223:
Two of the references are by the same person. In none of the references is it described by itself, all are announcing releases of several games. As I said, notability is not indicated by the article. Are there any favorable reviews noting public interest in this game? The article itself states it
285:
The guidelines state that the coverage must be non-trivial. The provided sources, and the other references I found in a gsearch are all trivial, short reviews among many or sites to download the game. This fails the notability standards, unless a better, non-trivial reference can be found.
245:. The references still represent significant coverage, even if other games are discussed in the same references. {{WP:N]] says: "Significant coverage is more than trivial but may be less than exclusive." --
120:
303:
I don't see any rationale for deletion. No assertion of importance might work for speedy, but for an AFD some indication that sources were looked for first would be helpful, since
164:
264:
307:
is the issue. Though I'd agree that what is in effect a single source does not cut the mustard in relation to reception, there's an in-depth review on
326:- I'm happy with the MacWorld and InsideMacGames reviews as they appear to be reliable sources, and are substantial enough to satisfy
54:
17:
87:
82:
91:
351:. However, the general notability guideline recommends multiple sources, so I am inclined to side on the deletion side for now.
74:
436:
36:
375:
315:
435:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
311:
which google spat out as the first result when I searched for the game's name along with 'game' and 'review'.
421:
404:
378:
364:
339:
318:
295:
276:
254:
233:
214:
197:
179:
154:
136:
56:
52:
347:— If additional sources can be found besides the good coverage from MacWorld, I'll be happy to change to
335:
229:
150:
372:
312:
291:
417:
400:
358:
250:
210:
193:
175:
78:
272:
132:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
331:
225:
146:
127:
Unremarkable Game. I would have filed a speedy delete except there was no such option haha.
327:
287:
308:
304:
413:
389:
352:
246:
206:
189:
171:
70:
62:
268:
128:
108:
330:. The NYT ref was merely a publisher's description, so I have removed it.
388:
Nothing wrong with the core of this article, just needs improving.
429:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
205:
per
Eastmain's improvements, notability is established.
115:
104:
100:
96:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
439:). No further edits should be made to this page.
371:What about the inside mac games review above?
165:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
263:: This debate has been included in the
163:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
265:list of video game related deletions
412:the article is sufficiently cited.
24:
145:. No indication of notability.
188:. I added some references. --
1:
422:00:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
405:01:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
379:15:50, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
365:04:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
340:00:38, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
319:17:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
296:15:02, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
277:12:02, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
255:04:58, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
234:04:10, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
215:04:03, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
198:03:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
180:03:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
155:03:39, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
137:02:03, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
57:01:23, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
456:
224:was an unsuccessful game.
432:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
397:
44:The result was
390:
279:
182:
168:
447:
434:
396:
393:
361:
355:
309:Inside Mac Games
259:
169:
159:
118:
112:
94:
34:
455:
454:
450:
449:
448:
446:
445:
444:
443:
437:deletion review
430:
394:
391:
359:
353:
114:
85:
69:
66:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
453:
451:
442:
441:
425:
424:
407:
382:
381:
368:
367:
342:
321:
298:
280:
257:
239:
238:
237:
236:
218:
217:
200:
183:
157:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
452:
440:
438:
433:
427:
426:
423:
419:
415:
411:
408:
406:
402:
398:
387:
384:
383:
380:
377:
374:
370:
369:
366:
362:
356:
350:
346:
343:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
322:
320:
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
297:
293:
289:
284:
281:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
256:
252:
248:
244:
241:
240:
235:
231:
227:
222:
221:
220:
219:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
199:
195:
191:
187:
184:
181:
177:
173:
166:
162:
158:
156:
152:
148:
144:
141:
140:
139:
138:
134:
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:Active Lancer
68:
67:
64:
63:Active Lancer
61:
59:
58:
55:
53:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
431:
428:
409:
385:
348:
344:
323:
300:
282:
260:
242:
202:
185:
160:
142:
126:
50:Juliancolton
45:
43:
31:
28:
345:Weak delete
332:Marasmusine
226:Synchronism
147:Synchronism
305:notability
288:Theseeker4
269:• Gene93k
414:Icewedge
354:MuZemike
247:Eastmain
207:Jclemens
190:Eastmain
172:Eastmain
121:View log
376:another
373:Someone
316:another
313:Someone
243:Comment
129:Dengero
88:protect
83:history
328:WP:GNG
283:Delete
143:Delete
116:delete
92:delete
386:Keep:
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
418:talk
410:Keep
401:talk
395:4314
392:Ryan
360:talk
349:keep
336:talk
324:Keep
301:Keep
292:talk
273:talk
261:Note
251:talk
230:talk
211:talk
203:Keep
194:talk
186:Keep
176:talk
161:Note
151:talk
133:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
46:keep
170:--
167:.
48:. –
420:)
403:)
363:)
338:)
294:)
275:)
267:.
253:)
232:)
213:)
196:)
178:)
153:)
135:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
416:(
399:(
357:(
334:(
290:(
271:(
249:(
228:(
209:(
192:(
174:(
149:(
131:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.