432:, I understand your concern and your view completely. I am the major contributor to the article and believed that I did a good job on capturing the firm from a neutral POV. I was not paid, neither do I work at the firm. As with any creative, there is a level of affinity that you would have for something you created. I do apologize if I came across as forceful. I just believe that this is a notable firm with sufficient coverage in notable Nigerian dailies, with international recognition as well, I am Nigeria as well, so I feel like when there is a Nigerian notable person, event or organization that has not received sufficient recognition, they should be given that opportunity. I mean no disrespect at all. My name is Ponle Gbile. Thank you.
775:
notable Law Firm in my country, it is among the best of the best. The assertions above, about the personalities in the firm are true. And as a matter of cause, I will take the liberty of reviewing the said article. I do not work at this firm, my firm is an emerging one, but, I can categorically say, if Aelex does not qualify for
Notability, then no firm is qualified for being notable in Nigeria, on Knowledge. As I have earlier stated.I will try to review this article.
774:
and everyone, I have read the above back and forth. I am a legal practitioner in
Nigeria. I am a Knowledge contributor too. I have taken the liberty to start a project, to create article on Nigerian Law Firms. I believe this will help subsequent conversation. Also. On Notability, Aelex Partners is a
482:- The Guardian Newspaper, Thisday Newspaper and Business Day are some of the more notable and quality reliable sources of news in Nigeria and these publications have in depth coverage of the subject, which have been cited in the article. I also listed some of the links earlier, which show
657:(SAN), Mrs. Funke Adekoya, that's the highest honour for a Nigerian lawyer, and SAN cannot be described as non-notable. Agreed that some of the references are notices of events, but there are also mentions of their involvements in landmark cases, like the
599:
as advertising for a non-notable firm.. The material would do nicely as a web page for the firm, but not an encyclopedia article. There seem to be no notable cases, no notable members of the firm, a, The references are some of them mere notices, such as
609:
in
Business Day, a vehicle for PR like many similarly named papers in other counties, or the announcement of an award that does no confer notability . I don't know it's PAID, but consider the other articles by the contributor, it seems likely--see
453:
as corpspam, probable WP:PAID against the WP:TOU. Also, a WP:BEFORE search indicates a dearth of persistent, in-depth coverage in high-quality reliable sources; little more than passing mentions, per WP:ROUTINE coverage of various cases.
340:, because it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable and independent secondary sources. Some of the more notable articles giving significant coverage on the law firm can be found in the Guardian Newspaper
201:
502:
only trivial coverage. Although The
Guardian etc might seem to add notability, and usually those sources would, in this case they don't because what is being covered in the articles is considered coverage by
336:- It appears that a number of the votes to delete have not even viewed the article or reviewed the references. The issues raised in the first article have been addressed and the subject of the article meets
574:
to create this article is very much plausible as I don’t understand why they are vehemently defending this article when there are literally infinite other real things to create You’d also notice
699:
690:
you should really quit this meat puppetry whilst no one is really paying attention else you risk getting blocked. This article if I remember correctly was first created by
195:
154:
272:
291:
658:
345:
524:- the subject has received significant coverage. The Guardian and This day Newspapers would not report on awards of no significance. Subject at least fits
101:
744:
86:
807:
462:
653:
as per DGG's assertion that the firm is non-notable with no notable lawyers, a Google search indicates that one of the partners at the firm is a
161:
661:
case and their involvement with Shell
Nigeria. There are other references not indicated in the article referring to the firm as notable.
365:- Furthermore, Aelex is one of the few Nigerian legal firms that has been ranked almost annually by the global assessor for legal firms
127:
122:
131:
613:
The
Guardian articles are either an announcement of a panel they sponsor, or the announcement of one of the promotional awards.
702:
against both you and the article creator he said you both worked extensively in the creation of this non notable article &
114:
81:
74:
17:
216:
183:
802:
469:
344:, their work on the takeover of a Nigerian firm by Coca-Cola was also documented in another leading Newspaper, ThisDay
545:
Trivial coverage, at best. Appears to have been created just to promote, not too spammy, but promotional nonetheless.
95:
91:
716:
who of course has another brand new SPI case against him opened by another editor handling
Nigeria related articles @
654:
341:
778:
Currently, I am currently curating contents on the article on
Nigerian Firms. I will need all the help I can get.
868:
550:
40:
177:
835:
818:
670:
563:
455:
607:
604:
601:
801:
will correct me if I'm wrong, but the arguments in favour keeping the article would seem to be rather weak?
752:
370:
259:
847:
830:
809:
787:
756:
733:
674:
645:
624:
603:
where it's a notice of a lecture by someone else merely sponsored by the firm) or their own work, such as
591:
554:
537:
516:
494:
474:
441:
423:
381:
357:
326:
302:
283:
263:
245:
173:
56:
843:
729:
587:
419:
322:
118:
864:
643:
36:
223:
826:
546:
490:
437:
377:
353:
348:. This is asides the over 20 references cited in the article, which were not in the original article.
241:
110:
62:
687:
666:
533:
209:
748:
512:
255:
821:
as weak as Donald Trump's understanding of COVID-19 or you know, bleach or like, basic science.
724:” advocating in one way or another, for the retention of the article. I mean what are the odds?
839:
798:
771:
725:
583:
579:
429:
415:
318:
295:
276:
70:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
863:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
717:
633:
483:
189:
575:
822:
794:
783:
721:
713:
709:
691:
567:
525:
504:
486:
433:
411:
403:
391:
373:
349:
337:
314:
237:
233:
408:
you are starting to appear like you are here to just ensure the creation of this article
571:
529:
399:
695:
662:
620:
508:
407:
395:
366:
53:
148:
779:
708:
warned you both about such meat puppetry behavior. Oh well now a user named
694:
in 2017 and was subsequently sent to an AFD where it was deleted. In this
615:
712:
comes outta the blues to create this article with the same passion as
606:
but the others are PR slightly disguised as news articles, such as
410:. Editing Knowledge is not a means to make wealth for yourself or
369:, and this achievement has been reported on in independent sources
720:. So in summary; we have yourself, Pastorflex & the mystery “
412:
give your organization a
Knowledge presence for the sake of clout
838:, yes! you are very much apt, their argument is very much weak.
859:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
704:
396:
creating an article for an organization you are affiliated to
611:
144:
140:
136:
700:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Pastorflex/Archive
208:
507:. Mainly inclusions in lists or winning awards. --
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
871:). No further edits should be made to this page.
743:Note: This discussion has been included in the
290:Note: This discussion has been included in the
271:Note: This discussion has been included in the
313:— Non notable organization that falls short of
273:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
222:
8:
292:list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions
102:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
742:
289:
270:
745:list of Law-related deletion discussions
7:
402:for the creation of an article is
24:
566:, your suspicion on this editor @
236:, still no change in notability.
665:is also not a promotional award.
87:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
232:Nearly identical article to
404:generally not accepted here
77:(AfD)? Read these primers!
888:
675:08:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
655:Senior Advocate of Nigeria
646:23:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
625:21:56, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
592:15:26, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
555:13:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
538:10:34, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
517:10:13, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
495:08:38, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
475:08:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
424:17:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
382:07:07, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
358:06:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
327:01:30, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
303:23:55, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
284:23:55, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
264:14:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
246:23:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
861:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
848:12:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
831:12:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
810:11:25, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
788:09:30, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
757:13:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
734:16:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
442:12:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
57:19:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
698:case I opened in 2017:
75:Articles for deletion
398:via employment or
836:Serial Number 54129
819:Serial Number 54129
578:that they are also
564:Serial Number 54129
400:receiving a reward
759:
632:per nom and DGG.
305:
286:
92:Guide to deletion
82:How to contribute
879:
805:
707:
641:
597:Delete. and Salt
472:
467:
460:
300:
281:
227:
226:
212:
164:
152:
134:
72:
34:
887:
886:
882:
881:
880:
878:
877:
876:
875:
869:deletion review
803:
776:
703:
634:
547:MistyGraceWhite
470:
463:
456:
296:
277:
169:
160:
125:
109:
106:
69:
66:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
885:
883:
874:
873:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
813:
812:
769:
768:
767:
761:
760:
739:
738:
737:
736:
688:Onyeuwaoma2000
678:
677:
667:Onyeuwaoma2000
648:
627:
594:
557:
540:
519:
497:
477:
447:
446:
445:
444:
426:
385:
384:
360:
330:
329:
307:
306:
287:
267:
266:
230:
229:
166:
111:Aelex Partners
105:
104:
99:
89:
84:
67:
65:
63:Aelex Partners
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
884:
872:
870:
866:
862:
857:
856:
849:
845:
841:
837:
834:
833:
832:
828:
824:
820:
817:
816:
815:
814:
811:
808:
806:
800:
796:
792:
791:
790:
789:
785:
781:
773:
766:
763:
762:
758:
754:
750:
749:Coolabahapple
746:
741:
740:
735:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
706:
701:
697:
693:
689:
685:
682:
681:
680:
679:
676:
672:
668:
664:
663:The Legal 500
660:
656:
652:
649:
647:
644:
642:
640:
639:
631:
628:
626:
622:
618:
617:
612:
608:
605:
602:
598:
595:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
558:
556:
552:
548:
544:
541:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
520:
518:
514:
510:
506:
501:
498:
496:
492:
488:
485:
481:
478:
476:
473:
468:
466:
461:
459:
452:
449:
448:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
388:
387:
386:
383:
379:
375:
372:
368:
367:The Legal 500
364:
361:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
332:
331:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
309:
308:
304:
301:
299:
293:
288:
285:
282:
280:
274:
269:
268:
265:
261:
257:
256:Dreamanderson
254:not notable
253:
250:
249:
248:
247:
243:
239:
235:
225:
221:
218:
215:
211:
207:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
175:
172:
171:Find sources:
167:
163:
159:
156:
150:
146:
142:
138:
133:
129:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:
103:
100:
97:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
78:
76:
71:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
860:
858:
840:Celestina007
799:Celestina007
793:I hope that
777:
772:celestina007
765:Comment-Keep
764:
726:Celestina007
683:
650:
637:
635:
629:
614:
596:
584:Celestina007
559:
542:
521:
499:
479:
464:
457:
450:
430:Celestina007
416:Celestina007
362:
333:
319:Celestina007
310:
298:CAPTAIN RAJU
297:
279:CAPTAIN RAJU
278:
251:
231:
219:
213:
205:
198:
192:
186:
180:
170:
157:
68:
49:
47:
31:
28:
718:Versace1608
196:free images
823:Praxidicae
795:Praxidicae
722:Ponlegbile
714:Pastorflex
710:Ponlegbile
692:Pastorflex
580:canvassing
568:Ponlegbile
487:Ponlegbile
434:Ponlegbile
392:Ponlegbile
374:Ponlegbile
350:Ponlegbile
238:Praxidicae
865:talk page
659:Coca-Cola
530:Philphleg
484:WP:SIGCOV
37:talk page
867:or in a
526:WP:NCORP
509:Adamant1
505:WP:NCORP
338:WP:NCORP
315:WP:NCORP
155:View log
96:glossary
39:or in a
705:Deskana
684:Comment
636:Versace
560:Comment
480:Comment
428:Hello @
390:Hello @
363:Comment
202:WP refs
190:scholar
128:protect
123:history
73:New to
54:Spartaz
804:SERIAL
696:WP:SPI
630:Delete
570:being
543:Delete
500:Delete
451:Delete
406:&
311:Delete
252:Delete
174:Google
132:delete
50:delete
780:Ogele
621:talk
471:54129
217:JSTOR
178:books
162:Stats
149:views
141:watch
137:links
16:<
844:talk
827:talk
784:talk
753:talk
730:talk
671:talk
651:Keep
638:1608
588:talk
576:here
572:paid
551:talk
534:talk
522:Keep
513:talk
491:talk
438:talk
420:talk
378:talk
371:here
354:talk
346:here
342:here
334:Keep
323:talk
260:talk
242:talk
234:ǼLEX
210:FENS
184:news
145:logs
119:talk
115:edit
797:or
686:— @
616:DGG
562:— @
224:TWL
153:– (
846:)
829:)
786:)
755:)
747:.
732:)
673:)
623:)
590:)
582:.
553:)
536:)
528:.
515:)
493:)
465:SN
458:——
440:)
422:)
414:.
394:,
380:)
356:)
325:)
294:.
275:.
262:)
244:)
204:)
147:|
143:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
121:|
117:|
52:.
842:(
825:(
782:(
770:@
751:(
728:(
669:(
619:(
586:(
549:(
532:(
511:(
489:(
436:(
418:(
376:(
352:(
321:(
317:.
258:(
240:(
228:)
220:·
214:·
206:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
176:(
168:(
165:)
158:·
151:)
113:(
98:)
94:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.