380:
inhabit the Earth. But no one has touched this "article". Being against any and all deletion is insufficient in a discussion that requires reason and deliberation. It helps no one and it hinders progress. The insinuation that I haven't put enough effort into it is yet another personal attack. I have a long list of edits over more than four years of working on
Knowledge almost seven days a week. I have books on my shelves, papers and folders stacked on my desk, files crowded on my computer, bookmarks bulging from my browser, not to mention back surgery and high cholesterol. May I suggest that work ethic is a subject in which pointing the finger is a very bad idea?
338:
understand them. By contrast, what is one to make of "if sufficient legwork is demonstrated"? This is speculation, suggestion, insinuation, and the invention of an imaginary criterion. When and how are "sufficient legwork" demonstrated? Where did that come from? If there is a specific point, get to it, and let's hear it. But let's not play games simply because one has strong feelings or wishes but no facts or reasons.
379:
It's a valid reason that doesn't require reading WP: BEFORE. That is an imaginary criteria. Without sources, there are no articles. If you have sourced material to add, free free to do so. No one is stopping you. You have had that freedom for eleven years, and so have the 7.5 billion other people who
337:
I resent the comments. What does "keep by default" mean? Is it the old
Groucho Marx song "Whatever it is, I'm against it"? I don't know. The accusation that I have offered "no valid reasons" is obviously false. Read my sentences again. Those are valid reasons stated simply and plainly, so anyone can
459:
I can't help you with that. But I do know it's pointless to continue to link to NOEFFORT. It's not policy. It's an essay, some opinions that popped into someone's head. So what? Everyone has opinions. There's no reason to read it, let alone follow it like a
209:
410:, and adding specific artists), bring up so many unrelated results. That was such a fertile period in the city's music history; I think it's possible that reliable sources do exist, and will keep looking.
430:
You've had eleven years. How many more would you like? Don't assume that all I have done is a "casual search" and don't assume that the searches I perform are casual, i.e. superficial or frivolous.
534:- I have no idea what "keep by default" means. The google results are so slim that we've all seen them and I'm not convinced that any of them confers notability. I don't see anything useful here.
319:
become a reason if sufficient legwork is demonstrated - I'd like to know what Tom Lord and other major jazz discographers have listed, and sadly I do not have access to Lord's book right now.
357:
was carried out and that it is sufficient - that one had looked in places where one ought to find sources for the topic. "Questionable notability" is not a valid reason for deletion -
203:
162:
551:- absolutely no evidence of notability has been presented in this debate, and my own searches show no coverage. Editors voting “keep by default” seems to be a case of
281:
257:
109:
94:
135:
130:
139:
169:
122:
299:
224:
191:
89:
82:
17:
240:
Not enough sources exist to write an article of substance. Questionable notability. Mostly untouched for eleven years.
185:
103:
99:
564:
543:
526:
495:
469:
454:
440:
419:
390:
374:
348:
328:
304:
273:
249:
64:
181:
581:
353:"Not enough sources exist to write an article of substance" would be a valid reason if we had some sense of what
40:
126:
552:
231:
560:
295:
118:
70:
513:. The article does not cite any sources and I can't find a single reliable sources discussing the label.
577:
524:
482:
The label appears most notable for issuing the first Wild
Magnolias single, although some sources, like
271:
36:
315:
by default - no valid reason for deletion has been offered. Of the three things mentioned, the first
217:
197:
556:
491:
465:
450:
436:
415:
386:
370:
362:
344:
324:
286:
245:
539:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
576:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
514:
354:
261:
486:, refer to the label as Crescent City 25. Other books assign 25 as the catalog number.
55:
510:
506:
487:
461:
446:
432:
411:
382:
366:
358:
340:
320:
241:
535:
156:
406:- A casual search is difficult, just because Crescent City and Records (and
361:. "Mostly untouched for X years" is not a valid reason for deletion -
572:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
484:
Groove
Interrupted: Loss, Renewal, and the Music of New Orleans
152:
148:
144:
216:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
584:). No further edits should be made to this page.
280:Note: This discussion has been included in the
256:Note: This discussion has been included in the
445:I keep hearing NOEFFORT here, again and again.
282:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
230:
8:
110:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
279:
258:list of Music-related deletion discussions
255:
7:
24:
555:and I would strongly discourage.
95:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
85:(AfD)? Read these primers!
601:
527:15:40, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
496:14:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
470:22:56, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
455:13:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
441:13:31, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
420:13:16, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
391:13:13, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
375:03:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
349:03:17, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
329:01:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
305:14:57, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
274:15:41, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
250:00:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
505:. The record label fails
574:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
565:09:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
544:06:10, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
65:11:29, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
119:Crescent City Records
83:Articles for deletion
71:Crescent City Records
553:WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY
307:
290:
276:
100:Guide to deletion
90:How to contribute
63:
592:
522:
303:
288:
269:
235:
234:
220:
172:
160:
142:
80:
62:
60:
53:
34:
600:
599:
595:
594:
593:
591:
590:
589:
588:
582:deletion review
515:
285:
262:
177:
168:
133:
117:
114:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
598:
596:
587:
586:
568:
567:
546:
529:
499:
498:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
431:
423:
422:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
381:
339:
332:
331:
309:
308:
277:
238:
237:
174:
113:
112:
107:
97:
92:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
597:
585:
583:
579:
575:
570:
569:
566:
562:
558:
557:Cardiffbear88
554:
550:
547:
545:
541:
537:
533:
530:
528:
525:
523:
521:
520:
512:
508:
504:
501:
500:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
471:
467:
463:
458:
457:
456:
452:
448:
444:
443:
442:
438:
434:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
402:
401:
392:
388:
384:
378:
377:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
351:
350:
346:
342:
336:
335:
334:
333:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
311:
310:
306:
301:
297:
293:
292:
283:
278:
275:
272:
270:
268:
267:
259:
254:
253:
252:
251:
247:
243:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:Find sources:
175:
171:
167:
164:
158:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
573:
571:
548:
531:
518:
516:
502:
483:
460:commandment.
407:
403:
316:
312:
287:
265:
263:
239:
227:
221:
213:
206:
200:
194:
188:
178:
165:
76:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
363:WP:NOEFFORT
204:free images
289:DOOMSDAYER
58:Sandstein
578:talk page
355:WP:BEFORE
37:talk page
580:or in a
488:Caro7200
462:Vmavanti
447:Chubbles
433:Vmavanti
412:Caro7200
383:Vmavanti
367:Chubbles
341:Vmavanti
321:Chubbles
300:Contribs
242:Vmavanti
163:View log
104:glossary
39:or in a
536:Ikjbagl
517:Versace
404:Comment
264:Versace
210:WPÂ refs
198:scholar
136:protect
131:history
81:New to
549:Delete
532:Delete
511:WP:ORG
507:WP:GNG
503:Delete
359:WP:JNN
182:Google
140:delete
50:delete
408:label
317:might
284:. ---
225:JSTOR
186:books
170:Stats
157:views
149:watch
145:links
16:<
561:talk
540:talk
519:1608
509:and
492:talk
466:talk
451:talk
437:talk
416:talk
387:talk
371:talk
345:talk
325:talk
313:Keep
296:Talk
266:1608
246:talk
218:FENS
192:news
153:logs
127:talk
123:edit
291:520
232:TWL
161:– (
563:)
542:)
494:)
468:)
453:)
439:)
418:)
389:)
373:)
365:.
347:)
327:)
260:.
248:)
212:)
155:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
129:|
125:|
52:.
559:(
538:(
490:(
464:(
449:(
435:(
414:(
385:(
369:(
343:(
323:(
302:)
298:|
294:(
244:(
236:)
228:·
222:·
214:·
207:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
184:(
176:(
173:)
166:·
159:)
121:(
106:)
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.