31:
766:) They are news reports about someone becoming a model because of a photograph. Whether you class that as events or human interest stories, these are primary. These do not count towards notability. There have been a string of keep votes that are not based in policy, but the policy reasons for keep have argued notability. Sourcing does not back up those arguments. Fails
517:: He is not among people notable for only one event. He went viral by chance then he became a professional model for brands, he did music videos as a model, and now he opens a cafe. On his every achievement, he has good media coverage. So, WP:IE does not apply here. Pakistani and international media cover him. Even Indian news sources which are RS, cover him.--
89:
for keeping it running this long. Views expressed here are passionate, and seem evenly divided. But upon closer inspection, almost all the "Keep" !votes rely on irrelevant reasons. Yes, the guy certainly exists, as is supported by a plethora of reliable sources, and I'm sure he is very popular. But
761:
to say whether this person will be notable or just a 1E footnote. There are 13 sources in the article, which the better keep arguments have addressed. One of them is the BBC. However, no attention has been given to the fact that these are primary sources (see
654:. Modeling and owning cafes aren't typically notable and the few media stories that cover his activities only exist because of the single event. Agree with the editor above that the keep votes are mostly non-arguments; see
240:
271:
A non-notable tea seller, looks like the creator is just advertising about the new Cafe started by the subject. I think, one person is getting viral everyday but this does not help them to be
Notable. Hence, fails
371:
coverage mostly, and later non-significant stories building on that 1E, not notable enough. WP is not a place to track life stories of people who were once famous on the internet. Thanks,
301:
197:
234:
548:
Final relist. Let's table the issue of how this subject became notable and focus on sources that establish notability. Right now, this is looking like a No consensus closure.
770:. Again, this may just be TOOSOON. Deletion now should be without prejudice to re-creation of the article in the future if secondary sources clearly establish notability.
305:
40:
297:
579:
327:
129:
144:
757:- It is not that this person cannot be notable. Models can be notable, and notability might be achieved for other reasons too. The problem here is it is
170:
165:
522:
174:
293:
157:
90:
none of that counters the basic problem of WP:1E. At this point, the man has not achieved notability that is independent from that one event.
518:
124:
117:
17:
814:
719:
Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject.
255:
222:
138:
134:
650:: When every source goes, "Hey, remember that guy whose photo went viral? Here's what he's doing now!" it's overwhelmingly
537:
485:
408:
796:
69:
46:
779:
747:
729:
704:
671:
638:
562:
526:
505:
474:
457:
428:
397:
380:
359:
338:
317:
285:
216:
201:
99:
313:
281:
212:
161:
763:
710:
262:
153:
105:
655:
792:
452:
393:
65:
610:
634:
470:
376:
309:
277:
758:
775:
725:
700:
334:
248:
692:
597:
347:
228:
714:
684:
329:
is a RS. Going viral is a thing now, we can keep articles about people attaining fame this way.
355:
113:
58:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
791:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
659:
64:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
448:
389:
767:
734:
No one here is alleging this is promotion and your argument doesn't address the concern of
273:
630:
466:
372:
94:
735:
680:
651:
621:
617:
601:
583:
441:
368:
771:
743:
721:
696:
667:
330:
691:
in Arshad's pocket to promote him or get him a
Knowledge (XXG) article! Clear case of
808:
351:
191:
687:. I am pretty sure that 13 reliable publications from 5 different countries are
596:
While there may have been significant coverage on the subject, but it is still
91:
739:
663:
571:
553:
496:
419:
84:
738:. There can exist many reliable sources and it can still be 1E.
713:, what, if any, of those 13 sources are secondary sources? From
787:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
616:
If he is a professional model (and went viral by chance), the
25:
540:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
488:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
411:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
576:
Most of the Keeps are votes without substantial reasoning.
620:
should mention as such, instead of building story on the
187:
183:
179:
247:
551:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
494:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
417:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
261:
629:Therefore, there is no substantial keep. Thanks,
388::Look like WP:SINGLEEVENT, not notable right now
72:). No further edits should be made to this page.
799:). No further edits should be made to this page.
292:Note: This discussion has been included in the
683:from 5 different countries are there to meet
8:
145:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
291:
81:. This was a tough one; my hat is off to
593:. (Bold is 1E, Italics is the coverage).
45:For an explanation of the process, see
718:
582:listed by Oaktree is just a story on
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
326:: BBC is fine, this source as well
41:deletion review on 2023 November 19
444:and even weak SIGCOV for that 1E.
24:
296:lists for the following topics:
130:Introduction to deletion process
29:
47:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
1:
780:19:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
748:23:01, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
730:19:26, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
705:15:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
672:21:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
639:04:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
563:23:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
100:23:15, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
527:06:04, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
506:23:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
475:14:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
458:00:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
429:23:21, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
398:03:34, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
381:15:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
360:06:04, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
339:15:03, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
318:14:28, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
286:14:28, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
465:He is very popular person.
120:(AfD)? Read these primers!
831:
591:might be from Afghanistan
815:Pages at deletion review
789:Please do not modify it.
607:is a very popular person
61:Please do not modify it.
624:event (as shown above).
310:Syed A. Hussain Quadri
278:Syed A. Hussain Quadri
202:edits since nomination
154:Arshad Khan (Chaiwala)
106:Arshad Khan (Chaiwala)
681:reliable publications
118:Articles for deletion
588:The famous chaiwala
546:Relisting comment:
565:
508:
431:
320:
135:Guide to deletion
125:How to contribute
53:
52:
39:was subject to a
822:
709:In the light of
575:
561:
550:
543:
541:
504:
493:
491:
489:
456:
427:
416:
414:
412:
294:deletion sorting
266:
265:
251:
195:
177:
115:
88:
63:
33:
32:
26:
830:
829:
825:
824:
823:
821:
820:
819:
805:
804:
803:
797:deletion review
569:
552:
536:
534:
495:
484:
482:
445:
418:
407:
405:
346:Subject passes
208:
168:
152:
149:
112:
109:
97:
82:
77:The result was
70:deletion review
59:
37:This discussion
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
828:
826:
818:
817:
807:
806:
802:
801:
783:
782:
764:WP:PRIMARYNEWS
752:
751:
750:
732:
711:WP:PRIMARYNEWS
674:
644:
643:
642:
641:
627:
626:
625:
614:
604:
594:
549:
544:
530:
529:
511:
510:
492:
478:
477:
460:
434:
433:
415:
401:
400:
383:
362:
341:
321:
302:Businesspeople
269:
268:
205:
148:
147:
142:
132:
127:
110:
108:
103:
95:
75:
74:
54:
51:
50:
44:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
827:
816:
813:
812:
810:
800:
798:
794:
790:
785:
784:
781:
777:
773:
769:
765:
760:
756:
753:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
731:
727:
723:
720:
716:
712:
708:
707:
706:
702:
698:
694:
690:
686:
682:
678:
675:
673:
669:
665:
661:
657:
656:WP:POPULARITY
653:
649:
648:Strong Delete
646:
645:
640:
636:
632:
628:
623:
619:
615:
612:
608:
605:
603:
599:
595:
592:
589:
585:
581:
578:
577:
573:
568:
567:
566:
564:
560:
558:
557:
547:
542:
539:
532:
531:
528:
524:
520:
516:
513:
512:
509:
507:
503:
501:
500:
490:
487:
480:
479:
476:
472:
468:
464:
461:
459:
455:
454:
450:
443:
439:
436:
435:
432:
430:
426:
424:
423:
413:
410:
403:
402:
399:
395:
391:
387:
384:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:Speedy Delete
363:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
342:
340:
336:
332:
328:
325:
322:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
290:
289:
288:
287:
283:
279:
275:
264:
260:
257:
254:
250:
246:
242:
239:
236:
233:
230:
227:
224:
221:
218:
214:
211:
210:Find sources:
206:
203:
199:
193:
189:
185:
181:
176:
172:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
150:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
131:
128:
126:
123:
122:
121:
119:
114:
107:
104:
102:
101:
98:
93:
86:
80:
73:
71:
67:
62:
56:
55:
48:
42:
38:
35:
28:
27:
19:
788:
786:
754:
688:
676:
647:
606:
590:
587:
555:
554:
545:
535:
533:
514:
498:
497:
483:
481:
462:
446:
437:
421:
420:
406:
404:
385:
364:
343:
323:
270:
258:
252:
244:
237:
231:
225:
219:
209:
111:
78:
76:
60:
57:
36:
772:Sirfurboy🏄
722:Sirfurboy🏄
677:Strong Keep
611:WP:STRAWMAN
519:Ameen Akbar
515:Strong Keep
390:Worldiswide
344:Speedy Keep
235:free images
759:WP:TOOSOON
631:User4edits
467:Fahads1982
373:User4edits
793:talk page
697:Okoslavia
613:argument.
598:WP:SIGCOV
348:WP:Sigcov
331:Oaktree b
66:talk page
809:Category
795:or in a
715:WP:BASIC
538:Relisted
486:Relisted
409:Relisted
306:Pakistan
198:View log
139:glossary
68:or in a
660:WP:FAME
586:event.
449:Timothy
352:Maliner
304:, and
241:WP refs
229:scholar
171:protect
166:history
116:New to
768:WP:GNG
755:Delete
693:Sigcov
438:Delete
386:Delete
298:People
274:WP:GNG
213:Google
175:delete
79:delete
736:WP:1E
685:Basic
679:. 13
652:WP:1E
622:WP:1E
618:WP:RS
602:WP:1E
584:WP:1E
442:WP:1E
369:WP:1E
256:JSTOR
217:books
192:views
184:watch
180:links
92:Owen×
16:<
776:talk
744:talk
740:Uhai
726:talk
701:talk
668:talk
664:Uhai
658:and
635:talk
523:talk
471:talk
463:Keep
453:talk
394:talk
377:talk
356:talk
335:talk
324:Keep
314:talk
282:talk
249:FENS
223:news
188:logs
162:talk
158:edit
689:not
609:is
600:of
572:Liz
451:::
447://
263:TWL
196:– (
85:Liz
811::
778:)
746:)
728:)
717::
703:)
695:.
670:)
662:.
637:)
559:iz
525:)
502:iz
473:)
440::
425:iz
396:)
379:)
367::
358:)
337:)
316:)
308:.
300:,
284:)
276:.
243:)
200:|
190:|
186:|
182:|
178:|
173:|
169:|
164:|
160:|
43:.
774:(
742:(
724:(
699:(
666:(
633:(
580:1
574::
570:@
556:L
521:(
499:L
469:(
422:L
392:(
375:(
354:(
350:.
333:(
312:(
280:(
267:)
259:·
253:·
245:·
238:·
232:·
226:·
220:·
215:(
207:(
204:)
194:)
156:(
141:)
137:(
96:☎
87::
83:@
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.