428:. This term is presumably used to distinguish an academic psychologist from a worker in popular psychology or an applied psychologist (worker in clinical, occupational or educational psychology). Do other sciences (physics, biology and chemistry) have a separate article on academic workers in their fields, to distinguish them from "popular science" or "applied science"?
352:, since much more information on academic psychologists is already included in the main article, and the distinction "academic" appears to be used primarily to distinguish psychologists from psychiatrists in publications aimed at laymen who hear "psychologist" and the image that jumps to mind is
575:
to psychologist (otherwise delete). This distinction is not necessary at all. Do we really need "academic physicist", "academic zoologist", "academic sociologist", academic archaeologist", "academic computer scientist", etc.?
326:
numerous hits on the term in books and scholar searches. The article obviously needs the attention of an expert in the field to make it more than the current stub, but the term itself seems to be used enough to be notable.
210:
557:
although some attorneys practice while others are full time academics. This is not a topic, even though some advice books /articles have been published for psychologists who wish to pursue academic research careers.
393:
The distinction made by the term "academic psychologist" is from "clinical psychologist" rather than "psychiatrist", in the same way that an academic lawyer is different from a practising lawyer.
683:. I had considered suggesting a 'redirect' to the latter but, surprisingly, the former actually offers better careers guidance, and I don't feel a redirect can be justified in this instance.
258:
278:
370:
to have "rewritten" the page is misleading, as what he really did was blank it and replace it with a single sentence that made it an even more useless content fork than before.
204:
163:
110:
95:
136:
131:
140:
170:
123:
507:
What do you mean by "notable"? Can you give an example of encyclopedic content that could be included in the page under discussion but not
225:
192:
541:. This common English usage is not a topic, merely a juxtaposition of two words with perfectly obvious plain English meanings.
90:
83:
17:
520:
379:
186:
104:
100:
692:
659:
636:
612:
585:
567:
525:
491:
470:
437:
420:
402:
384:
336:
318:
290:
270:
250:
65:
621:
594:
127:
182:
709:
314:
40:
232:
647:
538:
454:
398:
411:
It's now less tendentious, but only a dictionary entry. Hard to see why a separate article is required.
705:
680:
632:
608:
563:
550:
466:
349:
119:
71:
36:
554:
546:
688:
668:
655:
416:
310:
306:
246:
61:
332:
218:
198:
517:
487:
376:
286:
266:
650:
and 2) nothing notable is even presented in this “article” it’s literally one goddamn sentence.
675:, I feel neither iteration offers anything significant beyond that already available at either
581:
394:
79:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
704:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
604:
559:
462:
433:
684:
651:
412:
242:
57:
328:
512:
502:
483:
449:
not that I can find. Nor do other professional fields. We do not, for example, have
371:
302:
282:
262:
676:
577:
508:
363:
359:
345:
53:
157:
458:
450:
446:
429:
354:
461:
states: "Social work is an academic discipline and profession that..."
482:- Just needs cleanup & improvement. Term itself is notable.
358:, but this distinction is one we already make with our separate
700:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
624:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
597:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
301:
The content seemed rather tendentious so I rewrote it. See
259:
list of
Behavioural science-related deletion discussions
672:
367:
153:
149:
145:
217:
511:, the page of which I contend it is a content fork?
630:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
603:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
279:
list of Social science-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
712:). No further edits should be made to this page.
277:Note: This discussion has been included in the
257:Note: This discussion has been included in the
231:
8:
111:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
366:articles. Andrew's claim above and in his
276:
256:
7:
24:
545:that we do not have articles on
96:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
693:00:19, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
660:06:42, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
637:00:59, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
613:23:33, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
586:07:43, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
457:, but the first sentence of
403:09:43, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
66:09:44, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
568:01:40, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
537:to psychologist or DELETE.
526:23:41, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
492:23:39, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
471:01:42, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
438:15:31, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
421:15:02, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
385:14:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
337:12:30, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
319:10:37, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
291:09:40, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
271:09:40, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
251:09:20, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
86:(AfD)? Read these primers!
729:
702:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
681:Research psychologist
120:Academic psychologist
84:Articles for deletion
72:Academic psychologist
455:academic social work
551:academic physician
639:
615:
555:academic attorney
523:
382:
293:
273:
101:Guide to deletion
91:How to contribute
720:
671:'s rewrite from
648:WP:NOTDICTIONARY
635:
629:
627:
625:
602:
600:
598:
547:academic chemist
539:WP:NOTDICTIONARY
516:
506:
375:
236:
235:
221:
173:
161:
143:
81:
34:
728:
727:
723:
722:
721:
719:
718:
717:
716:
710:deletion review
669:Andrew Davidson
640:
631:
620:
618:
616:
593:
591:
500:
241:Personal essay
178:
169:
134:
118:
115:
78:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
726:
724:
715:
714:
696:
695:
662:
628:
617:
601:
590:
589:
588:
570:
531:
530:
529:
528:
495:
494:
476:
475:
474:
473:
441:
440:
423:
408:
407:
406:
405:
388:
387:
339:
321:
295:
294:
274:
239:
238:
175:
114:
113:
108:
98:
93:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
725:
713:
711:
707:
703:
698:
697:
694:
690:
686:
682:
678:
674:
670:
666:
663:
661:
657:
653:
649:
645:
642:
641:
638:
634:
633:North America
626:
623:
614:
610:
606:
599:
596:
587:
583:
579:
574:
571:
569:
565:
561:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
533:
532:
527:
522:
519:
514:
510:
504:
499:
498:
497:
496:
493:
489:
485:
481:
478:
477:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
445:
444:
443:
442:
439:
435:
431:
427:
424:
422:
418:
414:
410:
409:
404:
400:
396:
392:
391:
390:
389:
386:
381:
378:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
356:
351:
347:
343:
340:
338:
334:
330:
325:
322:
320:
316:
312:
308:
307:WP:NOTCLEANUP
304:
300:
297:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
275:
272:
268:
264:
260:
255:
254:
253:
252:
248:
244:
234:
230:
227:
224:
220:
216:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
184:
181:
180:Find sources:
176:
172:
168:
165:
159:
155:
151:
147:
142:
138:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:
112:
109:
106:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
88:
87:
85:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
701:
699:
677:Psychologist
673:this version
664:
643:
619:
592:
572:
542:
534:
509:Psychologist
479:
425:
395:Phil Bridger
368:edit summary
364:psychiatrist
360:psychologist
353:
350:content fork
348:. Redundant
346:Psychologist
341:
323:
298:
240:
228:
222:
214:
207:
201:
195:
189:
179:
166:
77:
54:Psychologist
49:
47:
31:
28:
605:Nosebagbear
560:E.M.Gregory
463:E.M.Gregory
459:Social work
451:social work
447:User:Vorbee
205:free images
685:Nick Moyes
652:Trillfendi
413:Rathfelder
243:Rathfelder
58:Randykitty
706:talk page
513:Hijiri 88
372:Hijiri 88
329:Neiltonks
311:Andrew D.
37:talk page
708:or in a
667:Despite
622:Relisted
595:Relisted
573:Redirect
535:Redirect
503:Skirts89
484:Skirts89
426:Question
342:Redirect
283:Bakazaka
263:Bakazaka
164:View log
105:glossary
50:redirect
39:or in a
578:MarkH21
355:Frasier
211:WP refs
199:scholar
137:protect
132:history
82:New to
665:Delete
644:Delete
430:Vorbee
303:WP:ATD
183:Google
141:delete
553:, or
226:JSTOR
187:books
171:Stats
158:views
150:watch
146:links
16:<
689:talk
656:talk
609:talk
582:talk
564:talk
543:Note
488:talk
480:Keep
467:talk
453:and
434:talk
417:talk
399:talk
362:and
333:talk
324:Keep
315:talk
305:and
299:Keep
287:talk
267:talk
247:talk
219:FENS
193:news
154:logs
128:talk
124:edit
62:talk
679:or
646:1)
344:to
233:TWL
162:– (
52:to
691:)
658:)
611:)
584:)
566:)
549:,
524:)
521:やや
490:)
469:)
436:)
419:)
401:)
383:)
380:やや
335:)
317:)
309:.
289:)
281:.
269:)
261:.
249:)
213:)
156:|
152:|
148:|
144:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
64:)
56:.
687:(
654:(
607:(
580:(
562:(
518:聖
515:(
505::
501:@
486:(
465:(
432:(
415:(
397:(
377:聖
374:(
331:(
313:(
285:(
265:(
245:(
237:)
229:·
223:·
215:·
208:·
202:·
196:·
190:·
185:(
177:(
174:)
167:·
160:)
122:(
107:)
103:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.