309:#3 if there were multiple book reviews in reliable sources, but not seeing it. He's active posting poems on poetry.com and has garnered fans there thus many are quoting his poems in various sources online. Don't think that's sufficient for notability, need more sources like WND or book reviews in reliable sources. --
645:
Also, one of the reasons we require more than just evidence of people liking an artist, we need material to write an article with. Need biographical information about the person. The WND piece is excellent in that regard. While WND is considered a poor source on some topics (politics), it's perfectly
672:
As far as I can tell, this article doesn't have information not verifiable by the given source(s). Like I said about buzzwords, I proved everything it said including notability, maybe through original research, but I certainly did. I could see if the article was written like an advertisement, but
486:
for a summary), the topic needs to be mentioned in reliable sources. Since
Facebook and Twitter are self-published (everyone can post) they are not considered reliable. Also it has to be "in depth" coverage. It shows however there is a fan base, which might mean book sales, which might mean book
435:
Understood. I created the article without closer considering all the guidelines. Some topics seem hard to classify: I understand that they're not sources, but I noticed the subject is mentioned or quoted about every few minutes to an hour on both
Facebook and Twitter
593:
It's ironic that the actual given, constant mass of people is considered a non-reliable source, whereas a biography can be written by a single individual and thrown on the bookshelf. Maybe that explains why the site is so vastly inconsistent in its inclusions.
523:
I see an article on him has gone through this before. It's easy for non-experienced users to get confused on this one. One of the "unreliable" sources said he's the number one quoted author (above the legends), however he's self-published:
183:
264:
82:
505:
Well, I'm not sure about the subject but they aren't people I know, Mike. I did a search for "Public Posts" on those sites which would be random people anywhere in the world, but yes I gotcha.
214:
Previously deleted article (after AfD) partially recreated, but supplemented with a bunch of third-rate sources. It is my belief that this self-published "philosopher" still fails WP:BIO.
279:
136:
650:
sources, and since WND is already considered controversial as a source, and since we don't have 3 or 4 other biographical sources, it's very difficult to make a case for keep. See
617:. Such a book may be useful as a reference for Knowledge (XXG) purposes, but its existence alone does not indicate that the subject meets Knowledge (XXG)'s notability guidelines.--
631:
That doesn't explain my point. In the end, buzzwords don't mean much when it comes to the reality of it. Maybe there's nothing we can do about it, but I'm just saying.
234:
249:
177:
143:
677:
until I realized that part of the subject's relevance is surpassing U.S. presidents and historical geniuses without the support of places like
Knowledge (XXG).
77:
721:
365:
there are presently no less than five footnotes sourced to WND.com, formerly known as WorldNetDaily but every bit as non-reliable under the new mask. --
348:
I don't see "WorldNetDaily" in that link. At this point it's not worth hashing out since it won't make a difference to this AfD. --
17:
461:- being mentioned or quoted in Twitter or Facebook by people you know does not constitute notability as it is understood here. --
109:
104:
747:
732:
714:
690:
667:
640:
626:
603:
587:
560:
541:
518:
500:
473:
453:
420:
395:
377:
357:
343:
318:
286:
271:
256:
241:
226:
61:
113:
198:
766:
165:
40:
720:
According to the Amazon store, he has also been in 19 books. It looks like 12 of them are independent of the subject.
96:
703:
678:
551:. On that note, I've made up my mind. Perfect sources or not, my human side says this article is very relevant.
663:
496:
391:
353:
314:
437:
159:
762:
283:
268:
253:
238:
57:
36:
408:
and the myriad times the topic has been discussed on our reliable sources noticeboard and elsewhere. --
155:
468:
415:
372:
338:
221:
100:
674:
529:
506:
488:
739:
724:
706:
682:
659:
632:
595:
552:
533:
510:
492:
445:
387:
349:
310:
191:
306:
205:
743:
728:
710:
686:
636:
599:
583:
556:
537:
514:
449:
92:
67:
622:
441:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
761:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
610:
53:
651:
571:
479:
302:
614:
462:
409:
366:
332:
215:
655:
575:
483:
383:
328:
171:
646:
reliable for reporting basic facts about the life of an artist. However, we also need
301:(WND) source is excellent. The rest are trivial mentions. One source isn't enough for
579:
298:
525:
618:
130:
400:
Oh, sorry, I was just linking to our definition of a reliable source. As to why
487:
reviews, and that would work to show notability - but right now looks like
755:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
265:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
404:
is not considered one, you'd have to read the article about
570:. Disregarding the reintroduction of previously discussed
126:
122:
118:
190:
280:
204:
526:http://www.gotknowhow.com/quotes/authors/popular/
83:Articles for deletion/Criss Jami (2nd nomination)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
769:). No further edits should be made to this page.
574:and non-reliable sources, there has been no new
8:
578:provided since the topic was deleted before
278:Note: This debate has been included in the
263:Note: This debate has been included in the
248:Note: This debate has been included in the
235:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
233:Note: This debate has been included in the
250:list of Poetry-related deletion discussions
444:). I'm just saying where I'm coming from.
277:
262:
247:
232:
386:") to justify why WND is unreliable. --
382:"that link" meaning the link you made ("
75:
609:No it's not ironic. Such a book is a
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
384:reliable source for much of anything
329:reliable source for much of anything
74:
738:Ah whatever guys, I give up! hehe
24:
78:Articles for deletion/Criss Jami
613:, whereas Knowledge (XXG) is a
673:it's not. I was agreeing with
62:17:51, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
1:
748:16:32, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
733:16:30, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
715:15:57, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
691:15:51, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
668:13:56, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
641:15:51, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
627:13:51, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
604:11:54, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
588:00:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
561:20:35, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
542:18:21, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
519:18:07, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
501:15:31, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
474:14:59, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
454:09:21, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
421:18:40, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
396:17:49, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
378:17:32, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
358:15:31, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
344:05:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
319:05:22, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
287:04:47, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
272:04:45, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
257:04:45, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
242:04:44, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
227:03:46, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
786:
758:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
654:which is summarized at
73:AfDs for this article:
327:is not considered a
509:seems about right.
305:. It could pass on
48:The result was
289:
274:
259:
244:
777:
760:
704:WP:TOOINCREDIBLE
679:WP:TOOINCREDIBLE
611:secondary source
471:
465:
418:
412:
375:
369:
341:
335:
284:Northamerica1000
269:Northamerica1000
254:Northamerica1000
239:Northamerica1000
224:
218:
209:
208:
194:
146:
134:
116:
34:
785:
784:
780:
779:
778:
776:
775:
774:
773:
767:deletion review
756:
615:tertiary source
469:
463:
416:
410:
373:
367:
339:
333:
222:
216:
151:
142:
107:
91:
88:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
783:
781:
772:
771:
751:
750:
718:
717:
696:
695:
694:
693:
670:
660:Green Cardamom
643:
591:
590:
572:self-published
564:
563:
546:
545:
544:
521:
503:
493:Green Cardamom
476:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
388:Green Cardamom
350:Green Cardamom
311:Green Cardamom
291:
290:
275:
260:
245:
212:
211:
148:
87:
86:
85:
80:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
782:
770:
768:
764:
759:
753:
752:
749:
745:
741:
737:
736:
735:
734:
730:
726:
723:
716:
712:
708:
705:
701:
698:
697:
692:
688:
684:
680:
676:
671:
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
644:
642:
638:
634:
630:
629:
628:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
607:
606:
605:
601:
597:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
566:
565:
562:
558:
554:
550:
547:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
522:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
502:
498:
494:
490:
485:
481:
477:
475:
472:
466:
460:
457:
456:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
434:
422:
419:
413:
407:
403:
399:
398:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
380:
379:
376:
370:
364:
361:
360:
359:
355:
351:
347:
346:
345:
342:
336:
330:
326:
325:WorldNetDaily
322:
321:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
299:WorldNetDaily
296:
293:
292:
288:
285:
281:
276:
273:
270:
266:
261:
258:
255:
251:
246:
243:
240:
236:
231:
230:
229:
228:
225:
219:
207:
203:
200:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
157:
154:
153:Find sources:
149:
145:
141:
138:
132:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
84:
81:
79:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
757:
754:
722:Amazon Books
719:
699:
647:
592:
567:
548:
458:
405:
401:
362:
324:
294:
213:
201:
195:
187:
180:
174:
168:
162:
152:
139:
49:
47:
31:
28:
464:Orange Mike
411:Orange Mike
368:Orange Mike
363:explanation
334:Orange Mike
217:Orange Mike
178:free images
54:Mark Arsten
675:WP:TOOSOON
530:WP:TOOSOON
507:WP:TOOSOON
489:WP:TOOSOON
93:Criss Jami
68:Criss Jami
763:talk page
307:WP:AUTHOR
37:talk page
765:or in a
740:Ahnold T
725:Ahnold T
707:Ahnold T
683:Ahnold T
648:multiple
633:Ahnold T
596:Ahnold T
580:TEDickey
553:Ahnold T
534:Ahnold T
511:Ahnold T
482:(or see
446:Ahnold T
438:Facebook
137:View log
39:or in a
619:ukexpat
459:comment
442:Twitter
184:WP refs
172:scholar
110:protect
105:history
700:Delete
652:WP:GNG
568:Delete
480:WP:GNG
303:WP:GNG
295:Delete
156:Google
114:delete
50:delete
658:. --
656:WP:42
576:WP:RS
491:. --
484:WP:42
323:????
199:JSTOR
160:books
144:Stats
131:views
123:watch
119:links
16:<
744:talk
729:talk
711:talk
687:talk
664:talk
637:talk
623:talk
600:talk
584:talk
557:talk
549:Keep
538:talk
515:talk
497:talk
478:Per
470:Talk
450:talk
417:Talk
392:talk
374:Talk
354:talk
340:Talk
331:. --
315:talk
297:The
223:Talk
192:FENS
166:news
127:logs
101:talk
97:edit
58:talk
406:WND
402:WND
206:TWL
135:– (
746:)
731:)
713:)
702:.
689:)
681:.
666:)
639:)
625:)
602:)
586:)
559:)
540:)
532:.
528:.
517:)
499:)
467:|
452:)
440:,
414:|
394:)
371:|
356:)
337:|
317:)
282:.
267:.
252:.
237:.
220:|
186:)
129:|
125:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
60:)
52:.
742:(
727:(
709:(
685:(
662:(
635:(
621:(
598:(
582:(
555:(
536:(
513:(
495:(
448:(
436:(
390:(
352:(
313:(
210:)
202:·
196:·
188:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
158:(
150:(
147:)
140:·
133:)
95:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.