926:
established. You will also note that I have not been supporting a total delete, rather I've indicated that most of what is in the article needs to be deleted and rewritten (i.e. delete the article and start from scratch). The topic does seem to deserve an article, but the article as it stands needs substantial work and much should be deleted. Also, in reply to Crud, this micronation has, quite frankly (and I recognize that this particular point doesn't have any bearings on this AfD), absolutely no chance of ever becoming a recognized and sovereign state (I'd be happy to discuss why elsewhere, say on my talk page, since this has no real implications for this AfD). However, this doesn't mean there should not be an article on the subject. Also, in reply to Tim, by empire I was referring to the concept of empire in political science, not the simplified definition supplied by
Webster's Dictionary. However, again this doesn't have direct implications for the AfD since the word 'Empire' is part of a proper noun rather than simply being an adjective (ie. saying "The Aerican Empire is a micronation" is fine, saying "the Aerican Empire is an Empire" is not. Finally, in response to Milburn, of course my previous comment had POV; we are arguing our interpretations of policy and such here. INPOV only fully applies to actual article writing; your comments are also POV (for example, it is your pov that this micronation has the best chance to become a sovereign state, it is also your pov that the article should be kept as is and it is my pov that it should be rewritten). All in all, please try not to be so hostile to other editors because they don't share your view in an AfD and I will do the same. --
591:
articles about other silly societies. 2) The number of members is not in the dozen or two digits; it's currently just below 150, which while not huge is significant, and also justifies the number in the article as actually being a low estimate. 3) I freely admit that the writing is unencyclopedic, but that's because I'm not a great author. This does not invalidate the topic. There have been requests made in the article's talk page and elsewhere for other writers to help change the article to wiki standards. 4) The Empire *does* genuinly exist, although I doubt many people here will believe me. You are allowing your biases of seriousness to determine what you will accept as realistic; if a group of people believe something is a nation, then in a very real sense, it is one. Most importantly, the article cites sources from recognized news sites and does present genuine information to readers. Whether the information is a bit silly has no impact on whether or not this is a real group. The article can and should be changed to better fit wiki standards but it should not be deleted.
895:(in response to The Way) Trivial sources? I am a non-newspaper reading individual from a different country, yet I have still heard of the newspapers that this article references. The fact that it is not fully sourced is not criteria for deletion. Are you honestly saying that articles in The New York Times, The Montreal Mirror and The Boston Pheonix, not to mention featuring in numerous books on the subject of micronations, are trivial sources? This article is notable. Having a couple of disputed or unsourced statements is not criteria for deletion- as was said above, editors are working on this article at the moment.
1058:: In regards to the notability of sources: 1) Being listed among a short list, when literally hundreds if not thousands of these microstates exist, is still a feat of some small note. 2) Le Soleil, The Montreal Mirror, and the Leader Newspaper Group, all of which made the Empire the main focus of their articles, are all papers with readership exceeding the million mark. None of them are widely internationally-read (although Le Soleil sells fairly well across Europe) but none of them are small. Also, just to explain why this material isn't in the
822:: Tim, My reference to The Aerican Empire as a 'glorious nation' was based on my own view of the aticle. I thought it sounded glorious when I first read the article in its entirity so I saved it to my watchlist. :) I have come to the conclusion that this micronation has dropped all fictional aspects (if there was ever any fictional element?) and is now an active and widely known micronation. I haven't read anything fictional in the article and so I must say that I don't know what Czj is referring to exactly.
578:
a concept that has been refined and retuned over the years by and for the citizens of The
Aerican Empire. The Kurds of Northern Iraq want their own nation yet they don't have one. Then why do they refer to the territory as Kurdistan? It's even well documented in Knowledge (XXG) even though they're not internationally recognized. Don't point out the humorous nature of the Empire as a sign of it being fake because you'll be very wrong.
72:
702:
towards its goals. How can anyone deny this? It has its own .com website. It has an extremely active citizenry and government. The
Aerican Empire is one of the oldest fully functional micronations in existence today. Aerica is a model micronation of what many want but what very few can ever aspire to become. To delete this page would be a direct insult to micronationalism and to every citizen of Aerica.
454:
been badly handled is not criteria for deletion, just criteria to renominate, as this has been. Irrelevent of how 'silly' the groups culture, rules and joining procedure may seem, this deserves a place in the encyclopedia, and isn't even particuarly badly written. Even if it was badly written, it is not original research, it is of a NPOV and it is verified. I think this matter may well come under
938:: It wasn't me who made the comments about the POV, although, it is understandably difficult to keep track of what everyone said when answering like that. My only concern in response to your comment you answered in the opening couple of lines of this comment, and the problem was brought about by me not linking you to your earlier comments.
786:
encyclopedia and less like prose, it seemed reasonable to change it to read what the stated goal had always been. I see this as a pretty minor change, but I can see how you might disagree. The point is, there's no contradiction, merely use of a different point of view (records kept on paper versus ask somebody who was there).
253:"Nationally recognized holidays (and "niftydays") within the Empire include 2 January Procrastinator's Day, 27 February *Oops* Day, 19 March What the Heck is That Day, 14 April Tempting Fate Day, 25 May Towel Day, 28 August Significant Historical Events Day, and 26 October Topin Wagglegammon, The Niftiest Day of the Year."
258:
857:
Again according to
Webster, "multiple territories under a single authority." Seems like it fits to me. The word "empire" is actually pretty circular, if you look it up, since an "empire" is just a body ruled by an emperor and an "emperor" is whoever rules an empire. Blame the English, not us. I will,
672:
The number of very established sources say otherwise. How can something that has been examined in the New York Times, The
Montreal Mirror and The Boston Pheonix, among others, have no notability in the real world? Any admin who takes their time to look at this article instead of just counting delete
590:
I'm the first to admit I'm biased about this (you'll see my name in the page's history) so I won't vote keep, but to respond to some of the comments made above (this being a discussion and not a ballot: 1) CZJ's comments seem to mostly attack the humour elements of the group, while Wiki has plenty of
577:
The
Aerican Empire has serious goats of sovoverignty it is not fake or a "political exercise." The silliness favtor is to not scare people away from joining. I happen to know that the government is very active and they are undergoing elections as we speak. It wasn't made up "one day in school," it is
706:
I fully object to the deletion of this page. What reason is there to delete a glorious nations
Knowledge (XXG) page? When people are interested in seeing examples of successful micronations they will want to read about The Empire of Aerica. The Empire of Aerica has also been mentioned many times via
501:
Any individual could sit down and make infeasible claims to whatever land they wanted, but that doesn't make it true, nor does it automatically merit an article. Getting 100 people (or 150 -- whatever insignificant number we're arguing over at this point) to fill out a short web form to join a club
701:
The
Aerican Empire has nearly 100 active citizenry but many have had their citizenship revoked due to inactivity so there has been maybe over a thousand citizens altogether. While most micronations are unrealistic or never last Aerica has existed since the 1980's and it continues to grow and strive
529:
a real nation under any understanding of the term. The article makes it sound like an actual, existing country. It is not. It may indeed be a real organization with membership and whatnot, but it is not a country. The article needs to reflect what this really is in context with the actual world,
453:
I cannot see any argument for deletion. How it was created, or whether it is technically a nation are completely irrelevent. It has featured in multiple, non-trivial sources as the subject, as displayed in the references section of the article, and is therefore notable. The fact that past AfDs have
882:
Your (The Way) "comment" was riddled with blatant POV. If you dispute facts take it up in the talkpage not here. All you pointed out that a rewrite is needed at the most. I have witnessed a very organized movement and (not to speak out of POV) but quite frankly it would have the best chance of any
515:
I've always taken "not made up in school one day" to mean it shouldn't be posted that day. After all, arguably, Microsoft was made up in school one day, and then it was built upon for years. The "made up in school" rule exists to prevent children from posting their fantasy-of-the-day and was never
327:
Not an actual nation, just an organization created for humorous purposes by a bunch of kids. While there has been an attempt to explain notability, the article currently does not have an encyclopedic value. It reads like an advertisement or tourist flyer, rather than examining the organization and
785:
The original records said that records had been lost, becuse young kids didn't bother writing things down. However, given that the founders are still alive, we have the ability to ask them. This doesn't consitute proper record keeping but, since we're trying to make the article sound more like an
757:
I'm sorry, I thought the idea here was for the article to get rewritten and improved. I've been working on it. I don't see the contradictions myself. The records were lost (they were all five-year olds, after all), but the goal was the same as today. And yes, it did mature... doesn't everyone and
491:
Once again, this is not a fictional empire. This is real and affects the lives of real people. Regardless of how silly it may look, please do not treat this as something out of a story book; there are people out there who believe in this and put work daily into its growth, and whether or not that
847:
It's, quite frankly, little more than a practical joke that has gone on too long to be funny. The lack of a substantial number of members comined with a few trivial sources does not establish notability. It is not a country and it will never be one. As it stands, unless better sources can be
639:
First, they dont claim all of Earth, they claim several well-defined small areas (and a couple of poorly defined small areas). Similarly, only a small portion of Mars is claimed, and precise coordinates are available. These territories aren't defined in the article but they are deifned in the
925:
Several things; first of all I do admit my choice or words was poor when I called the cited sources 'poor.' There are valid, legitimate sources listed. However, if you'll look at some of my previous comments I had already admitted as much and had stated that notability has seemingly been
1191:-- multiple verifiable reliable third-party sources, so what is the problem? So maybe it's silly, but silly doesn't necessarily mean non-notable. Parts of the article are unsourced and need to be re-written or removed, but that's not a reason to delete the whole article. Neither is not
838:
This 'micronation' has no legitimate claims to any sovereignty over anything, is not recognized by any official body, has no currency, etc. It is a made-up organization with a insignificant number of members who claim a bunch of outlandish, unsubstantiated things. It is certainly not an
1003:
I, for one, would be genuinely happy for pointers on how to clean the article up, since I'm obviously not very good at making my writing less prose-style. We may argue a bit over what points are and are not realistic and worthy of inclusion, but that's a chance I'm prepared to take.
502:
is not that impressive. There are small MMORPGs with 5,000-10,000 players that have been deleted for lack of notability/significance, and this group is a LOT smaller. Age is not criterion for inclusion, either. It doesn't matter how old this group of friends have had this club...
1174:
I completely agree with
Timcrow. Look at the references- whether or not this was literally made up in school one day, it is now VERY notable, easily meeting the primary notability criteria. This isn't a few obscure websites either- this is books, and articles in MAJOR newspapers.
1062:
article in the first place, the discussions at that article have long-since concluded that in general the article is dedicated to the phenomemnon and individual states should have separate entries, to keep the main article from growing too long. Hence, individual entries for
883:
micronation to become a soverign state. This micronation was even discussed and wrote about in many reputable media outlets and you still dispute the article? hm While I have favored deletion of other micronational articles I do believe that this article is well founded.
746:" So, which is it? Were "the records lost" or did it intend on becoming a nation from day one? Because of these blatant contradictions, I'm having a really hard time taking any of this seriously, and wonder if other parts of the article have been glamorized. --
353:
per the discussions below. Though the subject is patently absurd, the article appears to have enough references to (barely) claim notability. An outright deletion isn't warranted at this point. However, it still needs a strong rewrite to be encyclopedic. --
687:- this maybe needs a rewrite, and perhaps it would behoove Wiki to create a sub-catagory for micronations. The "letter of the law" concerning articles holds up, and I would argue the spirit is satisfied too, so long as the format i improved a little bit.
978:: The references are looking rather good now. I implore The Way and other editors who said that a complete rewrite was needed to have another look at the article, and decide whether it should stay in its current state, as I definately believe it should.
411:
The sources do seem to establish notability, however the entire article is written as if the empire actually existed and actually had major impacts on the wider world. Essentially, its an article about fiction thats written as if it were non-fiction.
265:), the website for Aerican Empire, or Knowledge (XXG) links. It seems to me like a small group of individuals (the X dozen belonging to this club) trying to force notability and best the system, by getting it listed as many places as possible.
1160:
At the risk of being extremely repetitive, can I just once again point out that an idea stops being "made up in school one day" when a magazine article (and presumably "book chapter" also qualifies) gets written about it. It says so right in
539:
I don't fully agree, obviously, but it's an interesting point. It would be easy enough to add something about it being an "aspirant state" or that it has the eventual goal of nationhood while saying that it is not one yet. Any suggestions?
775:
the records had been lost. They're still lost, but suddenly it becomes known that the purpose all along was to create an internationally recognized entity? No offense, but something like this wreaks of "it's being made up as we go".
720:: All this 'glorious nation' stuff really isn't helping the debate. If anything, it gives more fuel to those trying to delete the article. Let's stick to Knowledge (XXG) guidelines and policies, and not turn this into a flame war.
477:
The problem here isn't notability. This topic may indeed be notable, the sources do seem to indicate this, so an article on this topic isn't necessarily unjustifiable. The problem is that the article is written as if this place
630:. Aerican Empire claims the entire planet (plus mars). Given the sheer silliness of that claim, they don't have any defined territory whatsoever. They're not a nation, they're an organization created for humorous purposes. --
503:
1038:. Most sources establishing notability are either small publications of dubious impact, or simply list Aerocam Empire among other micronations. Anything particularly interesting about this thing can be merged to
990:
There are definitely still problems with the way things are stated at various points throughout the article, but mostly this is cause for a cleanup and can be discussed on the articles talk page and such.
424:
I am unconvinced that this has any outside notability, but if it does, this article would still need to be completely revamped. There's very little here written from a proper encyclopaedic perspective.
482:
the article presents the
Aerican Empire as being real. The entire article is written this way, presenting fictional material as being factual. The entire page needs to be deleted and rewritten. --
640:
website; if it would improve the article, I'd be happy to add the details to it. And again, I really feel that "silly" is a matter of perspective, and neither an objective nor a neutral label.
296:. Whether or not you believe that there was 'meatpuppetry/votestacking' last time, this article is on a notable subject. All the sources that are cited are notable, verifiable and third party.
79:
808:
is not a valid argument. If you disagree with the manner in which the article is presently written put a clean-up tag on it and work to improve it. AfD is not the correct venue.--
276:
a complete list of "citizens", which seems to number in the upper two-digits. The Knowledge (XXG) article proudly proclaims that the number of people who have joined is above 100.
230:
1105:
I don't see what the problem is. This is a group of people who identify themselves in a certain way. If your argument is with its humour, then perhaps you should delete the
241:
AfD several months back... there were a large number of Keep votes coming almost exclusively from unestablished users or IPs, including self-proclaimed members of the club.
962:: Well, that's a big step done towards that. A lot more work is obviously needed in the future to set up references for the more contentious claims, but this is a start.
238:
1117:. Just because a group of people don't have access to their own land (just like many other ethnic and religious groups), doesn't mean they aren't entitled to it.
744:
the goals and ideals of the Empire matured. The Empire slowly abandoned most fictional elements and worked towards becoming a political entity rather than a hobby.
248:"Annually, the Empire holds story-writing contests, role-playing and wargaming days, and such events as the Dog-Biscuit Appreciation Day Scavenger Hunt."
804:
Content disputes are not a valid reason for deletion. Verifiable references have been given in the article which seem to establish notability.
283:, and perhaps even protect from re-creation. Also, I urge whoever closes this AfD to PLEASE be on the lookout for meatpuppetry/votestacking. --
461:. Just as Knowledge (XXG) is not censored for children, Knowledge (XXG) does not hide unusual information, or information on amusing subjects.
848:
supplied and the article gets properly sourced and unless the article is written to reflect what this really is then it should be deleted. --
308:
At first blush it seems like an article that is screaming to be deleted, however it has apparently received multiple non-trivial mentions in
88:
118:
203:
198:
17:
207:
1241:
1203:
1179:
1169:
1153:
1135:
1121:
1091:
1075:
1046:
1030:
1008:
995:
982:
966:
942:
930:
899:
887:
862:
852:
826:
812:
790:
780:
762:
750:
724:
711:
691:
677:
664:
644:
634:
621:
609:
582:
553:
544:
534:
520:
510:
496:
486:
465:
445:
429:
416:
399:
387:
358:
344:
316:
300:
287:
55:
190:
707:
newspapers and I heard even on television a few times. The documentation can all be found on the official website. Thank you.
368:
per the nominator's excellent and well-reasoned research. The original AfD was a total mess, so I'm semiprotecting this one.
104:
628:
a community of people composed of one or more nationalities and possessing a more or less defined territory and government
52:
1256:
36:
660:
no notability in the real world. Invented micro-nations are best kept in people's heads, not on Knowledge (XXG). -
77:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
332:. The article needs a serious rewrite to be more encyclopedic. It does seem to have enough notability to satisfy
150:
1255:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
805:
516:
meant to be used to exclude organizations which simply had the misfortune to be invented in a specific place.
549:
How about beginning by actually sourcing some of the seemingly ridiculous claims throughout the article? --
134:
108:
442:
93:
336:, but it just isn't written to Knowledge (XXG)'s standards. This would be a better fit on Uncyclopedia.
734:: Since the AfD began, the article has really begun to contradict itself. Before the AfD was filed, "
601:. Just because people within the organization believe they are a nation, it does not follow that they
1132:
1068:
742:" Conflicting information still exists in the article, stating that it really did begin as a joke: "
1064:
661:
194:
268:
The Aerican Empire website itself states that anyone can become a citizen by filling out a simple
525:
No matter how much you claim it is real, it is not as real as the article makes it sound. It is
140:
71:
1131:- Who cares if these whackos wanna have some fun? You can't claim that they're serious, anyway.
1024:. Knowledge (XXG) is not for games dreamed up in school one day, even if that was 20 years ago.-
598:
1025:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
858:
however, see what references I can put in to specific points; thank you for suggesting that.
329:
1150:
1196:
1146:
455:
333:
309:
1200:
1176:
1088:
979:
939:
896:
884:
823:
721:
708:
674:
579:
462:
437:- Needs a rewrite though. Regarding notability, as wierd as it seems, I have actually
369:
297:
186:
61:
1197:
WP:NFT#The right way for things made up in school one day to get into Knowledge (XXG)
1118:
426:
492:
sounds sane, it elevates us above Lothlorrien and The United Federation of Planets.
338:
If the article isn't rewritten within the scope of this AfD, it needs to be deleted.
1218:
1166:
1072:
1043:
1005:
992:
963:
927:
859:
849:
809:
787:
759:
641:
618:
592:
550:
541:
531:
517:
493:
483:
413:
313:
279:
Undeniably cute and well-written, but completely unremarkable and unencyclopedic.
168:
156:
124:
224:
740:
a nation which might one day merit international recognition of soverignty (sic).
103:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
1059:
1039:
736:
records no longer exist to indicate what the purpose of creating the Empire was.
261:
for "Aerican Empire", but most seem to be passing mentions, directories (mainly
1110:
396:
1106:
688:
631:
606:
355:
341:
237:
Article about a non-notable, unimpressive make-believe country. Survived a
615:
777:
747:
507:
284:
273:
269:
1214:
1165:
and I really don't see why this issue should be a point of contention.
262:
738:" Suddenly, that changed to state that the purpose for creation was "
1087:
You're both bringing up arguments that were brought up and defeated.
840:
1114:
1249:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1213:
It seems as other micronations have not been deleted, such as
66:
1217:, that even was a featured article, but it needs a rewrite.
97:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
1195:
the subject. This article looks like a perfect example of
504:
Knowledge (XXG) is not for things made up in school one day
843:
under any standard definition of the term. Furthermore,
87:
among Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has
530:
not what members of the 'organization' want it to be --
220:
216:
212:
1162:
506:, whether that day happened to be in 2007, or 1987. --
771:
the purpose of creating the nation. It was unknown,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1259:). No further edits should be made to this page.
244:A couple of quotes from the article itself:
117:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
8:
91:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
767:That is my very point. The records were
616:http://www.webster.com/dictionary/nation
111:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
1113:. Certainly it is no worse than these
673:votes will see that it should be kept.
614:Mr. Webster might disagree with you.
48:. Rough consensus keeps the article–
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
626:I doubt it, given the definition:
24:
845:much of the article is unsourced.
70:
1163:http://en.wikipedia.org/WP:NFT
1:
107:on the part of others and to
1242:02:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
1204:00:34, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
1180:22:46, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
1170:22:08, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
1154:20:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
1136:15:29, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
1122:18:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
1092:09:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
1076:15:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
1047:07:53, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
1031:07:43, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
1009:02:57, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
996:02:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
983:23:05, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
967:20:36, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
943:23:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
931:22:55, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
900:19:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
888:19:49, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
863:19:51, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
853:19:44, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
827:19:38, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
813:19:33, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
791:19:45, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
781:19:34, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
763:19:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
751:19:22, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
725:19:18, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
712:18:28, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
692:17:47, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
678:17:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
665:17:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
645:17:23, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
635:17:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
622:16:56, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
610:16:42, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
583:18:58, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
554:19:45, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
545:19:22, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
535:19:18, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
521:18:53, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
511:18:44, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
497:17:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
487:17:33, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
466:11:36, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
446:11:18, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
430:04:50, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
417:01:05, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
400:01:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
388:00:43, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
359:00:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
345:22:14, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
317:21:36, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
301:19:41, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
288:19:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
56:08:13, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
349:I have updated my vote to '
1276:
1107:Polish Beer-Lover's Party
1252:Please do not modify it.
1115:Semi-Fictional countries
32:Please do not modify it.
149:; accounts blocked for
119:single-purpose accounts
89:policies and guidelines
960:Comment re: References
597:Please take a look at
1147:WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE
758:everything, ideally?
330:neutral point of view
239:seemingly votestacked
1069:Republic of Molossia
1065:Empire of Atlantium
328:its history from a
101:by counting votes.
80:not a majority vote
1211:Keep, but Rewrite
1111:Frivolous Parties
480:actually existed,
182:
181:
178:
105:assume good faith
1267:
1254:
1239:
1236:
1233:
1230:
1227:
1224:
1221:
1028:
443:House of Scandal
385:
382:
379:
376:
310:reliable sources
228:
210:
176:
164:
148:
132:
113:
83:, but instead a
74:
67:
34:
1275:
1274:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1257:deletion review
1250:
1237:
1234:
1231:
1228:
1225:
1222:
1219:
1071:, for example.
1026:
383:
380:
377:
374:
263:stuff like this
201:
185:
166:
154:
138:
122:
109:sign your posts
65:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1273:
1271:
1262:
1261:
1245:
1244:
1207:
1206:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1157:
1156:
1139:
1138:
1125:
1124:
1095:
1094:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1050:
1049:
1033:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
970:
969:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
830:
829:
816:
815:
806:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
754:
753:
728:
727:
704:
703:
695:
694:
682:
681:
680:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
585:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
556:
469:
468:
448:
432:
419:
409:Total Rewrite.
402:
395:per RWR8189. -
390:
370:Andrew Lenahan
363:
362:
361:
319:
303:
257:Google yields
235:
234:
187:Aerican Empire
180:
179:
75:
64:
62:Aerican Empire
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1272:
1260:
1258:
1253:
1247:
1246:
1243:
1240:
1216:
1212:
1209:
1208:
1205:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1187:
1186:
1181:
1178:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1168:
1164:
1159:
1158:
1155:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1141:
1140:
1137:
1134:
1130:
1127:
1126:
1123:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1097:
1096:
1093:
1090:
1086:
1083:
1082:
1077:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1061:
1057:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1048:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1034:
1032:
1029:
1023:
1020:
1019:
1010:
1007:
1002:
999:
998:
997:
994:
989:
986:
985:
984:
981:
977:
974:
973:
972:
971:
968:
965:
961:
958:
957:
944:
941:
937:
934:
933:
932:
929:
924:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
901:
898:
894:
891:
890:
889:
886:
881:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
864:
861:
856:
855:
854:
851:
846:
842:
837:
834:
833:
832:
831:
828:
825:
821:
818:
817:
814:
811:
807:
803:
800:
799:
792:
789:
784:
783:
782:
779:
774:
770:
766:
765:
764:
761:
756:
755:
752:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
730:
729:
726:
723:
719:
716:
715:
714:
713:
710:
700:
697:
696:
693:
690:
686:
683:
679:
676:
671:
668:
667:
666:
663:
659:
656:
646:
643:
638:
637:
636:
633:
629:
625:
624:
623:
620:
617:
613:
612:
611:
608:
605:a nation. --
604:
600:
596:
595:
594:
589:
586:
584:
581:
576:
573:
572:
555:
552:
548:
547:
546:
543:
538:
537:
536:
533:
528:
524:
523:
522:
519:
514:
513:
512:
509:
505:
500:
499:
498:
495:
490:
489:
488:
485:
481:
476:
473:
472:
471:
470:
467:
464:
460:
459:
452:
449:
447:
444:
440:
436:
433:
431:
428:
423:
420:
418:
415:
410:
406:
403:
401:
398:
394:
391:
389:
386:
371:
367:
366:Strong delete
364:
360:
357:
352:
348:
347:
346:
343:
339:
335:
331:
326:
325:
320:
318:
315:
311:
307:
304:
302:
299:
295:
292:
291:
290:
289:
286:
282:
281:Strong Delete
277:
275:
271:
266:
264:
260:
255:
254:
250:
249:
245:
242:
240:
232:
226:
222:
218:
214:
209:
205:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
183:
174:
170:
162:
158:
152:
146:
142:
136:
130:
126:
120:
116:
112:
110:
106:
100:
96:
95:
90:
86:
82:
81:
76:
73:
69:
68:
63:
60:
58:
57:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1251:
1248:
1210:
1192:
1188:
1142:
1128:
1102:
1098:
1084:
1055:
1035:
1021:
1000:
987:
975:
959:
935:
922:
892:
879:
844:
835:
819:
801:
772:
768:
743:
739:
735:
731:
717:
705:
698:
684:
669:
657:
627:
602:
587:
574:
526:
479:
474:
457:
450:
438:
434:
421:
408:
404:
392:
373:
365:
350:
337:
323:
321:
305:
293:
280:
278:
267:
256:
252:
251:
247:
246:
243:
236:
172:
160:
151:sockpuppetry
144:
133:; suspected
128:
114:
102:
98:
92:
84:
78:
45:
43:
31:
28:
1151:Susan Davis
1060:micronation
1040:Micronation
699:Strong Keep
259:513 results
1149:, item 9.
1133:Livingdone
1109:and other
441:of this.
85:discussion
1201:PubliusFL
1177:J Milburn
1089:Crud3w4re
980:J Milburn
940:J Milburn
897:J Milburn
885:Crud3w4re
824:Crud3w4re
769:regarding
722:J Milburn
709:Crud3w4re
675:J Milburn
580:Crud3w4re
463:J Milburn
397:Toptomcat
324:or Delete
298:J Milburn
141:canvassed
135:canvassed
94:consensus
1056:Response
599:WP:HORSE
588:Comment:
451:Comment:
427:GassyGuy
322:Rewrite
231:View log
173:username
167:{{subst:
161:username
155:{{subst:
145:username
139:{{subst:
129:username
123:{{subst:
1215:Sealand
1167:Timcrow
1103:Rewrite
1085:Comment
1073:Timcrow
1044:Sneftel
1027:gadfium
1006:Timcrow
1001:Comment
993:The Way
988:Comment
976:Comment
964:Timcrow
936:Comment
928:The Way
923:Comment
893:Comment
880:Comment
860:Timcrow
850:The Way
836:Comment
820:Comment
810:RWR8189
802:Comment
788:Timcrow
773:because
760:Timcrow
732:Comment
718:Comment
670:Comment
642:Timcrow
619:Timcrow
593:timcrow
575:Comment
551:The Way
542:Timcrow
532:The Way
518:Timcrow
494:Timcrow
484:The Way
475:Comment
414:The Way
351:Neutral
314:RWR8189
270:webform
204:protect
199:history
137:users:
1193:liking
1143:Delete
1036:Delete
1022:Delete
841:empire
658:Delete
458:policy
422:Delete
405:Delete
334:WP:ORG
274:Here's
208:delete
1119:Lewie
456:this
439:heard
225:views
217:watch
213:links
115:Note:
16:<
1189:Keep
1145:per
1129:Keep
1099:Keep
1067:and
1042:. --
689:Soch
685:Keep
662:fchd
632:Kesh
607:Kesh
435:Keep
393:Keep
356:Kesh
342:Kesh
306:Keep
294:Keep
221:logs
195:talk
191:edit
53:ceNT
46:Keep
1101:or
778:Czj
748:Czj
603:are
527:not
508:Czj
407:or
381:bli
340:--
312:.--
285:Czj
272:.
229:- (
169:csp
165:or
157:csm
125:spa
99:not
50:Pea
1199:.
991:--
776:--
412:--
384:nd
378:ar
375:St
372:-
223:|
219:|
215:|
211:|
206:|
202:|
197:|
193:|
175:}}
163:}}
153::
147:}}
131:}}
121::
1238:n
1235:i
1232:k
1229:e
1226:p
1223:c
1220:T
233:)
227:)
189:(
177:.
171:|
159:|
143:|
127:|
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
