398:. Well sourced.. As for "notability", there are many categories of stamps, and it could just as easily be opined that a particular category isn't notable, so we'll need more than an opinion that this particular category isn't notable before we take an axe to another editor's time, effort and good faith contribution. --
381:
I'd expect a longtime editor to be able to articulate a keep vote that actually explains how the article meets notability criteria better than the editor with 18 edits. Can you explain where any of those sources significantly cover Art Deco stamps? And not just stamps from the time period (the
597:
582:. My interpretation is that it makes no difference that it's a video as opposed to a print reference. The ATA is certainly a good source; in this case it's part of a tutorial which says it was curated and not some random presentation.
325:
None of the sources provided are about, significantly, Art Deco stamps. There's plenty of sources about historical stamps of the time period, etc., and stamps occasionally get minor mentions in works on Art Deco, but there's no
220:
637:
Other
Wikipedias with generally looser standards aren't particularly a good BEFORE strategy, especially if one can't actually come up with examples of expertise for the sources. It's an OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument.
451:
I have added several references specifically devoted to Art Deco on stamps and some other links. Without belaboring the point, if this article is not acceptable, huge numbers of lists would have to go.
363:, well sourced as per topic and several External links are topic specific, so meets guideline. An interesting article, thanks for pointing it out via this AfD. Let's call in Knowledge stamp expert
427:
has posted online a lengthy video on this topic, See Tom
Broadhead, "Art Deco! The 1925 Paris Exposition," 2021, Accessible from link . Other Knowledge articles on topical stamps include
317:
267:) - "No usage of secondary sources that demonstrate Art Deco stamps themselves are a subject of significant commentary beyond stamps of the contemporary time period, etc."
591:
I'll note that her work is cited in references on the
English, French, Swedish, Dutch, Japanese, German, Chinese, Italian and Polish Wikipedias; I didn't check the others.
287:
214:
444:
177:
531:
Groten, Arthur H., M.D., “The
Paraphilately Page - Art Deco and the 1925 Paris Exposition,” American Stamp Dealer & Collector, no. 88 (Mar 2015), pp. 55-57.
440:
124:
109:
345:
150:
145:
154:
295:
275:
546:
586:
137:
104:
97:
17:
235:
313:
202:
518:
424:
291:
271:
330:
here. The added external links don't appear to meet reliable source thresholds, either (fan pages and
Wordpress blog.)
181:
118:
114:
692:
many other articles, on many topics, should be deleted long before this one if we agree with the nominator. Thanks
785:
309:
196:
40:
270:
In my opinion the links Ww2censor added aren't sufficient for demonstrating notability and keeping the article.
448:
436:
420:
602:
768:
751:
726:
705:
684:
655:
644:
632:
618:
573:
562:
507:
488:
461:
409:
388:
376:
354:
336:
299:
279:
192:
79:
503:
405:
781:
579:
36:
242:
764:
722:
696:
for adding several new citations though I'm sure there are also more to be found in other languages.
372:
141:
701:
228:
680:
747:
558:
499:
457:
432:
399:
364:
93:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
780:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
208:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
639:
568:
383:
331:
327:
254:
760:
718:
474:
428:
368:
133:
85:
76:
697:
262:
54:
714:
676:
743:
735:
693:
585:
Ann Mette
Heindorff: I was unable to open that page but I found this other archive
554:
538:“Des Timbres Art Deco,” L'Echo de la Timbrologie, no. 1624 (Oct. 1990) (in French).
470:
453:
171:
522:
512:
Secondary sources cited in article that specifically deal with Art Deco stamps:
739:
651:
628:
614:
484:
350:
59:
498:
per nom. What significant sources are the keep lvoters seeing that I'm not?
517:
Tom
Broadhead, "Art Deco! The 1925 Paris Exposition" (2001) Published by
578:
Interesting question about
Broadhead. I looked around and found this:
594:
The
Russian and Spanish Wikipedias have articles on art deco stamps:
759:, an example of why the Prod list should be watched like a hawk.
776:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
623:
I've found checking other
Wikipedias is a good WP:BEFORE step.
52:. There's a clear consensus that this article should be kept.
649:
No, it's the "check the other articles for refs strategy". --
521:
45 minute video discussing French Art Deco stamps. See link
167:
163:
159:
227:
567:
What makes Heindorff or Broadhead reliable sources?
445:Soviet space exploration history on Soviet stamps
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
788:). No further edits should be made to this page.
288:list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions
286:Note: This discussion has been included in the
441:U.S. space exploration history on U.S. stamps
241:
8:
125:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
547:History on Stamps, Art Deco (1920s - 1930s)
473:and also the many pre-existing refs to the
285:
477:, a print publication. Print counts, too.
419:Art Deco stamps are a recognized area of
675:- based on sources provided by Ecphora.
7:
519:American Topical (stamp) Association
382:majority of which aren't Art Deco?)
24:
598:ru:Почтовые марки в стиле ар-деко
110:Introduction to deletion process
308:meets notability requirements.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
609:Both cite Ann Mette Heindorff.
549:(page from philatelic exhibit)
1:
425:American Topical Association
603:es:Sellos postales Art decó
100:(AfD)? Read these primers!
80:23:18, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
805:
769:13:56, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
752:13:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
727:13:13, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
706:11:12, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
685:10:54, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
656:17:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
645:17:11, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
633:17:04, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
619:17:03, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
574:13:14, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
563:04:32, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
508:03:03, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
489:23:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
462:23:00, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
410:18:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
389:16:58, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
377:12:56, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
355:03:10, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
337:00:07, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
318:23:49, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
300:22:45, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
280:22:45, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
251:Contested PROD (listed by
641:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
570:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
385:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
344:I left a notification at
333:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
778:Please do not modify it.
421:Topical stamp collecting
32:Please do not modify it.
292:The Squirrel Conspiracy
272:The Squirrel Conspiracy
182:edits since nomination
580:Knowledge:Video links
545:Ann Mette Heindorff,
346:WikiProject Philately
98:Articles for deletion
310:McFilet O' Fish Fan
55:(non-admin closure)
469:per refs added by
433:Insects on stamps
357:
302:
115:Guide to deletion
105:How to contribute
57:
796:
713:. Clearly meets
654:
642:
631:
617:
571:
487:
437:People on stamps
386:
353:
343:
334:
266:
258:
246:
245:
231:
175:
157:
95:
78:
53:
34:
804:
803:
799:
798:
797:
795:
794:
793:
792:
786:deletion review
650:
640:
627:
613:
569:
483:
475:Scott catalogue
429:Birds on stamps
384:
349:
332:
260:
259:, deprodded by
252:
188:
148:
134:Art Deco stamps
132:
129:
92:
89:
86:Art Deco stamps
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
802:
800:
791:
790:
772:
771:
754:
729:
708:
687:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
624:
610:
607:
606:
605:
600:
592:
589:
583:
552:
551:
550:
541:
540:
539:
534:
533:
532:
527:
526:
525:
513:
492:
491:
479:
478:
464:
413:
412:
393:
392:
391:
358:
340:
339:
320:
303:
249:
248:
185:
128:
127:
122:
112:
107:
90:
88:
83:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
801:
789:
787:
783:
779:
774:
773:
770:
766:
762:
758:
755:
753:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
730:
728:
724:
720:
716:
712:
709:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
688:
686:
682:
678:
674:
671:
657:
653:
648:
647:
646:
643:
636:
635:
634:
630:
625:
622:
621:
620:
616:
611:
608:
604:
601:
599:
596:
595:
593:
590:
588:
584:
581:
577:
576:
575:
572:
566:
565:
564:
560:
556:
553:
548:
544:
543:
542:
537:
536:
535:
530:
529:
528:
524:
520:
516:
515:
514:
511:
510:
509:
505:
501:
497:
494:
493:
490:
486:
481:
480:
476:
472:
468:
465:
463:
459:
455:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
415:
414:
411:
407:
403:
402:
397:
394:
390:
387:
380:
379:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
359:
356:
352:
347:
342:
341:
338:
335:
329:
324:
321:
319:
315:
311:
307:
304:
301:
297:
293:
289:
284:
283:
282:
281:
277:
273:
268:
264:
256:
244:
240:
237:
234:
230:
226:
222:
219:
216:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
194:
191:
190:Find sources:
186:
183:
179:
173:
169:
165:
161:
156:
152:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
130:
126:
123:
120:
116:
113:
111:
108:
106:
103:
102:
101:
99:
94:
87:
84:
82:
81:
77:
75:
74:
71:
68:
65:
62:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
777:
775:
756:
731:
710:
689:
672:
500:Clarityfiend
495:
466:
416:
401:Gwillhickers
400:
395:
365:Gwillhickers
360:
322:
305:
269:
250:
238:
232:
224:
217:
211:
205:
199:
189:
91:
72:
69:
66:
63:
60:
49:
47:
31:
28:
255:David Fuchs
215:free images
761:Randy Kryn
742:. Cheers,
719:Necrothesp
369:Randy Kryn
782:talk page
698:ww2censor
328:WP:SIGCOV
263:Ww2censor
37:talk page
784:or in a
677:Ingratis
178:View log
119:glossary
39:or in a
757:Comment
744:Last1in
736:Ecphora
694:Ecphora
555:Ecphora
471:Ecphora
454:Ecphora
221:WP refs
209:scholar
151:protect
146:history
96:New to
715:WP:GNG
496:Delete
423:. The
323:Delete
193:Google
155:delete
740:A. B.
717:. --
652:A. B.
629:A. B.
615:A. B.
485:A. B.
351:A. B.
236:JSTOR
197:books
172:views
164:watch
160:links
16:<
765:talk
748:talk
738:and
734:per
732:Keep
723:talk
711:Keep
702:talk
690:Keep
681:talk
673:Keep
587:link
559:talk
523:here
504:talk
467:Keep
458:talk
449:etc.
417:Keep
406:talk
396:Keep
373:talk
361:Keep
348:. --
314:talk
306:Keep
296:talk
276:talk
229:FENS
203:news
168:logs
142:talk
138:edit
50:keep
431:,
243:TWL
176:– (
767:)
750:)
725:)
704:)
683:)
626:--
612:--
561:)
506:)
482:--
460:)
447:,
443:,
435:,
408:)
375:)
367:.
316:)
298:)
290:.
278:)
223:)
180:|
170:|
166:|
162:|
158:|
153:|
149:|
144:|
140:|
763:(
746:(
721:(
700:(
679:(
557:(
502:(
456:(
439:,
404:(
371:(
312:(
294:(
274:(
265::
261:@
257::
253:@
247:)
239:·
233:·
225:·
218:·
212:·
206:·
200:·
195:(
187:(
184:)
174:)
136:(
121:)
117:(
73:i
70:t
67:s
64:u
61:D
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.