206:(this section added by the article's author in response to the above text)- I went about editing it originally because the initial wikipedia definition was totally inaccurate. The attempt was to create a definition for something which is based on a non-linear paradigm and eludes simple definition. If you want to delete the entire entry feel free - just don't publish inaccuracies please. I'd say the article is neutral unless you can site an example of where non-neutrality was used? The Chirobase link is inaccurate is it refers to a person not certified to perform Alphabiotics. I'm sure you wouldn't link an article under medicine about someone who wasn't a qualified doctor? Please can you qualify what you mean by fringe? And also that which is referred to 'content violation' I am very happy to oblige in editing this article for improvement.
316:
Which half of the article are you refering to please? (That is unsourced) I need specifics please to modify the article. There is no mention of 'unifying body and soul' so I am confused as to your source for that comment. Can you please re-read the article carefully as the terms I have used are very
180:
is particularly enlightening. Also, based on the official site, it appears that there's still not much more practioners then when said publication made a count of 75 practioners in 2002. In short: this is a fringe theory without wide traction and there don't appear to be enough reliable sources to
277:
Regarding the
Biography of a living person conflict can you please be specific as I know the 'living person' and can seek his approval on any content. I'm not sure if stress reduction is fringe theory? Can you please be specific with your reference to 'fringe' so the article may be improved or
289:, which should even qualify for speedy deletion. The other half is a description of, wait a moment, unifying body and soul by lying down for 15-30 seconds while having your head twisted by 10 degrees... unfortunately my English is not good enough to provide for an applicable polite word.--
120:
326:
87:
82:
91:
17:
162:
74:
278:
clarified. Notability is difficult for this subject matter, and if suggestions can be made I am open to them? Thank you.
317:
specific. Also there is no mention of twisting the head. In fact the article says "the lack of twisting". Many thanks.
128:
132:
357:
36:
356:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
186:
341:
313:
298:
274:
259:
227:
223:
203:
188:
167:
56:
78:
337:
70:
62:
305:
294:
266:
195:
182:
152:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
309:
270:
219:
199:
255:
333:
144:
290:
286:
247:
177:
148:
140:
239:
157:
136:
50:
108:
213:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
243:
251:
350:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
135:). Only 4 sources, all of which are primary, none of which are
285:, per nomination. Half of the article is a totally unsourced
250:
concerns, especially in view of the link provided by Mgm.
147:. Includes content which can be considered a violation of
115:
104:
100:
96:
218:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
143:editing since August 2008. Is not written from a
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
360:). No further edits should be made to this page.
238:, per nom. Not enough coverage by independent
327:list of Medicine-related deletion discussions
8:
181:write a balanced article on the topic. -
325:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
189:22:56, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
168:16:10, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
342:22:28, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
314:17:15, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
299:15:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
275:14:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
260:01:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
228:01:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
204:22:53, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
57:02:57, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
377:
353:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
145:neutral point of view
44:The result was
344:
330:
230:
127:Non-notable (see
368:
355:
331:
321:
242:, does not pass
240:reliable sources
217:
215:
165:
160:
155:
118:
112:
94:
53:
34:
376:
375:
371:
370:
369:
367:
366:
365:
364:
358:deletion review
351:
211:
163:
158:
153:
114:
85:
69:
66:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
374:
372:
363:
362:
346:
345:
302:
301:
263:
262:
232:
231:
216:
208:
192:
191:
133:google scholar
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
373:
361:
359:
354:
348:
347:
343:
339:
335:
328:
324:
320:
319:
318:
315:
311:
307:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
281:
280:
279:
276:
272:
268:
261:
257:
253:
249:
246:. Also valid
245:
241:
237:
234:
233:
229:
225:
221:
214:
210:
209:
207:
205:
201:
197:
190:
187:
184:
179:
175:
172:
171:
170:
169:
166:
161:
156:
150:
146:
142:
139:. Tagged for
138:
134:
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
352:
349:
322:
303:
282:
264:
235:
212:
193:
173:
126:
71:Alphabiotics
63:Alphabiotics
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
220:Ron Ritzman
129:google news
334:Raven1977
178:This page
291:Pgallert
137:reliable
121:View log
159:Spidern
88:protect
83:history
52:MBisanz
306:Trisfb
287:WP:BLP
283:Delete
267:Trisfb
248:WP:BLP
236:Delete
196:Trisfb
174:Delete
149:WP:BLP
116:delete
92:delete
46:delete
252:Nsk92
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
338:talk
323:Note
310:talk
295:talk
271:talk
256:talk
244:WP:N
224:talk
200:talk
131:and
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
332:--
329:.
183:Mgm
141:COI
340:)
312:)
304:--
297:)
273:)
265:--
258:)
226:)
202:)
194:--
176:.
151:.
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
336:(
308:(
293:(
269:(
254:(
222:(
198:(
185:|
164:→
154:←
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.