Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Astrobionomy - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

219:- Random bits about astrology influencing biology (or "bionomy") do not an article make, leavened with personal reflection and speculation. Weblinks to "astrobionomy" appear to have all been created by the article author. No indication that the term enjoys any actual use. The article skirts nonsense, but only barely. 305:
Studying the article history, this appears to be an attempt to advance a new thesis via an original essay – a dubious synthesis using (and sometimes copying) sources of uncertain reliability. Online searches do not attest to a wider usage of the term outside of this essay, not even in pseudoscience.
263:
Different sun sign have been linked with different psychological traits. Modern astrological predictions about human psychological traits are based on astronomical predispositions. Psychology has biochemical basis. Astrology must have some biochemical manifestations.
154: 283:
Regardless, Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to be publishing original ideas that are not fully described and substantiated by existing publications. I would suggest moving the material to your own web
115: 325: 148: 201:
G1 because edits were rapidly running the article into complete gibberish and nonsense. PROD and SPEEDY were contested, so here we are.
271: 17: 88: 83: 92: 169: 75: 136: 373: 36: 311: 372:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
130: 275: 267: 206: 126: 358: 340: 315: 295: 257: 238: 210: 57: 79: 307: 229: 176: 162: 198: 71: 63: 354: 336: 202: 53: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
194: 186: 289: 251: 222: 142: 190: 350: 332: 49: 109: 285: 247: 48:- but it was already blanked by the author and then deleted by another sysop. 366:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105: 101: 97: 161: 197:
and seconded. During PROD time, also nominated for
175: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 376:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 326:list of Science-related deletion discussions 320: 185:Article shows bias and violates policies 324:: This debate has been included in the 193:. Article was initially nominated for 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 349:the article reads like a joke. 278:) 17:48, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 1: 359:22:01, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 341:19:33, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 316:13:00, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 296:19:02, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 258:16:40, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 239:14:39, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 211:14:16, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 58:16:22, 7 January 2011 (UTC) 393: 369:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 246:as OR. A made up word.— 44:The result was 343: 329: 270:comment added by 234: 384: 371: 330: 279: 236: 232: 228: 225: 180: 179: 165: 113: 95: 34: 392: 391: 387: 386: 385: 383: 382: 381: 380: 374:deletion review 367: 265: 235: 230: 223: 221: 122: 86: 70: 67: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 390: 388: 379: 378: 362: 361: 344: 318: 299: 298: 261: 260: 241: 227: 183: 182: 119: 66: 61: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 389: 377: 375: 370: 364: 363: 360: 356: 352: 348: 345: 342: 338: 334: 327: 323: 319: 317: 313: 309: 304: 301: 300: 297: 293: 292: 287: 282: 281: 280: 277: 273: 272:117.96.99.186 269: 259: 255: 254: 249: 245: 242: 240: 237: 233: 226: 218: 215: 214: 213: 212: 208: 204: 203:Paul McDonald 200: 196: 192: 188: 178: 174: 171: 168: 164: 160: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 135: 132: 128: 125: 124:Find sources: 120: 117: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 68: 65: 62: 60: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 368: 365: 346: 321: 308:Erik Lönnrot 302: 290: 262: 252: 243: 220: 216: 184: 172: 166: 158: 151: 145: 139: 133: 123: 72:Astrobionomy 64:Astrobionomy 45: 43: 31: 28: 266:—Preceding 189:as well as 149:free images 224:Acroterion 333:• Gene93k 199:WP:SPEEDY 268:unsigned 116:View log 351:Nergaal 195:WP:PROD 187:WP:NPOV 155:WP refs 143:scholar 89:protect 84:history 50:Bearian 347:Delete 303:Delete 284:site.— 244:Delete 231:(talk) 217:Delete 127:Google 93:delete 46:delete 191:WP:OR 170:JSTOR 131:books 110:views 102:watch 98:links 16:< 355:talk 337:talk 322:Note 312:talk 291:talk 276:talk 253:talk 207:talk 163:FENS 137:news 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 54:talk 331:-- 286:RJH 248:RJH 177:TWL 114:– ( 357:) 339:) 328:. 314:) 306:-- 294:) 256:) 209:) 157:) 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 56:) 353:( 335:( 310:( 288:( 274:( 250:( 205:( 181:) 173:· 167:· 159:· 152:· 146:· 140:· 134:· 129:( 121:( 118:) 112:) 74:( 52:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Bearian
talk
16:22, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Astrobionomy
Astrobionomy
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:NPOV
WP:OR
WP:PROD
WP:SPEEDY

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.