140:, and because it is not, and will never be, properly sourced and fact checked. The Aleister Crowley article already mentions that Crowley crops up here and there in music, film, and print, but none of the items in this list of trivia would bear mentioning in the article. (Yes, I read them all.) Many of them merely mention characters named "Crowley", or things rumored to take Crowley as inspiration.
237:
Yeah, sort of the point is to avoid that cycle, by at least having a community action that rejects lists of trivia. But if limited to verified items, at least that addresses one thing. Unless someone steps up and tries to verify these things, though, that's going to consist of about two items.
284:
with the main
Crowley article as he is a legitimate figure in popular culture. I suggest to the nominator that if he/she has an issue with the "in popular culture" article that he/she seek policy change, as to my understanding they are not prohibited so that alone is an invalid rationale for
394:
These messy lists of references have no place in an encyclopedia, either as part of an article or as stand-alones. They are research notes rather than article sections and should be replaced with structured paragraphs (though in many cases outright deletion wouldn't be much of a loss).
171:
of barely related items, almost uniformly lacking references and entirely lacking any real-world context. This list is so bad, it gathers items that aren't even related to
Crowley because someone somewhere thought once that maybe Crowley was pictured when he wasn't.
90:
85:
117:
94:
411:). The fact that it is impossible to verify or properly maintain it just makes the decision even easier. Merging it wouldn't change anything, just make the main article worse.
77:
141:
375:
the rest, as per the above. I share Mango's concern that we'll just see it again shortly, but I'm not sure that's avoidable with a topic of such notoriety. —
202:
Completely unsourced list of apperances or possible appearances, most with only minmal ties to the subject. None of the entries appear to be
415:
399:
386:
363:
342:
330:
306:
289:
276:
249:
232:
220:
197:
176:
158:
59:
17:
194:
242:
151:
81:
73:
65:
228:, and delete the rest. Sit back and watch as the section bloats, is split out, then is nominated for deletion again. --
440:
36:
265:
48:. It's either merge or delete (definitely not keep), and given the comments, I think delete is a stronger argument.
439:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
358:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
350:
and I strongly oppose the merge of this info. It would cause the trivia section to dominate the guy's article
425:
189:
184:
per nom. This is useless listcruft, with no criteria for inclusion on the list, and no way to maintain.
322:
but only after a substantial trim to a handful of meaningful and verifiable entries. Alternatively
352:
326:
it and have the
Crowley article build up a tightly controlled verifiable popular culture section.
299:
125:
412:
339:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
378:
319:
185:
129:
408:
168:
137:
396:
262:
261:
Merge to main
Aleister Crowley article, or move to that article namespace as a subpage. --
239:
148:
54:
207:
203:
303:
286:
229:
217:
173:
111:
269:
49:
327:
433:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
407:
I can't find a single thing on the list that is notable enough (
272:
285:
deletion. In this case, however, a merge is a better idea.
302:
that would do nothing but detract from the main article.
298:
I for one strongly oppose merging. It is unencyclopedic
107:
103:
99:
136:
to be an indiscriminant collection of information per
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
443:). No further edits should be made to this page.
142:Knowledge (XXG):"In popular culture" articles
8:
208:reliable, fact-checked third-party sources
132:. This should be deleted as an article
226:Merge what can be verified with sources
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
74:Aleister Crowley in popular culture
66:Aleister Crowley in popular culture
24:
320:The Wickedest Man In The World
1:
416:18:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
400:03:26, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
387:00:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
364:20:15, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
343:14:21, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
331:13:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
307:12:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
290:06:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
277:05:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
250:14:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
233:06:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
221:04:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
198:04:39, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
177:03:42, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
159:03:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
60:00:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
124:A meaningless collection of
460:
436:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
409:WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE
204:externally verifiable
206:through the use of
371:sourced material,
144:are a bad idea.
451:
438:
385:
382:
381:
247:
196:
192:
156:
130:Aleister Crowley
115:
97:
57:
52:
34:
459:
458:
454:
453:
452:
450:
449:
448:
447:
441:deletion review
434:
383:
377:
376:
243:
190:
188:
152:
88:
72:
69:
55:
50:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
457:
455:
446:
445:
429:
428:
418:
402:
389:
366:
345:
333:
312:
311:
310:
309:
293:
292:
279:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
200:
179:
122:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
456:
444:
442:
437:
431:
430:
427:
426:66.91.214.167
423:
419:
417:
414:
410:
406:
403:
401:
398:
393:
390:
388:
380:
374:
370:
367:
365:
362:
361:
357:
356:
355:
349:
346:
344:
341:
337:
334:
332:
329:
325:
321:
317:
314:
313:
308:
305:
301:
297:
296:
295:
294:
291:
288:
283:
280:
278:
274:
271:
267:
264:
260:
257:
251:
248:
246:
241:
236:
235:
234:
231:
227:
224:
223:
222:
219:
215:
214:
209:
205:
201:
199:
195:
193:
187:
183:
180:
178:
175:
170:
166:
163:
162:
161:
160:
157:
155:
150:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
435:
432:
421:
413:Pax:Vobiscum
404:
391:
372:
368:
359:
353:
351:
347:
340:Alf photoman
335:
323:
315:
281:
258:
244:
225:
212:
211:
181:
164:
153:
145:
133:
123:
45:
43:
31:
28:
379:SMcCandlish
354:Fundamental
270:14 February
186:Chairman S.
397:Cloachland
266:(contribs)
169:directory
126:WP:TRIVIA
338:per nom
304:Otto4711
287:23skidoo
230:saberwyn
218:saberwyn
174:Otto4711
118:View log
146:Delete.
91:protect
86:history
405:Delete
392:Delete
373:delete
348:Delete
336:Delete
324:delete
300:trivia
275:(GMT)
268:05:55
213:Delete
182:Delete
165:Delete
138:WP:NOT
128:about
95:delete
46:delete
422:Merge
369:Merge
316:Merge
282:Merge
263:Gwern
259:Merge
245:juice
240:Mango
154:juice
149:Mango
134:bound
112:views
104:watch
100:links
51:Proto
16:<
273:2007
191:Talk
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
360:Dan
328:MLA
318:to
216:--
116:– (
424:.
210:.
167:-
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
420:'
384:ツ
120:)
114:)
76:(
56:►
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.