Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Adil Zarif - Knowledge

Source 📝

260:
thoroughly unconvinced by this as none of these sources have materialized and I feel like it's an argument which can be used anywhere; all an editor has to do is claim that sources exist. Please note I am a new editor and this is my understanding after trying my best to read as many guidelines and past discussions as possible, I could have easily made mistake, but I am just trying to be bold.
413:=3/min) from one third-world country during a world-wide lockdown is not the way to change notability guidelines. Meets an SNG and I put no stock on the assertion that a search for GNG has been exhausted; it's hard enough to achieve it during normal times and with better-studied subjects in more affluent parts of the world. 259:
guideline which is being debated itself and for it to change, precedent is needed, clearly those guidelines aren't being accepted and seem to me like they'll never be able to satisfy the GNG. Another argument given by editors on similar pages is given that sources in other languages might exist, I am
394:
one match notability is absurd. It is not like we make people notable for being the instructor of record for one official university course. Even publishing one article in an academic journal is almost never enough to make one notable. There are a few people notable for having published one book,
377:
Fails GNG/BIO/SPORTBASIC. A great example of why there is consensus at NSPORT to rewrite NCRIC and remove the low-bar domestic appearance criteria. One solitary match played, in which he contributed very little. No sources available beyond routine and indiscriminate statistics.
395:
academic or otherwise, but they are rare. Most writers who are notable, be they academics, aretists or however else one would describe writers, have many works to their name. This one match criteria is just absurd.
208: 161: 297: 202: 337: 317: 277: 252: 248: 108: 93: 168: 243:. The sources in the article are simply directory/stats listings, which I believe do not establish notability. Have performed a 88: 81: 17: 134: 129: 138: 223: 468: 460: 190: 121: 102: 98: 431: 489: 400: 40: 464: 184: 247:
and nothing came up. I've nominated two articles previously which were similar and they have been deleted (
418: 305: 285: 265: 485: 58: 36: 180: 472: 449: 422: 404: 386: 369: 349: 329: 309: 289: 269: 63: 396: 125: 445: 365: 345: 325: 216: 230: 117: 69: 415: 301: 281: 261: 77: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
484:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
244: 54: 196: 441: 380: 361: 341: 321: 256: 360:- unlikely to have further cricketing notability, only playing one List A match.   -- 240: 155: 480:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
434:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
412:
Meets NCRIC. Mass-nominating articles (at a rate of : -->
151: 147: 143: 215: 440:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 298:list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 492:). No further edits should be made to this page. 336:Note: This discussion has been included in the 316:Note: This discussion has been included in the 296:Note: This discussion has been included in the 276:Note: This discussion has been included in the 338:list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions 229: 8: 318:list of Cricket-related deletion discussions 109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 278:list of People-related deletion discussions 335: 315: 295: 275: 7: 463:, which would need to be created. 461:List of Rawalpindi Rams cricketers 24: 239:The article clearly doesn't meet 255:). Editors over there cited the 94:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 473:09:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC) 450:23:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC) 423:10:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC) 405:00:01, 11 September 2020 (UTC) 387:12:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 370:12:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 64:17:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC) 1: 350:20:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC) 330:20:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC) 310:19:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC) 290:19:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC) 270:19:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC) 84:(AfD)? Read these primers! 509: 482:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 82:Articles for deletion 452: 397:John Pack Lambert 352: 332: 312: 292: 99:Guide to deletion 89:How to contribute 500: 439: 437: 435: 383: 234: 233: 219: 171: 159: 141: 79: 62: 34: 508: 507: 503: 502: 501: 499: 498: 497: 496: 490:deletion review 453: 430: 428: 385: 381: 176: 167: 132: 116: 113: 76: 73: 53: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 506: 504: 495: 494: 476: 475: 438: 427: 426: 425: 407: 389: 379: 372: 354: 353: 333: 313: 293: 237: 236: 173: 112: 111: 106: 96: 91: 74: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 505: 493: 491: 487: 483: 478: 477: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 455: 454: 451: 447: 443: 436: 433: 424: 421: 420: 417: 411: 408: 406: 402: 398: 393: 390: 388: 384: 376: 373: 371: 367: 363: 359: 356: 355: 351: 347: 343: 339: 334: 331: 327: 323: 319: 314: 311: 307: 303: 299: 294: 291: 287: 283: 279: 274: 273: 272: 271: 267: 263: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 232: 228: 225: 222: 218: 214: 210: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 182: 179: 178:Find sources: 174: 170: 166: 163: 157: 153: 149: 145: 140: 136: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 114: 110: 107: 104: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 86: 85: 83: 78: 71: 68: 66: 65: 60: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 481: 479: 465:StickyWicket 456: 429: 416:Usedtobecool 414: 409: 391: 374: 357: 302:Iitianeditor 282:Iitianeditor 262:Iitianeditor 238: 226: 220: 212: 205: 199: 193: 187: 177: 164: 75: 49: 47: 31: 28: 203:free images 118:Adil Zarif 70:Adil Zarif 486:talk page 442:Barkeep49 410:Weak keep 382:wjemather 362:Whiteguru 342:Shellwood 322:Shellwood 245:WP:BEFORE 55:Vanamonde 37:talk page 488:or in a 457:Redirect 432:Relisted 162:View log 103:glossary 39:or in a 358:Delete: 257:WP:CRIN 209:WP refs 197:scholar 135:protect 130:history 80:New to 392:Delete 375:Delete 241:WP:GNG 181:Google 139:delete 50:delete 224:JSTOR 185:books 169:Stats 156:views 148:watch 144:links 16:< 469:talk 446:talk 401:talk 366:talk 346:talk 326:talk 306:talk 286:talk 266:talk 253:here 251:and 249:here 217:FENS 191:news 152:logs 126:talk 122:edit 59:Talk 459:to 231:TWL 160:– ( 471:) 448:) 419:☎️ 403:) 368:) 348:) 340:. 328:) 320:. 308:) 300:. 288:) 280:. 268:) 211:) 154:| 150:| 146:| 142:| 137:| 133:| 128:| 124:| 52:. 467:( 444:( 399:( 364:( 344:( 324:( 304:( 284:( 264:( 235:) 227:· 221:· 213:· 206:· 200:· 194:· 188:· 183:( 175:( 172:) 165:· 158:) 120:( 105:) 101:( 61:) 57:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Vanamonde
Talk
17:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Adil Zarif

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Adil Zarif
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.