324:
notable sources available? Indefinitely? Again, this article mostly concerns just the sci-fi aspect of the topic - which already has its own article. Why is that acceptable? I have deleted anything not applicable to the stated subject of this article now. I think this highlights how thin it actually
298:
While no "alien languages" exist that we know of, it is apperently a theoretical topic which has gotten enough academic attention... there are sufficient sources to warrant this as it's own article and a merger with alien languages in sci-fi wouldn't work, this has nothing to do with that topic. Ps
410:
As I stated directly above, "I have deleted anything not applicable to the stated subject of this article now. I think this highlights how thin it actually is. "What I deleted was all the SciFi material which belongs in the other article,
377:
The editor who nominated this article for deletion has removed some of the strongest sourced material, which emphasize the academic and scholarly angle of this topc, with what seems to me inaccurate and misleading edit summary....
202:
100:
95:
155:
254:
196:
90:
162:
415:. So, Sethie, you may have just made my point. Indead - that was "some of the strongest sourced material" here. Not much left other than the SciFi angle.
128:
123:
67:
17:
412:
343:
234:
132:
445:
424:
401:
368:
351:
334:
308:
299:
there was a strong concensus to keep the last two AFD's what has changed about the article or wiki policies to look at this again?
290:
266:
246:
73:
115:
217:
184:
462:
40:
281:. @Rp2006, would you like to withdraw this deletion discussion and suggest the merge on the article's talk page?
262:
178:
233:
Except for the single item in the
Inherent difficulties section, this is redundant with the info in article
347:
174:
63:
458:
441:
36:
437:
224:
258:
364:
210:
119:
316:: So it is acceptable to just keep an article that is nearly as old as Knowledge (XXG) itself and
278:
59:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
457:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
420:
397:
387:
330:
304:
286:
242:
190:
360:
111:
79:
52:. Again. A merge may be reasonable, but one of the talkpages is the place for it. ~
149:
416:
393:
383:
326:
300:
282:
238:
382:
the admin who closes the AFD, to look at it's state before these edits.
453:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
145:
141:
137:
209:
101:
Articles for deletion/Alien language (3rd nomination)
96:
Articles for deletion/Alien language (2nd nomination)
223:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
465:). No further edits should be made to this page.
253:Note: This discussion has been included in the
255:list of Language-related deletion discussions
8:
320:has not been updated to include any of the
252:
277:: Merger is different from deletion. See
88:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
91:Articles for deletion/Alien language
86:
24:
413:Alien language in science fiction
235:Alien language in science fiction
392:went ahead and fixed this issue.
1:
390:) 19:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
482:
446:19:48, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
402:05:14, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
74:03:02, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
425:22:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
369:21:57, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
352:13:03, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
335:21:52, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
309:21:34, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
291:00:46, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
267:15:00, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
247:14:33, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
455:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
85:AfDs for this article:
436:, valid subject.
269:
237:. Suggest merge.
72:
473:
380:strongly request
228:
227:
213:
165:
153:
135:
56:
55:
34:
481:
480:
476:
475:
474:
472:
471:
470:
469:
463:deletion review
259:The Mighty Glen
170:
161:
126:
110:
107:
105:
83:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
479:
477:
468:
467:
449:
448:
430:
429:
428:
427:
405:
404:
371:
359:, per Sethie.
354:
342:, per Sethie.
337:
311:
293:
271:
270:
231:
230:
167:
112:Alien language
106:
104:
103:
98:
93:
87:
84:
82:
80:Alien language
77:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
478:
466:
464:
460:
456:
451:
450:
447:
443:
439:
435:
432:
431:
426:
422:
418:
414:
409:
408:
407:
406:
403:
399:
395:
391:
389:
385:
381:
376:
372:
370:
366:
362:
358:
355:
353:
349:
345:
341:
338:
336:
332:
328:
323:
319:
315:
312:
310:
306:
302:
297:
294:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
273:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
251:
250:
249:
248:
244:
240:
236:
226:
222:
219:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
176:
173:
172:Find sources:
168:
164:
160:
157:
151:
147:
143:
139:
134:
130:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
108:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
81:
78:
76:
75:
71:
69:
65:
61:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
454:
452:
433:
379:
374:
373:
356:
339:
321:
317:
313:
295:
274:
232:
220:
214:
206:
199:
193:
187:
181:
171:
158:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
438:Staszek Lem
344:92.2.70.144
197:free images
322:supposedly
459:talk page
361:Shellwood
37:talk page
461:or in a
279:WP:ATD-M
156:View log
39:or in a
375:Comment
314:Comment
275:Comment
203:WP refs
191:scholar
129:protect
124:history
394:Sethie
384:Sethie
301:Sethie
283:Cnilep
175:Google
133:delete
318:still
218:JSTOR
179:books
163:Stats
150:views
142:watch
138:links
54:Amory
16:<
442:talk
434:Keep
421:talk
417:RobP
398:talk
388:talk
365:talk
357:Keep
348:talk
340:Keep
331:talk
327:RobP
325:is.
305:talk
296:Keep
287:talk
263:talk
243:talk
239:RobP
211:FENS
185:news
146:logs
120:talk
116:edit
50:keep
225:TWL
154:– (
444:)
423:)
400:)
367:)
350:)
333:)
307:)
289:)
265:)
257:.
245:)
205:)
148:|
144:|
140:|
136:|
131:|
127:|
122:|
118:|
66:•
62:•
440:(
419:(
396:(
386:(
363:(
346:(
329:(
303:(
285:(
261:(
241:(
229:)
221:·
215:·
207:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
182:·
177:(
169:(
166:)
159:·
152:)
114:(
70:)
68:c
64:t
60:u
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.