473:(the article has now been edited into) into pretty good shape. The controversy shold not take over the article, but it was widely-covered, and she played an active role, this is not a case of an innocent bystander getting dragged into a media/political thing. It certainly contributes to notability. Furthermore, it is pretty unusual for a professor at a major university, with significant prizes to her credit to be deleted. Especially a bench scientist with good citation numbers. so many AFDs fall into a grey area, but this widely-published research scientist whose job-related action created a controversy seems like an obvious KEEP to me.
721:
As things stand, the individual gained global notoriety for the incident and less for her scientific contributions. So this must be kept in mind when article WEIGHT is analysed. The article needs to be monitored so that the page does not become a 'hate-page'. 16:25, 21 March 2015
557:
Two significant awards and a full professorship at a major university is enough. Redless of her role in a non-scientific controversy, she;s notable. Content of the article here is a separate question. I;'m a little puzzled that
384:
the excess material already more-than-amply discussed in the controversy article. I didn't notice them before, but the categories the article was previously placed in are a clear BLP violation. First choice is still delete.
177:
659:#C1 (heavily cited pubs) and #C3 (Leopoldina). The controversy now occupies a balanced proportion of the article rather than overwhelming it as it did before, so there is much less of an issue of BIO1E and NOTNEWS. —
208:
CSD A7 twice removed by creator so in the light of the sources rather thna restore the CSD for a third time, the community should decide. A pleathora of reliable sources all reporting the same incident
443:
728:
this article about a full professor of some distinction. If there is too much weight to the controversy, that is grounds for trimming it, and not deleting an article about a scholar.
171:
582:
standards, but this is an otherwise low-profile BLP that was created as a borderline attack page, continues to attract disparaging commentary, and links to an extremely long
358:, she has a case for notability independent of the controversy. Redirecting her name to this flash-in-the-pan media fuss about a single bad decision seems inappropriate.
130:
266:
423:
403:
512:
680:
for the work to improve the article. Subject meets notability guidelines. The article still needs improvement but deserves a place in the encyclopedia.
103:
98:
583:
578:
I oppose the redirect suggestions that preceded me more strongly than I feel about keeping or deleting. I agree that she's eligible for an article by
307:
233:
107:
137:
90:
260:
618:
192:
287:
159:
17:
319:
256:
689:
638:#3). Article now is mainly about her, not the incident covered by an additional article, so I see no reason for deletion.
153:
241:
737:
713:
696:
668:
647:
626:
599:
573:
543:
523:
503:
482:
455:
435:
415:
394:
367:
341:
323:
294:
226:
94:
72:
61:
595:
390:
363:
149:
756:
733:
519:
499:
40:
709:
664:
643:
199:
622:
86:
78:
752:
677:
591:
559:
539:
478:
468:
386:
359:
36:
514:
that show she has used her racist attitudes at other times to justify the exclusion of Indian students.
729:
515:
495:
355:
236:. This story had spread over at least 5 pages, the actual specific WP page, the Beck-Sickinger BLP,
165:
705:
660:
639:
337:
185:
590:. I suppose keeping the article at least presents those searching for her name with some context.
315:
248:
66:
685:
451:
431:
411:
222:
214:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
751:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
535:
474:
282:
587:
252:
656:
635:
610:
579:
491:
333:
57:
53:
704:
May I recommend to withdraw the nomination in the light of the article's development?
490:
and stop trying to downplay her racism. People would not try to rewrite an article on
255:!) It seems the women is not notable, except for this event. The creator of this BLP,
693:
614:
569:
329:
311:
681:
466:
I stumbled upon this in the AFD list; a controversy I had not heard of before, but
447:
427:
407:
303:
218:
210:
494:
to primarily focus on his early career when he was known for championing the poor.
124:
562:, on basically the same arguments as my own, comes to an opposite conclusion.
511:
To call Beck-Sickinger's racism "one event" is to ignore articles like this
251:. (Where about 30 of the 45 references on the page are now about this issue
237:
213:), interest in which will probably soon blow over if it has not already (
56:
keep - some of the delete/redirect votes didn't consider notability under
564:
380:
some actual information about the subject's career, for the record, and
273:
three related pages. The addition to
Vigilante was also theirs. See
745:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
354:. With an H-index of 37 and a reasonably fleshed-out article at
444:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
381:
377:
275:
120:
116:
112:
60:
and article now doesn't solely focus on the incident. (
184:
586:
that is littered with dubious sources and MRA-tinged
613:
easily, with a h-index of over 40. Agreed that some
634:Obviously notable as a member of the Leopoldina (
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
759:). No further edits should be made to this page.
269:) only edits on WP have been on this issue at
198:
8:
442:Note: This debate has been included in the
424:list of Science-related deletion discussions
422:Note: This debate has been included in the
404:list of Germany-related deletion discussions
402:Note: This debate has been included in the
441:
421:
401:
308:Leipzig University internship controversy
234:Leipzig University internship controversy
7:
24:
617:issues need to be looked at. --
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
306:, alternativley redirect to
776:
738:20:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
714:08:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
697:17:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
669:15:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
648:22:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
627:11:21, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
600:08:07, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
584:article on the controversy
574:06:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
544:13:04, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
524:03:10, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
504:02:57, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
483:01:05, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
456:16:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
436:16:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
416:16:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
395:07:29, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
368:02:19, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
342:00:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
324:18:49, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
295:07:49, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
227:05:23, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
73:21:11, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
471:did a good job of editing
356:de:Annette_Beck-Sickinger
257:ProdigiousKing32480910284
240:(which I have reverted),
748:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
242:Germany–India relations
87:Annette Beck-Sickinger
79:Annette Beck-Sickinger
469:User:Opabinia regalis
534:(wow, I had no idea)
472:
249:Leipzig University
48:The result was
516:John Pack Lambert
496:John Pack Lambert
467:
458:
438:
418:
291:
62:non-admin closure
767:
750:
678:Opabinia regalis
592:Opabinia regalis
560:Opabinia regalis
387:Opabinia regalis
360:Opabinia regalis
352:keep and rewrite
350:, second choice
289:
280:
203:
202:
188:
140:
128:
110:
69:
67:
34:
775:
774:
770:
769:
768:
766:
765:
764:
763:
757:deletion review
746:
730:Robert McClenon
676:with thanks to
274:
219:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
145:
136:
101:
85:
82:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
773:
771:
762:
761:
741:
740:
723:
716:
706:Axolotl Nr.733
699:
671:
661:David Eppstein
650:
640:Axolotl Nr.733
629:
604:
603:
602:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
527:
526:
506:
492:George Wallace
485:
460:
459:
439:
419:
399:
398:
397:
371:
370:
344:
326:
297:
206:
205:
142:
81:
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
772:
760:
758:
754:
749:
743:
742:
739:
735:
731:
727:
724:
720:
717:
715:
711:
707:
703:
700:
698:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
672:
670:
666:
662:
658:
654:
651:
649:
645:
641:
637:
633:
630:
628:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
576:
575:
571:
567:
566:
561:
556:
553:
552:
545:
541:
537:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
525:
521:
517:
513:
510:
507:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
486:
484:
480:
476:
470:
465:
462:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
440:
437:
433:
429:
425:
420:
417:
413:
409:
405:
400:
396:
392:
388:
383:
379:
375:
374:
373:
372:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
346:First choice
345:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
298:
296:
293:
292:
286:
285:
279:
278:
272:
268:
265:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
243:
239:
235:
231:
230:
229:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
201:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
151:
148:
147:Find sources:
143:
139:
135:
132:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
71:
70:
68:Esquivalience
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
747:
744:
725:
718:
701:
673:
652:
631:
619:120.17.55.37
606:
563:
554:
508:
487:
463:
351:
347:
299:
288:
283:
276:
270:
263:
244:
232:Redirect to
207:
195:
189:
181:
174:
168:
162:
156:
146:
133:
65:
49:
47:
31:
28:
536:E.M.Gregory
475:E.M.Gregory
172:free images
215:WP:NOTNEWS
753:talk page
609:. Passes
448:• Gene93k
428:• Gene93k
408:• Gene93k
334:MZMcBride
238:Vigilante
37:talk page
755:or in a
588:WP:SYNTH
332:said. --
330:Amortias
312:Amortias
267:contribs
253:wp:UNDUE
131:View log
39:or in a
702:Comment
682:DocTree
657:WP:PROF
636:WP:PROF
611:WP:PROF
580:WP:PROF
509:Comment
382:removed
376:I have
300:Delete
178:WP refs
166:scholar
104:protect
99:history
58:WP:PROF
54:WP:SNOW
615:WP:BLP
348:delete
150:Google
108:delete
722:(UTC)
570:talk
378:added
328:What
304:WP:1E
211:WP:1E
193:JSTOR
154:books
138:Stats
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
734:talk
726:Keep
719:Keep
710:talk
690:ʇuoɔ
686:ʞlɐʇ
674:Keep
665:talk
655:per
653:Keep
644:talk
632:Keep
623:talk
607:Keep
596:talk
555:Keep
540:talk
520:talk
500:talk
488:Keep
479:talk
464:Keep
452:talk
432:talk
412:talk
391:talk
364:talk
338:talk
302:per
277:here
261:talk
223:talk
186:FENS
160:news
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
50:keep
694:WER
565:DGG
284:220
271:all
247:at
245:and
217:).
200:TWL
129:– (
736:)
712:)
692:)
667:)
646:)
625:)
598:)
572:)
542:)
522:)
502:)
481:)
454:)
446:.
434:)
426:.
414:)
406:.
393:)
366:)
340:)
322:)
318:)(
310:.
290:of
281:-
225:)
180:)
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
64:)
52:.
732:(
708:(
688:·
684:(
663:(
642:(
621:(
594:(
568:(
538:(
518:(
498:(
477:(
450:(
430:(
410:(
389:(
362:(
336:(
320:C
316:T
314:(
264:·
259:(
221:(
209:(
204:)
196:·
190:·
182:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
152:(
144:(
141:)
134:·
127:)
89:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.