317:), Vietnam, and Germany (×2), and that's in addition to the Neowin article in English and the article in Czech. I can't say I'm 100% sure that each of those is a RS, but they each appear to be from a news organization, so I'm pretty sure at least two of them are (and anyone who wants to check, feel free — several of them have WP pages in English, and I'd guess some others have a page in their native language). We should be careful not to introduce
211:
321:
here — it makes sense that most of the coverage so far is not in
English, given that Abstract Knowledge is being publicized as mostly something to help out non-English Wikipedias.
438:
291:
246:
applies. It is (or rather will be) created by notable organisation but that does not mean it is automatically notable itself. Most of the sources are not exactly independent.
305:
205:
338:
The page is certainly currently short, but I don't think we could say it's unlikely to be expanded soon (several of the sources I just added were published today).
263:
164:
314:
111:
96:
171:
137:
132:
141:
294:
382:
242:
I do not see it being notable just yet. No doubt it will be in the future (hopefully), but currently, imho "No inherited notability" of
124:
226:
193:
91:
84:
17:
105:
101:
187:
494:
40:
477:
450:
428:
403:
386:
356:
275:
255:
66:
183:
378:
128:
233:
62:
490:
327:
301:
36:
411:
There's plenty enough at present to demonstrate in-depth reporting by a variety of sources to meet the
287:
422:
219:
399:
369:
120:
72:
199:
462:
now, and we all know it will increase with time, a delete at this point would be pedantic. --
80:
58:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
489:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
470:
318:
297:
296:) to justify a paragraph there, but not nearly enough for a stand-alone article at present.
443:
417:
394:
Will be notable after the project has gone online, but not yet now. May return later.--
271:
251:
54:
459:
412:
395:
243:
158:
463:
458:
I could see a concern if it was still a proposal and not approved. But it meets
344:
267:
247:
336:, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.
334:
and is unlikely to be expanded within a reasonable amount of time
485:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
439:
m:Special:MyLanguage/Abstract
Knowledge/July 2020 announcement
313:. I just added additional news coverage from France (an
154:
150:
146:
218:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
497:). No further edits should be made to this page.
262:Note: This discussion has been included in the
264:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
232:
8:
290:. There's just barely enough coverage (like
112:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
261:
331:
7:
24:
97:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
87:(AfD)? Read these primers!
514:
478:17:32, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
67:01:43, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
487:Please do not modify it.
451:22:08, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
429:18:54, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
404:23:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
387:18:28, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
357:18:30, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
332:If a page is very short
330:states (emphasis added)
306:17:59, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
276:16:54, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
256:16:54, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
85:Articles for deletion
288:Wikimedia Foundation
326:Regarding merging,
315:RSP-greenlit source
55:(non-admin closure)
121:Abstract Knowledge
73:Abstract Knowledge
354:
342:
278:
102:Guide to deletion
92:How to contribute
57:
505:
475:
468:
449:
446:
425:
420:
385:
376:
372:
355:
352:
351:
349:
340:
237:
236:
222:
174:
162:
144:
82:
53:
34:
513:
512:
508:
507:
506:
504:
503:
502:
501:
495:deletion review
471:
464:
447:
442:
423:
418:
374:
368:
367:
345:
343:
339:
179:
170:
135:
119:
116:
79:
76:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
511:
509:
500:
499:
481:
480:
453:
432:
431:
406:
389:
360:
359:
328:WP:MERGEREASON
323:
322:
308:
280:
279:
240:
239:
176:
115:
114:
109:
99:
94:
77:
75:
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
510:
498:
496:
492:
488:
483:
482:
479:
476:
474:
469:
467:
461:
457:
454:
452:
445:
440:
437:
434:
433:
430:
427:
426:
421:
414:
410:
407:
405:
401:
397:
393:
390:
388:
384:
380:
375:Pigsonthewing
371:
365:
362:
361:
358:
350:
348:
337:
335:
329:
325:
324:
320:
319:language bias
316:
312:
309:
307:
303:
299:
295:
292:
289:
285:
282:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
260:
259:
258:
257:
253:
249:
245:
235:
231:
228:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
185:
182:
181:Find sources:
177:
173:
169:
166:
160:
156:
152:
148:
143:
139:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:
113:
110:
107:
103:
100:
98:
95:
93:
90:
89:
88:
86:
81:
74:
71:
69:
68:
64:
60:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
486:
484:
472:
465:
455:
435:
416:
408:
391:
383:Andy's edits
379:Talk to Andy
370:Andy Mabbett
363:
346:
333:
310:
283:
241:
229:
223:
215:
208:
202:
196:
190:
180:
167:
78:
59:Mdaniels5757
49:
47:
31:
28:
415:threshold.
366:Meets GNG.
206:free images
298:XOR'easter
491:talk page
37:talk page
493:or in a
396:Aschmidt
165:View log
106:glossary
39:or in a
419:Schwede
212:WP refs
200:scholar
138:protect
133:history
83:New to
460:WP:GNG
413:WP:GNG
392:Delete
244:WP:WEB
184:Google
142:delete
466:Green
284:Merge
227:JSTOR
188:books
172:Stats
159:views
151:watch
147:links
16:<
456:Keep
444:Moxy
436:Keep
409:Keep
400:talk
364:Keep
347:Sdkb
341:{{u|
311:Keep
302:talk
293:and
272:talk
268:Base
252:talk
248:Base
220:FENS
194:news
155:logs
129:talk
125:edit
63:talk
50:keep
441:.--
377:);
286:to
234:TWL
163:– (
448:🍁
424:66
402:)
381:;
353:}}
304:)
274:)
266:.
254:)
214:)
157:|
153:|
149:|
145:|
140:|
136:|
131:|
127:|
65:)
52:.
473:C
398:(
373:(
300:(
270:(
250:(
238:)
230:·
224:·
216:·
209:·
203:·
197:·
191:·
186:(
178:(
175:)
168:·
161:)
123:(
108:)
104:(
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.