245:, which just elects a representative to a council? In that case it probably would not be notable, unless there wa something special. It seems to be more than a mere neighborhood, whose notability varies. Is it a region known historically by the name, or a contemporary artificial construct? It does not necessarily matter how good the roads are, or the other environmental factors; if it is, or is about to be, a separate jurisdiction, it is as notable as if it were a village geographically isolated separate from Dublin. If not, it depends. Not every p
136:
Many roads here lack pavements. I'm sure they do but that does not make it notable. A railway passes through the area. Does every square metre in the world that has a railway pass by occasionally get an article? Near a road that goes to Navan indeed you might say of all places. Says it all. There
213:
As railway has been in existence for more than 100 years that is hardly a valid point. Lots of nooks and crannies have had railways for the same period and not much else. If each is notable it would seem to lower the overall notability of railways by suggesting that every single one is worthy of
342:
Balloholic. Please do not strike out other editor's comments. Your feelings on whether or not their argument has validity is irrelevant. Leave it to the closing admin to decide whether or not to ignore them.
276:
It's not a separate village. The name
Ashtown is relatively new as can be told by its components. Old Irish names don't tend to be composed of two English words, they tend to be translations of words like
137:
isn't even anything else worth mentioning in the article. The roads are bad, a railway goes through it (probably very quickly) and it goes to Navan. More likely it is notable as being an escape route
129:
255:
237:, is it a "Town: The remaining town authorities, formerly known as urban districts or towns with town commissioners, were all redesignated as towns" that elects a
361:
Everything I've read about this suggests that it is a non-notable district of a larger, more notable region. I see nothing that warrants it's own article.
242:
238:
96:
91:
100:
17:
83:
322:
321:. This is not a vote. A proper opinion is requested. It sounds like some sort of ganging up against the nominator. Don't
382:
233:
it is not clear to me what the jurisdictional status of this & the other two locations might be: In terms of the
36:
234:
381:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
241:? If it has a Council of it's own, it is a separate jurisdictional unit, and intrinsically notable. Or is it a
168:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
367:
349:
334:
313:
294:
270:
223:
208:
204:
189:
172:
150:
65:
285:. It is clear it is a newly expanded part of the city which thinks it has a bigger place in the world. --
330:
290:
219:
185:
146:
87:
309:
164:
200:
266:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
61:
326:
286:
215:
181:
142:
79:
71:
57:
362:
344:
305:
199:- it's a notable place. It's had its own railway station for more than 100 years. -
262:
117:
160:
50:
375:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
180:. Where exactly is the connection with moss in that link? --
124:
113:
109:
105:
214:
mention never mind the avenue where it is located. --
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
385:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
256:list of Ireland-related deletion discussions
254:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
304:as per everyone but the nominator.
24:
1:
368:09:39, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
350:09:39, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
335:01:21, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
314:15:54, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
295:14:13, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
271:09:23, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
224:14:13, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
209:02:31, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
190:14:13, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
173:00:24, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
151:23:59, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
66:00:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
402:
235:Local Government Act 2001
378:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
163:and much else besides.
243:Local Election Area
44:The result was
323:follow the leader
273:
259:
64:
393:
380:
365:
347:
260:
250:
247:
246:
159:Notable for its
127:
121:
103:
56:
53:
34:
401:
400:
396:
395:
394:
392:
391:
390:
389:
383:deletion review
376:
363:
345:
123:
94:
80:Ashtown, Dublin
78:
75:
72:Ashtown, Dublin
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
399:
397:
388:
387:
371:
370:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
299:
298:
297:
248:
228:
227:
226:
201:Richard Cavell
194:
193:
192:
165:Colonel Warden
134:
133:
74:
69:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
398:
386:
384:
379:
373:
372:
369:
366:
360:
357:
351:
348:
341:
338:
337:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
317:
316:
315:
311:
307:
303:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
275:
274:
272:
268:
264:
257:
253:
249:
244:
240:
236:
232:
229:
225:
221:
217:
212:
211:
210:
206:
202:
198:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
175:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:
154:
153:
152:
148:
144:
140:
131:
126:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
377:
374:
358:
339:
318:
301:
282:
278:
251:
239:Town council
230:
196:
177:
156:
138:
135:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
359:Weak Delete
327:Balloholic
287:Balloholic
216:Balloholic
182:Balloholic
143:Balloholic
58:delusional
364:Trusilver
346:Trusilver
306:Edward321
263:• Gene93k
231:question
130:View log
62:kangaroo
340:Comment
319:Comment
178:Comment
141:Navan.
97:protect
92:history
125:delete
101:delete
279:baile
128:) – (
118:views
110:watch
106:links
52:Jerry
16:<
331:talk
325:. --
310:talk
302:Keep
291:talk
283:rath
267:talk
252:Note
220:talk
205:talk
197:Keep
186:talk
169:talk
161:moss
157:Keep
147:talk
139:from
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
46:Keep
281:or
261:--
258:.
333:)
312:)
293:)
269:)
222:)
207:)
188:)
171:)
149:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
60:¤
48:.
329:(
308:(
289:(
265:(
218:(
203:(
184:(
167:(
145:(
132:)
122:(
120:)
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.