447:. ("Futurism" is a schlock website for sensationalism, ScienceAlert is an aggregator that was literally just reposting an infographic that doesn't itself give a source for the term, etc.) These are the kind of marginal-to-outright-garbage "references" that
200:
483:
439:
Cruft. Simple cruft. It's a non-notable neologism with passing mentions in gray-area-or-worse "references". None of the few items that searching has turned up constitute
474:
where a topic becomes wiki-notable because the pop-science coverage was so intense that it overcame a dearth of peer-reviewed literature, but this is not one of them.
194:
161:
358:
as a poorly sourced neologism. It might become a notable term at some point, but definitely isn't at this point judging from how few sources there are for the term.
320:
471:
400:: extremely few sources, none of them reliable, and then no more than an unscientific mention (the BBC link given by Jackattack1597 being an example). An
108:
93:
451:. Passing mentions in pop science aren't the kind of material we need to base an encyclopedia article upon. We don't need an article for a synonym for
448:
341:
306:
266:
270:
530:
Lacks any good source. It would be interesting if "absolute hot" were a thing, but it just isn't. The actual scientific concepts are
134:
129:
138:
88:
81:
17:
215:
242:
121:
182:
375:
This is a borderline case, but I deprodded it because I could find another reliable source mentioning the term ( This
102:
98:
464:
247:
568:
40:
384:
363:
336:
301:
260:
176:
376:
499:
172:
564:
551:
522:
503:
479:
429:
408:
388:
367:
347:
312:
63:
36:
125:
535:
281:
222:
517:
380:
359:
324:
289:
256:
208:
117:
69:
531:
452:
277:
58:
495:
405:
236:
77:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
563:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
547:
475:
440:
539:
491:
285:
188:
512:
397:
252:
53:
379:, which not only mentions it but includes it in the "headline" of the infographic.
494:
of two totally different concepts that are covered in their own separate articles.
444:
426:
232:
155:
543:
459:
stronger presence than a pop-science infographic that doesn't even say where
401:
511:
Per "adding two not notable topics does not make one notable" (WP:SYNTH).
413:
The BBC is a reliable source. A 'scientific' term doesn't have to be used
455:
that scientists don't actually use. Actual scientific terminology has a
467:, and for practical purposes, infographics are all headline. There
559:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
269:), did not provide any sources that prove notability. See also
421:, especially if it's been used by an influential source.
151:
147:
143:
207:
276:
The content is entirely about two different topics (
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
571:). No further edits should be made to this page.
449:might have just copied from Knowledge themselves
319:Note: This discussion has been included in the
255:, and does not appear elsewhere. The deprodder,
271:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Physics#Absolute_hot
221:
8:
321:list of Science-related deletion discussions
109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
318:
284:) discussed separately, so it may fail
7:
465:Headlines are not reliable sources
245:) as a neologism originating in a
24:
404:of what does not belong in WP. —
538:, and joining them like this is
94:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
542:as others have pointed out.
84:(AfD)? Read these primers!
588:
552:13:15, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
523:10:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
504:06:05, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
484:18:28, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
430:16:25, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
409:00:16, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
389:00:00, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
368:22:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
348:20:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
313:20:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
561:Please do not modify it.
64:23:47, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
82:Articles for deletion
536:Hagedorn temperature
441:significant coverage
282:Hagedorn temperature
463:got the term from.
396:as utterly failing
251:epsiode that fails
532:Planck temperature
453:Planck temperature
278:Planck temperature
417:to be considered
350:
99:Guide to deletion
89:How to contribute
579:
445:reliable sources
423:Borderline keep.
344:
339:
309:
304:
226:
225:
211:
159:
141:
79:
61:
56:
34:
587:
586:
582:
581:
580:
578:
577:
576:
575:
569:deletion review
377:BBC infographic
342:
337:
307:
302:
168:
132:
116:
113:
76:
73:
59:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
585:
583:
574:
573:
555:
554:
525:
506:
486:
472:isolated cases
434:
433:
432:
415:scientifically
391:
381:Jackattack1597
370:
360:SamStrongTalks
352:
351:
257:Jackattack1597
229:
228:
165:
112:
111:
106:
96:
91:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
584:
572:
570:
566:
562:
557:
556:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
526:
524:
521:
520:
516:
515:
510:
507:
505:
501:
497:
493:
490:
487:
485:
481:
477:
473:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
435:
431:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
411:
410:
407:
403:
399:
395:
392:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
371:
369:
365:
361:
357:
354:
353:
349:
345:
340:
334:
333:
330:
327:
322:
317:
316:
315:
314:
310:
305:
299:
298:
295:
292:
287:
283:
279:
274:
272:
268:
265:
262:
258:
254:
250:
249:
244:
241:
238:
234:
224:
220:
217:
214:
210:
206:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
174:
171:
170:Find sources:
166:
163:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
83:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
560:
558:
527:
518:
513:
508:
496:Hemiauchenia
488:
468:
460:
456:
436:
422:
418:
414:
393:
372:
355:
331:
328:
325:
296:
293:
290:
275:
263:
246:
239:
230:
218:
212:
204:
197:
191:
185:
179:
169:
118:Absolute hot
75:
70:Absolute hot
49:
47:
31:
28:
231:PRODded by
195:free images
476:XOR'easter
288:as well. –
565:talk page
37:talk page
567:or in a
540:WP:SYNTH
492:WP:SYNTH
402:exemplar
286:WP:SYNTH
267:contribs
243:contribs
162:View log
103:glossary
39:or in a
514:Cinadon
427:jftsang
419:notable
406:Quondum
326:Laundry
291:Laundry
233:Quondum
201:WP refs
189:scholar
135:protect
130:history
80:New to
544:Tercer
528:Delete
509:Delete
489:Delete
437:Delete
398:WP:GNG
394:Delete
356:Delete
253:WP:NEO
173:Google
139:delete
60:plicit
50:delete
329:Pizza
294:Pizza
216:JSTOR
177:books
156:views
148:watch
144:links
16:<
548:talk
534:and
500:talk
480:talk
385:talk
373:Keep
364:talk
280:and
261:talk
248:NOVA
237:talk
209:FENS
183:news
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
469:are
457:far
443:in
323:. –
223:TWL
160:– (
550:)
519:36
502:)
482:)
461:it
425:--
387:)
366:)
346:)
343:c̄
332:03
311:)
308:c̄
297:03
273:.
203:)
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
52:.
546:(
498:(
478:(
383:(
362:(
338:d
335:(
303:d
300:(
264:·
259:(
240:·
235:(
227:)
219:·
213:·
205:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
180:·
175:(
167:(
164:)
158:)
120:(
105:)
101:(
55:✗
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.