241:. Hello I dont know If im allowed to post here, but I daresay I find it somewhat presumptuous of Ramma's arrow to mark my contribution for deletion simply because he found the content offensive, I have provided almost 33 different sources and I will expand the article in the future, if you have time help me do that, dont delete informative articles with sources just because you dont like them.
255:
zealous anti-Pakistan sentiment that exists in a majority of Hindus, Hindu chauvinism spurred by anti-Pakistan sentiment has grown and with it extremist religious parties like the BJP. However anti-Pakistan sentiment is so deeply embedded into the psyche of the Hindu faithful that it is not confined
389:. It's a valid topic, though the current article is badly flawed. The article itself is already tagged for verification and NPOV checking. I've started a talk page for the article, and deleted the OR/non-NPOV section on AP sentiment in India. --
375:. These issues should have been raised on the talk page first as an attempt at resolution and/or improvement. The topic is a valid one for an article, so I recommend keeping and starting a discussion on the article's talk page. --
272:
I struck my delete above, If you want to work on the article you should have a chance to fix it. But remember, we are a tertiary source therefore WE DO NOT HAVE AN OPINION and no matter how we feel about a theme we must be neutral
202:, so the topic is valid. Contrary to the nominator, I see that the provided references contain such topics as "demonization of Pakistan", etc., although I can say nothing whether they match the wikipedia text. `'
310:
There are many are anti-national sentiment articles. However, the article still needs to be cleaned up and follow a neutral point of view. Besides, to all those
Hindutvaadis out there, on the same premise an
354:. The topic is a valid one and one on which there appear to be sufficient sources to write a good article. However, the article as written has serious POV issues. In principle, it
78:
169:
138:
216:
161:. Even though several sources have been provided, none of them attribute to the assertions made in the article, which are grossly biased and original research.
111:
106:
115:
393:
366:
346:
325:
295:
279:
264:
245:
232:
206:
190:
73:
98:
17:
305:
288:
379:
80:
408:
36:
102:
180:, if after reading this article for the third time I would have come to the conclusion that this article conforms
72:
either. (Sum of all the views on this AfD presented by the participants) The delete arguments are unconvincing. —
407:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
94:
86:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
184:
I would have said keep, It is not the theme but it is the unbalanced way that makes me advocate deleting it
258:
do give an insight into your POV... this vitriol doesnt deserve an iota of server space on Wiki servers..
340:
312:
199:
224:
358:
be fixed and the existing sources (if not the current text) would provide a good starting point.
162:
292:
376:
363:
322:
274:
185:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
181:
146:
68:
sources available on the subject and are provided on the article. I don't see how this fails
61:
49:
335:
158:
154:
69:
57:
390:
145:
I submit this article for examination and possible deletion owing to strong violations of
371:
I initially intended to remain neutral on the issue, but I just noticed that the article
150:
53:
259:
242:
203:
316:
132:
401:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
128:
124:
120:
56:, unless that cannot be fixed (Please remember that
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
411:). No further edits should be made to this page.
360:Due to my ambivalence, I will remain neutral.
8:
315:can be created so don't get so emotional :p
289:List of anti-ethnic and anti-national terms
198:. For every major nation Foo there is the
48:, we don't delete articles for violating
215:: This debate has been included in the
64:). As far as I can see, there are valid
291:. Are we going to delete those also?
287:. Other countries have similar pages
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
217:list of Pakistan-related deletions
24:
306:Category:Anti-national_sentiment
1:
196:Keep, extremely heavy cleanup
66:multiple, reliable, secondary
428:
394:02:11, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
380:00:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
367:00:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
347:00:05, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
326:07:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
256:to Hindu chauvinists alone
81:15:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
373:does not have a talk page
296:19:43, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
280:15:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
265:15:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
246:09:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
233:09:18, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
207:23:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
191:23:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
170:21:34, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
404:Please do not modify it.
95:Anti-Pakistani sentiment
87:Anti-Pakistani sentiment
32:Please do not modify it.
253:Statements such as ...
313:Anti-Indian sentiment
75:Nearly Headless Nick
333:- NationalORcruft.
261:Amey Aryan DaBrood
200:anti-Foo sentiment
235:
220:
60:is superceded by
419:
406:
343:
338:
277:
231:
229:
221:
211:
188:
167:
136:
118:
76:
34:
427:
426:
422:
421:
420:
418:
417:
416:
415:
409:deletion review
402:
341:
336:
275:
225:
223:
186:
163:
109:
93:
90:
74:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
425:
423:
414:
413:
397:
396:
384:
383:
382:
349:
328:
298:
282:
267:
248:
236:
209:
193:
143:
142:
89:
84:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
424:
412:
410:
405:
399:
398:
395:
392:
388:
385:
381:
378:
374:
370:
369:
368:
365:
361:
357:
353:
350:
348:
345:
344:
339:
332:
329:
327:
324:
323:
320:
319:
314:
309:
307:
302:
299:
297:
294:
290:
286:
283:
281:
278:
271:
268:
266:
263:
262:
257:
252:
249:
247:
244:
240:
237:
234:
230:
228:
218:
214:
210:
208:
205:
201:
197:
194:
192:
189:
183:
179:
178:
174:
173:
172:
171:
168:
166:
160:
156:
152:
148:
140:
134:
130:
126:
122:
117:
113:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
91:
88:
85:
83:
82:
79:
77:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
403:
400:
391:Clay Collier
386:
377:Black Falcon
372:
364:Black Falcon
359:
355:
351:
334:
330:
321:
317:
304:
300:
284:
269:
260:
254:
250:
238:
226:
212:
195:
176:
175:
165:Rama's arrow
164:
144:
65:
45:
43:
31:
28:
227:⇒ bsnowball
243:S Seagal
139:View log
270:Comment
251:Delete:
182:WP:NPOV
147:WP:NPOV
112:protect
107:history
62:WP:NPOV
50:WP:NPOV
331:Delete
177:Delete
159:WP:NEO
155:WP:ATT
116:delete
70:WP:NEO
58:WP:ATT
318:Gizza
293:IP198
204:mikka
151:WP:OR
133:views
125:watch
121:links
54:WP:OR
16:<
387:Keep
352:Keep
337:Baka
303:Per
301:Keep
285:Keep
239:Keep
222:--
213:Note
129:logs
103:talk
99:edit
46:keep
362:--
356:can
342:man
276:Alf
219:.
187:Alf
137:– (
157:,
153:,
149:,
131:|
127:|
123:|
119:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
52:,
308:.
141:)
135:)
97:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.