332:
As I have pointed out before, WP has only about half the hull losses of much more significant aircraft like 727s and DC9s with articles. In fact articles have been deleted that are hull losses. For the Short360, exactly 2 out of 16 hull losses have articles. The first Short hull loss don't have an
478:: Despite the hull loss there is very little notability in this accident. If proof of significant changes to aircraft design maintenance or operations can be directly attributed to this incident then there would be a case for keeping it.--
208:
524:
there is no enduring coverage beyond an immediate recounting of the event, no analysis. If enduring coverage is found or the article is otherwise kept, ping me and I will add these sources.--
274:
161:
432:, especially WP:PERSISTENCE. I found two wire service articles at the time of the crash. A later article mentions the crash in a list of incidents related to turboprop safety.
202:
293:
405:
255:
433:
499:
this was indeed "Damaged beyond repair", but also that "The cockpit and passenger cabin were relatively undamaged and there was no fire". What is lacking here - is
93:
108:
168:
134:
129:
495:. AIRCRASH is but an essay, and this fairly small (or medium-small) civil aircraft (36 seats, 12,292 kg MTOW) is in the grey zone of the essay. Per
138:
121:
88:
81:
17:
223:
190:
102:
98:
564:
184:
40:
547:
530:
512:
487:
470:
445:
417:
390:
372:
341:
324:
304:
285:
266:
247:
63:
180:
125:
230:
543:
315:- Hull loss, only 2nd of that aircraft type. A lack of fatalities does not equate to a lack of notability.
117:
69:
378:
357:
356:
If air-crash articles are being wrongly deleted (and they are, as we saw with the recent discussion about
560:
58:
36:
525:
338:
301:
282:
263:
244:
216:
196:
503:, and given the circumstances of the crash it seems likely to believe that it simply isn't there.
500:
457:, though, I've had a hard time finding sources indicating notability, and without that this fails
539:
483:
386:
521:
496:
429:
508:
441:
413:
320:
77:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
559:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
54:
458:
361:
466:
368:
239:
Not notable incident. At most this deserves is a mention in a airport or airline article.
334:
297:
278:
259:
240:
479:
382:
504:
454:
437:
409:
316:
428:. Despite being an early hull loss for this type of aircraft, it appears to fail
155:
333:
article. What is notable about this one from the thousands of other hull losses?
520:
I found significant coverage in newspaper archives on 1 February 1986, but per
436:
had three recommendations, but I haven't found evidence they came to anything.
462:
364:
360:) then this is something to discuss outside of this AFD. Otherwise,
555:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
151:
147:
143:
215:
275:
229:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
567:). No further edits should be made to this page.
404:Note: This discussion has been included in the
292:Note: This discussion has been included in the
273:Note: This discussion has been included in the
254:Note: This discussion has been included in the
294:list of Aviation-related deletion discussions
8:
406:list of England-related deletion discussions
109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
256:list of Events-related deletion discussions
403:
291:
272:
253:
337:, is the complaint department really on
300:, is the complaint department really on
281:, is the complaint department really on
262:, is the complaint department really on
243:, is the complaint department really on
538:per WP:EVENT. No enduring notability.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
453:A hull-loss is a clear keep. Like
24:
381:was wrongly saved from deletion--
94:Introduction to deletion process
377:Au Contraire, I would say that
1:
548:10:32, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
531:07:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
513:07:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
488:15:03, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
471:21:45, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
446:20:41, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
418:19:58, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
391:00:28, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
373:21:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
342:20:21, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
325:19:38, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
305:18:29, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
286:18:29, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
267:18:29, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
248:18:28, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
64:18:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
84:(AfD)? Read these primers!
584:
557:Please do not modify it.
434:official accident report
32:Please do not modify it.
379:Korean Air Flight 2708
358:Korean Air Flight 2708
118:Aer Lingus Flight 328
82:Articles for deletion
70:Aer Lingus Flight 328
528:
526:
420:
307:
288:
269:
99:Guide to deletion
89:How to contribute
575:
234:
233:
219:
171:
159:
141:
79:
62:
34:
583:
582:
578:
577:
576:
574:
573:
572:
571:
565:deletion review
176:
167:
132:
116:
113:
76:
73:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
581:
579:
570:
569:
551:
550:
533:
527:Pontificalibus
515:
490:
473:
448:
422:
421:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
347:
346:
345:
344:
309:
308:
289:
270:
237:
236:
173:
112:
111:
106:
96:
91:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
580:
568:
566:
562:
558:
553:
552:
549:
545:
541:
537:
534:
532:
529:
523:
519:
516:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
491:
489:
485:
481:
477:
474:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
449:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
424:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
402:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
375:
374:
370:
366:
363:
359:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
343:
340:
336:
331:
328:
327:
326:
322:
318:
314:
311:
310:
306:
303:
299:
295:
290:
287:
284:
280:
276:
271:
268:
265:
261:
257:
252:
251:
250:
249:
246:
242:
232:
228:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
182:
179:
178:Find sources:
174:
170:
166:
163:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
83:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
60:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
556:
554:
535:
517:
492:
475:
450:
425:
329:
312:
238:
226:
220:
212:
205:
199:
193:
187:
177:
164:
75:
49:
47:
31:
28:
451:Weak Delete
203:free images
335:...William
298:...William
279:...William
260:...William
241:...William
561:talk page
501:WP:SIGCOV
455:• Gene93k
438:• Gene93k
410:• Gene93k
339:the roof?
302:the roof?
283:the roof?
264:the roof?
245:the roof?
55:Vanamonde
37:talk page
563:or in a
522:WP:EVENT
480:Petebutt
430:WP:EVENT
383:Petebutt
162:View log
103:glossary
39:or in a
540:Charles
505:Icewhiz
330:Comment
317:Mjroots
209:WP refs
197:scholar
135:protect
130:history
80:New to
536:Delete
518:Delete
493:Delete
476:Delete
459:WP:GNG
426:Delete
362:WP:WAX
181:Google
139:delete
50:delete
463:FOARP
365:FOARP
224:JSTOR
185:books
169:Stats
156:views
148:watch
144:links
16:<
544:talk
509:talk
484:talk
467:talk
442:talk
414:talk
387:talk
369:talk
321:talk
313:Keep
217:FENS
191:news
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
59:Talk
497:ASN
231:TWL
160:– (
546:)
511:)
486:)
469:)
444:)
416:)
408:.
389:)
371:)
323:)
296:.
277:.
258:.
211:)
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
52:.
542:(
507:(
482:(
465:(
461:.
440:(
412:(
385:(
367:(
319:(
235:)
227:·
221:·
213:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
183:(
175:(
172:)
165:·
158:)
120:(
105:)
101:(
61:)
57:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.