191:-- as I think Erik actually seems to say also--whether it is important enough to include is a content question for the talk page. As part of a merged article on these figures, the content need not show notability and can be referenced from the fiction itself. But although the article is not in my opinion appropriate for a stand alone, the nom, as usual, gives no arguments against a merge. Incidentally, what is the source for the hypothesis that characters need to show notability independent of the series ? It's more reasonable to say that things need to show notability only in their context.
422:. I'd suggest creating a separate article that deals with entire set of characters and redirecting all current articles to it. Of course, if some editors feel they can develop an article separately, fulfilling necessary notability and providing broader coverage, they can do so. Otherwise, I see no difference in structure and content-type of all these articles.
460:
Well, you can say that. I am definitely not supporting keep. I don't see any importance of writing articles that simply reiterate plot from individual character point of view. But if someone feels the need for such information, particularly since this is film series, that's fine. I wanted to gauge
211:
You can maybe justify setting the notability bar for spinoff articles a little lower than for stand-alone articles, but this is not a free pass. You cannot say "This work of fiction is notable, therefore every character and thing with some sort of relevance within the fictional universe is
212:
immediately deserving of an article, even if there is nothing to establish notability outside the fictional universe". It just ain't so, and this article is a perfect example of why I take this stance.
418:. If you read all the character articles for this film series, you'd find almost all of the articles are written in in-universe style and present no real world reference. Not even the article for the
241:
168:
due to lack of real-world context surrounding the character; if the character did anything of importance in the film(s), it can be mentioned in the film articles' Plot or Cast sections. —
123:
267:
90:
85:
94:
77:
333:. Non-notable; there isn't even a claim of notability, and no external sources. If it's simply plot re-hashing, it's not needed.
17:
363:
179:
474:
455:
435:
402:
368:
342:
324:
309:
282:
256:
227:
202:
183:
159:
59:
493:
317:. Just an extract of the plot involving this character, which doesn't seem to have an coverage in movie reviews.
304:
36:
492:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
292:
81:
47:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
321:
469:
430:
318:
338:
297:
419:
73:
65:
415:
411:
463:
424:
278:
252:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
358:
334:
395:
384:
220:
175:
451:
198:
155:
147:
135:
380:
274:
248:
143:
139:
53:
111:
352:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
131:
388:
213:
169:
410:- I noticed that nominator here has also nominated two other articles viz.
446:
193:
151:
461:
what others felt about the idea of a single article instead of so many.
379:- Unsourced article about a minor character that consists mostly of
486:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
242:
list of
Fictional characters-related deletion discussions
150:. There is no current assertion for future improvement.
118:
107:
103:
99:
357:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
134:independent of its series through the inclusion of
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
496:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
268:list of Film-related deletion discussions
266:: This debate has been included in the
240:: This debate has been included in the
142:. Most of the information is made up of
295:. No notability outside that universe.
444:I believe you are suggesting a merge.
7:
130:This character does not establish
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
140:reliable, third party sources
60:02:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
475:06:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
456:04:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
436:02:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
403:01:49, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
369:00:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
343:01:52, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
325:03:07, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
310:02:43, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
283:00:53, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
257:00:53, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
228:01:49, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
203:00:48, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
184:22:58, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
160:14:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
513:
489:Please do not modify it.
293:Underworld (film series)
148:unnecessary plot details
48:Underworld (film series)
32:Please do not modify it.
136:real world information
74:Amelia (Underworld)
66:Amelia (Underworld)
416:Erika (Underworld)
412:Soren (Underworld)
44:The result was
381:original research
371:
285:
271:
259:
245:
144:original research
504:
491:
393:
361:
356:
354:
300:
272:
262:
246:
236:
218:
172:
121:
115:
97:
56:
34:
512:
511:
507:
506:
505:
503:
502:
501:
500:
494:deletion review
487:
473:
434:
399:
389:
366:
359:
350:
298:
224:
214:
170:
117:
88:
72:
69:
54:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
510:
508:
499:
498:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
467:
439:
438:
428:
420:main character
405:
397:
373:
372:
364:
355:
347:
346:
345:
327:
312:
286:
260:
233:
232:
231:
230:
222:
206:
205:
186:
128:
127:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
509:
497:
495:
490:
484:
483:
476:
472:
471:
466:
465:
459:
458:
457:
453:
449:
448:
443:
442:
441:
440:
437:
433:
432:
427:
426:
421:
417:
413:
409:
406:
404:
401:
400:
394:
392:
386:
382:
378:
375:
374:
370:
367:
362:
353:
349:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
326:
323:
320:
316:
313:
311:
308:
307:
306:
302:
301:
294:
290:
287:
284:
280:
276:
269:
265:
261:
258:
254:
250:
243:
239:
235:
234:
229:
226:
225:
219:
217:
210:
209:
208:
207:
204:
200:
196:
195:
190:
187:
185:
181:
177:
173:
167:
164:
163:
162:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
125:
120:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
57:
50:
49:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
488:
485:
468:
462:
445:
429:
423:
407:
396:
390:
385:plot summary
376:
351:
330:
314:
305:
303:
296:
288:
263:
237:
221:
215:
192:
188:
165:
129:
52:
45:
43:
31:
28:
335:Mr. Absurd
132:notability
275:• Gene93k
249:• Gene93k
46:merge to
299:Schmidt,
124:View log
464:Sleaves
425:Sleaves
408:Comment
180:contrib
91:protect
86:history
55:MBisanz
377:Delete
360:treelo
331:Delete
315:Delete
166:Delete
119:delete
95:delete
365:radda
289:Merge
189:Merge
138:from
122:) – (
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
470:talk
452:talk
431:talk
414:and
391:Reyk
383:and
339:talk
279:talk
264:Note
253:talk
238:Note
216:Reyk
199:talk
176:talk
171:Erik
156:talk
146:and
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
447:DGG
398:YO!
291:to
270:.
244:.
223:YO!
194:DGG
152:TTN
454:)
387:.
341:)
319:VG
281:)
255:)
201:)
182:)
178:•
158:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
51:.
450:(
337:(
329:'
322:☎
277:(
273:—
251:(
247:—
197:(
174:(
154:(
126:)
116:(
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.