Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Aerican Empire

Source đź“ť

323:"fully functional" if it doesn't serve any function. I mean read this shit: "As a result, modern Imperial culture is filled with references to Star Wars and The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and other such institutions." It doesn't matter if it's been mentioned in the Times (dumber things have been)--this is clearly just a nerdy club. "The single most widespread cultural activity within the Empire is gaming." Seriously? This group is completely interchangeable with any other group of neckbeards meeting to play D&D. The "Defense" section down there even brags about this club having a .com website. While that is pretty God Damned Amazing, there are lots of websites, there are lots of nerdy clubs, they are not all noteworthy, and this page should be deleted. 548:(such as the flag and the territorial claims) are based only on the groups website and therefore are not quite "verifiable", but it is necessary to reproduce them here to give WP readers an idea of the nature of the group. Readers will surely understand that they are only make-believe. By the way, I do believe that the Micronation infobox is a bad idea (since it makes those claims seem like facts), but I am not willing to fight the infobox fans on this one. All the best, -- 74: 53: 388:
towards its goals. How can anyone deny this? It has its own .com website. It has an extremely active citizenry and government. The Aerican Empire is one of the oldest fully functional micronations in existence today. Aerica is a model micronation of what many want but what very few can ever aspire to become. To delete this page would be a direct insult to micronationalism and to every citizen of Aerica.
22: 146: 838:
webpage, as the minting of coins is a real activity, as opposed to (for example) printing a passport out at home), but that doesn't extend to anthems or other unreported vanity items. Motto's are usually kept though, and the micronation's website is probably good for the leader's name. It may be good for the membership (in this case, I think it is).
799:
supported by a reasonable number of reliable sources. I agree with you that reliable sources must be the basis for an article, but I don't agree that they're the only useful references. It's as reliable as quoting a celebrity's biography in their article; it's biased, but it's accepted, if I'm reading the rules correctly.
798:
Your point about the difference between notable and reliable is well taken, as is your comment about the Aerican website not being a reliable source. I agree with you that it isn't a reliable source. As I see it, it's reasonable to cite it as a source of information in an article which is, in general
547:
The nation itself is imaginary, but the social group is real (at least in the same sense that a political party, a fraternity, or a philosophical school are real), and has got some exposure in major media. The article deserves to exist on these grounds, nothing more. Some of the "facts" about Aerica
391:
I fully object to the deletion of this page. What reason is there to delete a glorious nations Knowledge (XXG) page? When people are interested in seeing examples of successful micronations they will want to read about The Empire of Aerica. The Empire of Aerica has also been mentioned many times via
792:
Yes, I deliberately said that I was biased, because it's relevant and I'm not trying to hide it. Let's not confuse "bias" with "conflict." I want the article to be as good as possible. I didn't revert or undo the changes you made on the 11th because those changes made sense to me. I'm not trying to
387:
The Aerican Empire has nearly 100 active citizenry but many have had their citizenship revoked due to inactivity so there has been maybe over a thousand citizens altogether. While most micronations are unrealistic or never last Aerica has existed since the 1980's and it continues to grow and strive
809:
So, what would be a fair way to handle this? I don't agree that every unsourced statement can or should be deleted, simply because that would make this a less useful and informative article, and in the end our absolute goal should be to produce a good quality and informative article. I'm certainly
359:
Lol, wait, you've resorted to threats now if they don't delete this page? Its been up for deletion many times, and it makes it through it every time. However, those that you are threatening it with would be deleted within seconds of creation. Its not that hard to undo that minuscule damage. :-/ -
322:
No, there are plenty of things Knowledge (XXG) tends to deem not noteworthy. This should be one of them. It is nothing but a series of "we're so wacky" jokes, as is this terrible article. Why are you saying that it's "successful" or that it has "active citizenry"? It has no "citizens". It is not
837:
As to deleting unsourced statements: that's likely what will happen. Micronation pages are, in general, full of highly unencyclopaedic fluff that doesn't conform to WP's policies. There's a degree of latitude given to certain things (like, for example, sourcing the coins to the micronation's
432:
As the Aerican Empire is a micronation and not a real country, I have replaced the country infobox with the micronation infobox. This is consistent with the usage established by consensus at the article for practically every other micronation with an article on Knowledge (XXG).
476:
Lol, I was going to request this article get deleted and question it's existence, but then I realized you put a lot of work into it. It's not my say, you must really have planned this out, so all my support goes to you! Praise the Aerican Empire! Lol :-P -
217:
It depends what you consider real. The empire does not hold any land, other than some land on Mars, and any land belonging to the citizens. It exists mostly upon the internet, although many of its citizens do treat it as at least a semi-real place.
869:
Thank you for the help, as well as the patience and the willingness to discuss. I would welcome you checking in over time. If things have to get deleted later... well, I'll certainly object, but I won't make it a war of undo buttons.
263:
Seriously? Was this stuff made-up by a 5 year old? This is not a real nation, you can't have a nation in your playpen in Canada, and a nation on a planet millions of mile away. Get a grip, this makes me ashamed to be human.
742:
of a subject (in this case the article on Aerica). Once that's established (which, BTW, is not a given in this case - the number of RS that mention Aerica in a significant way is minimal to none), they're used to
409:. It's basically a text-game where you create yor own country. I have one called Kaszuby. I knew straight away, because "AEGIS" is a major unofficial group of alliances there. you can find out more at their wiki ( 166: 416:
It's actually totally unrelated, but that is an interesting coicidence. I suppose words like aegis must show up rather frequently in acronym form, since it sounds good and the letters could mean anything.
766:
is reliable, and can be used to support a statement. However it wouldn't be useful in establishing notability of the subject, as the mention of Aerica is "trivial" (rather than "significant").
810:
willing to spend some time in the next few days trying to replace more references with reliable sources, which is probably possible, but that will obviously take me more than an hour or so.
804:
I would actually be curious if the Mirror is considered a reliable source, totally independent of the rest of this discussion. They were considered a respected local paper back in the day.
196:
It pisses me off that articles about certain fictional characters or people apparently "not notable" get deleted, but this bullshit is allowed to stay. cool double standard, wiki.
662: 658: 644: 176: 124: 924: 610: 313:, is perhaps the most famous micronation and it has more "citizens" than any other internet micronation. It is very noteworthy and it does deserve its own page. 955: 114: 764: 734:
Secondly, you mentioned that you believe content should be supported by "notable sources". That's not entirely accurate: in WP parlance, they're called
253:
this is rediculous!!! man...it made my tummy shaked up and down non-stop with great pain as a result of over-laughing after reading about this...LOL!!!
90: 600: 950: 769:
The Aercia website is not a RS, neither is Molossia's. Wikis, like microwiki, are not reliable either. I don't believe a free paper like the
81: 58: 828:
If you can find some more reliable sources, that'd be great. I'll hold off editing the article for a bit to give you a chance to add them.
493: 463: 324: 727:
What did you mean by that, precisely? I suspect it means that you shouldn't be editing the article, as it seems likely that you have a
302: 271: 238: 514: 203: 309:
Knowledge (XXG) is built to become a source of all human knowledge. Just read the mission statement. The Aerican Empire, along with
590: 611:
https://web.archive.org/web/20061017070301/http://www.contextmag.com/setFrameRedirect.asp?src=/archives/200104/ManAndMachine.asp
392:
newspapers and I heard even on television a few times. The documentation can all be found on the official website. Thank you.
33: 932: 705: 614: 507:
for the love of all that is sane delete this damn article. this is not an empire, just a nerd who wants to own pluto.
152: 917: 661:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
601:
https://web.archive.org/web/20060506180741/http://bostonphoenix.com/archive/features/00/10/12/MICRONATIONS2.html
497: 459: 328: 287:
THIS MICRONATION IS NOT NOTEWORTHY ENOUGH TO DESERVE IT'S OWN PAGE. If I had an acount, Id vote for deletion.
39: 913:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
275: 242: 928: 696: 604: 582: 298: 207: 510: 451: 290: 267: 199: 553: 518: 455: 680:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
668: 294: 89:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
581:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 875: 871: 815: 811: 721: 635: 145: 21: 894:
I just felt 'smiley face' was a little bit too informal so I changed it. Great article by the way.
852: 782: 482: 365: 748: 899: 228: 219: 665:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
681: 591:
https://web.archive.org/web/20061124095707/http://www.montrealmirror.com/2006/081706/news3.html
492:
So, as long as someone "put a lot of work" into an article, the notability rule can be ignored?
549: 534: 73: 52: 774: 739: 728: 688: 770: 735: 848: 778: 647:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 594: 574: 478: 434: 393: 361: 744: 687:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
654: 944: 909:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
895: 615:
http://www.contextmag.com/setFrameRedirect.asp?src=/archives/200104/ManAndMachine.asp
530: 418: 86: 529:
What the hell? LOL! Whoever invented the flag is a fan of Watchmen or something.
345:
the Musturn, the planet hidden behind Saturn that houses the Mustang Space Ranch,
351:
the Freeland, the other micronation that houses all free-thinking men and women
338:
If this one is not deleted, I'm going to create these much needed entries for
758: 653:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 314: 155:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: 410: 605:
http://www.bostonphoenix.com/archive/features/00/10/12/MICRONATIONS2.html
377: 936: 903: 879: 856: 819: 786: 710: 557: 538: 522: 501: 486: 437: 421: 396: 369: 332: 317: 310: 279: 246: 231: 222: 211: 257: 747:. If there are opposing vewpoints, they're used to determine the " 348:
the Pord, the next wave of foreign automobile invasion from Poland,
140: 15: 620:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
585:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
724:. Before we go any further, you said you were "biased". 725: 578: 595:
http://www.montrealmirror.com/2006/081706/news3.html
85:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 657:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 376:I didn't find Moronia in this list of micronations 923:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 643:This message was posted before February 2018. 773:would be considered a RS, but I can check on 342:the Jedisia, the colony for the fallen Jedis, 8: 378:http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_micronations 47: 573:I have just modified 3 external links on 847:I'll ask over on RSN about the Mirror. 99:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Micronations 49: 19: 745:support the statements in the article 632:to let others know (documentation at 7: 956:Mid-importance Micronations articles 775:the noticeboard that deals with that 79:This article is within the scope of 258:http://how-to-spell-ridiculous.com/ 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 577:. Please take a moment to review 102:Template:WikiProject Micronations 144: 72: 51: 20: 151:This article was nominated for 119:This article has been rated as 937:02:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC) 247:20:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 1: 951:B-Class Micronations articles 738:. They're used to establish 487:01:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC) 447:Pluto's not a planet anymore 318:15:14, 18 November 2006 (UTC) 212:03:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC) 93:and see a list of open tasks. 558:07:39, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 523:21:19, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 502:05:13, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 397:18:19, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 370:08:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 333:19:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC) 223:23:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC) 711:23:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC) 232:21:00, 9 October 2006 (UTC) 227:Is this even a real place? 972: 674:(last update: 5 June 2024) 570:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 438:14:31, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 125:project's importance scale 880:02:32, 13 July 2017 (UTC) 857:02:26, 13 July 2017 (UTC) 820:02:10, 13 July 2017 (UTC) 787:21:46, 12 July 2017 (UTC) 539:01:22, 4 April 2009 (UTC) 118: 67: 46: 904:09:48, 26 May 2020 (UTC) 280:21:48, 8 June 2010 (UTC) 82:WikiProject Micronations 566:External links modified 422:19:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 165:, 20 January 2007, see 28:This article is rated 756:TheFlag&AnthemGuy 293:comment was added by 105:Micronations articles 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 729:conflict of interest 655:regular verification 405:This is CyberNations 760:are not a RS. The 645:After February 2018 624:parameter below to 175:, 5 July 2006, see 929:Community Tech bot 918:Flag of Aerica.svg 754:YouTube videos by 699:InternetArchiveBot 650:InternetArchiveBot 315:Ace Combat Fanatic 237:I believe it is. - 34:content assessment 777:if you'd like. 751:" given to each. 675: 513:comment added by 472:Why this article? 468: 454:comment added by 306: 270:comment added by 202:comment added by 189: 188: 185: 184: 139: 138: 135: 134: 131: 130: 963: 793:pull a fast one. 736:reliable sources 716:Reliable sources 709: 700: 673: 672: 651: 639: 525: 467: 448: 288: 282: 214: 157: 156: 148: 141: 107: 106: 103: 100: 97: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 971: 970: 966: 965: 964: 962: 961: 960: 941: 940: 925:nomination page 911: 892: 771:Montreal Mirror 718: 703: 698: 666: 659:have permission 649: 633: 583:this simple FaQ 568: 508: 474: 449: 445: 430: 407: 385: 289:—The preceding 265: 197: 194: 104: 101: 98: 95: 94: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 969: 967: 959: 958: 953: 943: 942: 921: 920: 910: 907: 891: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 862: 861: 860: 859: 842: 841: 840: 839: 832: 831: 830: 829: 823: 822: 806: 805: 801: 800: 795: 794: 717: 714: 693: 692: 685: 618: 617: 609:Added archive 607: 599:Added archive 597: 589:Added archive 575:Aerican Empire 567: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 542: 541: 505: 504: 494:99.100.235.195 473: 470: 456:69.234.213.255 444: 441: 429: 426: 425: 424: 406: 403: 401: 384: 381: 374: 373: 372: 353: 352: 349: 346: 343: 336: 325:134.173.60.174 286: 284: 261: 260: 251: 250: 249: 193: 190: 187: 186: 183: 182: 181: 180: 170: 149: 137: 136: 133: 132: 129: 128: 121:Mid-importance 117: 111: 110: 108: 91:the discussion 77: 65: 64: 62:Mid‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 968: 957: 954: 952: 949: 948: 946: 939: 938: 934: 930: 926: 919: 916: 915: 914: 908: 906: 905: 901: 897: 889: 881: 877: 873: 868: 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 858: 854: 850: 846: 845: 844: 843: 836: 835: 834: 833: 827: 826: 825: 824: 821: 817: 813: 808: 807: 803: 802: 797: 796: 791: 790: 789: 788: 784: 780: 776: 772: 767: 765: 763: 759: 757: 752: 750: 746: 741: 737: 732: 730: 726: 723: 715: 713: 712: 707: 702: 701: 690: 686: 683: 679: 678: 677: 670: 664: 660: 656: 652: 646: 641: 637: 631: 627: 623: 616: 612: 608: 606: 602: 598: 596: 592: 588: 587: 586: 584: 580: 576: 571: 565: 559: 555: 551: 546: 545: 544: 543: 540: 536: 532: 528: 527: 526: 524: 520: 516: 512: 503: 499: 495: 491: 490: 489: 488: 484: 480: 471: 469: 465: 461: 457: 453: 442: 440: 439: 436: 427: 423: 420: 415: 414: 413: 411: 404: 402: 399: 398: 395: 389: 382: 380: 379: 371: 367: 363: 358: 357: 356: 350: 347: 344: 341: 340: 339: 335: 334: 330: 326: 320: 319: 316: 312: 307: 304: 300: 296: 295:68.193.53.233 292: 283: 281: 277: 273: 272:98.233.136.32 269: 259: 256: 255: 254: 248: 244: 240: 239:138.87.145.17 236: 235: 234: 233: 230: 229:Black Omnimon 225: 224: 221: 220:Aericanwizard 215: 213: 209: 205: 201: 191: 178: 174: 171: 168: 164: 161: 160: 159: 158: 154: 150: 147: 143: 142: 126: 122: 116: 113: 112: 109: 92: 88: 84: 83: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 922: 912: 893: 768: 761: 755: 753: 733: 719: 697: 694: 669:source check 648: 642: 629: 625: 621: 619: 572: 569: 550:Jorge Stolfi 515:86.21.13.183 506: 475: 446: 431: 408: 400: 390: 386: 375: 354: 337: 321: 308: 285: 262: 252: 226: 216: 204:98.230.8.206 195: 172: 162: 120: 96:Micronations 87:Micronations 80: 59:Micronations 40:WikiProjects 636:Sourcecheck 509:—Preceding 450:—Preceding 266:—Preceding 198:—Preceding 945:Categories 890:Minor Edit 872:Roaminhand 812:Roaminhand 740:notability 722:Roaminhand 706:Report bug 177:discussion 167:discussion 849:Bromley86 779:Bromley86 689:this tool 682:this tool 435:PubliusFL 394:Crud3w4re 355:and more 896:Ooh Saad 695:Cheers.— 511:unsigned 464:contribs 452:unsigned 303:contribs 291:unsigned 268:unsigned 200:unsigned 153:deletion 762:Atlanta 622:checked 579:my edit 531:Kausill 479:J-Whitt 428:Infobox 419:Timcrow 383:Defense 311:Sealand 192:Really? 123:on the 30:B-class 749:weight 630:failed 362:JWhitt 36:scale. 933:talk 900:talk 876:talk 853:talk 816:talk 783:talk 626:true 554:talk 535:talk 519:talk 498:talk 483:talk 460:talk 366:talk 329:talk 299:talk 276:talk 243:talk 208:talk 173:keep 163:keep 927:. — 720:Hi 663:RfC 640:). 628:or 613:to 603:to 593:to 115:Mid 947:: 935:) 902:) 878:) 855:) 818:) 785:) 731:. 676:. 671:}} 667:{{ 638:}} 634:{{ 556:) 537:) 521:) 500:) 485:) 466:) 462:• 443:Um 412:) 368:) 331:) 305:). 301:• 278:) 245:) 210:) 931:( 898:( 874:( 851:( 814:( 781:( 708:) 704:( 691:. 684:. 552:( 533:( 517:( 496:( 481:( 458:( 364:( 327:( 297:( 274:( 241:( 206:( 179:. 169:. 127:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Micronations
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Micronations
Micronations
the discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
Articles for deletion
deletion
discussion
discussion
unsigned
98.230.8.206
talk
03:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Aericanwizard
23:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Black Omnimon
21:00, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
138.87.145.17
talk
20:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
http://how-to-spell-ridiculous.com/
unsigned
98.233.136.32
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑