472:
Slight tendency towards ""keep"" - this article, admittedly, needs more information, but it would form an important topic of discussion for those interested in exobiology and also among science fiction fans. I think that what I am probably saying is repeating what a person has said above - namely,
457:
last year have increased interest in the topic. I wouldn't describe it as an "Ill-referenced and speculative essay-style article"; it's a reasonably functional stub with links to other relevant articles and off-wikipedia sources.
190:
88:
83:
490:
Quite expandable. It's just wikipedians don't give a feck on the subject beyond popculture trivia. I've added a little bit, to show that not only scifi geeks and kranks are interested in the subject.
221:
Ill-referenced and speculative essay-style article roughly about a fictional concept. Looking through the history, it's been like this since 2005; has in the past been a magnet for long slabs of
338:
282:
143:
390:
246:
184:
318:
226:
78:
150:
229:, soon after it was created in 2005, suggested potential for a good article here, and that we should wait and see; this has not happened in the 12 years since.
400:
515:. The topic is clearly notable but, as it is inherently speculative, we should expect it to be difficult to do well. Deletion would be contrary to our
225:, which then had to be removed. Not clear there could be a clearly-referenceable topic for this to be about any time in the foreseeable future. The
380:
116:
111:
17:
304:
268:
120:
583:
566:
545:
528:
499:
482:
467:
445:
428:
370:
350:
330:
310:
274:
238:
61:
103:
453:
Deleting the article is unlikely to result in a better one. Seems a notable topic based on cited references, and things like
205:
172:
391:"If we found aliens, could we speak to them? Scientist explores how humans might translate an extraterrestrial language"
602:
40:
326:
524:
166:
579:
463:
508:
162:
424:
346:
322:
234:
516:
598:
495:
299:
263:
36:
512:
491:
212:
562:
520:
366:
575:
411:
405:
385:
198:
107:
459:
57:
222:
420:
342:
230:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
597:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
478:
416:
287:
251:
178:
558:
541:
362:
454:
441:
99:
67:
554:
53:
137:
474:
537:
395:
437:
381:"Alien Interpreters: How Linguists Would Talk to Extraterrestrials"
553:
If the subject was notable in 2005, then it is notable in 2017.
591:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
409:, etc. Then there's all that first contact fiction, such as
401:"Scientist develops programme to understand alien languages"
473:
that room for improvement is not a ground for deletion.
339:
list of
Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
133:
129:
125:
197:
89:
Articles for deletion/Alien language (3rd nomination)
84:
Articles for deletion/Alien language (2nd nomination)
283:
list of
Science fiction-related deletion discussions
211:
436:room for improvement is not grounds for deletion.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
605:). No further edits should be made to this page.
247:list of Language-related deletion discussions
8:
379:. There's enough discussion out there, e.g.
337:Note: This debate has been included in the
319:list of Science-related deletion discussions
317:Note: This debate has been included in the
281:Note: This debate has been included in the
245:Note: This debate has been included in the
336:
316:
280:
244:
536:The subject is notable and verifiable. /
76:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
79:Articles for deletion/Alien language
74:
24:
557:Notability is not temporary.--
1:
415:, and let us not forget the
574:- Needs work not deletion.
622:
584:05:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
567:23:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
546:15:07, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
529:21:17, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
500:22:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
483:14:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
468:11:16, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
446:02:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
429:23:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
371:22:58, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
351:22:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
331:22:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
311:21:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
275:21:50, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
239:21:14, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
62:15:23, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
594:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
361:. Inadequate sources.
73:AfDs for this article:
406:The Daily Telegraph
386:Scientific American
353:
333:
323:Shawn in Montreal
313:
277:
613:
596:
417:Klingon language
307:
302:
294:
290:
271:
266:
258:
254:
216:
215:
201:
153:
141:
123:
34:
621:
620:
616:
615:
614:
612:
611:
610:
609:
603:deletion review
592:
309:
305:
300:
292:
288:
273:
269:
264:
256:
252:
158:
149:
114:
98:
95:
93:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
619:
617:
608:
607:
587:
586:
576:Antonioatrylia
569:
548:
531:
517:editing policy
502:
485:
470:
455:Arrival (film)
448:
431:
374:
355:
354:
334:
314:
298:
278:
262:
219:
218:
155:
100:Alien language
94:
92:
91:
86:
81:
75:
72:
70:
68:Alien language
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
618:
606:
604:
600:
595:
589:
588:
585:
581:
577:
573:
570:
568:
564:
560:
556:
552:
549:
547:
543:
539:
535:
532:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
509:WP:NOTCLEANUP
506:
503:
501:
497:
493:
489:
486:
484:
480:
476:
471:
469:
465:
461:
460:Colapeninsula
456:
452:
449:
447:
443:
439:
435:
432:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
413:
408:
407:
402:
398:
397:
392:
388:
387:
382:
378:
375:
372:
368:
364:
360:
357:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
335:
332:
328:
324:
320:
315:
312:
308:
303:
297:
296:
295:
284:
279:
276:
272:
267:
261:
260:
259:
248:
243:
242:
241:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
214:
210:
207:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
164:
161:
160:Find sources:
156:
152:
148:
145:
139:
135:
131:
127:
122:
118:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:
90:
87:
85:
82:
80:
77:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
593:
590:
571:
550:
533:
504:
487:
450:
433:
421:Clarityfiend
410:
404:
394:
384:
376:
358:
343:David Gerard
291:
286:
255:
250:
231:David Gerard
227:previous AFD
220:
208:
202:
194:
187:
181:
175:
169:
159:
146:
49:
47:
31:
28:
513:WP:NOEFFORT
492:Staszek Lem
185:free images
559:Truthtests
396:Daily Mail
363:Xxanthippe
599:talk page
555:WP:N#TEMP
521:Andrew D.
293:Quidditch
257:Quidditch
37:talk page
601:or in a
223:WP:SYNTH
144:View log
58:Edgar181
39:or in a
412:Arrival
393:in the
191:WP refs
179:scholar
117:protect
112:history
475:Vorbee
359:Delete
163:Google
121:delete
52:. --
538:Julle
206:JSTOR
167:books
151:Stats
138:views
130:watch
126:links
16:<
580:talk
572:Keep
563:talk
551:Keep
542:talk
534:Keep
525:talk
511:and
507:per
505:Keep
496:talk
488:keep
479:talk
464:talk
451:Keep
442:talk
438:Artw
434:Keep
425:talk
377:Keep
367:talk
347:talk
327:talk
235:talk
199:FENS
173:news
134:logs
108:talk
104:edit
50:keep
403:in
383:in
213:TWL
142:– (
582:)
565:)
544:)
527:)
519:.
498:)
481:)
466:)
458:--
444:)
427:)
419:.
399:,
389:,
369:)
349:)
341:.
329:)
321:.
289:WC
285:.
253:WC
249:.
237:)
193:)
136:|
132:|
128:|
124:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
60:)
54:Ed
578:(
561:(
540:(
523:(
494:(
477:(
462:(
440:(
423:(
373:.
365:(
345:(
325:(
306:✎
301:☎
270:✎
265:☎
233:(
217:)
209:·
203:·
195:·
188:·
182:·
176:·
170:·
165:(
157:(
154:)
147:·
140:)
102:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.