356:- Up until recently, Alison Morris merely worked for local news stations, but now she's the anchor of a major American news network with a national and even international audience. Most, if not all, news anchors from the major American news networks have articles on Knowledge. Morris is not a random person who found herself in the midst of a controversy, she is an anchor of one of the most influential news networks in the world. Even without the incident, there would have been more than enough reasons to create a page for her. --
301:
a profile on
Variety is hardly noteworthy enough to warrant its own article, which is why nobody created one back in July. This incident has received coverage in major publications, but it remains to be seen if this is a simple one-day controversy or something more notable. Knowledge doesn't report
639:
the n-word on TV, as we didn't have a page for her before that. As JPL says above, this is news cycle type coverage that seems to fall in line with BLP1E. For our subjects we look for sustained coverage. While she did have an article in variety about 6 months ago, that alone doesn't do it for me. My
491:
Matter of fact, I heard "nakers" BEFORE she ever came out saying that. I'm guessing you've never worked in public speaking before. I am a bleeding heart liberal who has 'cancelled' tons of celebrities for using racial epithets or saying racially inappropriate things. but there is no merit to this
562:
Probably the most truthful statement above is the "she deserves to be known for using the n-word". To me, living in
Detroit surrounded by people who use this word with many permutations of meaning on a regular basis, this claim makes zero sense. Secondly, even if it is true, Knowledge does not have
249:
Non-notable - Knowledge is not a newspaper. coverage not significant enough to warrant an entire article about the news anchor, who had no page prior to this incident. there is coverage in major publications, but creating an article for this would be like creating an article for every controversy
492:
one and right now, this lady is getting harassed for what is clearly a flub and if you actually listen without pre-conceived bias, you'll hear she did not use the epithet, but rather gibberish due to getting tongue tied and starting to say the wrong team's name. she's not a sports reporter.
476:
She didn't use the n-word. she very clearly said something gibberish that sounded like Nakers. but that's not relevant to the argument. it looks like this is going to overwhelmingly be "keep", which is fine, but your argument for why is the only one out of all of these that is
287:- She appears as an anchor on a national news channel and has received coverage from multiple sources for her controversial remarks. To prove that this is not a one event only case, she also was profiled by Variety back in July, long before the incident.--
617:
technically not a BLP1E because she is known for her role as a talking head, and then somewhat infamous for her use of the N word on live television. I think we have enough RS for a keep and perhaps a weak keep.
218:
640:
question: will we still be talking about this event 6 months from now? I suspect not. Thus we're going to make a negative BLP over a single reactionary news event? I fail to see the encyclopedic value here.
563:
the purpose to right great wrongs. The coverage of Morris is all one event, news cycle type coverage. It does not show long term notability. We should delete this article. We are not a newspaper.
331:
171:
394:
212:
414:
77:
373:
462:
118:
103:
601:
XenonNSMB pretty much said it best. (SN: I always get a little suspicious when one of the first contributions from a supposed new user is an AfD.)
272:
178:
144:
139:
648:
276:
148:
466:
446:
98:
91:
17:
131:
233:
200:
112:
108:
668:
568:
40:
497:
482:
307:
268:
255:
194:
455:
She deserves to be known for using the N-word. That kind of slip up only means she uses it more than once.
651:
627:
609:
593:
572:
554:
550:
537:
520:
501:
486:
470:
450:
426:
406:
385:
365:
347:
311:
296:
259:
190:
61:
57:
493:
478:
303:
264:
251:
664:
36:
623:
564:
458:
339:
323:
240:
357:
442:
422:
402:
381:
361:
226:
516:
327:
135:
585:
546:
87:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
663:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
533:
292:
206:
641:
619:
589:
335:
438:
418:
398:
377:
581:
512:
127:
67:
635:
As I see this, the only reason we suddenly decided she was notable was for saying
165:
529:
288:
302:
the news, and this anchor seems noteworthy just for this single incident.
659:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
437:- National news anchor with significant press coverage. --
161:
157:
153:
528:
Passes GNG, notable even without the Kobe controversy.
225:
332:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 January 27
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
671:). No further edits should be made to this page.
413:Note: This discussion has been included in the
393:Note: This discussion has been included in the
372:Note: This discussion has been included in the
395:list of Journalism-related deletion discussions
415:list of New York-related deletion discussions
239:
8:
119:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
456:
412:
392:
374:list of Women-related deletion discussions
371:
250:that gets national exposure for a day.
75:
7:
584:as the host on a major TV network.
78:Articles for deletion/Alison Morris
74:
24:
545:for all the reasons stated above.
104:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
330:). I have transcluded it to
652:18:58, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
628:19:06, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
610:18:47, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
594:04:22, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
573:13:47, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
555:00:44, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
538:01:49, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
521:01:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
502:03:29, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
487:03:28, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
471:00:24, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
451:23:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
427:21:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
407:21:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
386:21:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
366:21:37, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
348:20:23, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
312:20:28, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
297:20:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
260:19:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
62:15:26, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
322:This AfD was not correctly
94:(AfD)? Read these primers!
688:
661:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
73:AfDs for this article:
463:2600:387:A:7:0:0:0:5E
277:few or no other edits
92:Articles for deletion
279:outside this topic.
511:- She passes GNG.
320:Automated comment:
608:
565:John Pack Lambert
473:
461:comment added by
429:
409:
388:
350:
346:
280:
109:Guide to deletion
99:How to contribute
679:
646:
607:
605:
342:
341:Talk to my owner
337:
318:
262:
244:
243:
229:
181:
169:
151:
89:
34:
687:
686:
682:
681:
680:
678:
677:
676:
675:
669:deletion review
642:
603:
345:
340:
186:
177:
142:
126:
123:
86:
83:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
685:
683:
674:
673:
655:
654:
630:
612:
596:
575:
557:
540:
523:
506:
505:
504:
494:StickyEmotions
489:
479:StickyEmotions
453:
431:
430:
410:
369:
368:
351:
338:
316:
315:
314:
304:StickyEmotions
265:StickyEmotions
252:StickyEmotions
247:
246:
183:
122:
121:
116:
106:
101:
84:
82:
81:
80:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
684:
672:
670:
666:
662:
657:
656:
653:
650:
647:
645:
638:
634:
631:
629:
625:
621:
616:
613:
611:
606:
600:
597:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
576:
574:
570:
566:
561:
558:
556:
552:
548:
544:
541:
539:
535:
531:
527:
524:
522:
518:
514:
510:
507:
503:
499:
495:
490:
488:
484:
480:
475:
474:
472:
468:
464:
460:
454:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
433:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
411:
408:
404:
400:
396:
391:
390:
389:
387:
383:
379:
375:
367:
363:
359:
355:
352:
349:
343:
336:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
300:
299:
298:
294:
290:
286:
283:
282:
281:
278:
274:
270:
266:
261:
257:
253:
242:
238:
235:
232:
228:
224:
220:
217:
214:
211:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
192:
189:
188:Find sources:
184:
180:
176:
173:
167:
163:
159:
155:
150:
146:
141:
137:
133:
129:
128:Alison_Morris
125:
124:
120:
117:
114:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
96:
95:
93:
88:
79:
76:
69:
68:Alison_Morris
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
660:
658:
643:
636:
632:
615:Keep for now
614:
602:
598:
577:
559:
547:Johnny Spasm
542:
525:
508:
457:— Preceding
434:
370:
353:
326:to the log (
319:
284:
248:
236:
230:
222:
215:
209:
203:
197:
187:
174:
85:
54:Pax:Vobiscum
49:
47:
31:
28:
324:transcluded
275:) has made
213:free images
644:CaptainEek
620:Lightburst
665:talk page
439:XenonNSMB
419:Shellwood
399:Shellwood
378:Shellwood
358:Adriano 7
37:talk page
667:or in a
513:Missvain
477:invalid.
459:unsigned
447:contribs
273:contribs
172:View log
113:glossary
39:or in a
633:Comment
580:Passes
344::Online
219:WP refs
207:scholar
145:protect
140:history
90:New to
604:Erpert
582:WP:GNG
560:Delete
530:LM2000
328:step 3
289:Rusf10
191:Google
149:delete
637:maybe
599:Keep.
586:KidAd
234:JSTOR
195:books
179:Stats
166:views
158:watch
154:links
16:<
624:talk
590:talk
578:Keep
569:talk
551:talk
543:Keep
534:talk
526:Keep
517:talk
509:Keep
498:talk
483:talk
467:talk
443:talk
435:Keep
423:talk
403:talk
382:talk
362:talk
354:Keep
334:. —
308:talk
293:talk
285:Keep
269:talk
256:talk
227:FENS
201:news
162:logs
136:talk
132:edit
58:talk
50:keep
241:TWL
170:– (
626:)
592:)
571:)
553:)
536:)
519:)
500:)
485:)
469:)
449:)
445:,
425:)
417:.
405:)
397:.
384:)
376:.
364:)
310:)
295:)
271:•
263:—
258:)
221:)
164:|
160:|
156:|
152:|
147:|
143:|
138:|
134:|
60:)
52:.
649:⚓
622:(
588:(
567:(
549:(
532:(
515:(
496:(
481:(
465:(
441:(
421:(
401:(
380:(
360:(
306:(
291:(
267:(
254:(
245:)
237:·
231:·
223:·
216:·
210:·
204:·
198:·
193:(
185:(
182:)
175:·
168:)
130:(
115:)
111:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.