guy episode, Mr. Saturday Knight. In the DVD commentary, Seth MacFarlane admits he got the phrase through the FOX censors precisely because they didn't have a
513:
Hmm, I really don't know, and I'm not going to ask what your personal preferences are, whether you cruise the church socials or the singles' bars or the leather bars or the swingers' clubs. Not my business. It does, however, seem that you take an unusual interest in grotesque sex jokes popular
485:
of slang or two that have "definitions" that look just like this article. Definition plus examples of usage in sentence form or quotation. All it needs now is called a noun and given an IPA pronunciation transcription. I highly doubt
Wiktionary would take this, as we aren't quite the dumping
1127:: As has been mentioned, this is a highly suspect nomination, particularly given the short lapse in time between the previous nomination. Additionally, the article clearly meets the core qualifications of notability and usefulness. Regardless of the incidence of the article's topic as a
819:
No way should an article be made to face a sixth AfD. I don't accept the argument that a definition and a few instances means that it's a dicdef. It's hardly in mainstream usage (I hope!) and is a valid and verifiable entry into the sexual activities area of
Knowledge. The integrity of
1067:
Facial and felching are commonly used terms for real sexual acts, and in both cases major subgenres of pornography appear to be based on them. This is not a widely used term and no subgenres of pornography appear to be based on it. It's a dictionary definition plus a few bits of
191:- "juvenile piece of shit" is not a guideline or policy I am currently familar with. (I totally stole the rest of this from one of the many many AFDs this article has had - but why come up with something new when someone else has came up with a very good reason to keep).
1027:
543:
Please keep it. I heard the term on and came straight to the wikipedia to find out what it meant, and here it was. The justifications for removal look like a thin sham to cover up for prudes wanting to supress potty language.
399:
candidate is if it listed its part of speech, pronunciation, and etymology. If it could be usefully expanded, between its two and a half years of existence and previous appearances on AFD, surely it would have been by now.
130:
134:
613:
142:
138:
1140:
I'm calling "shenanigans." Your arguments are patent nonsense, based on no policy whatsoever. "...clearly meets the core qualifications of notability and usefulness?" Please provide a link to that policy.
377:
This argument has been around long enough, and been AfDed enough times, that if there was any verifiable information beyond the dicdef and the original research pop culture cruft it would be in there by now.
59:
233:
to
Wictionary unless the article is expanded - it really is just a dicdef. The "use in pop culture" section doesn't give any useful non-etymological information about the term. --
799:
word, term, or phrase could be turned into such an "article" consisting of its definition plus a list of some instances of its usage in culture. An article on a term should be
245:
Heh, solid sources. Like poop. But seriously, this has survived AfD five times already and the term is important in popular culture such as Family Guy and the Daily Show.
154:. A definition plus usage examples constitute a lexicon entry, not an encyclopedia entry. Plus, this is a stupid, juvenile piece of shit article that needs deleted like
126:
700:
Inclusion of this article does not really advance the interests of the encyclopedia, overall. It's a very, very marginally notable entity. Let's say it adds .0001
477:
I've seen some horrifying stuff doing my newpage patrol thing, but this takes the prize. I agree with the nominator in spirit and agree with his reasoning per
780:
can work the other way - it can be kept because although it isn't much more than a definition, it won't be found in many dictionaries and thus is useful. Your
738:
LOL! That is one of the best arguments for delete I have ever seen! I completely endorse this reasoning: the existence of a class of articles whose removal
629:, since the dead hooker is often used as a plot device in TV and movies as something unpleasant that must be disposed of carefully and with great difficulty.
670:
in the real world. There isn't a scrap of encyclopedic content in the article. Previous AfD keep votes were given because they saw potential for the article
340:
AfD is pretty clearly messed up when such an obvious candidate for wiktionary is kept here. It's hard to argue that it's anything but a term definition. --
955:-- possibly, erect some sort of bar to renomination. The world has all kinds of ugly sides; we don't discriminate. The article is short but encyclopedic.
824:
is at stake if we start arguing about what's encyclopedic and what's a dicdef. There is no harm with the term appearing here and
Wiktionary if necessary.
514:
among young men aged 15 to 25 and that this unusual interest constitutes a set of blinders you wear to avoid looking at policy. Just my two euro cents.
999:. This is beyond ridiculous. Like it or not, this is a widely known and used term, and the article, while brief, is well referenced. Get over it.
676:
175:
803:
that term in a more meaningful way than this, such as through an expansive description of its meaning, etymology, and/or history of usage (and a
867:
56:
593:. If people are interested in the meaning of this term, they can go to Urbandictionary or something, because this isn't the place for it.
1172:
1145:
1135:
1119:
1091:
1078:
1060:
1016:
1003:
987:
965:
945:
924:
841:
828:
811:
788:
768:
752:
729:
690:
657:
633:
620:
604:
577:
532:
518:
508:
494:
469:
452:
440:
428:
404:
384:
372:
353:
344:
335:
321:
309:
293:
282:
265:
249:
237:
225:
211:
200:
162:
895:
742:
the net worth of the project is something I have long appreciated but not found a way to put into words. I once saw the
Yiddish term
560:
103:
317:. I urge the closing admin to review this carefully, as this is pretty clearly something meant for Wiktionary, not for Knowledge. --
23:
1087:
in pornography and related areas, whereas the latter is notable due to its permience(sp?) througout mainstream popular culture. --
179:
17:
368:
Transwiktionary is for items that could never be expanded beyond a term definition, that is not the case with this article. --
833:
Your fears are unfounded, I think. Legit sex acts clearly deserve a place here. Hey, I'm a perv myself, having engaged in
1158:
so it is likely that people will look to
Knowledge for this information. What we have now meets verifiability standards.
1156:
746:
defined as the kind of person who when they leave the room you think someone just came in - this article is like that :-)
962:
171:
1107:. Crystal clear bad faith nomination made by a single purposed account mere days after the fifth AFD was closed.
851:- I believe that this is not just a definition but a chunk of modern American culture. I disagree with deletion.
448:
I nominated this and gave policy based reasons for doing so because I feel it doesn't belong and violates policy.
1187:
43:
1186:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
765:
42:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
863:
528:
504:
331:
278:
449:
350:
290:
208:
167:
159:
891:
600:
417:
349:
Oh, AfD is way, way fucked up. If it makes fourteen year old boys titter, it's "speedy keep!" all around.
785:
625:
Now that I think about it, it seems to me that an article on dead hookers would be more encyclopedic than
556:
79:
859:
524:
500:
499:
Now you question my neutrality? Are you saying I have a bias toward shitting on someone's chest? d:-P --
327:
274:
1142:
1013:
942:
838:
650:
nomination: I've fixed the page and its inbound links, as well as linked to the last five at the top. —
630:
617:
515:
491:
887:
552:
1114:
1055:
982:
883:
855:
821:
589:. This article is essentially a dictionary definition with a list of examples of its usage, which is
548:
1031:
234:
959:
687:
654:
395:
This "article" is a definition and a list of usage examples. The only way this could be a clearer
1034:
938:
596:
420:. I know the term even outside of pop culture - it's one of those in this category that it seems
369:
262:
197:
937:
is a horrible article, a total piece of crap, and it should have been deleted unilaterally by a
918:
626:
401:
304:
303:. Knowledge is not a dictionary, and especially not a dictionary of American fratboy slang. --
73:
65:
36:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
726:
466:
425:
261:
know the term, and I'm about as far removed from the pop-culture mainstream as they come. --
246:
222:
941:
long ago. If that leaked to the press, Knowledge would look like a White Power hate site.
1132:
1108:
1088:
1047:
1029:
974:
590:
478:
151:
571:
or simply delete. The article is the only thing in the world shittier than the subject.
956:
834:
764:
The language doesn't bother me, but it's a definition, not an encyclopedia article. --
684:
651:
1009:
I insist that there has been no policy based argument to keep, ever, for this article.
1169:
1074:
1000:
825:
777:
748:
722:
718:
612:
an AfD of an article that seems to be comparable to this Cleveland steamer article:
573:
487:
380:
1131:
sex act, it nonetheless has integrated itself into popular culture all the same. --
709:
is what is meant), general ickiness, and so on. We can say that overall the article
462:
per above: This is very obviously a dictionary entry, not an encyclopedia article.
1069:
911:
808:
776:. AfD isn't something you can repeatedly use until you get the 'right' result. And
413:
667:
837:, and I wouldn't let any legit sex act get deleted without my strong opposition.
463:
341:
318:
717:
of value. Therefore it is bad for the 'pedia, and the closing admin should
1038:
437:
1026:. Notable slang for an extreme (though possibly apocryphal) sexual act
482:
416:, of all things. And it really can't be confined to a definition, a lá
1044:
1041:. Passed into popular culture per examples above, in the article and
804:
1042:
784:(however much I like the word) claim has no evidence supporting it.
24:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Cleveland steamer (fifth nomination)
614:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Dead prostitutes in popular culture
221:
I agree, its notable, has solid sources, and fairly well written.
1180:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
934:
907:
1155:. Google returns more than 125,000 matches for the term,
683:, we can wait until then to have an article, can't we. —
1159:
879:
can go for information with out feeling embarassed....
481:, but disagree with the salty language. BTW, I have a
115:
109:
97:
91:
85:
662:
Chaning my !vote. Since it's here, I might as well...
910:is a clear example of deletion for deletions sake.
675:
words, I agree with Improv wholeheartedly. Also see
906:this is a clear abuse of the AFD system. This like
46:). No further edits should be made to this page.
125:Note that there were five nominations previously:
1190:). No further edits should be made to this page.
326:Because the last 5 AfDs certainly thought so. --
679:: if this is going to be encyclopedic in the
8:
273:. This was just at AfD a few weeks ago. --
929:On the contrary, that's precisely why it
523:Damn reputation not matching reality. --
973:. Isn't five consensi (plural) enough?
721:and delete it regardless. That is what
1033:. Same principle we have articles on
666:. This is a definition and a list of
7:
436:, per above, bad faith nomination.
1046:. What policy dictates we delete?
31:
664:Delete or transwiki to Wiktionary
591:not encyclopedic in the slightest
807:can make for a good article).
677:The World Will Not End Tomorrow
610:I wish to enter into the record
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
57:Can't sleep, clown will eat me
1:
1173:23:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
1146:14:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
1136:11:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
1120:10:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
1092:11:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
1079:10:01, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
1061:07:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
1017:06:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
1004:06:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
988:06:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
966:04:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
946:14:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
925:03:19, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
842:01:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
829:01:07, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
812:23:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
789:23:29, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
769:23:23, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
753:10:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
730:23:13, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
691:22:14, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
658:22:08, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
634:17:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
621:17:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
605:14:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
578:23:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
533:14:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
519:14:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
509:03:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
495:19:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
470:18:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
453:17:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
441:08:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
429:01:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
405:16:38, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
385:10:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
373:08:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
354:17:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
345:03:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
336:03:06, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
322:02:38, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
310:00:38, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
294:17:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
212:17:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
60:00:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
283:23:13, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
266:22:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
250:21:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
238:21:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
226:21:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
201:20:53, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
163:20:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
1207:
563:) 21:48, 11 November 2006
1183:Please do not modify it.
794:Transwiki to wiktionary.
39:Please do not modify it.
1162:22:02, 14 November 2006
953:Keep for the fifth time
762:Transwiki to wiktionary
412:There's an entry for
180:few or no other edits
876:just a random reader
822:Category:Sexual acts
766:Milo H Minderbinder
194:clue what it meant.
182:outside this topic.
1035:facial (sexuality)
450:Guglielmo Clintone
351:Guglielmo Clintone
291:Guglielmo Clintone
263:User:AlbertHerring
209:Guglielmo Clintone
168:Guglielmo Clintone
160:Guglielmo Clintone
1070:original research
900:
886:comment added by
872:
858:comment added by
627:Cleveland steamer
565:
551:comment added by
531:
507:
334:
281:
183:
74:Cleveland Steamer
66:Cleveland Steamer
22:(Redirected from
1198:
1185:
1143:Mr Spunky Toffee
1058:
1054:
1050:
1014:Mr Spunky Toffee
985:
981:
977:
943:Mr Spunky Toffee
923:
916:
899:
880:
871:
852:
839:Mr Spunky Toffee
715:encyclopeditrons
702:encyclopeditrons
631:Mr Spunky Toffee
618:Mr Spunky Toffee
564:
545:
527:
516:Mr Spunky Toffee
503:
492:Mr Spunky Toffee
475:Ye gods, delete!
330:
307:
277:
165:
121:
120:
114:
108:
102:
96:
90:
84:
78:
41:
27:
1206:
1205:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1188:deletion review
1181:
1056:
1052:
1048:
983:
979:
975:
921:
912:
881:
853:
782:encyclopeditron
546:
315:Transwiktionary
305:
118:
112:
106:
100:
94:
88:
82:
76:
72:
69:
51:The result was
44:deletion review
37:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1204:
1202:
1193:
1192:
1176:
1175:
1163:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1122:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1020:
1019:
1006:
995:or better yet
990:
968:
950:
949:
948:
901:
873:
860:74.192.142.103
846:
845:
844:
835:golden showers
814:
791:
771:
758:
757:
756:
755:
733:
732:
695:
694:
693:
638:
637:
636:
607:
580:
566:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
525:badlydrawnjeff
501:badlydrawnjeff
472:
457:
456:
455:
431:
407:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
328:badlydrawnjeff
312:
298:
297:
296:
275:badlydrawnjeff
268:
252:
240:
228:
216:
215:
214:
185:
184:
148:
147:
122:
68:
63:
49:
48:
32:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1203:
1191:
1189:
1184:
1178:
1177:
1174:
1171:
1167:
1164:
1161:
1157:
1154:
1151:
1147:
1144:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1123:
1121:
1117:
1116:
1112:
1111:
1106:
1103:
1102:
1093:
1090:
1085:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1077:
1076:
1071:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1059:
1051:
1045:
1043:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1030:
1028:
1025:
1022:
1021:
1018:
1015:
1010:
1007:
1005:
1002:
998:
994:
991:
989:
986:
978:
972:
969:
967:
964:
961:
958:
954:
951:
947:
944:
940:
936:
933:be deleted.
932:
928:
927:
926:
920:
917:
915:
909:
905:
902:
897:
893:
889:
885:
877:
874:
869:
865:
861:
857:
850:
847:
843:
840:
836:
832:
831:
830:
827:
823:
818:
815:
813:
810:
806:
805:horrible word
802:
798:
795:
792:
790:
787:
783:
779:
775:
772:
770:
767:
763:
760:
759:
754:
751:
750:
745:
741:
737:
736:
735:
734:
731:
728:
724:
720:
716:
712:
708:
703:
699:
696:
692:
689:
686:
682:
678:
673:
669:
665:
661:
660:
659:
656:
653:
649:
645:
643:
639:
635:
632:
628:
624:
623:
622:
619:
615:
611:
608:
606:
603:
602:
599:
598:
592:
588:
584:
581:
579:
576:
575:
570:
567:
562:
558:
554:
550:
542:
534:
530:
526:
522:
521:
520:
517:
512:
511:
510:
506:
502:
498:
497:
496:
493:
489:
484:
480:
476:
473:
471:
468:
465:
461:
458:
454:
451:
447:
444:
443:
442:
439:
435:
432:
430:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
408:
406:
403:
398:
394:
393:
386:
383:
382:
376:
375:
374:
371:
370:Charlesknight
367:
366:
365:
364:
355:
352:
348:
347:
346:
343:
339:
338:
337:
333:
329:
325:
324:
323:
320:
316:
313:
311:
308:
302:
299:
295:
292:
289:
286:
285:
284:
280:
276:
272:
269:
267:
264:
260:
256:
253:
251:
248:
244:
241:
239:
236:
232:
229:
227:
224:
220:
217:
213:
210:
207:
204:
203:
202:
199:
198:Charlesknight
195:
190:
187:
186:
181:
177:
173:
169:
164:
161:
157:
153:
150:
149:
146:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
123:
117:
111:
105:
99:
93:
87:
81:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
54:
47:
45:
40:
34:
33:
25:
19:
1182:
1179:
1165:
1152:
1133:Y|yukichigai
1128:
1124:
1115:
1113:<sac: -->
1109:
1104:
1089:Y|yukichigai
1083:
1073:
1023:
1008:
996:
992:
970:
952:
930:
913:
903:
888:70.89.27.122
882:— Preceding
875:
854:— Preceding
848:
816:
800:
796:
793:
781:
773:
761:
747:
743:
739:
714:
710:
706:
705:don't think
701:
697:
680:
671:
668:attestations
663:
647:
641:
640:
609:
595:
594:
586:
582:
572:
568:
553:Crispincowan
547:— Preceding
474:
459:
445:
433:
424:heard of. --
421:
414:Donkey punch
410:Speedy keep.
409:
396:
379:
314:
300:
287:
271:Speedy keep
270:
258:
255:Speedy keep.
254:
242:
230:
218:
205:
192:
188:
178:) has made
155:
124:
52:
50:
38:
35:
1166:Strong Keep
1160:Yamaguchi先生
1125:Speedy Keep
997:speedy keep
939:rouge admin
727:Herostratus
642:Abstain and
434:Speedy keep
426:Grahamdubya
422:everybody's
247:Valley2city
243:Speedy keep
223:scope_creep
219:Speedy keep
189:Speedy keep
80:discussion
1129:bona fide
740:increases
711:subtracts
685:Saxifrage
652:Saxifrage
583:Transwiki
569:Transwiki
460:Transwiki
446:(removed)
397:transwiki
301:Transwiki
288:(removed)
235:Hyperbole
231:Transwiki
206:(removed)
156:(removed)
1049:Rockpock
1039:felching
1001:Silensor
976:Rockpock
896:contribs
884:unsigned
868:contribs
856:unsigned
849:JoeJance
826:Mallanox
725:is for.
672:becoming
597:Warpstar
561:contribs
549:unsigned
479:WP:WINAD
418:Santorum
306:Charlene
176:contribs
152:WP:WINAD
104:undelete
1084:Comment
1024:Comment
914:ALKIVAR
809:Postdlf
778:WP:IAR
744:nebbish
723:WP:IAR
698:Delete.
644:comment
483:lexicon
402:Cryptic
92:protect
86:history
1118:.oOo.
931:should
786:Trebor
719:WP:IAR
713:.0002
681:future
587:delete
488:WP:NEO
467:(talk)
464:Friday
342:Improv
319:Improv
98:delete
957:John
801:about
648:sixth
601:Rider
257:Even
116:links
16:<
1153:Keep
1105:Keep
1037:and
993:Keep
971:Keep
960:Reid
935:GNAA
908:GNAA
904:Keep
892:talk
864:talk
817:Keep
774:Keep
707:this
557:talk
529:talk
505:talk
332:talk
279:talk
172:talk
110:logs
53:keep
1170:Lex
1110:roy
1075:Guy
797:Any
749:Guy
585:or
574:Guy
438:bbx
381:Guy
143:5th
139:4th
135:3rd
131:2nd
127:1st
55:.
1072:.
898:)
894:•
870:)
866:•
559:•
196:--
174:•
166:—
158:.
141:,
137:,
133:,
129:,
1057:t
1053:e
984:t
980:e
963:°
922:☢
919:™
890:(
862:(
688:✎
655:✎
555:(
400:—
259:I
170:(
145:.
119:)
113:|
107:|
101:|
95:|
89:|
83:|
77:(
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.