534:
start (especially from the trade papers I mentioned) due to big names being involved, and there is a second surge of coverage right around the time of the film's release. In between, circumstances will vary. Subject matter with fan bases (e.g., comic book films) will be heavily covered throughout its whole production. If a film is shot somewhere relatively unusual (e.g., Shreveport, Louisiana), there tends to be local coverage to draw upon. However, there is a subset of films that go through production without much attention, but I think that the early (and especially repeated) coverage from the trade papers make it highly likely that this is a film that will get attention upon arrival. Is there a chance that it won't ever be released? Yes, but for films that have entered production, the odds of that are very, very small. In my opinion, it's not enough to delete this article which, considering these circumstances, is not detrimental to have on
Knowledge.
553:
websites; readers who hear about the film can come here and then look at the actors' articles. In any case, I've added a bit about development history (personally find it neat that it was in development since Jan. '11) and that casting began before a director was found. Not to mention filming at Dodger
Stadium. Sorry to add on, I just think this is a clear-cut case and wanted to articulate and demonstrate why.
457:
While an article in "post" is more likely to have received significant coverage than a similarly-well-known/similarly-promoted movie in the pre-production or filming stage would, there are no doubt films that get widely covered within 24 hours of the announcement of the plans for the film. On the
552:
I have added a "Production" section using the aforementioned trade papers. I think that there is more substance than just who appears in the film, even though I think even that would be enough in such an article. Even a cast list is useful in terms of navigating
Knowledge instead of IMDb or other
533:
in my research.) Considering the director and the cast, I find it highly unlikely that this film will not be reviewed. Its notability will only be further reinforced as the release date gets closer. Tokyogirl79, my experience with film coverage is that there is generally a lot of attention at the
485:
The biggie here is that the film's production would have to have received a lot of in-depth coverage, which this film hasn't. Most of what we have is so insanely light that it wouldn't really keep the film if, by some chance, the film were to release and receive zero coverage after that fact. It
216:
for this to pass notability guidelines. The film doesn't release until next year and all of the coverage so far has been "so and so is starring in this film" type of coverage. Nothing that would show that the film passes the very strict standards for unreleased films. I've tried redirecting this
486:
might seem unlikely that it wouldn't receive any further coverage, but it's not impossible and there have been multiple films in similar circumstances that were either pushed back even farther (and gotten no additional in-depth coverage) or released with no actual other coverage.
252:
Also note that the same editor has deleted the passage I put in the article for Sexual
Perversity in Chicago for this film, possibly in an attempt to dissuade any further attempts to redirect. I've left messages for the editor, but with zero response from him or her.
217:
three times, giving the editor several warnings that this didn't pass notability guidelines. Since they seem to be adamant about this remaining an article, I'm taking it to AfD to ensure that this doesn't pass notability guidelines at this point in time.
600:. I'm not too proud to admit that I was wrong, so can someone close this up? I didn't see the sources when I'd searched and I'd been pretty certain that this was just one of many articles added by a green editor with unreliable sources.
173:
434:
I think I have seen the articles in pre-production and filming status. This film is in post-production state and can be kept at
Knowledge according to the policies. And you know this better than me.--
167:
400:. As the film has been receiving coverage, and IS in post-production an undeletion/recreation is likely to be expected soon enough that a salting should be unneccessary.
99:
94:
103:
126:
86:
133:
363:
188:
155:
90:
149:
576:
per major improvements and in agreeing with Erik. GNG is now met for a completed film. Was happy to strike my earlier opinion.
332:
by
Knowledge standards. Changing from "delete" to "defer to history of similar discussions where there was similar coverage."
17:
637:
611:
588:
566:
547:
497:
480:
448:
426:
384:
354:
308:
264:
247:
228:
68:
145:
470:
344:
298:
397:
283:
209:
195:
82:
74:
562:
543:
378:
658:
585:
474:
423:
409:
348:
328:. I am not familiar enough with film-related deletion debates to determine if the listed coverage is considered
302:
65:
40:
161:
526:
627:
438:
654:
604:
490:
257:
240:
221:
36:
578:
416:
402:
58:
181:
56:. Nominator has withdrawn per improvements and sources and there are no arguments for deletion.
466:
340:
294:
213:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
653:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
601:
487:
254:
237:
236:
Note that the same editor has tried to create this through AfC and has been declined twice.
218:
282:). While I would prefer a delete, I would support a consensus to redirect-and-protect to
558:
539:
373:
514:
510:
325:
205:
53:
459:
333:
287:
120:
623:
I think it is better to close it up for now...after agreeing of
Tokyogirl79.--
554:
535:
368:
458:
flip side, there are many films that actually exist which are not notable.
513:
because it is verifiable that production has taken place and per
647:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
204:
I came across this as a PROD and seeing as it didn't pass
279:
116:
112:
108:
180:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
661:). No further edits should be made to this page.
320:There are now more references and this article
398:Sexual Perversity in Chicago#Film adaptations
284:Sexual Perversity in Chicago#Film adaptations
210:Sexual Perversity in Chicago#Film adaptations
194:
8:
525:about this film in development. (Also found
362:Note: This debate has been included in the
511:the notability guidelines for future films
361:
208:at that point in time, I redirected it to
364:list of Film-related deletion discussions
7:
24:
517:since there was coverage in both
515:the general notability guidelines
630:Assassin! No, Captain Assassin!
441:Assassin! No, Captain Assassin!
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
414:Struck my opinion. See below.
1:
83:About Last Night (2014 film)
75:About Last Night (2014 film)
678:
650:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
638:06:20, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
612:05:55, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
589:05:15, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
567:14:27, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
548:13:56, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
498:06:29, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
481:04:39, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
449:04:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
427:05:15, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
412:06:21, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
385:05:21, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
355:21:41, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
309:04:54, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
265:04:26, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
248:04:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
229:04:21, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
69:09:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
523:The Hollywood Reporter
212:since it was simply
54:Closing discussion
479:
478:
387:
353:
352:
307:
306:
669:
652:
636:
632:
631:
608:
581:
494:
464:
463:
447:
443:
442:
419:
405:
394:Redirect for now
383:
381:
376:
338:
337:
292:
291:
261:
244:
225:
199:
198:
184:
136:
124:
106:
61:
48:The result was
34:
677:
676:
672:
671:
670:
668:
667:
666:
665:
659:deletion review
648:
635:
629:
628:
624:
606:
598:Withdrawing nom
579:
492:
446:
440:
439:
435:
417:
403:
379:
374:
367:
259:
242:
223:
141:
132:
97:
81:
78:
59:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
675:
673:
664:
663:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
625:
615:
614:
592:
591:
571:
570:
569:
503:
502:
501:
500:
483:
452:
451:
436:
429:
389:
388:
359:
358:
357:
312:
311:
270:
269:
268:
267:
250:
202:
201:
138:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
674:
662:
660:
656:
651:
645:
639:
634:
633:
622:
619:
618:
617:
616:
613:
610:
609:
603:
599:
596:
595:
594:
593:
590:
587:
586:
583:
582:
575:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
551:
550:
549:
545:
541:
537:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
505:
504:
499:
496:
495:
489:
484:
482:
476:
472:
468:
461:
456:
455:
454:
453:
450:
445:
444:
433:
430:
428:
425:
424:
421:
420:
413:
411:
410:
407:
406:
399:
395:
391:
390:
386:
382:
377:
372:
371:
365:
360:
356:
350:
346:
342:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
316:
315:
314:
313:
310:
304:
300:
296:
289:
285:
281:
277:
276:
272:
271:
266:
263:
262:
256:
251:
249:
246:
245:
239:
235:
234:
233:
232:
231:
230:
227:
226:
220:
215:
211:
207:
197:
193:
190:
187:
183:
179:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
147:
144:
143:Find sources:
139:
135:
131:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
67:
66:
63:
62:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
649:
646:
626:
620:
605:
597:
584:
577:
573:
530:
522:
518:
506:
491:
437:
431:
422:
415:
408:
401:
396:as above to
393:
392:
369:
329:
321:
317:
278:as PRODder (
274:
273:
258:
241:
222:
203:
191:
185:
177:
170:
164:
158:
152:
142:
129:
64:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
602:Tokyogirl79
531:Toronto Sun
488:Tokyogirl79
330:significant
255:Tokyogirl79
238:Tokyogirl79
219:Tokyogirl79
168:free images
214:WP:TOOSOON
655:talk page
37:talk page
657:or in a
580:Schmidt,
563:contribs
544:contribs
471:contribs
418:Schmidt,
404:Schmidt,
345:contribs
299:contribs
127:View log
60:Schmidt,
39:or in a
621:Closeup
607:(｡◕‿◕｡)
519:Variety
493:(｡◕‿◕｡)
460:davidwr
432:Comment
334:davidwr
288:davidwr
260:(｡◕‿◕｡)
243:(｡◕‿◕｡)
224:(｡◕‿◕｡)
174:WP refs
162:scholar
100:protect
95:history
475:e-mail
349:e-mail
326:WP:GNG
318:Update
303:e-mail
275:Delete
206:WP:NFF
146:Google
104:delete
529:from
324:meet
189:JSTOR
150:books
134:Stats
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
574:Keep
559:talk
555:Erik
540:talk
536:Erik
527:this
521:and
509:per
507:Keep
467:talk
370:czar
341:talk
295:talk
280:PROD
182:FENS
156:news
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
50:keep
473:)/(
469:)/(
347:)/(
343:)/(
322:may
301:)/(
297:)/(
286:.
196:TWL
125:– (
565:)
561:|
546:)
542:|
366:.
176:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
52:.
557:(
538:(
477:)
465:(
462:/
380:·
375:·
351:)
339:(
336:/
305:)
293:(
290:/
200:)
192:·
186:·
178:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
148:(
140:(
137:)
130:·
123:)
85:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.