179:
Seems like spam of product, most hits are either youtube videos of the product or advertisements themselves, however, may be unique enough to be notable. I lean towards deleting however due to a lack of independent sources indicating notability, would vote keep if these can be provided; I couldn't
224:
as it doesn't have enough notable context to be what I consider encyclopaedic. To salvage the 'notable and interesting' bits one user commented on I'd remove all the spam links at the bottom (called 'sources' in the article), then merge what's left into the most appropriate of the four 'see also'
120:
17:
162:
I cleaned the article up a bit. Notable and interesting. Should be improved with more and better references and in-line citations.
87:
82:
91:
234:
74:
278:
36:
49:
167:
277:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
259:
209:
132:
263:
238:
213:
189:
171:
154:
136:
56:
78:
185:
163:
150:
70:
62:
255:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
230:
205:
128:
181:
247:
146:
108:
199:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
226:
48:. consensus was a clear delete before re-list. Does not need another five days.
127:
Skateboard style product, mentioned on someone's blog. Not notable.
271:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
115:
104:
100:
96:
204:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
281:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
254:publications demonstrating notability?
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
145:per nom, looks like product spam.
24:
180:find any from a google search.
1:
264:01:28, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
239:01:26, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
214:00:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
190:19:11, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
172:18:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
155:16:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
137:15:53, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
57:04:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
246:: Sourced, yes, but not per
298:
274:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
216:
289:
276:
250:. Are there any
203:
201:
118:
112:
94:
54:
34:
297:
296:
292:
291:
290:
288:
287:
286:
285:
279:deletion review
272:
197:
164:ChildofMidnight
114:
85:
69:
66:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
295:
293:
284:
283:
267:
266:
241:
218:
217:
202:
194:
193:
192:
174:
157:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
294:
282:
280:
275:
269:
268:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
242:
240:
236:
232:
228:
223:
220:
219:
215:
211:
207:
200:
196:
195:
191:
187:
183:
178:
175:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
156:
152:
148:
144:
141:
140:
139:
138:
134:
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
273:
270:
256:Cosmic Latte
251:
243:
221:
198:
176:
159:
142:
126:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
252:third-party
206:Ron Ritzman
177:Weak Delete
160:Strong keep
129:Oscarthecat
71:Alive board
63:Alive board
225:articles.
182:Theseeker4
147:JBsupreme
235:contribs
121:View log
88:protect
83:history
244:Delete
227:Nja247
222:Delete
143:Delete
116:delete
92:delete
46:delete
248:WP:RS
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
52:StarM
16:<
260:talk
231:talk
210:talk
186:talk
168:talk
151:talk
133:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
262:)
237:)
233:•
212:)
188:)
170:)
153:)
135:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
258:(
229:(
208:(
184:(
166:(
149:(
131:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.